INTEROPERABILITY

The VAP is com­mit­ted to inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. This means har­mo­ni­s­ing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run free­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Swiss freight trans­port knows no bor­ders. Many of our mem­bers are inter­na­tio­nal­ly acti­ve and regu­lar­ly serve the EU area. To ensu­re that we can con­ti­nue to pro­vi­de you with this access to an inte­res­t­ing mar­ket poten­ti­al in the future, we are invol­ved in the inter­na­tio­nal arena.

 

  • The «Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wag­on­kee­pers» – UIP for short – pur­sues Euro­pean freight trans­port poli­cy. We at the VAP foun­ded the UIP in 1950 and have been incor­po­ra­ting the Swiss per­spec­ti­ve in Euro­pe ever since.
  • The «Euro­pean Rail Freight Asso­cia­ti­on» sums up its goal: «We deli­ver com­pe­ti­ti­on!». We are also clo­se­ly asso­cia­ted with this orga­ni­sa­ti­on and pro­vi­de its Vice-President.
Bilaterals III: Switzerland must be involved in the future of rail freight transport

Bilaterals III: Switzerland must be involved in the future of rail freight transport

The Fede­ral Coun­cil has given the go-ahead for the Bila­te­ral Agree­ments III­wi­th the defi­ni­ti­ve nego­tia­ting man­da­te. Nego­tia­ti­ons on the so-cal­led Bila­te­rals III began on 18 March 2024. We at the VAP sup­port the efforts of the man­da­te in the area of over­land trans­port. Switz­er­land must be able to help shape the far-rea­ching rene­wal of the rail freight trans­port system.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Sta­bi­li­sing Swiss-EU relations
  • Man­da­te takes into account the fears of SBB and trade unions
  • VAP wel­co­mes con­ti­nua­tion of the dialogue
  • Joi­ning forces in favour of rail as the mode of trans­port of the future
 
Stabilising Swiss-EU relations

At its mee­ting on 8 March 2024, the Fede­ral Coun­cil adopted the man­da­te for nego­tia­ti­ons with the Euro­pean Union (EU). The nego­tia­ti­ons on the com­pre­hen­si­ve packa­ge are inten­ded to sta­bi­li­se and fur­ther deve­lop bila­te­ral rela­ti­ons bet­ween Switz­er­land and the Euro­pean Union. They star­ted on 18 March 2024. In its man­da­te, the Fede­ral Coun­cil has adopted a num­ber of recom­men­da­ti­ons, inclu­ding mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on in the elec­tri­ci­ty sec­tor, the pre­ser­va­ti­on of the coope­ra­ti­on model in the over­land trans­port sec­tor and the reten­ti­on of cus­toms tariffs in the agri­cul­tu­ral sec­tor. Other adopted recom­men­da­ti­ons rela­te to immi­gra­ti­on, wage pro­tec­tion and insti­tu­tio­nal elements.

Mandate takes into account the fears of SBB and trade unions

In its «Report on the results of the con­sul­ta­ti­on on the draft nego­tia­ting man­da­te bet­ween Switz­er­land and the Euro­pean Union on the sta­bi­li­sa­ti­on and deve­lo­p­ment of their rela­ti­ons», the Fede­ral Coun­cil sta­tes that the model of SBB coope­ra­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal rail pas­sen­ger trans­port remains pos­si­ble, that Switz­er­land may con­ti­nue to allo­ca­te train paths and that the rules for inter­na­tio­nal pas­sen­ger trans­port must not impair the Swiss qua­li­ty of public rail trans­port. In its nego­tia­ting man­da­te, it also gua­ran­tees tariff inte­gra­ti­on, a syn­chro­nis­ed time­ta­ble and a modal shift from road to rail. The regu­la­to­ry dia­lo­gue in the finan­cial sec­tor bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU will be resu­med. In doing so, he dis­pels the unfoun­ded fears of SBB and the trade uni­ons of the «dark forces» of competition.

VAP welcomes resumption of dialogue

In our state­ment of 12 Febru­ary 2024, we at the VAP wel­co­me the fact that the govern­ment – in par­ti­cu­lar the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) and the Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port, Ener­gy and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC) – is con­ti­nuing its efforts to make pro­gress on the key dos­sier for the rail sec­tor in rea­li­stic stages despi­te the exis­ting poli­ti­cal dead­lock bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. After all, mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on offers Switz­er­land inte­res­t­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties such as gua­ran­teed inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, grea­ter inno­va­ti­ve strength and hig­her effi­ci­en­cy. In this con­text, we also sup­port the revi­si­on of the Rail­way Act and wel­co­me the fact that there are alre­a­dy con­cre­te pro­po­sals for amend­ments at ordi­nan­ce level.

We con­sider the rea­li­sa­ti­on of ERA mem­ber­ship for Switz­er­land fol­lo­wing the suc­cessful nego­tia­ti­ons to be the next mile­stone. The ERA has crea­ted expert sta­tus spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for Switz­er­land. This means that Swiss experts can alre­a­dy par­ti­ci­pa­te in the ERA com­mit­tees for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the com­mon spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons. In addi­ti­on, Switz­er­land has been sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly adop­ting rules from the EU’s Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty Direc­ti­ve and Safe­ty Direc­ti­ve for years. Over­all, Switz­er­land has a great inte­rest in secu­ring sus­tainable access to the Euro­pean rail­way sec­tor as soon as pos­si­ble through full ERA mem­ber­ship – not only to par­ti­ci­pa­te but also to have a say in decision-making.

We sup­port the pre­sent nego­tia­ting man­da­te in the area of land trans­port. In our view, the mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal pas­sen­ger trans­port, which has not been imple­men­ted for years, is neces­sa­ry and offers oppor­tu­ni­ties for inte­res­t­ing deve­lo­p­ments despi­te the rest­ric­tions imposed.The pro­ce­du­re for inte­gra­ting the insti­tu­tio­nal ele­ments into the sec­to­ral agree­ments is jus­ti­fia­ble based on our pre­vious expe­ri­ence in the deve­lo­p­ment of legis­la­ti­on with the invol­vement of Swiss experts.

Joining forces in favour of rail as the mode of transport of the future

Rail freight trans­port should regain mar­ket share thanks to inno­va­ti­on – that is what the EU wants and that is what Switz­er­land wants too.However, we need long-term stra­te­gies and strong inves­tors to achie­ve this.Stability is the indis­pensable basis for inter­na­tio­nal trans­port coope­ra­ti­on (see blog post «Sta­bi­li­ty as an indis­pensable basis for inter­na­tio­nal trans­port coope­ra­ti­on»).The inno­va­ti­on for future rail freight trans­port with digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on is curr­ent­ly being deve­lo­ped in the EU.Switzerland wants to par­ti­ci­pa­te and have a say in sha­ping this far-rea­ching rene­wal of the rail freight trans­port system.

This is only pos­si­ble in an effi­ci­ent and sus­tainable man­ner if poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces are resol­ved and there is suf­fi­ci­ent cla­ri­ty about future coope­ra­ti­on. This includes Switz­er­land rejoi­ning the Hori­zon 2020 rese­arch and inno­va­ti­on pro­gram­me, an update of the over­land trans­port agree­ment bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU and bila­te­ral agree­ments on bor­der ope­ra­ting rou­tes with our neigh­bou­ring countries.

Stability as an indispensable basis for international transport cooperation

Stability as an indispensable basis for international transport cooperation

Once again, the sta­tus quo was saved in the Joint Com­mit­tee on the Land Trans­port Agree­ment, despi­te the gloo­my out­look. In 2024, the EU will once again grant Switz­er­land limi­t­ed access to the ERA data plat­form OSS for one year. How long does Switz­er­land want to con­ti­nue working with these dithe­ring parties?

That’s the question:

  • What is the aim of the Fede­ral Office of Transport?
  • Why is inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on important?
  • Switz­er­land must move
  • Sta­bi­li­ty is cen­tral to sol­ving upco­ming tasks
 
What is the Federal Office of Transport’s goal?

