SUSTAINABILITY

The VAP under­stands sus­taina­bi­li­ty as the three aspects of eco­lo­gi­cal pro­duc­tion, social working con­di­ti­ons and a sus­tainable eco­no­my. Only if sus­tainable solu­ti­ons are found is the future secure.

Sustainable production

One third of emis­si­ons are due to trans­port. We have set our­sel­ves high goals to redu­ce these emis­si­ons. Rail trans­port is alre­a­dy a very envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly means of transport.

 

Sustainable working conditions

The safe­ty and health of shun­ting workers is strai­ned by the cum­ber­so­me pro­ce­du­res and heavy phy­si­cal work. In the fore­seeable future, there will be a shorta­ge of workers in this sec­tor due to the unat­trac­ti­ve natu­re of the work. We can chan­ge this and take on social responsibility.

  • With the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling (DAC), the risk to health and safe­ty is signi­fi­cant­ly reduced.

 

Sustainable economy

Only a sys­tem that makes a pro­fit can sur­vi­ve in the long term. In order to remain com­pe­ti­ti­ve, the rail freight sec­tor must make its pro­ces­ses more effi­ci­ent, increase its pro­duc­ti­vi­ty and make bet­ter use of its capa­ci­ties. This is important, among other things, in order to be bet­ter able to absorb the fore­cast growth of 30% more freight traf­fic volu­me by 2050.

  • With the auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port, there is a sus­tainable push that increa­ses the mar­ke­ta­bi­li­ty of the rail­way and also redu­ces pro­duc­tion costs.
Titus Büter from Swiss Post wants fast and punctual freight trains

Titus Büter from Swiss Post wants fast and punctual freight trains

Titus Büt­ler is Head of Trans­port at Post CH AG and has been respon­si­ble for all let­ter, par­cel and news­pa­per trans­port by rail and road in Switz­er­land since the begin­ning of 2022. Pre­vious­ly, he mana­ged the Frau­en­feld par­cel cen­ter for over 20 years, where up to half a mil­li­on par­cels are pro­ces­sed daily. He also desi­gned the net­work expan­si­on with the new par­cel cen­ters in Caden­az­zo, Vétroz, Unter­vaz and Oster­mun­di­gen. In an inter­view with VAP, he explains the importance of rail trans­port for Swiss Post.

Here’s what it’s all about:

  • How high is the share of rail in the modal split at Swiss Post?
  • Cus­to­mer demand for fast deli­very is increasing
  • “Pain points”, or opti­miza­ti­on poten­ti­al in rail freight transport
  • Swiss Post is the Euro­pean lea­der in the trans­port of goods by rail

 

VAP: Mr. Bütler, Swiss Post’s yellow trains are striking. More and more, yellow trucks can also be seen on the roads. Is this impression deceptive?

Titus Büt­ler: Our trucks with the yel­low con­tai­ners do attract atten­ti­on. Our cus­to­mers are incre­asing­ly deman­ding fast deli­very: picked up in the evening and deli­ver­ed the next mor­ning. So we’re not tal­king about 24-hour deli­very, but about 15 to 20 hours – and that to any place in Switz­er­land, whe­ther urban or rural. So we are under time pres­su­re throug­hout the sup­p­ly chain. This makes it dif­fi­cult to bund­le par­cel volu­mes to fill enti­re trains. We choo­se to go by rail whe­re­ver it makes eco­lo­gi­cal and eco­no­mic sense. Around 50 per­cent of all let­ters and par­cels alre­a­dy make at least part of their jour­ney by train. A short train with one or two wagons makes no sense – not even ecologically.

What is stopping Swiss Post from using rail for the transports we see on the road?

We are working with our trans­port part­ner SBB-Cargo to shift more par­cel ship­ments back onto rail. We need fast and regu­lar express rou­tes. The avera­ge speed of some pos­tal trains is below 50km/h, even though we have fast rol­ling stock and run light trains. That is too slow.

How do you see the future of postal logistics, will there be more by rail or by road?

We cle­ar­ly want to bring more volu­me onto the rail­ways, espe­ci­al­ly on the west-east axis.

Swiss Post’s newly planned centers do not have rail connections. Why?

In recent years, we have put seve­ral small par­cel cen­ters into ope­ra­ti­on. Ter­mi­nals requi­re land, make the pro­ject more expen­si­ve and delay rea­liza­ti­on. Plan­ning and con­s­truc­tion were car­ri­ed out under time pres­su­re: in some cases, less than 2 years pas­sed bet­ween the decis­i­on on the loca­ti­on and the ope­ning. Where pos­si­ble, howe­ver, we use ter­mi­nals in the vici­ni­ty, e.g. in the case of Caden­az­zo, the SBB ter­mi­nal. Par­cels to and from sou­thern Switz­er­land tra­vel by rail.

Parcels and letters are not considered so-called “rail-affine” goods. What competencies do you have as Swiss Post, as a shipper, to ensure that these goods are nevertheless transported by rail?

We are the only pos­tal ser­vice in Euro­pe that trans­ports such goods by rail on a large scale. The pre­re­qui­si­te is that the inclu­si­on of rail is alre­a­dy taken into account in the design and – even more important – that there is an infra­struc­tu­re that allows fast freight trains with high punc­tua­li­ty at all. We have experts in our team who are very fami­li­ar with rail freight transport.

Swiss Post has the same owner as SBB Cargo. Is this more of an opportunity/simplification for you? How would you describe this relationship?

The trans­ports were put out to public ten­der. The owner­ship does not play a role. We have a clear cus­to­mer-sup­pli­er rela­ti­onship, just like other trans­port com­pa­nies. Our requi­re­ments in terms of punc­tua­li­ty and relia­bi­li­ty are very high and we are very satis­fied with the ser­vices pro­vi­ded by SBB Cargo.

If the fairy godmother were to grant you one logistical wish, what would it be?

I would wish for regu­lar and fast train paths on the west-east axis.

How would you describe the VAP?

We are one of the lar­gest siding owners and one of the lar­gest rail ship­pers in Switz­er­land. The VAP repres­ents their legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests at various levels and net­works the play­ers among themselves.

What strengths do you attribute to the VAP?

The VAP is indis­pensable for the poli­ti­cal work of all play­ers in rail freight transport.

To whom would you recommend cooperation with the VAP?

Every com­pa­ny that owns tracks or wagons or is acti­ve in rail freight trans­port – whe­ther as a cus­to­mer or as an RU – bene­fits from the VAP.

What has not been said yet:

Our mail trains are important to us. We use them to con­nect Switz­er­land quick­ly, relia­bly and eco­lo­gi­cal­ly. That is why it is important to us that the image of slow and often spray-pain­ted freight trains does not rub off on our mail trains.

