SITES

Under “sites” – or mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs – we group tog­e­ther topics on sites with high­ly effi­ci­ent rail and road con­nec­tions and infra­struc­tu­re for logi­stics func­tions. This also includes free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals or sidings with warehouse infrastructure.

For the first and last mile, we are con­cer­ned about a balan­ced dis­tri­bu­ti­on of power among the mar­ket powers, pro­per incen­ti­ves and atten­ti­on to appro­pria­te safe­ty regu­la­ti­ons. The first and last mile in the rail freight sys­tem includes sidings, free loa­ding faci­li­ties and ter­mi­nals. None of these tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties should allow the abuse of mar­ket power and thus unneces­s­a­ri­ly distort com­pe­ti­ti­on. The rail freight sys­tem needs free access to the first and last mile in par­ti­cu­lar. For exam­p­le, it deri­ves no bene­fit from a sta­ti­on con­ver­ted for pas­sen­ger traf­fic that can no lon­ger be recon­ci­led with its loa­ding prac­ti­ce – but rather addi­tio­nal expense.

The VAP advo­ca­tes for equal cubits in ope­ra­ting and safe­ty regu­la­ti­ons for freight and pas­sen­ger trans­port. Stan­dard increa­ses in pas­sen­ger trans­port can have a nega­ti­ve impact on freight trans­port. This is where the VAP intervenes.

 

Actors in the field of sites

Siding owner

Ter­mi­nal ope­ra­tors, mar­shalling yards (first/last mile)

Ship­per

Can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties (ter­ri­to­ri­al planning)

INFORMATIVE

Commitment

We are sup­port­ers of the rail­way siding char­ter. The latest ver­si­on of the char­ter will be published at the end of January.

 

Political
 
Railway sidings

Over 850 rail­way sidings are used in Switz­er­land. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, there is a ste­ady decli­ne. To coun­ter­act this, the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) pro­vi­des finan­cial aid for the con­s­truc­tion and rene­wal of rail­way sidings. In the fol­lo­wing links you will find gui­de­lines and regu­la­ti­ons con­cer­ning sidings. At Rail­Com you will find infor­ma­ti­on on non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry net­work access and the net­work usage conditions.

 
Spatial planning canton and commune

The VAP pro­vi­des advice to can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties. In the fol­lo­wing examp­les, the can­tons inte­gra­te freight trans­port logi­stics into spa­ti­al planning:

Rail Connections Charter 2024: a broad-based initiative for a strong rail system

Rail Connections Charter 2024: a broad-based initiative for a strong rail system

On 31 Janu­ary 2024, the rail sec­tor pres­ents the siding char­ter to the repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of the Ger­man govern­ment in Ber­lin. Signed by 56 asso­cia­ti­ons across Euro­pe, the initia­ti­ve sets out con­cre­te mea­su­res for the suc­cessful trans­for­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port as part of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics based on sidings and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted access points.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • A bet­ter future for sidings and access points
  • Key areas of action and con­cre­te imple­men­ta­ti­on proposals
  • Uti­li­sing the strengths of the rail­way across natio­nal borders

 

A better future for sidings and access points

On 31 Janu­ary 2024, the new siding char­ter was pre­sen­ted to Micha­el Theu­rer, Par­lia­men­ta­ry State Secre­ta­ry and Fede­ral Govern­ment Com­mis­sio­ner for Rail Trans­port. This is a mile­stone for the future of rail freight trans­port in Euro­pe and Switz­er­land. The co-signa­to­ries want to impro­ve the future pro­s­pects of rail sidings and mul­ti­mo­dal access points. We at the VAP have been invol­ved in various working groups and have con­tri­bu­ted our know­ledge and expe­ri­ence. Regu­lar dia­lo­gue of this kind is key to impro­ving deve­lo­p­ments in the future of Swiss rail freight trans­port and its inter­na­tio­nal connections.

Key areas of action and concrete proposals for implementation

The char­ter sets out five over­ar­ching goals and spe­ci­fies mea­su­res that are cru­cial to the attrac­ti­ve­ness and sur­vi­val of rail freight transport.