Trains should be able to tra­vel across bor­ders with as few obs­ta­cles as pos­si­ble. The Swiss stan­dard-gauge net­work forms a cen­tral part of the inter­ope­ra­ble Euro­pean rail net­work (Sin­gle Euro­pean Rail­way Area). To make this pos­si­ble, the FOT peri­odi­cal­ly har­mo­ni­s­es the sove­reign Swiss rail­way regu­la­ti­ons with the cur­rent Euro­pean rules of the Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty Direc­ti­ve and the Safe­ty Direc­ti­ve. Switz­er­land should be able to act as an equal part­ner to the mem­ber sta­tes in the area of respon­si­bi­li­ty of the EU Trans­port Com­mis­si­on (DG MOVE). The over­land trans­port agree­ment plays a cen­tral role in this bila­te­ral coope­ra­ti­on. Rati­fied agree­ments crea­te legal cer­tain­ty and predictability.

Why is international cooperation important?

The EU wants to com­ple­te­ly over­haul the exis­ting natio­nal rail­way sys­tem and deve­lop it into the strong mode of trans­port of the future. In future, modern trains are to run across bor­ders on an effi­ci­ent and stan­dar­di­sed rail net­work wit­hout any obs­ta­cles. For this far-rea­ching trans­for­ma­ti­on, rail ope­ra­ti­ons must be rede­si­gned from the ground up and new stan­dar­di­sed sys­tems with trans­pa­rent inter­faces must be deve­lo­ped and intro­du­ced. This can only be achie­ved with cen­tra­li­sed coor­di­na­ti­on and gui­ded cross-bor­der coope­ra­ti­on. The 4th Rail­way Packa­ge, which came into force in 2019, forms the legal basis for this: as a Euro­pean agen­cy, ERA is now respon­si­ble for the tech­ni­cal design of stan­dar­di­sed pro­ce­du­res and rules as well as for mana­ging Euro­pean aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on pro­ce­du­res. For the neces­sa­ry deve­lo­p­ments, the EU crea­ted new com­pre­hen­si­ve orga­ni­sa­ti­ons with «Europe’s Rail» as part of «Hori­zon» and pro­vi­ded them with con­sidera­ble finan­cial resour­ces. Minis­tries, rail­way com­pa­nies, asso­cia­ti­ons and indus­try are cal­led upon to actively par­ti­ci­pa­te in the ERJU’s num­e­rous working groups, con­sis­ting of the Sys­tem and Inno­va­ti­on Pil­lars, and to con­tri­bu­te their exper­ti­se to sha­ping the future Euro­pean rail­way sys­tem. The topic of «DAK» is also an inte­gral part of this organisation.

Switzerland must move forward

Over the past 25 years, Switz­er­land has adopted many ele­ments from the newly orga­nis­ed EU rail­way world. Thanks to the pro­ven equi­va­lence, important steps towards inte­gra­ti­on into the Euro­pean rail­way sys­tem have been achie­ved. The Fede­ral Council’s decis­i­on to break off nego­tia­ti­ons on an insti­tu­tio­nal agree­ment (InstA) has also meant that no sub­stan­ti­al fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the land trans­port agree­ment has been pos­si­ble in the trans­port sec­tor since 2021. Switz­er­land must now choo­se bet­ween iso­la­ti­on and cooperation.

Stability is key to solving upcoming tasks

The com­pre­hen­si­ve trans­for­ma­ti­on of the exis­ting Euro­pean rail­ways, which are stron­gly natio­nal in cha­rac­ter, into a modern, effi­ci­ent over­all trans­port sys­tem requi­res a joint, coor­di­na­ted effort – going it alone could have serious con­se­quen­ces. Those who are part of it can par­ti­ci­pa­te and play an acti­ve role in sha­ping it.

Switz­er­land must now do its homework:

  • Sett­le poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces with the EU
  • Ensu­re per­ma­nent par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the «Hori­zon 2020» rese­arch programme
  • Update the EU-CH land trans­port agreement 
    • Imple­ment the rail­way packa­ge mar­ket part (mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on at least in inter­na­tio­nal pas­sen­ger transport)
    • Com­ple­te rail packa­ge (adapt EBV, ERA mem­ber­ship, reco­g­ni­se ERA aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­ons, regu­la­te ERA competences)
  • Reac­ti­va­te bila­te­ral agree­ments on cross-bor­der routes

Trans­port and logi­stics are trans­na­tio­nal. The plan­ned migra­ti­on to digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of the rail­ways requi­res a wil­ling­ness to make far-rea­ching chan­ges on the one hand and major invest­ments on the other. Both will only be pos­si­ble in an effi­ci­ent and sus­tainable man­ner if there is suf­fi­ci­ent cla­ri­ty about future cooperation.

Marco Rosso: «Collaborative innovation can contribute to the quality of life and function profitably at the same time.»

Marco Rosso: «Collaborative innovation can contribute to the quality of life and function profitably at the same time.»

Marco Rosso is Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors of Cargo sous ter­rain AG (CST). In an inter­view with the VAP, he talks about inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, non-dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on on the last mile and the logi­stics of the future. And about how col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve inno­va­ti­on can con­tri­bu­te to the qua­li­ty of life of peo­p­le in Switz­er­land and func­tion pro­fi­ta­b­ly at the same time.

VAP: Mr Rosso, how do you see the rela­ti­onship bet­ween rail freight and CST in the future?

Marco Rosso: Rail and CST are two sys­tems that com­ple­ment each other. CST coope­ra­tes with all modes of trans­port to joint­ly absorb the pre­dic­ted freight traf­fic growth of over 30% by 2050 in an inno­va­ti­ve, sus­tainable way. Becau­se CST is not sui­ta­ble for all trans­ports, the com­pa­ny sup­ports the busi­ness models of rail, road hau­liers and other logi­stics play­ers with new tech­no­lo­gy and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. Only with coope­ra­ti­on (within the frame­work of com­pe­ti­ti­on rules) can inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty be gua­ran­teed among the most diver­se modes of trans­port and trans­port com­pa­nies. The­r­e­fo­re, CST plans to con­nect to rail, road, ship, air freight and other sys­tems. At the CST hubs, there will be mul­ti­mo­dal con­nec­tions, in par­ti­cu­lar also a rail con­nec­tion. In the con­s­truc­tion phase, start­ing as early as 2026 and con­ti­nuing until 2045, CST will use rail trans­port to the tune of 2,000 goods trains per year and thus beco­me an important rail customer.

Should­n’t the state crea­te the infra­struc­tu­re and the ope­ra­ti­on in the tun­nels, as well as the ope­ra­ti­on of the ter­mi­nals and the last/first mile would then be free and sub­ject to competition?

CST is a sys­tem that only works as a whole becau­se all pro­ces­ses are con­trol­led end-to-end. This is the only way to ensu­re that the gene­ral cargo rea­ches its desti­na­ti­on on time and relia­bly. For this reason, the sys­tem must be mana­ged from a sin­gle source and at the same time be con­nec­ta­ble to all part­ner plat­forms. CST has been plan­ned and con­cei­ved as a pri­va­te-sec­tor pro­ject from the very begin­ning. With this finan­cing con­cept, it is pos­si­ble and important to move for­ward quick­ly wit­hout strai­ning the funds in the fede­ral bud­get. The inves­tors also include important future cus­to­mers. They help to deve­lop the sys­tem in line with the mar­ket. The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has reco­g­nis­ed that it would not be expe­di­ent to act as a crea­tor its­elf, but to limit its­elf to the legal frame­work. With careful­ly pre­pared busi­ness plans, com­pe­ti­ti­ve pri­ces and the broad inves­tor base that sup­ports the pro­ject, CST shows that inno­va­ti­on in freight trans­port con­tri­bu­tes to the qua­li­ty of life in cities and rural areas and can func­tion pro­fi­ta­b­ly at the same time.

Where do you see the big­gest chal­lenges in your project?