 

Mr. Bütler, thank you for the interview and the interesting insights.
Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Ener­gy secu­ri­ty is and remains one of our top issues. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is curr­ent­ly con­cre­ti­sing the manage­ment mea­su­res in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in the form of pre­pared ordi­nan­ces. Spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons are envi­sa­ged for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies, inclu­ding rail freight trans­port. The FOT is pre­pa­ring a draft ordi­nan­ce for public trans­port tog­e­ther with the working group of indus­try asso­cia­ti­ons, while the VAP repres­ents the inte­rests of freight transport.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Fede­ral Coun­cil has plan of mea­su­res for secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly drawn up
  • Gra­du­al quota sys­tem to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shutdowns
  • Next step: pre­pa­ra­ti­on of spe­ci­fic draft ordinances
  • Trac­tion cur­rent will beco­me more expen­si­ve next year

 

At its mee­ting on 23 Novem­ber 2022, the Fede­ral Coun­cil dis­cus­sed the manage­ment mea­su­res to be taken in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. For the draft ordi­nan­ces with gra­dua­ted
mea­su­res until 12 Decem­ber 2022. The sys­tem lea­der rail com­men­ted on behalf of the industry.

Avoiding the worst with each level of measures

With the mea­su­res adopted so far, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is streng­thening the secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly: main­tai­ning hydro­power reser­ves, pro­vi­ding ther­mal reser­ve power plants, incre­asing the trans­mis­si­on capa­ci­ty of the elec­tri­ci­ty grids. In addi­ti­on, it wants to prepa­re gra­dua­ted mea­su­res to redu­ce elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on. Calls for eco­no­mic­al elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on and the ener­gy-saving alli­ance of the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty are inten­ded to raise awa­re­ness among com­pa­nies across the board.

Should a cri­ti­cal power sup­p­ly bot­t­len­eck occur during the win­ter peri­od, the Fede­ral Coun­cil will regu­la­te the power sup­p­ly with tem­po­ra­ry mea­su­res. In the event of a cri­sis, it would issue tar­ge­ted con­sump­ti­on rest­ric­tions with the help of decrees. This is inten­ded to ensu­re grid sta­bi­li­ty and thus the sup­p­ly of elec­tri­ci­ty. The aim of each stage is to avoid even more dra­stic measures.

Quota system to prevent grid shutdowns

The Fede­ral Coun­cil sees the quota sys­tem as a key mea­su­re to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shut­downs. In order to ensu­re its effec­ti­ve­ness, it does not want to exempt any elec­tri­ci­ty purchasers.

Howe­ver, it envi­sa­ges spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies. Public trans­port as a core ser­vice should be gua­ran­teed for as long as pos­si­ble. In order to ensu­re its func­tio­ning even in the event of power shorta­ges, mea­su­res are to be imple­men­ted accor­ding to the «public trans­port manage­ment model».

Management measures for public transport

In a working group of VöV, SBB, BAV and VAP, we have work­ed out the gra­dua­ted mea­su­res for pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the last few months. In the case of a power quota, freight logi­stics should basi­cal­ly be main­tai­ned and sca­led as quick­ly as pos­si­ble accor­ding to the deve­lo­p­ment of demand. The indus­try must prepa­re to react quick­ly. For it is impos­si­ble to pre­dict today in which areas decrea­ses or increa­ses in demand will occur. Based on the “public trans­port manage­ment model”, our working group will deve­lop a cor­re­spon­ding draft ordi­nan­ce of gra­dua­ted manage­ment mea­su­res for public trans­port. We at the VAP sup­port the approach that has been deve­lo­ped, espe­ci­al­ly the spe­cial mea­su­res for public transport.

Traction current will become more expensive

The fact that trac­tion cur­rent is not excluded from sud­den tur­bu­len­ces is shown by the latest announce­ment of the SBB. Here, the ener­gy divi­si­on announ­ces a serious defi­cit of CHF 180 mil­li­on for 2022. Accor­ding to SBB, as a result of the per­sis­tent drought in the sum­mer, 90% of the railway’s elec­tri­ci­ty could not be gene­ra­ted from its own hydro­elec­tric power plants as usual. SBB had to buy expen­si­ve elec­tri­ci­ty on the mar­ket at short notice.

After nego­tia­ti­ons with the BAV, the SBB will raise the elec­tri­ci­ty price for 2023 by 3 cen­ti­mes to 13.5 cen­ti­mes per kilo­watt hour. The BAV wants to pass on the hig­her elec­tri­ci­ty costs in the train path price to the various trans­port sec­tors on a dif­fe­ren­tia­ted basis. In long-distance traf­fic the full amount of 3 cen­ti­mes will be pas­sed on, in regio­nal and freight traf­fic only a part with 1 cen­ti­me. The fact that SBB’s appli­ca­ti­on for full defi­cit covera­ge with a surchar­ge of 10 cen­ti­mes was not appro­ved by the FOT may be good news for the rail­way com­pa­nies for the time being. But the uncer­tain­ty of fur­ther surchar­ges remains, and this will also have an influence on future offer calculations.

Transparency needed

We belie­ve that the pro­vi­si­on of elec­tri­cal ener­gy at a pre­dic­ta­ble cost rate is cen­tral to the future design of offers. The recent price tur­bu­len­ces alre­a­dy seem very adven­tur­ous; even more so when one looks back at the many years with a posi­ti­ve balan­ce. We expect a trans­pa­rent review of the recent events.

ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

The elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge is an urgent poli­ti­cal and eco­no­mic issue. That is why we are keen to ensu­re that our mem­bers are kept up to date. In this third blog epi­so­de, we dis­cuss how the rail­way indus­try can respond to the Fede­ral Council’s calls for savings by taking vol­un­t­a­ry ener­gy-saving measures.

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has set out the tasks for deal­ing with a pos­si­ble ener­gy cri­sis. Depen­ding on how the ener­gy situa­ti­on deve­lo­ps, it can take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. Four levels are pos­si­ble. At pre­sent we are on level 1 “vol­un­t­a­ry savings appeals”. The Fede­ral Office of Trans­port per­forms the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on task in trans­port mat­ters. The Fede­ral Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC) has laun­ched the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance” with a broad-based cam­paign. This alli­ance calls on orga­ni­sa­ti­ons throug­hout Switz­er­land to sup­port efforts for secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly in win­ter and to vol­un­t­a­ri­ly take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. The goal must be to imple­ment mea­su­res that are as uni­form as pos­si­ble across the indus­try in Switz­er­land. This is best unders­tood by the users of trans­port services.

VAP joins in

We at the VAP endor­se the recom­men­da­ti­on to join the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance”. In doing so, we are pas­sing on the wake-up call of the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV) to our mem­bers. At its board mee­ting on 9 Sep­tem­ber 2022, VöV published its recom­men­da­ti­on paper for the rail­way indus­try. In this paper, VöV recom­mends that the rail­way indus­try actively prepa­re for pos­si­ble sce­na­ri­os of an ener­gy shorta­ge and quick­ly imple­ment the first con­cre­te measures.

