FREIGHT TRANSPORT INDUSTRY

What moves the freight trans­port indus­try? Various fac­tors have an impact on the freight trans­port indus­try. As the voice of the ship­ping indus­try, we are cam­paig­ning for a com­pe­ti­ti­ve rail freight sys­tem. To this end, we moni­tor, among other things, modal shift and lobby poli­ti­ci­ans for non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry rail.

The future of inland freight transport

Fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of freight trans­port: vari­ants of the Fede­ral Coun­cil do not go far enough

COMPETITION IN RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT

Interoperability

The opti­mi­sa­ti­on of pro­ces­ses and inter­faces and the con­nec­tion with the 4th EU rail­way package.

Sustainability

The moti­on by Josef Ditt­li, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, calls for an over­all con­cept on how rail freight trans­port and mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons can con­tri­bu­te to redu­cing CO2 emissions.

Digitalisation

What is hel­ping Euro­pean rail freight to reach the next dimen­si­on of modernisation?

Flyer Rail Freight Traffic 2050

INFORMATIVE

Future rail freight transport in the area / wagonload transport

 

Energy crisis

 

Rail Freight Transport Vision of the Advisory Group on the Development of Rail Freight Transport, 2022

 

Summary of a study commissioned by the shipping industry

 

Modal shift report 2021

 

Transport of dangerous goods

 

Legal

 

Basic studies of the Confederation
 
Underground freight transport
Archive
Freight transport in the Covid 19 crisis

 

Relocation report 2019 – industry calls for additional measures

Operations

Freight railway undertakings

DB Cargo GATX  Hupac rail­Ca­re
 
SRT swiss rail traffic TR Trans Rail WRS  
DB Cargo GATX  Hupac
SRT swiss rail traffic TR Trans Rail WRS
   
rail­Ca­re    

Freight railway wagon rental companies

VTG was­co­sa erme­wa Grou­pe Millet
VTG was­co­sa erme­wa
   
Grou­pe Millet  

Shippers (examples)

Holcim Logo
Die Post Hol­cim Pan­log Has­tag
Holcim Logo
Die Post Hol­cim Pan­log
   
Has­tag    

Sites

First and last mile

Over 850 sidings are used in Switz­er­land. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, there is a ste­ady decli­ne. You can find out how the VAP is cam­paig­ning for the pre­ser­va­ti­on of the sites and other useful infor­ma­ti­on in the chap­ter Sites.

Network

The net­work is about access to the rail­ways, the train paths. Opti­mal uti­li­sa­ti­on requi­res far-sigh­ted con­s­truc­tion plan­ning, fair pri­ces and good organisation.

You can find out how we are com­mit­ted to this and other useful infor­ma­ti­on under the fol­lo­wing link.

Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Ener­gy secu­ri­ty is and remains one of our top issues. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is curr­ent­ly con­cre­ti­sing the manage­ment mea­su­res in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in the form of pre­pared ordi­nan­ces. Spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons are envi­sa­ged for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies, inclu­ding rail freight trans­port. The FOT is pre­pa­ring a draft ordi­nan­ce for public trans­port tog­e­ther with the working group of indus­try asso­cia­ti­ons, while the VAP repres­ents the inte­rests of freight transport.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Fede­ral Coun­cil has plan of mea­su­res for secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly drawn up
  • Gra­du­al quota sys­tem to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shutdowns
  • Next step: pre­pa­ra­ti­on of spe­ci­fic draft ordinances
  • Trac­tion cur­rent will beco­me more expen­si­ve next year

 

At its mee­ting on 23 Novem­ber 2022, the Fede­ral Coun­cil dis­cus­sed the manage­ment mea­su­res to be taken in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. For the draft ordi­nan­ces with gra­dua­ted
mea­su­res until 12 Decem­ber 2022. The sys­tem lea­der rail com­men­ted on behalf of the industry.

Avoiding the worst with each level of measures

With the mea­su­res adopted so far, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is streng­thening the secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly: main­tai­ning hydro­power reser­ves, pro­vi­ding ther­mal reser­ve power plants, incre­asing the trans­mis­si­on capa­ci­ty of the elec­tri­ci­ty grids. In addi­ti­on, it wants to prepa­re gra­dua­ted mea­su­res to redu­ce elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on. Calls for eco­no­mic­al elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on and the ener­gy-saving alli­ance of the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty are inten­ded to raise awa­re­ness among com­pa­nies across the board.

Should a cri­ti­cal power sup­p­ly bot­t­len­eck occur during the win­ter peri­od, the Fede­ral Coun­cil will regu­la­te the power sup­p­ly with tem­po­ra­ry mea­su­res. In the event of a cri­sis, it would issue tar­ge­ted con­sump­ti­on rest­ric­tions with the help of decrees. This is inten­ded to ensu­re grid sta­bi­li­ty and thus the sup­p­ly of elec­tri­ci­ty. The aim of each stage is to avoid even more dra­stic measures.

Quota system to prevent grid shutdowns

The Fede­ral Coun­cil sees the quota sys­tem as a key mea­su­re to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shut­downs. In order to ensu­re its effec­ti­ve­ness, it does not want to exempt any elec­tri­ci­ty purchasers.

Howe­ver, it envi­sa­ges spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies. Public trans­port as a core ser­vice should be gua­ran­teed for as long as pos­si­ble. In order to ensu­re its func­tio­ning even in the event of power shorta­ges, mea­su­res are to be imple­men­ted accor­ding to the «public trans­port manage­ment model».

Management measures for public transport

In a working group of VöV, SBB, BAV and VAP, we have work­ed out the gra­dua­ted mea­su­res for pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the last few months. In the case of a power quota, freight logi­stics should basi­cal­ly be main­tai­ned and sca­led as quick­ly as pos­si­ble accor­ding to the deve­lo­p­ment of demand. The indus­try must prepa­re to react quick­ly. For it is impos­si­ble to pre­dict today in which areas decrea­ses or increa­ses in demand will occur. Based on the “public trans­port manage­ment model”, our working group will deve­lop a cor­re­spon­ding draft ordi­nan­ce of gra­dua­ted manage­ment mea­su­res for public trans­port. We at the VAP sup­port the approach that has been deve­lo­ped, espe­ci­al­ly the spe­cial mea­su­res for public transport.

Traction current will become more expensive

The fact that trac­tion cur­rent is not excluded from sud­den tur­bu­len­ces is shown by the latest announce­ment of the SBB. Here, the ener­gy divi­si­on announ­ces a serious defi­cit of CHF 180 mil­li­on for 2022. Accor­ding to SBB, as a result of the per­sis­tent drought in the sum­mer, 90% of the rail­way’s elec­tri­ci­ty could not be gene­ra­ted from its own hydro­elec­tric power plants as usual. SBB had to buy expen­si­ve elec­tri­ci­ty on the mar­ket at short notice.

After nego­tia­ti­ons with the BAV, the SBB will raise the elec­tri­ci­ty price for 2023 by 3 cen­ti­mes to 13.5 cen­ti­mes per kilo­watt hour. The BAV wants to pass on the hig­her elec­tri­ci­ty costs in the train path price to the various trans­port sec­tors on a dif­fe­ren­tia­ted basis. In long-distance traf­fic the full amount of 3 cen­ti­mes will be pas­sed on, in regio­nal and freight traf­fic only a part with 1 cen­ti­me. The fact that SBB’s appli­ca­ti­on for full defi­cit covera­ge with a surchar­ge of 10 cen­ti­mes was not appro­ved by the FOT may be good news for the rail­way com­pa­nies for the time being. But the uncer­tain­ty of fur­ther surchar­ges remains, and this will also have an influence on future offer calculations.