Such a com­pre­hen­si­ve pro­ject pres­ents many chal­lenges, for exam­p­le in plan­ning, legal, envi­ron­men­tal, finan­cial and poli­ti­cal terms. What distin­gu­is­hes CST is the model of col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve inno­va­ti­on – with the inclu­si­on of all stake­hol­ders. The pro­ject approa­ches the chal­lenges prag­ma­ti­cal­ly in stages.

How do you design a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry first/last mile?

Our sys­tem is plan­ned to be non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry from the start any­way, wit­hout the law requi­ring it. The fol­lo­wing appli­es throug­hout: ever­yo­ne has access to the sys­tem with the same price for the same ser­vice. But we go even fur­ther, for exam­p­le, by deve­lo­ping CST’s city logi­stics in a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve part­ner­ship and are open to any coope­ra­ti­on with smal­ler as well as lar­ger part­ners, inclu­ding the rail­ways and the post office. Here, too, our prin­ci­ple is col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve inno­va­ti­on, which we live by every day.

What is the grea­test bene­fit or moti­va­ti­on of CST for the Swiss population?

The most important effect of CST will be to increase the qua­li­ty of life for all inha­bi­tants of Switz­er­land. By show­ing a way how the logi­stics of the future can look sus­tainable, how heavy traf­fic on the road can be moved away by bund­ling and pre-sort­ing in tun­nels for all ship­pers, or how a traf­fic jam can be avo­ided for the sup­p­ly of goods, how to get the best out of the available resour­ces in terms of CO2 emis­si­ons, noise, etc. The pre­cious space on the sur­face should pri­ma­ri­ly belong to the popu­la­ti­on. CST favours the expan­si­on of infra­struc­tu­re as well as rene­wa­ble ener­gies in Switz­er­land. CST is a pri­va­te­ly finan­ced dri­ver of inno­va­ti­on for the bene­fit of the Swiss eco­no­my and for qua­li­ty of life in cities and vil­la­ges by gua­ran­te­e­ing secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly and thus incre­asing pro­spe­ri­ty in Switzerland.

Are there any points that you think we should still let our mem­bers know about?

There are decisi­ve decis­i­ons and dis­cus­sions ahead, espe­ci­al­ly against the back­ground of the poli­ti­cal deba­tes on freight trans­port. We are firm­ly con­vin­ced that with an entre­pre­neu­ri­al atti­tu­de we can make an effec­ti­ve con­tri­bu­ti­on to main­tai­ning Switz­er­land in the 21st cen­tu­ry as an excel­lent busi­ness loca­ti­on with a high qua­li­ty of life, also for future gene­ra­ti­ons. We par­ti­ci­pa­te in this work with enthu­si­asm and commitment.

Mr Rosso, thank you very much for the interview.

REVISION OF THE RAILWAY ACT: FULL EFFECT MAY NOT MATERIALISE

REVISION OF THE RAILWAY ACT: FULL EFFECT MAY NOT MATERIALISE

On 12 Sep­tem­ber 2023, the Natio­nal Coun­cil appro­ved the revi­si­on of the Rail­ways Act (EBG), fol­lo­wing its unani­mous appr­oval by the Coun­cil of Sta­tes in the 2023 sum­mer ses­si­on. Howe­ver, the revi­si­on of the Rail­ways Act can­not be fully imple­men­ted until the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge is included in the land trans­port agree­ment or the tran­si­tio­nal solu­ti­on with the EU is exten­ded. Inef­fi­ci­en­ci­es could the­r­e­fo­re remain.

That’s the point:
  • What has hap­pen­ed so far
  • Switz­er­land has adopted three EU rail­way packages
  • Revi­sed EBG crea­tes equi­va­lent conditions
  • Ordi­nan­ces must also be adapted
  • Inclu­si­on of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge in the Land Trans­port Agree­ment necessary
 
What has happened so far

The 4th EU rail­way packa­ge has been in force since 16 June 2019 and the EU Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA) is now respon­si­ble for issuing uni­form safe­ty cer­ti­fi­ca­tes and appr­ovals for rol­ling stock for cross-bor­der traf­fic. In the 2023 sum­mer ses­si­on, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes appro­ved its committee’s request to amend the Rail­ways Act (imple­men­ta­ti­on of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way package).

The 4th EU rail­way packa­ge con­ta­ins three key elements:

  1. The appli­ca­ble regu­la­ti­ons are to be sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly har­mo­nis­ed in all par­ti­ci­pa­ting count­ries. This is achie­ved through insti­tu­tio­na­li­sed entry into force pro­ce­du­res for the tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, TSIs and their updates. This means that TSIs published by the EU Com­mis­si­on are now direct­ly valid in all count­ries; natio­nal imple­men­ta­ti­on pro­ces­ses are no lon­ger required.
  2. ERA moni­tors the rem­oval of obso­le­te natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons by the respon­si­ble natio­nal super­vi­so­ry authorities.
  3. ERA now coor­di­na­tes the aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on pro­ce­du­res and issues uni­form, cross-bor­der ope­ra­ting licences.

ERA ope­ra­tes the online vehic­le aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on por­tal “One Stop Shop”. It works clo­se­ly with the natio­nal super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties when che­cking aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on dos­siers. Today, an appli­ca­ti­on for aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on can be made and the cor­re­spon­ding dos­sier sub­mit­ted in ERA’s “One Stop Shop”. The ERA exami­nes the dos­sier in con­sul­ta­ti­on with the natio­nal super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties invol­ved and issues an ope­ra­ting licence that is direct­ly valid in all the count­ries appli­ed for.

Switzerland has adopted three EU railway packages

Switz­er­land has adopted the rele­vant tech­ni­cal pro­vi­si­ons of the three EU rail­way packa­ges as part of the land trans­port agree­ment with the EU. It alre­a­dy sits as an obser­ver on the rele­vant com­mit­tees for the ongo­ing deve­lo­p­ment of inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and co-ope­ra­tes with the ERA. It has not yet been pos­si­ble to join the ERA.

Revised EBG creates equivalent conditions

The tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge includes the revi­si­on of the requi­re­ments for inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (Direc­ti­ve 2016/797) and rail­way safe­ty (Direc­ti­ve 2016/798). It also includes the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the ERA into an EU super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty with the One Stop Shop for stan­dar­di­sed pro­ce­du­res (see blog artic­le “Switz­er­land faces iso­la­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal rail trans­port”). The revi­si­on of the Rail­ways Act lays the foun­da­ti­ons for imple­men­ting the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th rail­way packa­ge. Accor­din­gly, all inter­ope­ra­ble Swiss rail­ways are to be sub­ject to the same con­di­ti­ons as EU mem­ber sta­tes and access to the sim­pli­fied aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on pro­ce­du­re is to be ope­ned up via ERA.

Ordinances also need to be amended

On the basis of the amend­ments to the EBG, the FOT can estab­lish the neces­sa­ry con­for­mi­ty with the EU direc­ti­ves in a second step at ordi­nan­ce level. It has the­r­e­fo­re alre­a­dy pre­pared the cor­re­spon­ding draft amend­ments to the ordi­nan­ces and had them review­ed by the EU Com­mis­si­on – with a favoura­ble result. Switz­er­land has thus inde­pendent­ly crea­ted the basis for the equi­va­lence of its legis­la­ti­on with that of the EU.

Inclusion of the 4th EU railway package in the land transport agreement necessary

With the imple­men­ted revi­si­on of the EBG, Switz­er­land has gai­ned valuable time. After all, it usual­ly takes seve­ral years for a revi­si­on of the law to come into force. In this case, the natio­nal legal frame­work is alre­a­dy in place. Howe­ver, the inclu­si­on of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge in the Land Trans­port Agree­ment and acces­si­on to the ERA are neces­sa­ry for it to take full effect. Neither is fore­seeable for the time being in the con­text of the fal­te­ring nego­tia­ti­ons bet­ween the EU and Switz­er­land. The EU requi­res an agree­ment on the frame­work agree­ment and the ope­ning of pas­sen­ger trans­port in Switz­er­land (part of the 3rd EU rail­way packa­ge). The lat­ter has so far fai­led to mate­ria­li­se; all attempts by the FOT to make con­ces­si­ons by sof­tening the mar­ket par­ti­tio­ning by Switz­er­land have so far been unsuccessful.