To ensu­re that the ener­gy-saving mea­su­res can be imple­men­ted in a coor­di­na­ted man­ner by all play­ers in the rail­way indus­try, the working group “Elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in public trans­port” is respon­si­ble for their coor­di­na­ti­on. We are actively invol­ved in this. The working group works clo­se­ly with the SBB and Post­Bus AG Switz­er­land as sys­tem lea­ders. The com­mon goal is to avoid ope­ra­tio­nal rest­ric­tions in both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. Capa­ci­ties are only to be redu­ced in the event of a cor­re­spon­ding decli­ne in demand. We are pre­pa­ring inten­si­ve­ly for fur­ther escala­ti­on levels in various working groups. The public sec­tor should per­cei­ve our indus­try as com­pe­tent and cooperative.

Because energy is scarce

Ener­gy is scar­ce. Let’s not waste it.” Under this cam­paign title, DETEC has sum­ma­ri­sed saving tips for pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als and com­pa­nies. The rail­way indus­try should also save ener­gy vol­un­t­a­ri­ly. This appeal includes imple­men­ta­ti­on mea­su­res for num­e­rous buil­dings used by the rail­ways. They do not rest­rict the range of rail freight ser­vices. Curr­ent­ly, the focus is on lowe­ring the hea­ting tem­pe­ra­tu­re and redu­cing hot water and light­ing. In addi­ti­on, every trans­port com­pa­ny is requi­red to opti­mi­se the ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy of its office and ope­ra­tio­nal buil­dings. The packa­ge will be sup­ple­men­ted by tar­ge­ted savings mea­su­res for employees (train dri­vers, office staff, work­shop staff).

«You won’t go far without courage»

«You won’t go far without courage»

Dr Heiko Fischer pre­si­des over the Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP. The for­mer VTG boss talks to the VAP about the future of Euro­pean rail freight trans­port and the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. He would like to see more enthu­si­asm for the lat­ter and explains why he con­siders the dis­con­ti­nua­tion of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic in Switz­er­land to be fatal.

 

Dr Fischer, where do you see the biggest challenges and where do you see the levers for the European rail market?

There are quite a few. The rail­way infra­struc­tu­re is out­da­ted or in many places a patch­work quilt that has grown his­to­ri­cal­ly. There are still bor­ders bet­ween the sub­sys­tems. Every year that not­hing is done, the pro­blem grows, becau­se the infra­struc­tu­re con­ti­nues to age unwa­ve­rin­gly. This is where I see the adjus­ting screw in the coor­di­na­ti­on of expan­si­on plans, reli­ef rou­tes and cor­re­spon­ding con­s­truc­tion mea­su­res throug­hout Cen­tral Euro­pe. It is true that the trans-Euro­pean net­works pur­sue this inte­gra­ti­ve approach. But secon­da­ry lines and fine dis­tri­bu­ti­on net­works must not be excluded when it comes to invest­ment allo­ca­ti­on, expan­si­on and rene­wal plan­ning, train con­trol sys­tems and regulation.

I see a fur­ther con­trol varia­ble in the com­ple­te digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of the rail­way sec­tor, start­ing with the net­wor­king of the infra­struc­tu­re via the rol­ling stock to the ope­ra­tio­nal busi­ness. There should be a stan­dar­di­sed logic with cor­re­spon­ding inter­faces. As a result, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on can take place in a mea­su­red and tar­ge­ted man­ner. Light­ly loa­ded rou­tes could also be ser­ved by hydro­gen-powered hybrid locomotives.

«Rail freight reli­es on public fun­ding for cer­tain urgen­ci­es, such as basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re deve­lo­p­ment, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, imple­men­ta­ti­on of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap innovations.»

Available capi­tal is also a cor­ner­stone. The rail­way mar­ket does not only need suf­fi­ci­ent pri­va­te capi­tal. For cer­tain urgen­ci­es, it depends on public funds, for exam­p­le for basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap inno­va­tions. Such invest­ments are bey­ond the finan­cial powers of the pri­va­te sec­tor and most state rail­ways. After all, nobo­dy wants to invest in tech­no­lo­gies that will only bear fruit in the next deca­de, per­haps even with other play­ers in the rail­way sys­tem. This brings me to ano­ther set screw: we also need an ancho­red eco­no­mic under­stan­ding of the mecha­nisms of rail freight trans­port among govern­ments, regu­la­tors and poli­ti­ci­ans. This requi­res a rethink on the part of all those invol­ved in the system.

In what way?

The rail sec­tor is not exact­ly known for thin­king proac­tively and imple­men­ting new things quick­ly. Many see them­sel­ves as vic­tims, be it of the past, of wrong decis­i­ons, of the road, of the wea­ther or of any­thing else. In my opi­ni­on, that abso­lut­e­ly has to chan­ge. After all, we don’t haul goods trains around becau­se we enjoy it, but becau­se we want to gene­ra­te added value for ship­pers and our com­mu­ni­ties. The play­ers in rail freight trans­port need to put the cus­to­mer back in the cent­re of their atten­ti­on and to be aware of their future needs. For the upco­ming chan­ge to actual­ly hap­pen, we need more of a start-up men­ta­li­ty, a “can do” attitude.

What innovations have you driven forward at VTG in recent years, and which of them were groundbreaking?

VTG Con­nect spon­ta­neous­ly comes to mind. This tele­ma­tics tech­no­lo­gy coll­ects rele­vant data on the enti­re fleet and many trans­ports. It crea­tes the basis for effi­ci­ent digi­tal fleet manage­ment, becau­se it makes data usable for cus­to­mers, freight rail­ways and main­ten­an­ce pur­po­ses. With this inno­va­ti­on, we have, so to speak, laun­ched the entry into real-time data trans­mis­si­on in freight trans­port as envi­sa­ged by the DAC.

What importance do you attach to the DAC in the future?

The DAC is a cata­lyst for the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. With it, a new con­trol logic and real-time data flows can be map­ped. We are a long way from that today. The DAC does more than auto­ma­te the cou­pling pro­cess. It net­works train dri­vers, cargo, cargo car­ri­ers and ener­gy, i.e. elec­tri­ci­ty. The poten­ti­al of this com­bi­ned with new digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies is immense. The DAC is not only an intel­li­gent train and load con­trol sys­tem, but also a faci­li­ta­tor for other digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on initia­ti­ves such as digi­tal data, train con­trol and boo­king platforms.

«There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even more of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge the ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way business.»

What role will these play in the future?

There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even seve­ral of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons. As such, they will pro­vi­de freight ope­ra­tors with relia­ble infor­ma­ti­on that can be used to redu­ce the distances bet­ween trains, cal­cu­la­te time win­dows and put more ton­na­ge on the track per unit of time. A pan-Euro­pean elec­tro­nic freight traf­fic con­trol sys­tem must not come from a tech giant à la Goog­le, but should deve­lop from within the rail sec­tor its­elf. In this way, we show inno­va­ti­ve strength vis-à-vis other modes of transport.