Transparency needed

We belie­ve that the pro­vi­si­on of elec­tri­cal ener­gy at a pre­dic­ta­ble cost rate is cen­tral to the future design of offers. The recent price tur­bu­len­ces alre­a­dy seem very adven­tur­ous; even more so when one looks back at the many years with a posi­ti­ve balan­ce. We expect a trans­pa­rent review of the recent events.

The rail sector must reinvent itself

The rail sector must reinvent itself

Rail is not exact­ly famous for its wil­ling­ness to inno­va­te. This must and will chan­ge if it wants to remain sus­tainable as a trans­port mode. At the 7th Inter­na­tio­nal Rail­way Forum IRFC 2022, the experts pre­sen­ted a wide range of initia­ti­ves, inno­va­tions and reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­ons. We have sum­ma­ri­sed and cri­ti­cal­ly app­rai­sed the most important ones here.

 

This is what it’s all about:
  • Imple­men­ting the Green Deal requi­res inno­va­ti­on, new tech­no­lo­gies and a com­pre­hen­si­ve moder­ni­sa­ti­on of the rail sector
  • The sca­la­bi­li­ty of inno­va­tions can only be achie­ved through coope­ra­ti­on and coordination.
  • Switz­er­land must not miss the boat on EU inno­va­ti­on programmes

 

Under the Czech Pre­si­den­cy of the Coun­cil of the EU, the EU Minis­ter of Trans­port hos­ted the IRFC in Pra­gue from 5 to 7 Octo­ber 2022. The motto of the con­gress was: “Buil­ding a new gene­ra­ti­on of rail­ways tog­e­ther”. The Czech Minis­ter of Trans­port, Mar­tin Kupka, empha­sis­ed the key role of rail­ways for the suc­cessful imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Green Deal. With this, the EU has defi­ned a clear ans­wer to the advan­cing cli­ma­te chan­ge. Traf­fic and trans­port in Euro­pe are to beco­me CO2-neu­tral by 2050. With the 2050 cli­ma­te tar­gets, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is stri­ving to replace fos­sil fuels in Switz­er­land within a com­pa­ra­ble timeframe.

For a few years now, a para­digm shift has been taking place in the rail sec­tor. Poli­ti­ci­ans are set­ting dead­lines and issuing con­cre­te man­da­tes to the sec­tors. In order for the Euro­pean rail­ways to be able to react accor­ding to the man­da­tes, more coope­ra­ti­on is nee­ded in the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of new tech­no­lo­gies and their imple­men­ta­ti­on. The tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th rail­way packa­ge forms the basis for the crea­ti­on of the plan­ned uni­fied Euro­pean rail­way system.

Until new tech­no­lo­gies have rea­ched their appli­ca­ti­on matu­ri­ty, it is first neces­sa­ry to coor­di­na­te inno­va­ti­on (cf. figu­re) and to con­duct tar­ge­ted rese­arch to deve­lop the sci­en­ti­fic basis. To this end, the EU has built up effi­ci­ent and com­pe­tent orga­ni­sa­ti­ons in recent years: The “Hori­zon” pro­gram­me leads and finan­ces various rese­arch pro­jects. Thanks to cross-sec­to­ral net­wor­king, the results and fin­dings should be made available to a wide range of users in a time­ly man­ner. Within the frame­work of the inno­va­ti­on part­ner­ship Euro­pe’s Rail Joint Under­ta­king (EU-Rail), inno­va­ti­ve new approa­ches based on rese­arch results are given con­cre­te form. The important pro­jects for rail ope­ra­ti­ons and tech­no­lo­gy are based on the two pil­lars “Sys­tem Pil­lar” and “Tech­ni­cal Pil­lar”. The Rail­way Agen­cy ERA defi­nes the new uni­form spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Euro­pean rail­way appli­ca­ti­ons and thus ensu­res inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. Thanks to this poo­ling of know­ledge, solu­ti­ons ready for inter­na­tio­nal appli­ca­ti­on can be deve­lo­ped in a short time.

Energy of the future is renewable

Until now, indus­tria­li­sed eco­no­mies have main­ly used fos­sil fuels. For a long time, these were available on the inter­na­tio­nal mar­ket at low pri­ces. With the Green Deal, the EU wants to redu­ce trans­port-rela­ted emis­si­ons by 90% by 2050 and shift 75% of the trans­port volu­me from road to rail or water­ways. The important ener­gy sources of the future are hydro­gen and elec­tri­ci­ty, both pro­du­ced from rene­wa­ble resources.

Modern data communication is digital

Indus­tria­li­sed pro­ces­ses func­tion suc­cessful­ly when the neces­sa­ry data is direct­ly and imme­dia­te­ly available to all par­ti­ci­pan­ts. The cur­rent use of data is still limi­t­ed; for many sub-pro­ces­ses, the data is coll­ec­ted again and again. Such solo efforts are resour­ce- and time-inten­si­ve as well as error-prone. In future, data should be available to all aut­ho­ri­sed par­ti­ci­pan­ts wit­hout media dis­con­ti­nui­ty and in real time. Direct access to data is cen­tral to the rea­li­sa­ti­on of auto­ma­ted pro­ces­ses, as is effec­ti­ve data pro­tec­tion. Cyber secu­ri­ty is beco­ming the core issue of modern data communication.

Reorganisation of the railway system called for

Rail­ways were essen­ti­al to indus­tria­li­sa­ti­on in the 19th and early 20th cen­tu­ries. It was not until the midd­le of the 20th cen­tu­ry that road and air trans­port pushed back the rail­ways in trans­port thanks to their suc­cessful inno­va­ti­ve steps. The decisi­ve fac­tors were intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and rigo­rous cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on. The cus­to­mers’ most important ques­ti­on was: How can we ful­fil our needs more easi­ly, more com­for­ta­b­ly and more chea­p­ly? And they recei­ved sui­ta­ble ans­wers on the road.

Today, the rail­ways must final­ly ask them­sel­ves the same ques­ti­on. The rail­way is an effi­ci­ent and resour­ce-saving trans­port sys­tem with num­e­rous advan­ta­ges. In a direct com­pa­ri­son of the ener­gy requi­red, the elec­tri­fied rail­way is the clear win­ner over the road. Under the same gene­ral con­di­ti­ons, the rail­way requi­res 10 times less ener­gy than the road. Important Euro­pean rail­way lines are alre­a­dy elec­tri­fied, so that the requi­red trac­tion ener­gy can be used with high effi­ci­en­cy. Today, a wide­ly rami­fied net­work of lines con­nects the important regi­ons of Euro­pe, a large part of the lines are stan­dard gauge, only in a few Euro­pean regi­ons are devia­ting gau­ges in ope­ra­ti­on today.

In order for the plan­ned shift of traf­fic to the rail­ways to actual­ly be rea­li­sed, a cul­tu­ral chan­ge in the rail­ways towards intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on is first nee­ded, as well as a com­pre­hen­si­ve and sys­te­ma­tic rene­wal of the rail­way system:

  • TEN‑T: The EU has defi­ned the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work to con­nect all major Euro­pean cen­tres. Trains are to be able to run wit­hout obs­ta­cles on a uni­form, har­mo­nis­ed infra­struc­tu­re; on secon­da­ry lines, hydro­gen or bat­tery ope­ra­ti­on can ensu­re the desi­red CO2 neu­tra­li­ty. The expan­si­on of the rail­way net­work is being car­ri­ed out with two dif­fe­rent empha­ses: For pas­sen­ger trans­port, a high-speed net­work is to be built that con­nects the important cen­tres and enables attrac­ti­ve tra­vel times. For freight trans­port, the neces­sa­ry train paths are to be made available so that rail freight trans­port can grow in accordance with the poli­ti­cal requi­re­ments. The freight rail­ways must more than dou­ble their trans­port capa­ci­ty in the coming deca­des. They can only achie­ve this ambi­tious goal with the help of inno­va­ti­on. In addi­ti­on, the cor­ri­dor mana­gers must be equip­ped with com­pre­hen­si­ve com­pe­ten­ces so that the cur­rent cher­ry-picking of the natio­nal, inte­gra­ted­ly mana­ged state rail­ways comes to an end.
  • Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and stan­dar­di­s­a­ti­on: The various Euro­pean rail­way sys­tems are still sub­ject to a multi­tu­de of often dif­fe­rent natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons. Com­pli­ance with these still signi­fi­cant­ly rest­ricts free cross-bor­der rail traf­fic and enables unfair com­pe­ti­ti­ve advan­ta­ges in the natio­nal mar­ket. Despi­te the tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons of inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSI), natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons still mas­si­ve­ly hin­der cross-bor­der traf­fic. The EU has made the eli­mi­na­ti­on of these natio­nal rules an important lea­der­ship task with the “rules clea­ning-up pro­gram­me”. This is a cru­cial pro­gram­me of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge to crea­te the Sin­gle Euro­pean Rail­way Area (SERA). While the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA) is respon­si­ble for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the Tech­ni­cal Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSIs), the rail­way sec­tor has to update and deve­lop the rela­ted stan­dards and norms. In the desi­red ideal case, the TSIs and the stan­dards should suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fy all rail­way sub­sys­tems in all par­ti­ci­pa­ting Euro­pean count­ries. Switz­er­land also reli­es con­sis­t­ent­ly on the TSI in the stan­dard gauge sec­tor. It has adopted the first ele­ments of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge within the frame­work of the cur­rent over­land trans­port agree­ment. As the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the EU and Switz­er­land is curr­ent­ly at a standstill, the plan­ned con­ti­nua­tion is unfort­u­na­te­ly not pos­si­ble at present.
  • Digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK): The rail­ways must replace their his­to­ri­cal­ly grown but out­da­ted stan­dards such as the clas­sic screw cou­pling in favour of modern digi­ta­li­sed sys­tems – such as the DAK4 – across the board. This forms a decisi­ve basis for future com­pre­hen­si­ve auto­ma­ti­on in the rail sec­tor. Even more important, howe­ver, is the net­wor­king of all actors along the enti­re logi­stics chain – bey­ond the mere rail run – thanks to the pos­si­bi­li­ties of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. Free­ly acces­si­ble data and boo­king plat­forms open up uni­ma­gi­ned increa­ses in effi­ci­en­cy and qua­li­ty. The mem­bers of the VAP and SBB are also actively con­tri­bu­ting to the suc­cess of this important pro­ject with their know-how.
  • Ener­gy: In the field of ener­gy, the neces­sa­ry pro­ces­ses for the CO2-neu­tral pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­bu­ti­on and simp­le use of hydro­gen are being work­ed on. For ope­ra­ti­on on lon­ger, non-elec­tri­fied rail­way lines, hydro­gen is a pro­mi­sing ener­gy source that can quick­ly replace fos­sil fuels.
Marathon with hurdles

With the Green Deal, the EU has defi­ned a com­pre­hen­si­ve pro­gram­me to crea­te a CO2-neu­tral Euro­pe. Howe­ver, the mem­ber sta­tes have dif­fe­rent start­ing points, prio­ri­ties and inte­rests. Con­se­quent­ly, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of this ambi­tious pro­gram­me will have to over­co­me a num­ber of hurd­les. It remains to be seen whe­ther the natio­nal inte­rests of the state rail­ways can be suf­fi­ci­ent­ly set aside in favour of a com­mon Euro­pean solution.

The rail­way is to play a key role in Euro­pean pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the future. It has some con­vin­cing advan­ta­ges. But it must also over­co­me an aver­si­on to rene­wal, chan­ge and com­pe­ti­ti­on that has deve­lo­ped over many deca­des. The com­part­ment­a­li­sa­ti­on of mar­kets, espe­ci­al­ly by the state rail­ways, con­ti­nues to be a major obs­ta­cle in many places. By sti­cking to natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons, often under the pre­text of safe­ty con­side­ra­ti­ons, state rail­ways want to con­ti­nue to pro­tect them­sel­ves from unwan­ted inter­na­tio­nal com­pe­ti­ti­on. It is up to the mem­ber sta­tes to help the Euro­pean idea achie­ve a breakth­rough and to put a stop to unfair prac­ti­ces by their state railways.

The rail sec­tor must set new stan­dards through inno­va­ti­on. It must stan­dar­di­se and stream­li­ne its regu­la­to­ry envi­ron­ment inter­na­tio­nal­ly. When deve­lo­ping new sys­tems, large sup­pli­ers to the rail sec­tor must not try to gain a one-sided mar­ket advan­ta­ge through exclu­si­ve, incom­pa­ti­ble pro­ducts. For sus­tainable migra­ti­on suc­cess, the sec­tor needs com­pa­ti­ble, matu­re and relia­ble inno­va­ti­ve pro­ducts. The manu­fac­tu­r­ers have not exact­ly distin­gu­is­hed them­sel­ves in this respect in recent years.

Whe­ther the inten­ded shift of trans­port to rail will be fea­si­ble on the plan­ned scale depends on the finan­cial resour­ces that can be deploy­ed. There will be no bul­ging EU cof­fers for the migra­ti­on from which the indi­vi­du­al com­pa­nies can help them­sel­ves as nee­ded. The indi­vi­du­al mem­ber sta­tes will have to con­tri­bu­te to the rene­wal and expan­si­on of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re with sub­stan­ti­al start-up finan­cing. This also appli­es to Switz­er­land. Core pro­jects such as the DAK must be inter­na­tio­nal­ly coor­di­na­ted, other­wi­se their effect will fizz­le out wit­hout a sound.

Switzerland is part of Europe

Switz­er­land, too, can only gain from acti­ve par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in these EU pro­gram­mes. The Swiss stan­dard gauge net­work with its major tran­sit axes con­tri­bu­tes to the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work of the EU. It forms an important part of the uni­form inter­ope­ra­ble Euro­pean sys­tem SERA. Since many of the Swiss trans­ports are cross-bor­der, inter­ope­ra­ble solu­ti­ons are indis­pensable. Switz­er­land has ful­fil­led its plan­ned tar­get with the con­ti­nuous expan­si­on of the north-south trans­ver­sals as announ­ced. The Swiss rail­way net­work must be fur­ther expan­ded for dome­stic traf­fic in order to be able to cope with the growth tar­get in freight trans­port in the future. Our experts can actively make valuable con­tri­bu­ti­ons to deve­lo­p­ment and com­pe­te with the best inter­na­tio­nal­ly. Our rail­way com­pa­nies can streng­then their mar­ket posi­ti­on with new con­cepts, espe­ci­al­ly in import and export traffic.

The VAP sup­ports joint acti­vi­ties to fur­ther deve­lop the rail sec­tor into an important part­ner in the mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port sys­tem. In this con­text, coope­ra­ti­on at Euro­pean level and intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on is a cru­cial pre­re­qui­si­te to achie­ve the poli­ti­cal goals on time. In terms of trans­port, we are so clo­se­ly lin­ked with neigh­bou­ring count­ries that our eco­no­my needs obs­ta­cle-free cross-bor­der traf­fic and trans­port ser­vices. From an ener­gy point of view, rail is pre­desti­ned for lon­ger distances. The poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU con­ti­nue to hin­der the urgen­tly nee­ded inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on. The rail­way indus­try is well advi­sed to actively seek and cul­ti­va­te pro­fes­sio­nal exch­an­ge despi­te the hurd­les. We can only have a suc­cessful rail­way future together.

Rail freight transport in the territory: the industry develops a joint solution

Rail freight transport in the territory: the industry develops a joint solution

The freight rail­ways of the umbrel­la orga­ni­sa­ti­on of public trans­port (VöV) and we at the VAP are hol­ding inten­si­ve talks on the upco­ming reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on and moder­ni­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the ter­ri­to­ry and its sus­tainable pro­mo­ti­on. Here is a sum­ma­ry of the state of the deba­te and the advan­ta­ges of an incen­ti­ve-based fun­ding model.