Full inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and a fun­da­men­tal sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­on of aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on pro­ce­du­res redu­ce admi­nis­tra­ti­ve and ope­ra­tio­nal costs. This is fun­da­men­tal for safe and com­pe­ti­ti­ve rail (freight) trans­port and thus for a suc­cessful modal shift.

Gotthard Base Tunnel (#4): Safety-critical components of freight wagons

Gotthard Base Tunnel (#4): Safety-critical components of freight wagons

The publicly published infor­ma­ti­on on the freight train derailm­ent in the Gott­hard Base Tun­nel indi­ca­tes a bro­ken wheel on the derai­led train. Over­loa­ding or mate­ri­al defects are under con­side­ra­ti­on as pos­si­ble cau­ses of the fail­ure. What actual­ly hap­pen­ed remains a mat­ter for the ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­ti­ons of the Swiss Trans­por­ta­ti­on Safe­ty Inves­ti­ga­ti­on Board (Sust).

Topics dis­cus­sed:

  • How are safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents manufactured?
  • How are they appro­ved and put into operation?
  • How are they maintained?
  • What signi­fi­can­ce does moni­to­ring have in daily operations?
  • Which moni­to­ring pos­si­bi­li­ties exist?
  • Uni­form rules enable safe coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween the actors
  • Out­look for digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC)

How are safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents manu­fac­tu­red?
Safe­ty-rele­vant and safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents such as wheel pans are desi­gned so as to per­form their task over the plan­ned peri­od of use under the pre­vai­ling con­di­ti­ons of ope­ra­ti­on and use and ther­eby to ensu­re safe tra­vel. The manu­fac­tu­ring firms make use of inter­na­tio­nal­ly reco­g­nis­ed stan­dards to accom­plish this:

  • Tech­ni­cal Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSI) estab­lish fun­da­men­tal requirements.
  • Euro­pean Stan­dards (EN) defi­ne the spe­ci­fic properties.
  • Manu­fac­tu­r­ers employ har­mo­nis­ed and stan­dar­di­sed safe­ty methods for deve­lo­p­ment and testing.
  • Stan­dar­di­sed safe­ty veri­fi­ca­ti­ons and assess­ments docu­ment the safe­ty and usability.

The inter­na­tio­nal expe­ri­en­ces from inci­dents and acci­dents con­ti­nuous­ly enter into the deve­lo­p­ment of the stan­dards and TSI.

How are they appro­ved and put into ope­ra­ti­on?
Brin­ging safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents onto the mar­ket requi­res an inter­na­tio­nal­ly stan­dar­di­sed appr­oval from the Euro­pean Agen­cy for Rail­ways (ERA) or a natio­nal safe­ty aut­ho­ri­ty. This con­sists of:

  • Type appr­ovals for com­pon­ents or vehicles
  • Con­for­mi­ty veri­fi­ca­ti­ons for iden­ti­cal seri­al parts or vehicles
  • CE mark (Con­for­mi­té Euro­pé­en­ne) for a com­po­nent that satis­fies the appli­ca­ble EU directives
  • Ope­ra­ting aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on for a vehic­le in com­pli­ance with the rules

The cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on that com­pon­ents were manu­fac­tu­red accor­ding to the requi­re­ments of stan­dards and TSI is issued by so-cal­led “noti­fied bodies”, in other words state-aut­ho­ri­sed agen­ci­es. These inspect and eva­lua­te whe­ther the manu­fac­tu­red pro­ducts con­form to the rules.

How are they main­tai­ned?
The manu­fac­tu­rer is obli­ged to defi­ne and publish the appli­ca­ble main­ten­an­ce requi­re­ments for all com­pon­ents or vehic­les. Wagon kee­pers must imple­ment these manu­fac­tu­rer requi­re­ments in accordance with the con­di­ti­ons of use. They appoint cer­ti­fied enti­ties in char­ge of main­ten­an­ce (ECMs) for their rol­ling stock. The lat­ter in turn estab­lish main­ten­an­ce requi­re­ments for the vehic­les assi­gned to them in con­side­ra­ti­on of their own know­ledge and indus­try exper­ti­se. They also plan regu­lar work, carry it out and docu­ment the results. Every wagon appro­ved for ope­ra­ti­on must be regis­tered in an offi­ci­al vehic­le regis­try, inclu­ding the name of the wagon kee­per and the ECM.

What signi­fi­can­ce does moni­to­ring have in daily ope­ra­ti­ons?
The rail­way under­ta­kings (RUs) are respon­si­ble for the safe tra­vel, pre­pa­ra­ti­on, dis­patching and other safe­ty aspects of their trains. They defi­ne the inspec­tions and tests for ensu­ring that every trip can be com­ple­ted safe­ly. To deter­mi­ne this ope­ra­tio­nal sui­ta­bi­li­ty, trai­ned employees carry out defi­ned visu­al inspec­tions befo­re depar­tu­re. This extre­me­ly deman­ding work takes place at all times of day and in all wea­ther. During the train dis­patching and the asso­cia­ted inspec­tions and tests, safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents are also affor­ded spe­cial attention.

Which moni­to­ring pos­si­bi­li­ties exist?
The wagon kee­pers are respon­si­ble for the pro­per main­ten­an­ce of their vehic­les. Safe­ty-rele­vant and safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents are regu­lar­ly inspec­ted, such as with ultra­sound mea­su­re­ments. Safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents are sub­ject not only to strict inspec­tions but also spe­cial obli­ga­ti­ons with regard to label­ling, main­ten­an­ce and tracea­bi­li­ty of the mea­su­res. The RUs can demand wagon-spe­ci­fic infor­ma­ti­on from the wagon keepers.

On the Swiss stan­dard gauge net­work, the infra­struc­tu­re ope­ra­tors curr­ent­ly main­tain over 250 way­si­de train moni­to­ring sys­tems. These moni­tor every vehic­le as it pas­ses by for irre­gu­la­ri­ties and can trig­ger alarms in the event of unac­cep­ta­ble devia­ti­ons. In this case, the respec­ti­ve train is imme­dia­te­ly stop­ped and inspected.

Uni­form rules enable safe coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween the actors
A varie­ty of dif­fe­rent com­pa­nies all work tog­e­ther in rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons. Every actor must be able to depend on the relia­bi­li­ty of the others at the points where they inter­face tog­e­ther. Their tasks and respon­si­bi­li­ties are cle­ar­ly and uni­form­ly regu­la­ted at the inter­na­tio­nal level. Har­mo­nis­ed regu­la­ti­ons for manu­fac­tu­re, ope­ra­ti­on and main­ten­an­ce ensu­re safe rail trans­port (for more on the regu­la­ti­ons gover­ning the inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on, check back on this blog again soon).

Out­look for digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC)
Bes­i­des imple­men­ta­ti­on of the appli­ca­ble requi­re­ments by every actor par­ti­ci­pa­ting in rail trans­port, new tech­no­lo­gies are now coming to the fore. Auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on can do more than sim­ply make ope­ra­ting pro­ces­ses more effi­ci­ent. They also open up new oppor­tu­ni­ties for ope­ra­tio­nal moni­to­ring of safe­ty-rele­vant and safe­ty-cri­ti­cal com­pon­ents in freight trains. The ongo­ing digi­tal recor­ding of the con­di­ti­on of these com­pon­ents offers an attrac­ti­ve oppor­tu­ni­ty to the respon­si­ble par­ties. By digi­tal­ly track­ing pro­ces­ses of wear and age­ing pro­ces­ses on each indi­vi­du­al vehic­le, it is pos­si­ble to effi­ci­ent­ly plan main­ten­an­ce work accor­ding to the actu­al needs. Faul­ty com­pon­ents can be iden­ti­fied and repla­ced befo­re a total fail­ure. If a com­po­nent fail­ure occurs during tra­vel, this can imme­dia­te­ly trig­ger an alarm.