Per­haps in the future there will even be a super­or­di­na­te body like Euro­con­trol for the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on of air traf­fic con­trol. Such a cock­pit could con­trol Euro­pean rail freight traf­fic, give the train dri­vers cer­tain ins­truc­tions, inter­ve­ne if neces­sa­ry and later allow auto­no­mous trains to run. Howe­ver, such quan­tum leaps are only pos­si­ble if digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies with arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence are imple­men­ted and take effect. Only they bring dyna­mism and ensu­re the neces­sa­ry speed, which is abso­lut­e­ly cen­tral to the suc­cess of the digi­tal transformation.

How could rail freight transport in Europe be developed sustainably?

With some­thing that brings the eco­no­mic impact of freight trans­port down to a com­mon deno­mi­na­tor and to which all play­ers com­mit. I can ima­gi­ne that one day there will be a long-term mas­ter plan in the sense of a self-regu­la­ting yet bin­ding decla­ra­ti­on of intent. All par­ti­ci­pa­ting state and non-state rail­ways would have to co-sign it. This mas­ter plan could state that they are working tog­e­ther towards a modal shift. I would remind you of the Gene­ral Con­tract of Use (GCU) of 2006, which regu­la­tes the inter­ac­tion bet­ween wagon kee­pers and rail­way under­ta­kings as wagon ope­ra­tors. The advan­ta­ge of a supra­na­tio­nal agree­ment wit­hout the cha­rac­ter of law is that it can be sup­ple­men­ted or adapt­ed quick­ly and easi­ly. The acces­ses to the NRLA are the best exam­p­le of what should not hap­pen: The com­mu­ni­ty of rail­way sta­tes, inclu­ding Switz­er­land, has com­mit­ted its­elf to expan­ding the north-south axis. When Switz­er­land ope­ned the NRLA tun­nel, other sta­tes had not even star­ted plan­ning. A mas­ter plan for Euro­pean freight trans­port could make this inten­ti­on more bin­ding and make it clear that the Green Deal and modal shift goals are meant serious­ly. Today it is still a pipe dream. Most of the time, ever­yo­ne agrees with the basic demands. But as soon as it comes to working out some­thing con­cre­te from a sin­gle source, opi­ni­ons diverge.

What do you think of the Federal Council’s report on ‘Rail Freight Transport in the Area’? What would it mean if the Federal Council abolished it?

In my opi­ni­on, that would be the big­gest mista­ke in trans­port poli­cy for deca­des. Switz­er­land pro­ves that wagon­load traf­fic works. Howe­ver, it is still too expen­si­ve. But if train for­ma­ti­on and sepa­ra­ti­on are auto­ma­tic, the train line is digi­tal­ly con­trol­led and the mar­ket bene­fits from the many advan­ta­ges of digi­tal offers, then the costs will also go down – and the need for sub­si­dies will decrease. The Fede­ral Coun­cil should think about how to make the offers more attrac­ti­ve for freight rail cus­to­mers. To call the whole thing off even befo­re digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on bears fruit would be cri­mi­nal. Trans­fer­ring rail freight to trucks also costs money and not every freight can be con­tai­ne­ri­sed for block trains. In my opi­ni­on, the Swiss govern­ment should be more con­fi­dent in this area. Those who lack cou­ra­ge have alre­a­dy lost.

We at the VAP are members of the UIP. How would you describe the VAP?

It is a valuable mem­ber asso­cia­ti­on of our Euro­pean wagon kee­per fami­ly. I per­cei­ve it as inno­va­ti­ve and opi­ni­ona­ted. Becau­se of its uni­que mem­ber­ship struc­tu­re, it has a spe­cial weight with us. The VAP repres­ents not only the five lar­gest Swiss wagon kee­pers, but also the inte­rests of ship­pers, sidings and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. This diver­si­ty gene­ra­tes impact and a wealth of ideas among us, and I con­sider it a valuable strength. With its mem­ber diver­si­ty, the VAP can focus its demands more holi­sti­cal­ly on the users and place them with grea­ter aut­ho­ri­ty. I sup­port the VAP’s cli­ent-cent­red approach, which invol­ves the end-user in the dis­cus­sion and decis­i­on-making pro­cess. Euro­pe can bene­fit from the Swiss expe­ri­ence with wagon­load traf­fic or the per­for­mance-based heavy vehic­le char­ge. It is often seen as a “mini­lab” that mir­rors issues for us. Fur­ther­mo­re, the VAP shows us in an exem­pla­ry way how to con­vin­ce the popu­la­ti­on or how to shape some­thing posi­tively as a community.

What can the VAP do better?

Bet­ter is always pos­si­ble. My appeal is not only to the VAP, but to all asso­cia­ti­ons and peo­p­le invol­ved in trans­port poli­cy. We need com­mit­ted peo­p­le who are wil­ling to for­mu­la­te inte­rests with a view to the future. There are enough of those who think in terms of quar­ter­ly balan­ce sheets. But that is no way to win the future.

What do you wish for this future?

More inte­rest, more con­fi­dence. More enthu­si­asm. Ship­pers should be eager to put even more ton­nes on the rails. This is the only way we can achie­ve the ambi­tious modal shift and cli­ma­te tar­gets. The popu­la­ti­on should rea­li­se how important rail freight trans­port is – and that it costs money. After all, an unche­cked flood of lor­ries is not an alter­na­ti­ve. I hope that you from the VAP and we from the UIP will con­ti­nue to stand up for this depar­tu­re day after day.

Dr Fischer, thank you very much for the informative interview.

 

Dr. Heiko Fischer

Dr. Heiko Fischer ser­ved VTG for a total of more than 25 years until 2021, inclu­ding more than 17 years as Chair­man of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Board. Since 2015, he has been Pre­si­dent of the umbrel­la orga­niza­ti­on Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP, based in Brussels, as he was from 2004 to 2007. This repres­ents more than 250 freight wagon kee­pers and main­ten­an­ce cen­tres with more than 223,000 freight wagons, which cover 50% of the tonne-kilo­me­t­res in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port. Dr Heiko Fischer’s for­mer employ­er VTG AG ope­ra­tes the lar­gest pri­va­te freight car fleet in Euro­pe with around 88,500 rail freight cars. In addi­ti­on to hiring out freight wagons and tank con­tai­ners, VTG offers mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics ser­vices and inte­gra­ted digi­tal solutions.

Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Should an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge actual­ly occur in Switz­er­land due to the geo­po­li­ti­cal cri­sis and sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks, it is essen­ti­al that freight trans­port cus­to­mers can con­ti­nue to be ser­ved. This means that the trans­port com­pa­nies must cla­ri­fy their ener­gy needs in the event of a shorta­ge and ans­wer some key ques­ti­ons today.

The Swiss rail­ways play a decisi­ve role in coping with the high demand for both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. They depend on a secu­re sup­p­ly of elec­tri­cal energy.