Those respon­si­ble for rail freight at VöV and we at the VAP, as the voice of the ship­ping indus­try, want to show tog­e­ther that rail freight trans­port in the ter­ri­to­ry can be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly in the long term. The dis­cus­sions of the indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves on the future of inland trans­port logi­stics are in full swing and should result in a com­mon posi­ti­on on rail freight trans­port when the Fede­ral Coun­cil sends its mes­sa­ge on the “Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port int the ter­ri­to­ry” for consultation.

Building a sustainable network

The indus­try play­ers are stri­ving for an effi­ci­ent net­work offer (hub and spoke). The ope­ra­tors of rail freight trans­port and cus­to­mers in dome­stic trans­port should bene­fit from this in the same way. This requi­res a new dis­tri­bu­ti­on of roles in pro­duc­tion and a sus­tainable finan­cial sup­port model with distinct incen­ti­ve mecha­nisms. This must be com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral and at the same time as simp­le as pos­si­ble. It must not allow any mar­ket and com­pe­ti­ti­on dis­tor­ti­ons bet­ween sub­si­di­sed and non-sub­si­di­sed freight rail­ways and ser­vices or simi­lar dis­ad­van­ta­ges. The sub­s­idy model should con­tain few, but imple­men­ta­ble incen­ti­ve mecha­nisms with maxi­mum effect. Fur­ther­mo­re, it should adapt to deve­lo­p­ments; the reduc­tion path of the sub­si­dies ide­al­ly runs par­al­lel to the AS 2035 and the Zurich bypass line.

Improved framework conditions

In order for the rail freight trans­port to deve­lop its strengths, bet­ter frame­work con­di­ti­ons are nee­ded – irre­spec­ti­ve of the fun­ding model and under­stan­ding of its role. These include:

  • Reduc­tion of the train path price to Euro­pean level
  • Exten­si­on of the reim­bur­se­ment of the HVF to all road-rail-ship transports
  • Exten­si­on of invest­ment sub­si­dies to siding owners and operators
  • Automation/digitalisation, in par­ti­cu­lar through digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC)
  • Free­ly acces­si­ble data and infor­ma­ti­on plat­form for more effi­ci­ent ope­ra­tio­nal handling
Highly effective incentive mechanisms

Indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves envi­sa­ge incen­ti­ves to ship­pers and finan­cing and neu­tra­li­sa­ti­on of the first and last mile. Incen­ti­ves to ship­pers include com­pen­sa­ti­on for new traf­fic, the reope­ning of sidings after lon­ger ope­ra­tio­nal inter­rup­ti­ons, effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ment mea­su­res in shun­ting ope­ra­ti­ons and for own mano­eu­vres on the last mile. The ope­ra­ti­on of the first and last mile is to be finan­ced through com­pen­sa­ti­on to the ser­vice pro­vi­der. The lat­ter offers short-distance ser­vices for all freight rail­way com­pa­nies at defi­ned (stron­gly cost-under-reco­ve­ring) prices.

New role for SBB Cargo

SBB Cargo con­ti­nues to assu­me the role of net­work pro­vi­der. It hand­les main runs and shun­ting, is respon­si­ble for plan­ning net­work traf­fic and ensu­res effi­ci­ent bund­ling of traf­fic with indi­vi­du­al wagons or wagon groups. To this end, SBB Cargo is in sole cont­act with the ship­pers who com­mis­si­on trans­ports in net­work traf­fic and in dia­lo­gue with the ser­vice pro­vi­der who ser­ves the first/last mile.

In the favour of competition

The repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of VöV and VAP advo­ca­te a sus­tainable indus­try solu­ti­on that offers more plan­ning and invest­ment secu­ri­ty and increa­ses the attrac­ti­ve­ness of the rail freight mar­ket. They envi­sa­ge a com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral sup­port mecha­nism that uses exis­ting struc­tures and com­pen­sa­ti­on approa­ches. The indus­try­’s sup­port model can increase its modal shift effect by offe­ring addi­tio­nal incen­ti­ves to third par­ties with a favoura­ble first and last mile. This eli­mi­na­tes the make-or-buy decis­i­on for the freight rail­ways. SBB Cargo can ope­ra­te the net­work on its own. The solu­ti­on, which is emer­ging from the dia­lo­gue bet­ween freight rail­ways and the loa­ding indus­try, is inten­ded to streng­then the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the play­ers and enable inno­va­ti­on and cus­to­mer orientation.

 

It is inte­res­t­ing to note that in 2014, our study had alre­a­dy recom­men­ded “non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry ser­vice of the last mile for all rail­way undertakings”.

  • PDF Sum­ma­ry of our study “From inte­gra­ted to mar­ket-ori­en­ted rail” (in Ger­man, in French)
ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

The elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge is an urgent poli­ti­cal and eco­no­mic issue. That is why we are keen to ensu­re that our mem­bers are kept up to date. In this third blog epi­so­de, we dis­cuss how the rail­way indus­try can respond to the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s calls for savings by taking vol­un­t­a­ry ener­gy-saving measures.

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has set out the tasks for deal­ing with a pos­si­ble ener­gy cri­sis. Depen­ding on how the ener­gy situa­ti­on deve­lo­ps, it can take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. Four levels are pos­si­ble. At pre­sent we are on level 1 “vol­un­t­a­ry savings appeals”. The Fede­ral Office of Trans­port per­forms the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on task in trans­port mat­ters. The Fede­ral Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC) has laun­ched the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance” with a broad-based cam­paign. This alli­ance calls on orga­ni­sa­ti­ons throug­hout Switz­er­land to sup­port efforts for secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly in win­ter and to vol­un­t­a­ri­ly take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. The goal must be to imple­ment mea­su­res that are as uni­form as pos­si­ble across the indus­try in Switz­er­land. This is best unders­tood by the users of trans­port services.

VAP joins in

We at the VAP endor­se the recom­men­da­ti­on to join the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance”. In doing so, we are pas­sing on the wake-up call of the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV) to our mem­bers. At its board mee­ting on 9 Sep­tem­ber 2022, VöV published its recom­men­da­ti­on paper for the rail­way indus­try. In this paper, VöV recom­mends that the rail­way indus­try actively prepa­re for pos­si­ble sce­na­ri­os of an ener­gy shorta­ge and quick­ly imple­ment the first con­cre­te measures.

To ensu­re that the ener­gy-saving mea­su­res can be imple­men­ted in a coor­di­na­ted man­ner by all play­ers in the rail­way indus­try, the working group “Elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in public trans­port” is respon­si­ble for their coor­di­na­ti­on. We are actively invol­ved in this. The working group works clo­se­ly with the SBB and Post­Bus AG Switz­er­land as sys­tem lea­ders. The com­mon goal is to avoid ope­ra­tio­nal rest­ric­tions in both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. Capa­ci­ties are only to be redu­ced in the event of a cor­re­spon­ding decli­ne in demand. We are pre­pa­ring inten­si­ve­ly for fur­ther escala­ti­on levels in various working groups. The public sec­tor should per­cei­ve our indus­try as com­pe­tent and cooperative.

Because energy is scarce

Ener­gy is scar­ce. Let’s not waste it.” Under this cam­paign title, DETEC has sum­ma­ri­sed saving tips for pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als and com­pa­nies. The rail­way indus­try should also save ener­gy vol­un­t­a­ri­ly. This appeal includes imple­men­ta­ti­on mea­su­res for num­e­rous buil­dings used by the rail­ways. They do not rest­rict the range of rail freight ser­vices. Curr­ent­ly, the focus is on lowe­ring the hea­ting tem­pe­ra­tu­re and redu­cing hot water and light­ing. In addi­ti­on, every trans­port com­pa­ny is requi­red to opti­mi­se the ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy of its office and ope­ra­tio­nal buil­dings. The packa­ge will be sup­ple­men­ted by tar­ge­ted savings mea­su­res for employees (train dri­vers, office staff, work­shop staff).