  • Sup­port peo­p­le who make and imple­ment decis­i­ons. In the con­text of this claim, it is important to com­mu­ni­ca­te the sys­tem know­ledge and the pos­si­bi­li­ties of rail freight trans­port for mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains to poli­ti­cal decision-makers.
  • Equip the eco­no­my with access points and upstream infra­struc­tu­re as requi­red. In addi­ti­on to secu­ring and pos­si­bly expan­ding sui­ta­ble loca­ti­ons, this also includes tar­ge­ted finan­cial support.
  • Impro­ve frame­work con­di­ti­ons for rail­way sidings and loa­ding points. This pri­ma­ri­ly means redu­cing regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments and bureaucracy.
  • Offer mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port solu­ti­ons via sidings and loa­ding points. Rail freight trans­port is part of a mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chain. Freight cus­to­mers the­r­e­fo­re need incen­ti­ves for over­all offers with a high pro­por­ti­on of rail trans­port from various providers.
  • Use modern and inno­va­ti­ve tech­no­lo­gies. The trans­for­ma­ti­on and use of new achie­ve­ments such as digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC) or data plat­forms is abso­lut­e­ly essen­ti­al for rail freight trans­port (see blog post «Ready for the next level of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on»).
Utilising the strengths of the railway across borders

The Siding Char­ter 2024 is sup­port­ed by 56 asso­cia­ti­ons, orga­ni­sa­ti­ons and initia­ti­ves from the fields of indus­try, trade, logi­stics, con­s­truc­tion, agri­cul­tu­re, tim­ber, recy­cling and local aut­ho­ri­ties – inclu­ding the VAP. These stake­hol­ders will con­ti­nue to par­ti­ci­pa­te in future work to refi­ne and imple­ment the solu­ti­ons, and not just in Ger­ma­ny. After all, rail freight trans­port should be able to deve­lop its strengths across natio­nal bor­ders. Inte­res­ted par­ties from Switz­er­land are wel­co­me to cont­act Jür­gen Maier.

Statements:

Joa­chim Ber­ends, Vice Pre­si­dent of the VDV Asso­cia­ti­on of Ger­man Trans­port Com­pa­nies:
«Since the first edi­ti­on in 2019, many of the charter’s pro­po­sals have alre­a­dy been imple­men­ted or are in the pro­cess of being imple­men­ted. But we are still a long way from rea­ching our goal, and fur­ther topics have been added. 56 signa­to­ry orga­ni­sa­ti­ons are pro­po­sing mea­su­res to streng­then Ger­ma­ny as a busi­ness loca­ti­on with more and modern sidings – and to pro­tect the climate.»

Dr Hele­na Mel­ni­kov, Mana­ging Direc­tor of the Ger­man Asso­cia­ti­on of Mate­ri­als Manage­ment, Purcha­sing and Logi­stics (BME):
«We sup­port the cen­tral demands of the char­ter to the best of our abili­ty. The most important thing now is to redu­ce bureau­cra­cy and sim­pli­fy regu­la­ti­ons. At the same time, the pro­mo­ti­on of sidings must be impro­ved, more com­mer­cial areas must be con­nec­ted to the rail­ways and new trans­port con­cepts must be crea­ted that incor­po­ra­te sidings.»

Dr Frank Fur­rer, Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral of the VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of the Ship­ping Indus­try:
«The can­tons are alre­a­dy deve­lo­ping logi­stics and freight trans­port con­cepts for favour­a­b­ly loca­ted sites with good road and rail connections.The dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act aims to lead rail freight trans­port out of archaic pro­duc­tion con­di­ti­ons and make it fit to play a cen­tral role in mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains.The char­ter and dis­patch the­r­e­fo­re com­ple­ment each other ide­al­ly for import and export transport.»

Focus RailCom: presentation of key people

Focus RailCom: presentation of key people

This is the issue:

  • The Com­mis­si­on gua­ran­tees non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access
  • Who is behind the Com­mis­si­on? We would like to intro­du­ce you.

 

Rail­Com gua­ran­tees non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to Switzerland’s rail net­work, com­bi­ned trans­port tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties and local freight ser­vices. The Com­mis­si­on is actively com­mit­ted to an open and fair mar­ket access poli­cy in order to pro­mo­te healt­hy com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and increase the effi­ci­en­cy of the rail sector.

In this blog post, we intro­du­ce the staff who are com­mit­ted to RailCom.