Ensuring supply via rail

If at some point the available trac­tion cur­rent is no lon­ger suf­fi­ci­ent for all sche­du­led trains, jour­neys would have to be can­cel­led accor­din­gly. The ques­ti­on is: which ones? We at the VAP are firm­ly com­mit­ted to ensu­ring that our mem­bers can con­ti­nue to serve all freight trans­port cus­to­mers. The popu­la­ti­on and the eco­no­my depend on relia­ble trans­port chains. That is why freight trains must con­ti­nue to run as long as pos­si­ble even in a power shorta­ge situa­ti­on – as they did, by the way, in the thin­ned-out time­ta­ble during Covid-19.

Political leadership needed

The Swiss rail­way sys­tem is almost exclu­si­ve­ly elec­tri­cal­ly powered. Most of the requi­red trac­tion cur­rent (16.7 Hz) comes from the country’s own hydro­elec­tric power plants. Shif­ting trans­ports from rail to road when there is a shorta­ge of trac­tion cur­rent is not very pro­mi­sing. In the event of a serious bot­t­len­eck, fos­sil fuels would also beco­me scar­cer. In order to main­tain func­tio­ning trans­port chains, the com­pa­nies invol­ved in rail trans­port also need indus­tri­al elec­tri­ci­ty (50 Hz). Here, too, secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly must be ensu­red. Secu­ri­ty and relia­bi­li­ty are requi­red: The trans­port sec­tor and the freight rail­ways must be able to rely on the poli­ti­cal lea­der­ship in the event of a cri­sis. Becau­se even then, goods trains have to roll as long as there is demand. We want to streng­then this awa­re­ness among decision-makers.

Energy shortage not excluded

Let’s not fool our­sel­ves: An unfa­voura­ble coin­ci­dence of real­ly nega­ti­ve deve­lo­p­ments could mano­eu­vre Switz­er­land into a serious ener­gy shorta­ge situa­ti­on as early as next win­ter. As repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the elec­tri­ci­ty and gas indus­tries explai­ned at the Eco­no­mie­su­is­se web­i­nar on 9 August 2022, ener­gy sup­p­ly is high­ly com­plex and depen­dent on many influences.

The Confederation assumes responsibility

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on is aware of its respon­si­bi­li­ty. It takes mea­su­res to secu­re the ener­gy sup­p­ly and pre­pa­res for cri­ti­cal sce­na­ri­os of an acute power shorta­ge. Depen­ding on the situa­ti­on, these mea­su­res range from vol­un­t­a­ry, indus­try-spe­ci­fic
indus­try-spe­ci­fic savings appeals to pre­scri­bed manage­ment mea­su­res (quota system).

Determine demand and savings potential

If you think about your own ener­gy needs now, you will be pre­pared for an actu­al elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge and less likely to be sur­pri­sed. So it is time to assess your ener­gy needs, reser­ves, alter­na­ti­ves and savings poten­ti­al. This assess­ment helps to deci­de how, in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge, to redu­ce con­sump­ti­on in line with hig­her-level tar­gets and still con­tri­bu­te to the sup­p­ly of essen­ti­al goods. Con­cre­te ques­ti­ons in the com­pa­ny are, for example:

  • Which acti­vi­ties requi­re how much ener­gy, what is their importance in production?
  • What is the most effec­ti­ve ener­gy-saving potential?
  • How large are the reser­ves, how much ener­gy can be dis­pen­sed with and for how long?
  • Where can we switch to other ener­gy sources and how quickly?
  • Is com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on in the pro­duc­tion chains good? Are the cont­acts up to date?
  • What rest­ric­tions do we imple­ment to meet a quota?
Cooperation and communication

Com­pa­nies should be open about these con­side­ra­ti­ons. After all, it is not pos­si­ble to pre­dict which sce­na­ri­os will actual­ly occur at which point in time. The play­ers in the sec­tor can main­tain the sup­p­ly of important goods as well as pos­si­ble if they coope­ra­te across com­pa­nies and com­mu­ni­ca­te actively. That is why we at the VAP, as repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the ship­pers, are alre­a­dy actively invol­ved in various com­mit­tees and working groups.

Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Freight trans­port plays a cru­cial role for the natio­nal eco­no­my as it enables the exch­an­ge of goods and ser­vices. In view of the chal­lenges such as limi­t­ed road capa­ci­ty and cli­ma­te chan­ge, the shift of freight trans­port to rail is beco­ming incre­asing­ly important. Here we explain the eco­no­mic bene­fits of a modal shift.

Limited road capacity:

The road infra­struc­tu­re is limi­t­ed and is alre­a­dy rea­ching its limits in many regi­ons. Due to the increased use of HGVs in freight trans­port, traf­fic on the roads con­ti­nues to rise, lea­ding to con­ges­ti­on, delays and increased trans­port costs. Shif­ting freight traf­fic to the rail­ways reli­e­ves the roads. This enables more effi­ci­ent use of exis­ting infra­struc­tu­re and redu­ces the need for expen­si­ve road extensions.

Climate change and environmental pollution:

The trans­port sec­tor con­tri­bu­tes signi­fi­cant­ly to CO2 emis­si­ons and other harmful envi­ron­men­tal impacts. Com­pared to road trans­port, rail trans­port is more envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly, as trains pro­du­ce on avera­ge fewer emis­si­ons per tonne-kilo­met­re. In addi­ti­on, rail trans­port redu­ces noise levels and mini­mi­ses air pol­lu­ti­on in urban areas, resul­ting in an impro­ved qua­li­ty of life for the population.

Efficiency and economy:

Rail offers high effi­ci­en­cy in freight trans­port as trains can carry lar­ger loads than trucks. By using goods trains, large quan­ti­ties of goods can be trans­por­ted in one go, which leads to an opti­mi­sa­ti­on of trans­port costs. This allows com­pa­nies to impro­ve their logi­stics pro­ces­ses and increase the effi­ci­en­cy of their sup­p­ly chains. A more effi­ci­ent freight trans­port con­nec­tion leads to lower trans­port costs, which in turn increa­ses the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of com­pa­nies and has a posi­ti­ve impact on the natio­nal eco­no­my. Through digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, the neces­sa­ry freight wagons can be effi­ci­ent­ly net­work­ed, thus avo­i­ding fixed costs.

Safety and accident prevention:

Shif­ting freight trans­port to rail con­tri­bu­tes to incre­asing road safe­ty. Com­pared to road trans­port, acci­dents in rail trans­port are less fre­quent and gene­ral­ly have a lower impact on life, health and the envi­ron­ment. Redu­cing HGV traf­fic on the roads mini­mi­ses poten­ti­al sources of dan­ger and increa­ses safe­ty for other road users.

Experienced logistics experts needed

Inde­pen­dent and sec­tor-spe­ci­fic logi­stics experts are nee­ded who spe­cia­li­se in spe­ci­fic pro­ducts. The rail­ways should con­cen­tra­te on ope­ra­ting the trains, while the over­all logi­stics are in the spe­cia­li­sed hands of the logi­stics experts.