«You won’t go far without courage»

«You won’t go far without courage»

Dr Heiko Fischer pre­si­des over the Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP. The for­mer VTG boss talks to the VAP about the future of Euro­pean rail freight trans­port and the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. He would like to see more enthu­si­asm for the lat­ter and explains why he con­siders the dis­con­ti­nua­tion of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic in Switz­er­land to be fatal.

 

Dr Fischer, where do you see the biggest challenges and where do you see the levers for the European rail market?

There are quite a few. The rail­way infra­struc­tu­re is out­da­ted or in many places a patch­work quilt that has grown his­to­ri­cal­ly. There are still bor­ders bet­ween the sub­sys­tems. Every year that not­hing is done, the pro­blem grows, becau­se the infra­struc­tu­re con­ti­nues to age unwa­ve­rin­gly. This is where I see the adjus­ting screw in the coor­di­na­ti­on of expan­si­on plans, reli­ef rou­tes and cor­re­spon­ding con­s­truc­tion mea­su­res throug­hout Cen­tral Euro­pe. It is true that the trans-Euro­pean net­works pur­sue this inte­gra­ti­ve approach. But secon­da­ry lines and fine dis­tri­bu­ti­on net­works must not be excluded when it comes to invest­ment allo­ca­ti­on, expan­si­on and rene­wal plan­ning, train con­trol sys­tems and regulation.

I see a fur­ther con­trol varia­ble in the com­ple­te digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of the rail­way sec­tor, start­ing with the net­wor­king of the infra­struc­tu­re via the rol­ling stock to the ope­ra­tio­nal busi­ness. There should be a stan­dar­di­sed logic with cor­re­spon­ding inter­faces. As a result, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on can take place in a mea­su­red and tar­ge­ted man­ner. Light­ly loa­ded rou­tes could also be ser­ved by hydro­gen-powered hybrid locomotives.

«Rail freight reli­es on public fun­ding for cer­tain urgen­ci­es, such as basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re deve­lo­p­ment, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, imple­men­ta­ti­on of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap innovations.»

Available capi­tal is also a cor­ner­stone. The rail­way mar­ket does not only need suf­fi­ci­ent pri­va­te capi­tal. For cer­tain urgen­ci­es, it depends on public funds, for exam­p­le for basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap inno­va­tions. Such invest­ments are bey­ond the finan­cial powers of the pri­va­te sec­tor and most state rail­ways. After all, nobo­dy wants to invest in tech­no­lo­gies that will only bear fruit in the next deca­de, per­haps even with other play­ers in the rail­way sys­tem. This brings me to ano­ther set screw: we also need an ancho­red eco­no­mic under­stan­ding of the mecha­nisms of rail freight trans­port among govern­ments, regu­la­tors and poli­ti­ci­ans. This requi­res a rethink on the part of all those invol­ved in the system.

In what way?

The rail sec­tor is not exact­ly known for thin­king proac­tively and imple­men­ting new things quick­ly. Many see them­sel­ves as vic­tims, be it of the past, of wrong decis­i­ons, of the road, of the wea­ther or of any­thing else. In my opi­ni­on, that abso­lut­e­ly has to chan­ge. After all, we don’t haul goods trains around becau­se we enjoy it, but becau­se we want to gene­ra­te added value for ship­pers and our com­mu­ni­ties. The play­ers in rail freight trans­port need to put the cus­to­mer back in the cent­re of their atten­ti­on and to be aware of their future needs. For the upco­ming chan­ge to actual­ly hap­pen, we need more of a start-up men­ta­li­ty, a “can do” attitude.

What innovations have you driven forward at VTG in recent years, and which of them were groundbreaking?

VTG Con­nect spon­ta­neous­ly comes to mind. This tele­ma­tics tech­no­lo­gy coll­ects rele­vant data on the enti­re fleet and many trans­ports. It crea­tes the basis for effi­ci­ent digi­tal fleet manage­ment, becau­se it makes data usable for cus­to­mers, freight rail­ways and main­ten­an­ce pur­po­ses. With this inno­va­ti­on, we have, so to speak, laun­ched the entry into real-time data trans­mis­si­on in freight trans­port as envi­sa­ged by the DAC.

What importance do you attach to the DAC in the future?

The DAC is a cata­lyst for the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. With it, a new con­trol logic and real-time data flows can be map­ped. We are a long way from that today. The DAC does more than auto­ma­te the cou­pling pro­cess. It net­works train dri­vers, cargo, cargo car­ri­ers and ener­gy, i.e. elec­tri­ci­ty. The poten­ti­al of this com­bi­ned with new digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies is immense. The DAC is not only an intel­li­gent train and load con­trol sys­tem, but also a faci­li­ta­tor for other digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on initia­ti­ves such as digi­tal data, train con­trol and boo­king platforms.

«There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even more of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge the ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way business.»

What role will these play in the future?

There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even seve­ral of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons. As such, they will pro­vi­de freight ope­ra­tors with relia­ble infor­ma­ti­on that can be used to redu­ce the distances bet­ween trains, cal­cu­la­te time win­dows and put more ton­na­ge on the track per unit of time. A pan-Euro­pean elec­tro­nic freight traf­fic con­trol sys­tem must not come from a tech giant à la Goog­le, but should deve­lop from within the rail sec­tor its­elf. In this way, we show inno­va­ti­ve strength vis-à-vis other modes of transport.

Per­haps in the future there will even be a super­or­di­na­te body like Euro­con­trol for the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on of air traf­fic con­trol. Such a cock­pit could con­trol Euro­pean rail freight traf­fic, give the train dri­vers cer­tain ins­truc­tions, inter­ve­ne if neces­sa­ry and later allow auto­no­mous trains to run. Howe­ver, such quan­tum leaps are only pos­si­ble if digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies with arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence are imple­men­ted and take effect. Only they bring dyna­mism and ensu­re the neces­sa­ry speed, which is abso­lut­e­ly cen­tral to the suc­cess of the digi­tal transformation.

How could rail freight transport in Europe be developed sustainably?

With some­thing that brings the eco­no­mic impact of freight trans­port down to a com­mon deno­mi­na­tor and to which all play­ers com­mit. I can ima­gi­ne that one day there will be a long-term mas­ter plan in the sense of a self-regu­la­ting yet bin­ding decla­ra­ti­on of intent. All par­ti­ci­pa­ting state and non-state rail­ways would have to co-sign it. This mas­ter plan could state that they are working tog­e­ther towards a modal shift. I would remind you of the Gene­ral Con­tract of Use (GCU) of 2006, which regu­la­tes the inter­ac­tion bet­ween wagon kee­pers and rail­way under­ta­kings as wagon ope­ra­tors. The advan­ta­ge of a supra­na­tio­nal agree­ment wit­hout the cha­rac­ter of law is that it can be sup­ple­men­ted or adapt­ed quick­ly and easi­ly. The acces­ses to the NRLA are the best exam­p­le of what should not hap­pen: The com­mu­ni­ty of rail­way sta­tes, inclu­ding Switz­er­land, has com­mit­ted its­elf to expan­ding the north-south axis. When Switz­er­land ope­ned the NRLA tun­nel, other sta­tes had not even star­ted plan­ning. A mas­ter plan for Euro­pean freight trans­port could make this inten­ti­on more bin­ding and make it clear that the Green Deal and modal shift goals are meant serious­ly. Today it is still a pipe dream. Most of the time, ever­yo­ne agrees with the basic demands. But as soon as it comes to working out some­thing con­cre­te from a sin­gle source, opi­ni­ons diverge.