To make use of this inno­va­ti­on in freight trans­port, the wagons requi­re sen­sor sys­tems, elec­tri­cal ener­gy and data com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with the train dri­ver, the sys­tems of the wagon kee­pers and the ECMs. These pre­re­qui­si­tes will be met with the plan­ned Euro­pe-wide intro­duc­tion of DAC (see the blog post “Data eco­sys­tems: Sha­ring data to dou­ble its added value”). In this way, auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on are trans­forming con­ven­tio­nal rail freight ope­ra­ti­ons into an intel­li­gent, effi­ci­ent, resi­li­ent and safe mode of transport.

Driving service regulations: Please simplify and harmonise internationally

Driving service regulations: Please simplify and harmonise internationally

The Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) is fur­ther deve­lo­ping the Swiss Dri­ving Ser­vice Regu­la­ti­ons (FDV2024) as part of the 2024 amend­ment cycle. Sys­te­ma­tic chan­ges are cen­tral. Here is a state­ment from the per­spec­ti­ve of the ship­ping industry.

 

This is what it’s all about:

  • Fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons from 2024 in force
  • Sys­te­mic sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­on for rail­way employees required
  • Con­sis­tent appli­ca­ti­on of the TSI OPE addi­tio­nal­ly increa­ses interoperability
  • Rail­way indus­try should take respon­si­bi­li­ty for the rules on dri­ving services
  • VAP wants more entre­pre­neu­ri­al lee­way for siding operators

For more than 20 years, uni­form train ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons have been in force in Switz­er­land, which are bin­ding for all rail­way under­ta­kings. They are essen­ti­al for rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons, as they defi­ne safe­ty-rele­vant acti­vi­ties and coope­ra­ti­on mea­su­res and spe­ci­fy the tasks, com­pe­ten­ces and respon­si­bi­li­ties of all those invol­ved in rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons. The FOT works clo­se­ly with the rail­way indus­try to fur­ther deve­lop the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons and update them every four years. This amend­ment cycle makes sense, as it takes into account both the daily expe­ri­en­ces from ope­ra­ti­ons and the tech­ni­cal deve­lo­p­ments in the rail­way indus­try. Howe­ver, it also has nega­ti­ve side effects: For exam­p­le, the TSO have grown into a jungle of regu­la­ti­ons that is dif­fi­cult to keep track of and that urgen­tly needs to be stream­li­ned and ali­gned with the inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty regu­la­ti­ons. The respon­si­ble com­pa­nies must be gran­ted more entre­pre­neu­ri­al free­dom. The cur­rent revi­si­on is sche­du­led to come into force on 1 July 2024[1]

Amendment cycle 2024 with important sub-projects

We at the VAP wel­co­me the sys­te­ma­tic fur­ther deve­lo­p­ments of the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons pro­po­sed by the FOT in the con­cep­tu­al sub-pro­jects (cf. Figu­re 1). We also sug­gest that the fun­da­men­tal inno­va­tions be imple­men­ted con­sis­t­ent­ly and quickly.

  • With sub-pro­ject 1 “STRUCTURE”, the FOT wants to sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly struc­tu­re the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons in order to make them more com­pre­hen­si­ble and uni­form for users. The full imple­men­ta­ti­on of this uni­fi­ca­ti­on will requi­re seve­ral rounds of amend­ments. It usual­ly makes sense to com­bi­ne struc­tu­ral har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on with mate­ri­al adjustments.
  • With sub-pro­jects 2a, 2b and 2c “Appli­ca­ti­on”, the FOT aims to crea­te the con­di­ti­ons for a sys­te­ma­tic digi­tal use of the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons. Each indi­vi­du­al regu­la­ti­on is assi­gned to a scope of appli­ca­ti­on or an opti­on. It is now spe­ci­fied who per­forms which func­tion. As soon as this sub-pro­ject is rea­li­sed, regu­la­ti­ons can be cle­ar­ly fil­te­red accor­ding to areas of appli­ca­ti­on and assi­gned to func­tions. This will mas­si­ve­ly increase effi­ci­en­cy in the crea­ti­on and in all appli­ca­ti­ons of regu­la­ti­ons, as it allows for digi­tal usage options.
  • Within the frame­work of sub-pro­ject 3 “Impact”, the FOT is requi­red to find a user-fri­end­ly stra­tegy to ensu­re the safe trans­fer of respon­si­bi­li­ty to the rail­way under­ta­kings during ongo­ing ope­ra­ti­ons. Accor­ding to TSI OPE (see box), the rail­way under­ta­kings are respon­si­ble for ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons; this should also apply in Switz­er­land in the future. The ongo­ing deve­lo­p­ment of the TSI OPE will also make it pos­si­ble to gra­du­al­ly abo­lish the exis­ting natio­nal rules of the rol­ling stock regu­la­ti­ons and to retain only man­da­to­ry natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons that have to be noti­fied to the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy ERA as Noti­fied Natio­nal Tech­ni­cal Regu­la­ti­ons (NNTV)[2].
  • Sub-pro­ject 4 “MATERIAL” includes a num­ber of con­tent-rela­ted adapt­a­ti­ons that update the run­ning ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons.
    Regu­la­ting coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween all stakeholders

Far-rea­ching chan­ges are on the hori­zon for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons as of 2024. We are con­vin­ced that rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons can­not be clas­si­fied as com­plex per se. It needs clear rules for the coope­ra­ti­on of all those invol­ved – espe­ci­al­ly becau­se the divi­si­on of labour, auto­ma­ti­on and spe­cia­li­sa­ti­on in rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons are incre­asing. The­r­e­fo­re, in our view, the fol­lo­wing aspects should be included:

Aim for simplification

There is a need for uni­form, com­pre­hen­si­ble and addres­see-appro­pria­te regu­la­ti­ons that apply across com­pa­nies. Employees should have all the neces­sa­ry rules for their respec­ti­ve func­tions and be able to work con­sis­t­ent­ly freed from unneces­sa­ry ballast.

The ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons should be for­mu­la­ted on a risk basis, and the rail­way com­pa­nies must deve­lop simp­le and cost-effec­ti­ve solu­ti­ons tail­o­red to them within a defi­ned over­all frame­work in order to pro­du­ce competitively.

Use digitalisation

With func­tion-based fil­ters, digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on enables a mas­si­ve increase in effi­ci­en­cy in the use of the dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons. Anyo­ne car­ry­ing out a safe­ty-rele­vant acti­vi­ty needs to know the regu­la­ti­ons rele­vant to it – but only these.

Ensuring entrepreneurial freedoms

We at the VAP stri­ve for fea­si­ble solu­ti­ons for sidings, as strict com­pli­ance with the regu­la­ti­ons defi­ned for rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons is not always pos­si­ble here. For sidings in par­ti­cu­lar, we recom­mend a risk-based approach to ensu­re more entre­pre­neu­ri­al free­dom. Spe­ci­fic regu­la­ti­ons are nee­ded to make the ope­ra­ti­on of sidings safe and cost-effi­ci­ent for ope­ra­ting com­pa­nies and employees.

Ensure interoperability

Inter­ope­ra­ble rail­ways that ope­ra­te on dif­fe­rent infra­struc­tures and across bor­ders in seve­ral count­ries have dif­fe­rent requi­re­ments than regio­nal rail­ways and rail­way sidings that only ope­ra­te local­ly. In view of the dif­fe­rent con­di­ti­ons at sta­ti­ons and sidings, the ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons must be desi­gned dif­fer­ent­ly, com­pre­hen­si­bly and con­cen­tra­ted on the essen­ti­als within the frame­work of a uni­form over­all struc­tu­re, depen­ding on the traf­fic and infrastructure.