Electricity shortage: take precautions and develop scenarios

Electricity shortage: take precautions and develop scenarios

Ener­gy tran­si­ti­on, geo­po­li­ti­cal cri­ses, sup­p­ly shorta­ges – these and other fac­tors could lead to an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. The large con­su­mers are cal­led upon to deve­lop sce­na­ri­os for a quota sys­tem. We at the VAP are actively working on this.

Elec­tri­ci­ty is available – that was taken for gran­ted in Switz­er­land for deca­des. This is now being cal­led into ques­ti­on: on the one hand, the repla­ce­ment of fos­sil fuels by sus­tainable ener­gy sources will limit the available ener­gy resour­ces in the coming years. On the other hand, geo­po­li­ti­cal con­flicts and sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks may have an addi­tio­nal nega­ti­ve impact on their avai­la­bi­li­ty, as the cur­rent situa­ti­on shows us.

Active participation required

Against this back­ground, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has cal­led on all large con­su­mers to coope­ra­te in the pre­pa­ra­ti­ons for a pos­si­ble elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. If an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge does inde­ed occur, the rail sec­tor will have to rest­rict pas­sen­ger trans­port ser­vices. Freight trans­port is to be main­tai­ned in line with demand.

Freight transport plays a key role

The rail­ways play a sys­tem-rele­vant role in freight trans­port with dome­stic, import and export traf­fic for the sup­p­ly of the eco­no­my and socie­ty. If a mas­si­ve power shorta­ge occurs, the freight logi­stics capa­bi­li­ty should basi­cal­ly remain int­act. Howe­ver, it must adapt to the chan­ged demand.

This is also the great unknown. At pre­sent it is not pos­si­ble to draw up relia­ble sce­na­ri­os for the deve­lo­p­ment of demand in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. Cer­tain­ly, the demand for trans­port capa­ci­ty will chan­ge noti­ce­ab­ly both in Switz­er­land and in our neigh­bou­ring count­ries. But depen­ding on the sec­tor, it may fall as well as rise.

Viewing rail operations as a system

To ensu­re that rail freight traf­fic can con­ti­nue to roll even in a cri­sis situa­ti­on, the sec­tor must react to the chan­ged demand in a time­ly man­ner with an adapt­ed trans­port offer. This is only pos­si­ble if the enti­re rail ope­ra­ti­on is view­ed as a sys­tem. In other words, all ope­ra­tio­nal­ly rele­vant func­tions must remain functional.

Scenarios in progress

In order to curb ener­gy con­sump­ti­on in the event of a cri­sis, pas­sen­ger trans­port will be gui­ded by the redu­ced time­ta­bles that it has alre­a­dy drawn up and imple­men­ted in the pan­de­mic year 2020. In freight trans­port, pos­si­ble sce­na­ri­os are being deve­lo­ped in close dia­lo­gue with the logi­stics sec­tor and with a view to the eco­no­mic sup­p­ly of the coun­try. Accor­ding to the man­da­te, coor­di­na­ted sce­na­ri­os should be available by the end of 2022. We at the VAP are actively con­tri­bu­ting our know­ledge and expe­ri­ence to this process.

VAP becomes a member of SWISS SUPPLY

VAP becomes a member of SWISS SUPPLY

VAP as new competence partner

With the SWISS SUPPLY asso­cia­ti­on, the most important logi­stics, sup­p­ly and trans­port orga­ni­sa­ti­ons in Switz­er­land want to pro­mo­te the image of logi­stics, sup­p­ly chain and trans­port and carry out public edu­ca­ti­on work. The VAP, as the repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of the ship­per indus­try in rail freight trans­port, joi­n­ed the sup­port orga­ni­sa­ti­on in August 2021 to con­tri­bu­te to these objec­ti­ves. In this way, we crea­te the best con­di­ti­ons for our mem­bers for an eco­no­mic­al­ly fruitful envi­ron­ment and a broad public under­stan­ding for a well-func­tio­ning sup­p­ly. In future, we will coor­di­na­te our trans­port poli­cy acti­vi­ties in Cargo Forum Switz­er­land with the initia­ti­ves of Swiss Sup­p­ly in order to deve­lop even more clout together.

How it came about

The idea for SWISS SUPPLY came about at the begin­ning of 2020 as part of the new focus exhi­bi­ti­on “Expe­ri­ence Logi­stics!” at the Swiss Muse­um of Trans­port. The inten­ti­on was to rea­li­se such image pro­jects and cor­re­spon­ding initia­ti­ves in the future under the umbrel­la of a natio­nal non-pro­fit orga­ni­sa­ti­on and with com­bi­ned forces in a sus­tainable man­ner. Thus, the Swiss Asso­cia­ti­on for Voca­tio­nal Trai­ning in Logi­stics (ASFL SVBL), the Swiss Com­mer­cial Vehic­le Asso­cia­ti­on ASTAG, the value crea­ti­on net­work GS1 Switz­er­land, the pro­fes­sio­nal asso­cia­ti­on for purcha­sing and sup­p­ly manage­ment procure.ch, the asso­cia­ti­on of Swiss for­war­ding and logi­stics com­pa­nies SPEDLOGSWISS, the logi­stics net­work VNL Switz­er­land and the Swiss Logi­stics Foun­da­ti­on foun­ded the new asso­cia­ti­on SWISS SUPPLY on 26 March 2021. The orga­ni­sa­ti­on will be chai­red by Jörg Mathis, CEO of GS1 Switz­er­land. The mem­bers of the orga­ni­sa­ti­on also form the spon­so­ring body and repre­sent well over 10,000 members.

Strengthening supply, logistics and transport in Switzerland

Many peo­p­le do not know: The natio­nal sup­p­ly with the areas of pro­cu­re­ment, logi­stics, sto­rage, trans­port, for­war­ding, pack­a­ging, dis­po­sal and recy­cling form a sys­tem-rele­vant back­bone of the Swiss eco­no­my. The initia­tors of SWISS SUPPLY want to impro­ve the repu­ta­ti­on of these sec­tors in Switz­er­land in the long term and arou­se inte­rest and under­stan­ding for them among the public. To this end, exis­ting initia­ti­ves are being inten­si­fied and new acti­vi­ties laun­ched. In addi­ti­on, the asso­cia­ti­on wants to gene­ra­te enthu­si­asm for the indus­try among young peo­p­le at an early stage. SWISS SUPPLY shows stu­dents and care­er chan­gers com­pre­hen­si­ve care­er oppor­tu­ni­ties with deve­lo­p­ment pos­si­bi­li­ties in various directions.

Noise reduction and automation make rail more attractive

Noise reduction and automation make rail more attractive

A con­sidera­ble poten­ti­al for more sus­taina­bi­li­ty in rail freight trans­port lies in noise aba­te­ment. Noise must be fur­ther redu­ced so that an increase in rail freight trans­port can be rea­li­sed wit­hout signi­fi­cant increa­ses in noise. This will then bene­fit the envi­ron­ment and the popu­la­ti­on. The spea­k­ers at the Noise Rese­arch Forum 2021 explai­ned which con­cepts and mea­su­res are curr­ent­ly being exami­ned and are promising.