What do you think of the Federal Council’s report on ‘Rail Freight Transport in the Area’? What would it mean if the Federal Council abolished it?

In my opi­ni­on, that would be the big­gest mista­ke in trans­port poli­cy for deca­des. Switz­er­land pro­ves that wagon­load traf­fic works. Howe­ver, it is still too expen­si­ve. But if train for­ma­ti­on and sepa­ra­ti­on are auto­ma­tic, the train line is digi­tal­ly con­trol­led and the mar­ket bene­fits from the many advan­ta­ges of digi­tal offers, then the costs will also go down – and the need for sub­si­dies will decrease. The Fede­ral Coun­cil should think about how to make the offers more attrac­ti­ve for freight rail cus­to­mers. To call the whole thing off even befo­re digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on bears fruit would be cri­mi­nal. Trans­fer­ring rail freight to trucks also costs money and not every freight can be con­tai­ne­ri­sed for block trains. In my opi­ni­on, the Swiss govern­ment should be more con­fi­dent in this area. Those who lack cou­ra­ge have alre­a­dy lost.

We at the VAP are members of the UIP. How would you describe the VAP?

It is a valuable mem­ber asso­cia­ti­on of our Euro­pean wagon kee­per fami­ly. I per­cei­ve it as inno­va­ti­ve and opi­ni­ona­ted. Becau­se of its uni­que mem­ber­ship struc­tu­re, it has a spe­cial weight with us. The VAP repres­ents not only the five lar­gest Swiss wagon kee­pers, but also the inte­rests of ship­pers, sidings and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. This diver­si­ty gene­ra­tes impact and a wealth of ideas among us, and I con­sider it a valuable strength. With its mem­ber diver­si­ty, the VAP can focus its demands more holi­sti­cal­ly on the users and place them with grea­ter aut­ho­ri­ty. I sup­port the VAP’s cli­ent-cent­red approach, which invol­ves the end-user in the dis­cus­sion and decis­i­on-making pro­cess. Euro­pe can bene­fit from the Swiss expe­ri­ence with wagon­load traf­fic or the per­for­mance-based heavy vehic­le char­ge. It is often seen as a “mini­lab” that mir­rors issues for us. Fur­ther­mo­re, the VAP shows us in an exem­pla­ry way how to con­vin­ce the popu­la­ti­on or how to shape some­thing posi­tively as a community.

What can the VAP do better?

Bet­ter is always pos­si­ble. My appeal is not only to the VAP, but to all asso­cia­ti­ons and peo­p­le invol­ved in trans­port poli­cy. We need com­mit­ted peo­p­le who are wil­ling to for­mu­la­te inte­rests with a view to the future. There are enough of those who think in terms of quar­ter­ly balan­ce sheets. But that is no way to win the future.

What do you wish for this future?

More inte­rest, more con­fi­dence. More enthu­si­asm. Ship­pers should be eager to put even more ton­nes on the rails. This is the only way we can achie­ve the ambi­tious modal shift and cli­ma­te tar­gets. The popu­la­ti­on should rea­li­se how important rail freight trans­port is – and that it costs money. After all, an unche­cked flood of lor­ries is not an alter­na­ti­ve. I hope that you from the VAP and we from the UIP will con­ti­nue to stand up for this depar­tu­re day after day.

Dr Fischer, thank you very much for the informative interview.

 

Dr. Heiko Fischer

Dr. Heiko Fischer ser­ved VTG for a total of more than 25 years until 2021, inclu­ding more than 17 years as Chair­man of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Board. Since 2015, he has been Pre­si­dent of the umbrel­la orga­niza­ti­on Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP, based in Brussels, as he was from 2004 to 2007. This repres­ents more than 250 freight wagon kee­pers and main­ten­an­ce cen­tres with more than 223,000 freight wagons, which cover 50% of the tonne-kilo­me­t­res in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port. Dr Heiko Fischer’s for­mer employ­er VTG AG ope­ra­tes the lar­gest pri­va­te freight car fleet in Euro­pe with around 88,500 rail freight cars. In addi­ti­on to hiring out freight wagons and tank con­tai­ners, VTG offers mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics ser­vices and inte­gra­ted digi­tal solutions.

VAP General Assembly of 19 August 2022

VAP General Assembly of 19 August 2022

Our Gene­ral Assem­bly made it clear: 2050 is fast approa­ching. On site and vir­tual­ly, num­e­rous VAP mem­bers and guests fol­lo­wed the sta­tu­to­ry part with a memo­rable ope­ning speech by Pre­si­dent Josef Ditt­li. A spe­cial high­light was the speech by Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga on the importance of rail freight trans­port for Switzerland.

Gene­ral assem­bly, asso­cia­ti­on, freight trans­port – after these words most peo­p­le are men­tal­ly gone. Today, rea­ding on is recom­men­ded. Becau­se on the occa­si­on of our gene­ral assem­bly, it was not only about sta­tu­to­ry mat­ters of the ship­ping indus­try. In her guest speech, Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga gave a note­wor­t­hy signal to the logi­stics indus­try: «For the Fede­ral Coun­cil it is clear: we want to fur­ther streng­then the poten­ti­al that rail has for freight transport.»

Memorable things about then, today and the day after tomorrow
The ope­ning speech by VAP Pre­si­dent Josef Ditt­li gave the par­ti­ci­pan­ts valuable food for thought about ever­y­thing that was, is and should be in rail freight trans­port. He said that rail freight had play­ed a major role in ensu­ring that Switz­er­land sur­vi­ved Coro­na wit­hout any dama­ge in terms of sup­p­ly, becau­se rou­tes with litt­le pas­sen­ger traf­fic sud­den­ly allo­wed it to ope­ra­te as it should be able to in nor­mal times. Ditt­li descri­bed the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler as the epi­to­me of digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port, becau­se it stands for the kind of inno­va­ti­ve fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment that we urgen­tly need. For exam­p­le, so that all freight rail­ways can estab­lish coope­ra­ti­ve and fle­xi­ble net­work trans­port across the board tog­e­ther and wit­hout dis­ad­van­ta­ge. The Pre­si­dent looks to Euro­pe with con­cern. In his opi­ni­on, Switz­er­land must not miss the con­nec­tion to the Euro­pean rail­way sec­tor and the EU inno­va­ti­on pro­gram­mes under any circumstances. 
Landmark decision imminent
We were very plea­sed that the Minis­ter of Trans­port, Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga, agreed to give a guest speech at our Gene­ral Assem­bly. In her speech, she empha­sis­ed that the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on wants to fur­ther streng­then the rail­ways and pay more atten­ti­on to dome­stic trans­port, which is also of great importance for the sup­p­ly of Switz­er­land. “We must impro­ve and fur­ther deve­lop the sys­tem,” said the head of DETEC. She said that the Fede­ral Coun­cil would send a bill on this sub­ject for con­sul­ta­ti­on in the autumn. “We are facing a ground­brea­king decis­i­on. That is why we should not lose sight of what is the reci­pe for Switz­er­lan­d’s suc­cess, what has always made our coun­try strong: That we tack­le the neces­sa­ry chan­ges best tog­e­ther, that we take respon­si­bi­li­ty tog­e­ther: Rail­ways, indus­try and, of cour­se, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on.” The VAP is happy to respond to her invi­ta­ti­on to invol­ve our­sel­ves in the dis­cour­se, not least with its con­tri­bu­ti­on to the dis­cus­sion “Rail Freight Traf­fic 2050″ and the film “Cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted, Inno­va­ti­ve, Pro­fi­ta­ble – Rail Freight Trans­port of the Future”.
Elections successfully held
Of the items on the agen­da that were put to the vote in the sta­tu­to­ry part, all were accept­ed. We wel­co­me the fol­lo­wing new mem­bers to the Board: Titus Büt­ler, Bern­hard Hoff­mann, Bern­hard Kunz. We con­gra­tu­la­te all of them on their elec­tion or re-elec­tion and look for­ward to a con­s­truc­ti­ve coope­ra­ti­on in the Board.
Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Should an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge actual­ly occur in Switz­er­land due to the geo­po­li­ti­cal cri­sis and sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks, it is essen­ti­al that freight trans­port cus­to­mers can con­ti­nue to be ser­ved. This means that the trans­port com­pa­nies must cla­ri­fy their ener­gy needs in the event of a shorta­ge and ans­wer some key ques­ti­ons today.