In the stan­dard gauge sec­tor, the ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons are beco­ming incre­asing­ly har­mo­nis­ed inter­na­tio­nal­ly with the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the TSI OPE. The num­ber of remai­ning natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons must be kept to a mini­mum in order to impro­ve prac­ti­cal appli­ca­bi­li­ty. All count­ries invol­ved are requi­red to abo­lish natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons that are no lon­ger nee­ded. Con­sis­tent appli­ca­ti­on of the OPE TSI will lead to more uni­form rules in cross-bor­der traf­fic in the long term and to the gra­du­al dis­ap­pearance of hurdles.

Assume responsibility

The OPE TSI assigns respon­si­bi­li­ty for the ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons to the rail­way under­ta­kings. Con­se­quent­ly, the FOT must hand over its sove­reig­n­ty over the ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons to the rail­way indus­try. The Swiss rail­way indus­try should actively assu­me respon­si­bi­li­ty for the enti­re ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons and their fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment. The VAP wel­co­mes this trans­fer of respon­si­bi­li­ty of the FDV to the rail­way indus­try. It is to be com­bi­ned with the upco­ming inno­va­ti­on steps. In the rail­way sec­tor, a cross-com­pa­ny solu­ti­on for uni­form over­ar­ching ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons must be found. From the point of view of the VAP, a coope­ra­ti­ve col­la­bo­ra­ti­on model would be appro­pria­te, in which the FOT has the coor­di­na­ti­on task and deve­lo­ps and agrees on ope­ra­tio­nal regu­la­ti­ons in the form of a gui­de­line tog­e­ther with the tech­ni­cal experts of the rail­way indus­try (thus Art. 3a GüTV accor­ding to the draft of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of 2 Novem­ber 2022). After publi­ca­ti­on, these gui­de­lines can be used by the indi­vi­du­al com­pa­nies for the pre­pa­ra­ti­on of their dri­ving ser­vice regulations.

TSI OPE 2019/773
This abbre­via­ti­on stands for the Euro­pean Union’s imple­men­ting regu­la­ti­on on the Tech­ni­cal Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty “Traf­fic Ope­ra­ti­on and Manage­ment”, issued in 2019. Accor­ding to this regu­la­ti­on, rail should regain mar­ket share thanks to bar­ri­er-free train jour­neys across natio­nal bor­ders and con­tri­bu­te to the reduc­tion of CO2 emis­si­ons. This requi­res, among other things, a com­pre­hen­si­ve Euro­pe-wide har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on of ope­ra­ting rules. Until now, dif­fe­rent natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons have been appli­ed in dif­fe­rent count­ries. The EU is dri­ving har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on for­ward with the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the OPE TSI. In it, it defi­nes the respon­si­bi­li­ties for com­pa­nies, but does not pro­vi­de for any offi­ci­al­ly issued dri­ving ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons, as is curr­ent­ly the case in Switz­er­land. This remains the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the rail­way under­ta­kings. In the inte­rests of inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty, they must adapt the ser­vice regu­la­ti­ons to the requi­re­ments of the OPE TSI. Switz­er­land has also com­mit­ted its­elf to the appli­ca­ti­on of the OPE TSI via the Joint Com­mit­tee (CH-EU land trans­port agreement).

 

Sporty timetable

The FOT has published the fol­lo­wing time­ta­ble for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the dri­ving ser­vice regulations:

Imple­men­ta­ti­on step Dead­line
Publi­ca­ti­on of FDV2024 by the end of Novem­ber 2023
Entry into force of FDV2024 1 July 2024
Inter­me­dia­te cycle FDV2025
(Tram and TSI OPE sub-projects)
at the end of 2025
Next regu­lar cycle as of mid-2028

 

[1] https://www.bav.admin.ch/bav/de/home/publikationen/vernehmlassungen/abgeschlossene-vernehmlassungen/weiterentwicklung-fdv-a2024.html

[2] https://www.bav.admin.ch/bav/de/home/rechtliches/rechtsgrundlagen-vorschriften/nntv.html

Switzerland risks isolation in international rail traffic

Switzerland risks isolation in international rail traffic

From 2024, Switz­er­land will lose access to the EU plat­form for har­mo­nis­ed appr­oval pro­ce­du­res for new rol­ling stock. This is tan­ta­mount to a fur­ther step towards iso­la­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal rail trans­port. Unless Euro­pean-Hel­ve­tic rela­ti­ons normalise.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Access to “One Stop Shop” will only be exten­ded until the end of 2023
  • From then on, the EU will treat Switz­er­land as a third country.
  • This jeo­par­di­ses modal shift, digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and automation

 

The decis­i­on of the joint com­mit­tee on the land trans­port agree­ment with the EU on the fourth rail­way packa­ge has so far secu­red Switz­er­land access to the “One Stop Shop” (OSS) data­ba­se of the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA). OSS con­ta­ins com­mon sim­pli­fied pro­ce­du­res for vehic­le appr­ovals and safe­ty cer­ti­fi­ca­tes in cross-bor­der rail traf­fic. Accor­ding to the FOT (cf. publi­ca­ti­on in ger­man), this access will only be exten­ded until the end of 2023.

This decis­i­on is due to the unre­sol­ved issues in the bila­te­ral rela­ti­onship bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. Sepa­ra­te pro­ce­du­res are expec­ted to take effect from 2024. The same appli­es to the agree­ments on bor­der ope­ra­ting routes.

It is urgen­tly neces­sa­ry for Switz­er­land to cle­ar­ly decla­re its sup­port for coope­ra­ti­on with the Euro­pean sta­tes. Other­wi­se, both the modal shift and the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port are at risk.

Winter session 2022

Winter session 2022

On 6 Decem­ber 2022, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopted two moti­ons in the second ins­tance. They are important for modal shift in tran­sit, but also con­cern the Basel-North ports route, which is cen­tral for import and export traf­fic. We at the VAP sup­port both moti­ons and encou­ra­ge the exten­si­on of state sup­port to con­ven­tio­nal rail freight transport.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopts two moti­ons in favour of the freight cor­ri­dor through Switzerland
  • We at the VAP sup­port the con­tents of the moti­ons – and set priorities
  • Becau­se con­ven­tio­nal rail freight trans­ports are curr­ent­ly still being excluded

 

Promotion of the freight corridor through Switzerland

With the moti­on 22.3013 «Streng­thening the attrac­ti­ve­ness and com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the freight cor­ri­dor through Switz­er­land», the Fede­ral Coun­cil is to spe­ci­fi­cal­ly extend the sup­port mea­su­res in tran­sit to cer­tain regi­ons and groups of goods. We at the VAP sup­port this moti­on. Howe­ver, it excludes con­ven­tio­nal rail freight trans­port and its untap­ped poten­ti­al. This defi­ci­en­cy should be cor­rec­ted as soon as possible.

Artic­le 8 of the Freight Traf­fic Shift Act (in ger­man) allows the pro­mo­ti­on of all – i.e. tran­sal­pi­ne – freight traf­fic in tran­sit. Accor­din­gly, the Fede­ral Coun­cil should be ins­truc­ted to pro­mo­te all freight traf­fic and to pro­vi­de the pro­mo­ti­on instru­ments con­sis­ting of finan­cial sup­port, qua­li­ty moni­to­ring and the expan­si­on of access rou­tes for con­ven­tio­nal traf­fic as well. For these, too, the tar­ge­ted exten­si­on of sup­port mea­su­res to cer­tain regi­ons and freight groups makes sense. By sti­cking to the dogma of «com­bi­ned trans­port», Switz­er­land is miss­ing out on inte­res­t­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for an addi­tio­nal shift from road to rail.

The Fede­ral Coun­cil should design the sup­port instru­ments in a tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral way and extend them to all freight trans­port in tran­sit, regard­less of the type of production.

Expansion of the Wörth-Strasbourg Neat feeder road on the left bank of the Rhine

Moti­on 22.3000 «Con­ti­nua­tion of the suc­cessful modal shift poli­cy and gua­ran­tee of sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty thanks to expan­si­on of the Wörth-Stras­bourg cor­ri­dor on the left bank of the Rhine» calls on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to take care of the elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on and upgrading of the affec­ted sec­tion of the line to NEAT stan­dards. It is con­side­ring the pos­si­bi­li­ty of fun­ding from Switzerland.