At the Noise Rese­arch Forum 2021, the focus was on an essen­ti­al aspect of future-proof rail freight trans­port: auto­ma­ti­on. For rail to beco­me more attrac­ti­ve for freight trans­port, it must beco­me more effi­ci­ent and sus­tainable. One exam­p­le of this is the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAK). It repres­ents a major mile­stone in auto­ma­ti­on and allows for a con­sidera­ble increase in effi­ci­en­cy in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port. If rail freight trans­port beco­mes more cost-effec­ti­ve, the share of rail in the total volu­me of traf­fic can increase, which favours CO2 reduction.

The manage­ment of infra­struc­tu­re and traf­fic must also be incre­asing­ly auto­ma­ted and digi­ta­li­sed. Real-time infor­ma­ti­on for cus­to­mers on the trans­port or safe ope­ra­ti­on of the wagons used and the cor­rect loa­ding as well as semi-auto­no­mous ope­ra­ti­on of the sidings streng­then rail freight trans­port. Start-up finan­cing would faci­li­ta­te the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, while at the same time sub­si­dies could be reduced.

The VAP makes a signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­on to streng­thening the inno­va­ti­ve strength and the will to trans­form of its mem­bers. Only in this way can rail freight trans­port beco­me more attrac­ti­ve and deve­lop into a valid alter­na­ti­ve to the road. To this end, the VAP sup­ports its mem­bers in the imple­men­ta­ti­on of auto­ma­ti­on in Switz­er­land, always in coor­di­na­ti­on with deve­lo­p­ments and requi­re­ments in Europe.

Detailed information from the Railway Noise Research Forum 2021

Rudolf Sper­lich, Vice-Direc­tor of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), wel­co­med the par­ti­ci­pan­ts and loo­ked back on the deve­lo­p­ment of noise reme­dia­ti­on to clas­si­fy the forum. He explai­ned Switzerland’s pio­nee­ring role in Euro­pe and noted that the pro­gram­me had been imple­men­ted very suc­cessful­ly in terms of costs and dead­lines. Howe­ver, becau­se the effect fell just short of the sta­tu­to­ry reme­dia­ti­on tar­get, the par­lia­ment unani­mously adopted addi­tio­nal mea­su­res in 2013. Inno­va­ti­on assis­tance and depart­ment­al rese­arch are two of these sup­ple­men­ta­ry instru­ments that will expi­re in 2025. For this reason, a wealth of ideas, net­wor­king and the will to inno­va­te are once again cal­led for in order to help the new, inte­res­t­ing approa­ches to suc­cess or to broad application.

Paul Stef­fen, Vice Direc­tor at the Fede­ral Office for the Envi­ron­ment (FOEN), poin­ted out in his wel­co­me address the need for fur­ther inno­va­tions in the rail­ways. Inno­va­ti­on is still neces­sa­ry, not only for the health of resi­dents, but also to streng­then the envi­ron­men­tal advan­ta­ge of rail over road and thus to main­tain mar­ket share in freight transport.

Det­lef Schli­ckel­mann, repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of the VAP Swiss Rail Ship­pers Asso­cia­ti­on, explai­ned that the noise reme­dia­ti­on pro­ject ended in 2016 with the com­mis­sio­ning of the last 4,000 or so refur­bis­hed wagons. The indus­try had suc­cessful­ly orga­nis­ed the enti­re pro­cess of series engi­nee­ring, appr­oval, con­ver­si­on incl. mate­ri­al pool and finan­cing under the pro­ject manage­ment of the VAP. Schli­ckel­mann added that the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAK) pro­ject would crea­te a great increase in effi­ci­en­cy in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port and that the VAP wan­ted to write a second suc­cess story for the pro­gress of rail freight trans­port with the rapid imple­men­ta­ti­on of the DAK project.

Rail­way noise rese­arch accor­ding to the Fede­ral Rail­way Noise Aba­te­ment Act (BGLE)
Fredy Fischer, Depu­ty Head of the Noise and NIR Divi­si­on at the FOEN, empha­sis­ed in his intro­duc­to­ry pre­sen­ta­ti­on how important it is for the rail­ways to beco­me even quie­ter. He cal­led on the indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves to crea­te a com­mon visi­on of the quiet rail­way. If this requi­red rese­arch or deve­lo­p­ment, he said, the fede­ral govern­ment would be happy to sup­port projects.

5L demons­tra­tor train
Jens-Erik Gal­diks, head of fleet tech­no­lo­gy at SBB Cargo, used the “5L demons­tra­tor train” pro­ject to show that cur­rent tech­no­lo­gies can redu­ce the noise of freight wagons by a fur­ther 6 dB. Here, it is important to keep an eye on and con­sider the cost-bene­fit ratio. Other effects such as wear reduc­tion are also signi­fi­cant. These com­mer­cial effects do not neces­s­a­ri­ly accrue to the inves­tor. The­r­e­fo­re, a balan­ce of bene­fits bet­ween infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers, rail­way under­ta­kings and wagon kee­pers must be crea­ted. Jens-Erik Gal­diks fur­ther sta­ted that a fur­ther noise reduc­tion of freight wagons would be dis­pro­por­tio­na­te at pre­sent and that other mea­su­res such as opti­mi­sa­ti­on of loco­mo­ti­ves should be pursued.

Over­all opti­mi­sed inno­va­ti­ve freight wagon
Dr Hanno Schell, Head of Inno­va­ti­on at VTG Rail Euro­pe GmbH, spoke about the goal of desig­ning a quie­ter freight wagon. The first step was to redu­ce the weight by 800 kg and the sound from 83 dB(A) to 76 dB(A). VTG fur­ther deve­lo­ped the bogie of the type RC25NT-H‑D from the com­pa­ny ELH Eisen­bahn­lauf­wer­ke Halle GmbH & Co. KG fur­ther. It repla­ced the fric­tion dam­ping with hydrau­lic dam­ping. This enab­led it to save 200 kg per bogie in the cross beam at the draw­bar. VTG also instal­led Bona­trans wheel­sets with a noise-redu­cing BASF coa­ting. A wel­ded steel disc was used for the disc brake, which is 49 kg ligh­ter than con­ven­tio­nal cast discs; a fur­ther 13 kg could be saved on the disc brake cali­per. Various tests have alre­a­dy been car­ri­ed out in Switz­er­land with the quie­ter bogie. All in all, it would allow hig­her dri­ving speeds, take more weight and, thanks to the hydrau­lic dam­ping, have very good run­ning characteristics.