The Swiss rail­ways play a decisi­ve role in coping with the high demand for both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. They depend on a secu­re sup­p­ly of elec­tri­cal energy.

Ensuring supply via rail

If at some point the available trac­tion cur­rent is no lon­ger suf­fi­ci­ent for all sche­du­led trains, jour­neys would have to be can­cel­led accor­din­gly. The ques­ti­on is: which ones? We at the VAP are firm­ly com­mit­ted to ensu­ring that our mem­bers can con­ti­nue to serve all freight trans­port cus­to­mers. The popu­la­ti­on and the eco­no­my depend on relia­ble trans­port chains. That is why freight trains must con­ti­nue to run as long as pos­si­ble even in a power shorta­ge situa­ti­on – as they did, by the way, in the thin­ned-out time­ta­ble during Covid-19.

Political leadership needed

The Swiss rail­way sys­tem is almost exclu­si­ve­ly elec­tri­cal­ly powered. Most of the requi­red trac­tion cur­rent (16.7 Hz) comes from the coun­try­’s own hydro­elec­tric power plants. Shif­ting trans­ports from rail to road when there is a shorta­ge of trac­tion cur­rent is not very pro­mi­sing. In the event of a serious bot­t­len­eck, fos­sil fuels would also beco­me scar­cer. In order to main­tain func­tio­ning trans­port chains, the com­pa­nies invol­ved in rail trans­port also need indus­tri­al elec­tri­ci­ty (50 Hz). Here, too, secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly must be ensu­red. Secu­ri­ty and relia­bi­li­ty are requi­red: The trans­port sec­tor and the freight rail­ways must be able to rely on the poli­ti­cal lea­der­ship in the event of a cri­sis. Becau­se even then, goods trains have to roll as long as there is demand. We want to streng­then this awa­re­ness among decision-makers.

Energy shortage not excluded

Let’s not fool our­sel­ves: An unfa­voura­ble coin­ci­dence of real­ly nega­ti­ve deve­lo­p­ments could mano­eu­vre Switz­er­land into a serious ener­gy shorta­ge situa­ti­on as early as next win­ter. As repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the elec­tri­ci­ty and gas indus­tries explai­ned at the Eco­no­mie­su­is­se web­i­nar on 9 August 2022, ener­gy sup­p­ly is high­ly com­plex and depen­dent on many influences.

The Confederation assumes responsibility

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on is aware of its respon­si­bi­li­ty. It takes mea­su­res to secu­re the ener­gy sup­p­ly and pre­pa­res for cri­ti­cal sce­na­ri­os of an acute power shorta­ge. Depen­ding on the situa­ti­on, these mea­su­res range from vol­un­t­a­ry, indus­try-spe­ci­fic
indus­try-spe­ci­fic savings appeals to pre­scri­bed manage­ment mea­su­res (quota system).

Determine demand and savings potential

If you think about your own ener­gy needs now, you will be pre­pared for an actu­al elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge and less likely to be sur­pri­sed. So it is time to assess your ener­gy needs, reser­ves, alter­na­ti­ves and savings poten­ti­al. This assess­ment helps to deci­de how, in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge, to redu­ce con­sump­ti­on in line with hig­her-level tar­gets and still con­tri­bu­te to the sup­p­ly of essen­ti­al goods. Con­cre­te ques­ti­ons in the com­pa­ny are, for example:

  • Which acti­vi­ties requi­re how much ener­gy, what is their importance in production?
  • What is the most effec­ti­ve ener­gy-saving potential?
  • How large are the reser­ves, how much ener­gy can be dis­pen­sed with and for how long?
  • Where can we switch to other ener­gy sources and how quickly?
  • Is com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on in the pro­duc­tion chains good? Are the cont­acts up to date?
  • What rest­ric­tions do we imple­ment to meet a quota?
Cooperation and communication

Com­pa­nies should be open about these con­side­ra­ti­ons. After all, it is not pos­si­ble to pre­dict which sce­na­ri­os will actual­ly occur at which point in time. The play­ers in the sec­tor can main­tain the sup­p­ly of important goods as well as pos­si­ble if they coope­ra­te across com­pa­nies and com­mu­ni­ca­te actively. That is why we at the VAP, as repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the ship­pers, are alre­a­dy actively invol­ved in various com­mit­tees and working groups.

«We want to be faster and better than the others in the future as well.»

«We want to be faster and better than the others in the future as well.»

In June 2022, the take­over of the fami­ly busi­ness WASCOSA by Swiss Life and Vau­ban was announ­ced. We wan­ted to know more about the back­ground to this sale and the visi­on of WASCOSA from the for­mer owner and future Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors Phil­ipp Müller.

Mr Müller, the news of the sale of your successful family business came as a surprise. What will change?

Phil­ipp Mül­ler: Less than you might think at first glan­ce. With this step we have secu­red the future of WASCOSA. Of cour­se there will be a chan­ge from a fami­ly-run to an invest­ment-dri­ven com­pa­ny. But the spi­rit of WASCOSA will remain. We want to con­ti­nue to act fas­ter and bet­ter than others, to be suc­cessful as a team and to put cus­to­mers’ inte­rests befo­re our own. These goals are deman­ding, but doable.

What prompted you to take this step?

The suc­ces­si­on plan and secu­ring the future of the com­pa­ny. Neither of our child­ren was inte­res­ted in suc­cee­ding me. So we had to find an exter­nal solu­ti­on to this ques­ti­on. Eight years ago, we had alre­a­dy hired a CEO from out­side the fami­ly, Peter Bal­zer. In addi­ti­on, our mar­ket is curr­ent­ly under­go­ing an enorm­ous shake­out. Of the ten lar­gest car ren­tal com­pa­nies in Euro­pe, we are the only ones who have not expe­ri­en­ced a mer­ger or take­over. Those who are still in the game are con­stant­ly get­ting big­ger, making major long-term invest­ments and taking high finan­cial risks. We sim­ply nee­ded more finan­cial strength for WASCOSA to be able to sur­vi­ve as an SME in this mar­ket. We found these strong finan­cial part­ners in Swiss Life and Vauban.

What other solutions were on the table?

At first we con­side­red a mino­ri­ty share­hol­ding by third-party share­hol­ders. Howe­ver, this did not result in an opti­mal solu­ti­on for the par­ties invol­ved. Sel­ling to a com­pe­ti­tor was never on the table. In the end, long-term coope­ra­ti­on with a strong finan­cial part­ner pro­ved to be the most sustainable.

«WASCOSA has estab­lished its­elf from a small, unknown ren­tal com­pa­ny to a suc­cessful sup­pli­er of freight car sys­tems throug­hout Euro­pe through inno­va­ti­on, cus­to­mer pro­xi­mi­ty and agility.»

What experiences from the past will shape the future of the company?