Chairmanship:
  • Chair: Patri­zia Danioth Hal­ter, lic. iur., att­or­ney-at-law and nota­ry, LL.M., Alt­dorf (UR)
  • Vice-Chair­man: Mar­kus Kern, Prof. Dr. iur., LL.M., Pro­fes­sor of Public, Admi­nis­tra­ti­ve and Euro­pean Law at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Berne (BE)
Members of the committee:
  • Cesa­re Brand, lawy­er, Forel (FR)
  • Anna Cia­ran­fi Zanet­ta, Lawy­er, Depart­ment of Finan­ce and Eco­no­my of the Can­ton of Tici­no, Dalpe (TI)
  • Bar­ba­ra Fur­rer, Dr. iur., att­or­ney-at-law, Head of Legal Ser­vices, DHL Express (Schweiz) AG, Hedin­gen (ZH)
  • Man­fred Hal­ler, EMBA, inde­pen­dent con­sul­tant, Unter­kulm (AG)

 

The secre­ta­ri­at pro­vi­des pro­fes­sio­nal and tech­ni­cal sup­port to the com­mit­tee. It fol­lows the Commission’s ins­truc­tions. It is admi­nis­tra­tively atta­ched to the Gene­ral Secre­ta­ri­at of the Fede­ral Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port, Ener­gy and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC). Its mem­bers are as follows:

Head:
  • Chris­tof Böh­ler, M.A. HSG Inter­na­tio­nal Relations
  • Depu­ty: Melis­sa Rick­li, lic. phil. hist.
Staff members:
  • Ana Dett­wi­ler, Lawy­er, Legal Affairs
  • Ursu­la Erb, Doc­tor of Eco­no­mics, Mar­ket Monitoring
  • Andre­as Opp­li­ger, lic. phil. nat, Mar­ket Monitoring
  • Kat­rin Suter-Burri, Ph. ETH, Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on, Agen­da and Research

 

Titus Büter from Swiss Post wants fast and punctual freight trains

Titus Büter from Swiss Post wants fast and punctual freight trains

Titus Büt­ler is Head of Trans­port at Post CH AG and has been respon­si­ble for all let­ter, par­cel and news­pa­per trans­port by rail and road in Switz­er­land since the begin­ning of 2022. Pre­vious­ly, he mana­ged the Frau­en­feld par­cel cen­ter for over 20 years, where up to half a mil­li­on par­cels are pro­ces­sed daily. He also desi­gned the net­work expan­si­on with the new par­cel cen­ters in Caden­az­zo, Vétroz, Unter­vaz and Oster­mun­di­gen. In an inter­view with VAP, he explains the importance of rail trans­port for Swiss Post.

Here’s what it’s all about:

  • How high is the share of rail in the modal split at Swiss Post?
  • Cus­to­mer demand for fast deli­very is increasing
  • “Pain points”, or opti­miza­ti­on poten­ti­al in rail freight transport
  • Swiss Post is the Euro­pean lea­der in the trans­port of goods by rail

 

VAP: Mr. Bütler, Swiss Post’s yellow trains are striking. More and more, yellow trucks can also be seen on the roads. Is this impression deceptive?

Titus Büt­ler: Our trucks with the yel­low con­tai­ners do attract atten­ti­on. Our cus­to­mers are incre­asing­ly deman­ding fast deli­very: picked up in the evening and deli­ver­ed the next mor­ning. So we’re not tal­king about 24-hour deli­very, but about 15 to 20 hours – and that to any place in Switz­er­land, whe­ther urban or rural. So we are under time pres­su­re throug­hout the sup­p­ly chain. This makes it dif­fi­cult to bund­le par­cel volu­mes to fill enti­re trains. We choo­se to go by rail whe­re­ver it makes eco­lo­gi­cal and eco­no­mic sense. Around 50 per­cent of all let­ters and par­cels alre­a­dy make at least part of their jour­ney by train. A short train with one or two wagons makes no sense – not even ecologically.

What is stopping Swiss Post from using rail for the transports we see on the road?

We are working with our trans­port part­ner SBB-Cargo to shift more par­cel ship­ments back onto rail. We need fast and regu­lar express rou­tes. The avera­ge speed of some pos­tal trains is below 50km/h, even though we have fast rol­ling stock and run light trains. That is too slow.

How do you see the future of postal logistics, will there be more by rail or by road?

We cle­ar­ly want to bring more volu­me onto the rail­ways, espe­ci­al­ly on the west-east axis.

Swiss Post’s newly planned centers do not have rail connections. Why?

In recent years, we have put seve­ral small par­cel cen­ters into ope­ra­ti­on. Ter­mi­nals requi­re land, make the pro­ject more expen­si­ve and delay rea­liza­ti­on. Plan­ning and con­s­truc­tion were car­ri­ed out under time pres­su­re: in some cases, less than 2 years pas­sed bet­ween the decis­i­on on the loca­ti­on and the ope­ning. Where pos­si­ble, howe­ver, we use ter­mi­nals in the vici­ni­ty, e.g. in the case of Caden­az­zo, the SBB ter­mi­nal. Par­cels to and from sou­thern Switz­er­land tra­vel by rail.