Com­po­si­te wheel­set
Pro­fes­sor Masoud Mota­val­li, head of the Struc­tu­ral Engi­nee­ring Depart­ment at the Swiss Fede­ral Labo­ra­to­ries for Mate­ri­als Test­ing and Rese­arch (Empa), spoke about the use of light­weight and high-strength fibre-rein­forced pla­s­tics to pro­du­ce a com­po­si­te wheel­set and a com­po­si­te bogie. A fea­si­bi­li­ty study show­ed that the desi­gned wheel­set was 40% ligh­ter than the con­ven­tio­nal metal ver­si­on. In addi­ti­on, a noise reduc­tion of 3 dB was achie­ved. The car­bon fibre-rein­forced pla­s­tics are cor­ro­si­on-resistant, have a very long ser­vice life and high fati­gue strength, but are much more expen­si­ve com­pared to clas­sic mate­ri­als. Masoud Mota­val­li the­r­e­fo­re pro­po­ses to design an enti­re bogie out of com­po­si­tes, becau­se this would make opti­mi­sed pri­cing more fea­si­ble. He is con­vin­ced that a mas­si­ve weight reduc­tion would be pos­si­ble and the self-dam­ping of the mate­ri­al would redu­ce the num­ber of dam­pers. In addi­ti­on, other inno­va­tions could be incor­po­ra­ted, for exam­p­le self-stee­ring, which would redu­ce the wear and tear on the tracks. All this would bring a signi­fi­cant noise reduc­tion com­pared to con­ven­tio­nal bogies.

Deve­lo­p­ment of a super­s­truc­tu­re simu­la­ti­on tool
In his pre­sen­ta­ti­on, Jean Marc Wun­der­li, Head of the Acoustics/Noise Reduc­tion Depart­ment at Empa, pre­sen­ted a nume­ri­cal model for the simu­la­ti­on of roll­over pro­ces­ses, which simu­la­tes the resul­ting cont­act forces, the struc­tu­ral vibra­ti­ons and final­ly the radia­ted air­bor­ne sound in three modu­les. Mr Wun­der­li empha­sis­ed that simu­la­ti­on tools that model­led the sound gene­ra­ti­on and radia­ti­on of the rol­ling noise of rail­ways in a phy­si­cal­ly cor­rect man­ner were a man­da­to­ry pre­re­qui­si­te for opti­mi­sa­ti­ons to the vehic­le and super­s­truc­tu­re. Due to the high com­ple­xi­ty of the sys­tem and the part­ly con­tra­dic­to­ry requi­re­ments (noise, vibra­ti­ons, wear, posi­tio­nal sta­bi­li­ty …), a trial-and-error approach was not expedient.

“Rail pads – less rol­ling noise and more pro­tec­tion
Hol­ger Frau­en­rath, pro­fes­sor at the Insti­tu­te of Mate­ri­als Sci­ence at the Ecole Poly­tech­ni­que Fédé­ra­le de Lau­sanne (EPFL), pre­sen­ted a pro­ject to deve­lop new types of rail pads. These should enable both bet­ter pro­tec­tion of the rail­way super­s­truc­tu­re and a noise reduc­tion of at least 1 dB (A) com­pared to con­ven­tio­nal rail pads. The mul­ti­di­sci­pli­na­ry pro­ject team brings tog­e­ther rese­ar­chers from EPFL, HEIG Yver­don and Empa from the fields of mate­ri­als sci­ence, nume­ri­cal simu­la­ti­on, vibroa­cou­stics, envi­ron­men­tal engi­neers and rail­way experts from SBB. Based on an expe­ri­men­tal model­ling chain ran­ging from the mate­ri­al pro­per­ties to the beha­viour of a rail pad as a com­po­nent to the sys­tem beha­viour in the track, new multi-mate­ri­al rail pads with a soft core with high dam­ping capa­ci­ty bet­ween 200 and 2’000 Hz are deve­lo­ped. These will be opti­mi­sed for a good balan­ce bet­ween mecha­ni­cal sta­bi­li­ty, noise reduc­tion and per­ma­nent way pro­tec­tion. Designs are curr­ent­ly being tes­ted to Euro­pean stan­dards and pre­pared for the final deve­lo­p­ment phase, which will invol­ve the pro­duc­tion of engi­nee­ring-scale pro­to­ty­pes for field tri­als in the track from March 2022. The new rail pads will be of inte­rest both for redu­ced noise pol­lu­ti­on in den­se­ly popu­la­ted count­ries and for rail­way ope­ra­tors, as they should redu­ce the costs of main­tai­ning the per­ma­nent way.

Opti­mi­sed con­cre­te slee­per, opti­mi­sed inter­me­dia­te layer
Dr Chris­ti­an Czol­be, Seni­or Engi­neer Acou­stics at PROSE AG, show­ed that noise along rail­way lines depends on both the rol­ling stock and the com­pon­ents in the track. For the infra­struc­tu­re, it the­r­e­fo­re makes sense to take mea­su­res that increase rail dam­ping and redu­ce rail noise. In a rese­arch pro­ject, PROSE deve­lo­ped acou­sti­cal­ly opti­mi­sed con­cre­te slee­pers tog­e­ther with Vigier Rail and exami­ned two pro­mi­sing pro­to­ty­pes in a test track. In ano­ther pro­ject, an incon­spi­cuous and bare­ly visi­ble com­po­nent bet­ween rail and slee­per was opti­mi­sed. Dr. Chris­ti­an Czol­be sta­ted that the deve­lo­ped Bate­gu inter­me­dia­te layer unites a long­stan­ding demand of the rail­way indus­try: it dam­pens the dyna­mic impact loads in the super­s­truc­tu­re and redu­ces noise at the same time. With a mea­su­red noise reduc­tion of up to 5 dB (A), it would be signi­fi­cant­ly quie­ter along the line, which resi­dents could per­cei­ve and con­firm imme­dia­te­ly after its instal­la­ti­on. It also pro­tects the track super­s­truc­tu­re and thus leads to a reduc­tion in life cycle costs – a win-win situa­ti­on for the rail­way indus­try and resi­dents. The new Bate­gu inter­me­dia­te layer has pas­sed all rele­vant stan­dard and field tests as well as the fati­gue strength tests and is now available for safe series use in the rail­way infrastructure.

Mea­su­re­ment of acou­stic rough­ness
Flo­ri­an Mauz, rese­arch asso­cia­te and doc­to­ral stu­dent at ETH Zurich, pre­sen­ted a deve­lo­p­ment approach for an opti­cal mea­su­ring device for mea­su­ring acou­stic rough­ness on rails. In the future, it should be pos­si­ble to mea­su­re the rough­ness from the moving train. By cle­ver­ly com­bi­ning seve­ral sen­sors, the mea­su­re­ment result could be opti­mi­sed. Flo­ri­an Mauz show­ed the test setup and the series of tests in a labo­ra­to­ry envi­ron­ment. Soon the approach would be tes­ted on a moving train and vali­da­ted for its accuracy.

The link to the Forum’s web­site is www.laermforschung-eisenbahn.ch.

Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on on the depart­ment­al rail­way rese­arch and the award cri­te­ria can be found on the FOEN web­site (in ger­man, french or italian).