We in the VAP sup­port this moti­on, as we did with moti­on 20.3003 «State trea­ty for a Neat access route on the left bank of the Rhine». An effi­ci­ent rou­ting of the flat rail­way in the nor­t­hern approach to the NRLA is urgen­tly nee­ded in terms of sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty, alter­na­ti­ve capa­ci­ty for con­s­truc­tion pha­ses, punc­tua­li­ty and qua­li­ty. Elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on and the intro­duc­tion of the NRLA stan­dard on the affec­ted sec­tion of track, tog­e­ther with the simul­ta­neous expan­si­on of the Kan­nen­feld and Schüt­zen­matt tun­nels to 4 met­res, will allow an initi­al sub­stan­ti­al increase in capa­ci­ty on the nor­t­hern approach to the NRLA.

 

Click here for the SDA news item of 6 Decem­ber 2022 (in german)

The rail sector must reinvent itself

The rail sector must reinvent itself

Rail is not exact­ly famous for its wil­ling­ness to inno­va­te. This must and will chan­ge if it wants to remain sus­tainable as a trans­port mode. At the 7th Inter­na­tio­nal Rail­way Forum IRFC 2022, the experts pre­sen­ted a wide range of initia­ti­ves, inno­va­tions and reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­ons. We have sum­ma­ri­sed and cri­ti­cal­ly app­rai­sed the most important ones here.

 

This is what it’s all about:
  • Imple­men­ting the Green Deal requi­res inno­va­ti­on, new tech­no­lo­gies and a com­pre­hen­si­ve moder­ni­sa­ti­on of the rail sector
  • The sca­la­bi­li­ty of inno­va­tions can only be achie­ved through coope­ra­ti­on and coordination.
  • Switz­er­land must not miss the boat on EU inno­va­ti­on programmes

 

Under the Czech Pre­si­den­cy of the Coun­cil of the EU, the EU Minis­ter of Trans­port hos­ted the IRFC in Pra­gue from 5 to 7 Octo­ber 2022. The motto of the con­gress was: “Buil­ding a new gene­ra­ti­on of rail­ways tog­e­ther”. The Czech Minis­ter of Trans­port, Mar­tin Kupka, empha­sis­ed the key role of rail­ways for the suc­cessful imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Green Deal. With this, the EU has defi­ned a clear ans­wer to the advan­cing cli­ma­te chan­ge. Traf­fic and trans­port in Euro­pe are to beco­me CO2-neu­tral by 2050. With the 2050 cli­ma­te tar­gets, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is stri­ving to replace fos­sil fuels in Switz­er­land within a com­pa­ra­ble timeframe.

For a few years now, a para­digm shift has been taking place in the rail sec­tor. Poli­ti­ci­ans are set­ting dead­lines and issuing con­cre­te man­da­tes to the sec­tors. In order for the Euro­pean rail­ways to be able to react accor­ding to the man­da­tes, more coope­ra­ti­on is nee­ded in the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of new tech­no­lo­gies and their imple­men­ta­ti­on. The tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th rail­way packa­ge forms the basis for the crea­ti­on of the plan­ned uni­fied Euro­pean rail­way system.

Until new tech­no­lo­gies have rea­ched their appli­ca­ti­on matu­ri­ty, it is first neces­sa­ry to coor­di­na­te inno­va­ti­on (cf. figu­re) and to con­duct tar­ge­ted rese­arch to deve­lop the sci­en­ti­fic basis. To this end, the EU has built up effi­ci­ent and com­pe­tent orga­ni­sa­ti­ons in recent years: The “Hori­zon” pro­gram­me leads and finan­ces various rese­arch pro­jects. Thanks to cross-sec­to­ral net­wor­king, the results and fin­dings should be made available to a wide range of users in a time­ly man­ner. Within the frame­work of the inno­va­ti­on part­ner­ship Europe’s Rail Joint Under­ta­king (EU-Rail), inno­va­ti­ve new approa­ches based on rese­arch results are given con­cre­te form. The important pro­jects for rail ope­ra­ti­ons and tech­no­lo­gy are based on the two pil­lars “Sys­tem Pil­lar” and “Tech­ni­cal Pil­lar”. The Rail­way Agen­cy ERA defi­nes the new uni­form spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Euro­pean rail­way appli­ca­ti­ons and thus ensu­res inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. Thanks to this poo­ling of know­ledge, solu­ti­ons ready for inter­na­tio­nal appli­ca­ti­on can be deve­lo­ped in a short time.

Energy of the future is renewable

Until now, indus­tria­li­sed eco­no­mies have main­ly used fos­sil fuels. For a long time, these were available on the inter­na­tio­nal mar­ket at low pri­ces. With the Green Deal, the EU wants to redu­ce trans­port-rela­ted emis­si­ons by 90% by 2050 and shift 75% of the trans­port volu­me from road to rail or water­ways. The important ener­gy sources of the future are hydro­gen and elec­tri­ci­ty, both pro­du­ced from rene­wa­ble resources.

Modern data communication is digital

Indus­tria­li­sed pro­ces­ses func­tion suc­cessful­ly when the neces­sa­ry data is direct­ly and imme­dia­te­ly available to all par­ti­ci­pan­ts. The cur­rent use of data is still limi­t­ed; for many sub-pro­ces­ses, the data is coll­ec­ted again and again. Such solo efforts are resour­ce- and time-inten­si­ve as well as error-prone. In future, data should be available to all aut­ho­ri­sed par­ti­ci­pan­ts wit­hout media dis­con­ti­nui­ty and in real time. Direct access to data is cen­tral to the rea­li­sa­ti­on of auto­ma­ted pro­ces­ses, as is effec­ti­ve data pro­tec­tion. Cyber secu­ri­ty is beco­ming the core issue of modern data communication.

Reorganisation of the railway system called for

Rail­ways were essen­ti­al to indus­tria­li­sa­ti­on in the 19th and early 20th cen­tu­ries. It was not until the midd­le of the 20th cen­tu­ry that road and air trans­port pushed back the rail­ways in trans­port thanks to their suc­cessful inno­va­ti­ve steps. The decisi­ve fac­tors were intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and rigo­rous cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on. The cus­to­mers’ most important ques­ti­on was: How can we ful­fil our needs more easi­ly, more com­for­ta­b­ly and more chea­p­ly? And they recei­ved sui­ta­ble ans­wers on the road.

Today, the rail­ways must final­ly ask them­sel­ves the same ques­ti­on. The rail­way is an effi­ci­ent and resour­ce-saving trans­port sys­tem with num­e­rous advan­ta­ges. In a direct com­pa­ri­son of the ener­gy requi­red, the elec­tri­fied rail­way is the clear win­ner over the road. Under the same gene­ral con­di­ti­ons, the rail­way requi­res 10 times less ener­gy than the road. Important Euro­pean rail­way lines are alre­a­dy elec­tri­fied, so that the requi­red trac­tion ener­gy can be used with high effi­ci­en­cy. Today, a wide­ly rami­fied net­work of lines con­nects the important regi­ons of Euro­pe, a large part of the lines are stan­dard gauge, only in a few Euro­pean regi­ons are devia­ting gau­ges in ope­ra­ti­on today.