WASCOSA has estab­lished its­elf from a small, unknown ren­tal com­pa­ny to a suc­cessful pro­vi­der of freight car sys­tems throug­hout Euro­pe through inno­va­ti­on, cus­to­mer pro­xi­mi­ty and agi­li­ty. We want to main­tain this lat­ter posi­ti­on. One exam­p­le of our inno­va­ti­ve strength: there is curr­ent­ly a strong trend towards modu­lar freight car con­cepts. We intro­du­ced such con­cepts 15 years ago. Now that the trend is cat­ching on, we are ready for the mar­ket. In the last 60 years of our com­pa­ny, an uncom­pro­mi­sing cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on has made the dif­fe­rence in our daily busi­ness. We want to keep it that way too. It is in the inte­rest of the new owners that WASCOSA remains at its core what it has always been: an inno­va­ti­ve and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted company.

How will you master this change process?

The par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on of Swiss Life and Vau­ban as third-party share­hol­ders was deri­ved from an inten­si­ve stra­tegy pro­cess with around 15 employees. After the decis­i­on was made, we intro­du­ced the new share­hol­ders to the com­pa­ny at a one-day event. Throug­hout the enti­re stra­tegy pro­cess, we wan­ted to avoid uncer­tain­ty, mis­trust and false assump­ti­ons on the part of manage­ment and employees. We suc­cee­ded in doing so, and we are doing ever­y­thing we can to ensu­re that we also suc­ceed under the new owner­ship. CEO Peter Bal­zer and I will still be on the Board of Direc­tors. This is a strong mes­sa­ge with regard to con­ti­nui­ty and the future of WASCOSA.

«The DAC is a key pro­ject with enorm­ous poten­ti­al to move freight wagon trans­port for­ward.»

Where do you see the most urgent need for action in rail freight transport?

There are dif­fe­rent start­ing points. We need suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ties on the net­work, i.e. more train paths. In addi­ti­on, coun­try-spe­ci­fic obs­ta­cles should be remo­ved. And final­ly, rail freight trans­port is depen­dent on tar­ge­ted finan­cial sup­port to get inno­va­tions rol­ling, for exam­p­le the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC).

Speaking of DAC: what do you think about it?

It is a key pro­ject with enorm­ous poten­ti­al to move freight wagon trans­port for­ward. Howe­ver, we have litt­le influence on this high­ly poli­ti­cal topic. We have been working on the elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on of freight wagons for seve­ral years. Here, of cour­se, the DAC gives us an addi­tio­nal boost.

Is the real added value of the DAC recognised by the industry?

Our indus­try is not too keen on inno­va­ti­on and also not very future-ori­en­ted. The auto­ma­ti­on of cou­pling by the DAC has arri­ved. I am not so sure about its poten­ti­al for digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. As always, it pro­ba­b­ly first needs someone to lead the way and make the effi­ci­en­cy gains clear.

You have been involved in the VAP’s Executive Committee (GLA) for years. How do you describe the work of the VAP?

The VAP is cha­rac­te­ri­sed by a high level of com­pe­tence and a plea­sant working rela­ti­onship. The asso­cia­ti­on’s acti­vi­ties are dri­ven by the cause and not by the ego of indi­vi­du­als. The VAP is the lea­der in some areas. This is shown by the high level of par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on at home and abroad in events such as the forums. This inte­rest pro­ves that the VAP takes up poli­ti­cal, eco­no­mic or legal issues proac­tively and con­s­truc­tively. I found the get-tog­e­ther at the GLA very posi­ti­ve. In the dia­lo­gue with SBB, the asso­cia­ti­on shows stay­ing power. Here, pas­sen­ger trans­port comes first, then infra­struc­tu­re, then real estate and only then rail freight. That makes it all the more important to keep at it. The pati­ence and con­stant coope­ra­ti­on of Frank Fur­rer’s team stand out.

What strengths do you attribute to the VAP?

One of its main strengths is the large num­ber of ship­pers among its mem­bers. The VAP net­works all the play­ers in freight trans­port. In addi­ti­on, it offers the ship­pers’ indus­try a high­ly inte­res­t­ing and rele­vant plat­form. I think that you can only make suc­cessful poli­cy if you repre­sent all interests.

How has the VAP supported you and your WASCOSA?

We have had very good expe­ri­en­ces with the VAP. It has even sup­port­ed us com­pe­tent­ly and suc­cessful­ly all the way to the Fede­ral Court.

What else would you like to see from the VAP?

That it beco­mes more visi­ble in the media. The VAP could appear more pro­min­ent­ly as an opi­ni­on-lea­ding expert on rail trans­port and thus increase its public pro­fi­le, just like the TCS or ASTAG.

To whom would you recommend cooperation with the VAP?

Ever­yo­ne who is inte­res­ted in rail freight trans­port. I am thin­king above all of asso­cia­ti­ons from other modes of trans­port. For a long time now it has no lon­ger been just about rail ver­sus road, but about sen­si­ble mul­ti­mo­dal co-existence.

What has not yet come up in this conversation?

The topic of sus­taina­bi­li­ty. Rail freight trans­port is one of the most important dri­vers and car­ri­ers of sus­tainable trans­port. Inci­den­tal­ly, this was also one of the reasons why I took over from my father-in-law at WASCOSA 30 years ago.

 

Mr Müller, thank you very much for the interesting interview.
Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Freight trans­port plays a cru­cial role for the natio­nal eco­no­my as it enables the exch­an­ge of goods and ser­vices. In view of the chal­lenges such as limi­t­ed road capa­ci­ty and cli­ma­te chan­ge, the shift of freight trans­port to rail is beco­ming incre­asing­ly important. Here we explain the eco­no­mic bene­fits of a modal shift.

Limited road capacity:

The road infra­struc­tu­re is limi­t­ed and is alre­a­dy rea­ching its limits in many regi­ons. Due to the increased use of HGVs in freight trans­port, traf­fic on the roads con­ti­nues to rise, lea­ding to con­ges­ti­on, delays and increased trans­port costs. Shif­ting freight traf­fic to the rail­ways reli­e­ves the roads. This enables more effi­ci­ent use of exis­ting infra­struc­tu­re and redu­ces the need for expen­si­ve road extensions.

Climate change and environmental pollution:

The trans­port sec­tor con­tri­bu­tes signi­fi­cant­ly to CO2 emis­si­ons and other harmful envi­ron­men­tal impacts. Com­pared to road trans­port, rail trans­port is more envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly, as trains pro­du­ce on avera­ge fewer emis­si­ons per tonne-kilo­met­re. In addi­ti­on, rail trans­port redu­ces noise levels and mini­mi­ses air pol­lu­ti­on in urban areas, resul­ting in an impro­ved qua­li­ty of life for the population.

Efficiency and economy:

Rail offers high effi­ci­en­cy in freight trans­port as trains can carry lar­ger loads than trucks. By using goods trains, large quan­ti­ties of goods can be trans­por­ted in one go, which leads to an opti­mi­sa­ti­on of trans­port costs. This allows com­pa­nies to impro­ve their logi­stics pro­ces­ses and increase the effi­ci­en­cy of their sup­p­ly chains. A more effi­ci­ent freight trans­port con­nec­tion leads to lower trans­port costs, which in turn increa­ses the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of com­pa­nies and has a posi­ti­ve impact on the natio­nal eco­no­my. Through digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, the neces­sa­ry freight wagons can be effi­ci­ent­ly net­work­ed, thus avo­i­ding fixed costs.

Safety and accident prevention:

Shif­ting freight trans­port to rail con­tri­bu­tes to incre­asing road safe­ty. Com­pared to road trans­port, acci­dents in rail trans­port are less fre­quent and gene­ral­ly have a lower impact on life, health and the envi­ron­ment. Redu­cing HGV traf­fic on the roads mini­mi­ses poten­ti­al sources of dan­ger and increa­ses safe­ty for other road users.

Experienced logistics experts needed

Inde­pen­dent and sec­tor-spe­ci­fic logi­stics experts are nee­ded who spe­cia­li­se in spe­ci­fic pro­ducts. The rail­ways should con­cen­tra­te on ope­ra­ting the trains, while the over­all logi­stics are in the spe­cia­li­sed hands of the logi­stics experts.

No results found.