In order for the plan­ned shift of traf­fic to the rail­ways to actual­ly be rea­li­sed, a cul­tu­ral chan­ge in the rail­ways towards intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on is first nee­ded, as well as a com­pre­hen­si­ve and sys­te­ma­tic rene­wal of the rail­way system:

  • TEN‑T: The EU has defi­ned the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work to con­nect all major Euro­pean cen­tres. Trains are to be able to run wit­hout obs­ta­cles on a uni­form, har­mo­nis­ed infra­struc­tu­re; on secon­da­ry lines, hydro­gen or bat­tery ope­ra­ti­on can ensu­re the desi­red CO2 neu­tra­li­ty. The expan­si­on of the rail­way net­work is being car­ri­ed out with two dif­fe­rent empha­ses: For pas­sen­ger trans­port, a high-speed net­work is to be built that con­nects the important cen­tres and enables attrac­ti­ve tra­vel times. For freight trans­port, the neces­sa­ry train paths are to be made available so that rail freight trans­port can grow in accordance with the poli­ti­cal requi­re­ments. The freight rail­ways must more than dou­ble their trans­port capa­ci­ty in the coming deca­des. They can only achie­ve this ambi­tious goal with the help of inno­va­ti­on. In addi­ti­on, the cor­ri­dor mana­gers must be equip­ped with com­pre­hen­si­ve com­pe­ten­ces so that the cur­rent cher­ry-picking of the natio­nal, inte­gra­ted­ly mana­ged state rail­ways comes to an end.
  • Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and stan­dar­di­s­a­ti­on: The various Euro­pean rail­way sys­tems are still sub­ject to a multi­tu­de of often dif­fe­rent natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons. Com­pli­ance with these still signi­fi­cant­ly rest­ricts free cross-bor­der rail traf­fic and enables unfair com­pe­ti­ti­ve advan­ta­ges in the natio­nal mar­ket. Despi­te the tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons of inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSI), natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons still mas­si­ve­ly hin­der cross-bor­der traf­fic. The EU has made the eli­mi­na­ti­on of these natio­nal rules an important lea­der­ship task with the “rules clea­ning-up pro­gram­me”. This is a cru­cial pro­gram­me of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge to crea­te the Sin­gle Euro­pean Rail­way Area (SERA). While the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA) is respon­si­ble for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the Tech­ni­cal Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSIs), the rail­way sec­tor has to update and deve­lop the rela­ted stan­dards and norms. In the desi­red ideal case, the TSIs and the stan­dards should suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fy all rail­way sub­sys­tems in all par­ti­ci­pa­ting Euro­pean count­ries. Switz­er­land also reli­es con­sis­t­ent­ly on the TSI in the stan­dard gauge sec­tor. It has adopted the first ele­ments of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge within the frame­work of the cur­rent over­land trans­port agree­ment. As the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the EU and Switz­er­land is curr­ent­ly at a standstill, the plan­ned con­ti­nua­tion is unfort­u­na­te­ly not pos­si­ble at present.
  • Digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK): The rail­ways must replace their his­to­ri­cal­ly grown but out­da­ted stan­dards such as the clas­sic screw cou­pling in favour of modern digi­ta­li­sed sys­tems – such as the DAK4 – across the board. This forms a decisi­ve basis for future com­pre­hen­si­ve auto­ma­ti­on in the rail sec­tor. Even more important, howe­ver, is the net­wor­king of all actors along the enti­re logi­stics chain – bey­ond the mere rail run – thanks to the pos­si­bi­li­ties of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. Free­ly acces­si­ble data and boo­king plat­forms open up uni­ma­gi­ned increa­ses in effi­ci­en­cy and qua­li­ty. The mem­bers of the VAP and SBB are also actively con­tri­bu­ting to the suc­cess of this important pro­ject with their know-how.
  • Ener­gy: In the field of ener­gy, the neces­sa­ry pro­ces­ses for the CO2-neu­tral pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­bu­ti­on and simp­le use of hydro­gen are being work­ed on. For ope­ra­ti­on on lon­ger, non-elec­tri­fied rail­way lines, hydro­gen is a pro­mi­sing ener­gy source that can quick­ly replace fos­sil fuels.
Marathon with hurdles

With the Green Deal, the EU has defi­ned a com­pre­hen­si­ve pro­gram­me to crea­te a CO2-neu­tral Euro­pe. Howe­ver, the mem­ber sta­tes have dif­fe­rent start­ing points, prio­ri­ties and inte­rests. Con­se­quent­ly, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of this ambi­tious pro­gram­me will have to over­co­me a num­ber of hurd­les. It remains to be seen whe­ther the natio­nal inte­rests of the state rail­ways can be suf­fi­ci­ent­ly set aside in favour of a com­mon Euro­pean solution.

The rail­way is to play a key role in Euro­pean pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the future. It has some con­vin­cing advan­ta­ges. But it must also over­co­me an aver­si­on to rene­wal, chan­ge and com­pe­ti­ti­on that has deve­lo­ped over many deca­des. The com­part­ment­a­li­sa­ti­on of mar­kets, espe­ci­al­ly by the state rail­ways, con­ti­nues to be a major obs­ta­cle in many places. By sti­cking to natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons, often under the pre­text of safe­ty con­side­ra­ti­ons, state rail­ways want to con­ti­nue to pro­tect them­sel­ves from unwan­ted inter­na­tio­nal com­pe­ti­ti­on. It is up to the mem­ber sta­tes to help the Euro­pean idea achie­ve a breakth­rough and to put a stop to unfair prac­ti­ces by their state railways.

The rail sec­tor must set new stan­dards through inno­va­ti­on. It must stan­dar­di­se and stream­li­ne its regu­la­to­ry envi­ron­ment inter­na­tio­nal­ly. When deve­lo­ping new sys­tems, large sup­pli­ers to the rail sec­tor must not try to gain a one-sided mar­ket advan­ta­ge through exclu­si­ve, incom­pa­ti­ble pro­ducts. For sus­tainable migra­ti­on suc­cess, the sec­tor needs com­pa­ti­ble, matu­re and relia­ble inno­va­ti­ve pro­ducts. The manu­fac­tu­r­ers have not exact­ly distin­gu­is­hed them­sel­ves in this respect in recent years.

Whe­ther the inten­ded shift of trans­port to rail will be fea­si­ble on the plan­ned scale depends on the finan­cial resour­ces that can be deploy­ed. There will be no bul­ging EU cof­fers for the migra­ti­on from which the indi­vi­du­al com­pa­nies can help them­sel­ves as nee­ded. The indi­vi­du­al mem­ber sta­tes will have to con­tri­bu­te to the rene­wal and expan­si­on of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re with sub­stan­ti­al start-up finan­cing. This also appli­es to Switz­er­land. Core pro­jects such as the DAK must be inter­na­tio­nal­ly coor­di­na­ted, other­wi­se their effect will fizz­le out wit­hout a sound.

Switzerland is part of Europe

Switz­er­land, too, can only gain from acti­ve par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in these EU pro­gram­mes. The Swiss stan­dard gauge net­work with its major tran­sit axes con­tri­bu­tes to the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work of the EU. It forms an important part of the uni­form inter­ope­ra­ble Euro­pean sys­tem SERA. Since many of the Swiss trans­ports are cross-bor­der, inter­ope­ra­ble solu­ti­ons are indis­pensable. Switz­er­land has ful­fil­led its plan­ned tar­get with the con­ti­nuous expan­si­on of the north-south trans­ver­sals as announ­ced. The Swiss rail­way net­work must be fur­ther expan­ded for dome­stic traf­fic in order to be able to cope with the growth tar­get in freight trans­port in the future. Our experts can actively make valuable con­tri­bu­ti­ons to deve­lo­p­ment and com­pe­te with the best inter­na­tio­nal­ly. Our rail­way com­pa­nies can streng­then their mar­ket posi­ti­on with new con­cepts, espe­ci­al­ly in import and export traffic.

The VAP sup­ports joint acti­vi­ties to fur­ther deve­lop the rail sec­tor into an important part­ner in the mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port sys­tem. In this con­text, coope­ra­ti­on at Euro­pean level and intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on is a cru­cial pre­re­qui­si­te to achie­ve the poli­ti­cal goals on time. In terms of trans­port, we are so clo­se­ly lin­ked with neigh­bou­ring count­ries that our eco­no­my needs obs­ta­cle-free cross-bor­der traf­fic and trans­port ser­vices. From an ener­gy point of view, rail is pre­desti­ned for lon­ger distances. The poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU con­ti­nue to hin­der the urgen­tly nee­ded inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on. The rail­way indus­try is well advi­sed to actively seek and cul­ti­va­te pro­fes­sio­nal exch­an­ge despi­te the hurd­les. We can only have a suc­cessful rail­way future together.