Parcels and letters are not considered so-called “rail-affine” goods. What competencies do you have as Swiss Post, as a shipper, to ensure that these goods are nevertheless transported by rail?

We are the only pos­tal ser­vice in Euro­pe that trans­ports such goods by rail on a large scale. The pre­re­qui­si­te is that the inclu­si­on of rail is alre­a­dy taken into account in the design and – even more important – that there is an infra­struc­tu­re that allows fast freight trains with high punc­tua­li­ty at all. We have experts in our team who are very fami­li­ar with rail freight transport.

Swiss Post has the same owner as SBB Cargo. Is this more of an opportunity/simplification for you? How would you describe this relationship?

The trans­ports were put out to public ten­der. The owner­ship does not play a role. We have a clear cus­to­mer-sup­pli­er rela­ti­onship, just like other trans­port com­pa­nies. Our requi­re­ments in terms of punc­tua­li­ty and relia­bi­li­ty are very high and we are very satis­fied with the ser­vices pro­vi­ded by SBB Cargo.

If the fairy godmother were to grant you one logistical wish, what would it be?

I would wish for regu­lar and fast train paths on the west-east axis.

How would you describe the VAP?

We are one of the lar­gest siding owners and one of the lar­gest rail ship­pers in Switz­er­land. The VAP repres­ents their legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests at various levels and net­works the play­ers among themselves.

What strengths do you attribute to the VAP?

The VAP is indis­pensable for the poli­ti­cal work of all play­ers in rail freight transport.

To whom would you recommend cooperation with the VAP?

Every com­pa­ny that owns tracks or wagons or is acti­ve in rail freight trans­port – whe­ther as a cus­to­mer or as an RU – bene­fits from the VAP.

What has not been said yet:

Our mail trains are important to us. We use them to con­nect Switz­er­land quick­ly, relia­bly and eco­lo­gi­cal­ly. That is why it is important to us that the image of slow and often spray-pain­ted freight trains does not rub off on our mail trains.

 

Mr. Bütler, thank you for the interview and the interesting insights.
«An excellent neutral negotiation partner»

«An excellent neutral negotiation partner»

The Vetro­pack Group is a lis­ted and fami­ly-run glass pack­a­ging manu­fac­tu­rer in Switz­er­land. We at the VAP accom­pa­nied Vetro­pack during the nego­tia­ti­ons on the new siding con­tract and the rene­wal of the sidings. We talk about this coope­ra­ti­on and the future of rail freight trans­port with Phil­ip­pe Clerc, Head of the Vetro­pack site in St-Prex.

Mr Clerc, how did the collaboration between Vetropack and VAP come about?

Phil­ip­pe Clerc: First we car­ri­ed out an ope­ra­tio­nal ana­ly­sis to prove that Vetro­pack had been allo­ca­ted too many tracks. VAP’s exper­ti­se and nego­tia­ting skills meant that we were able to make signi­fi­cant savings on the siding con­tract and renewal.

How important are the sidings for Vetropack?

The con­di­ti­ons of our mar­ket are beco­ming incre­asing­ly dif­fi­cult. If we want to remain a lea­der here, we have to beco­me more agile and fas­ter. The VAP has hel­ped us to impro­ve the over­all manage­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re and the pro­duc­tion pro­ces­ses. This helps us to increase our com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and Switzerland’s secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly. Vetropack’s stra­tegy is based on the deve­lo­p­ment of a green fac­to­ry. Here we want to make the best pos­si­ble use of sus­tainable ener­gy in order to signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce our CO2 emis­si­ons. Rail as a mode of trans­port is an essen­ti­al part of this stra­tegy. Our cus­to­mers app­re­cia­te the fact that we are incre­asing­ly using rail. They appro­ve of our method of trans­port in the area of glass recycling.

How did the VAP support you?

The VAP actively sup­port­ed us in nego­tia­ting the siding dos­sier with SBB Infra­struc­tu­re. Thanks to its excel­lent legal exper­ti­se, we were able to nego­tia­te a good con­tract. This enables us to con­ti­nue our envi­ron­men­tal stra­tegy by expan­ding rail transport.

How did you experience the cooperation with the VAP?

The VAP repres­ents the inte­rests of the owners of rail­way sidings. Thanks to its neu­tra­li­ty, it can effec­tively sup­port its mem­bers. It has hel­ped us to find an opti­mal solu­ti­on so that we can con­ti­nue to use our rail­way tracks.

Did you have any previous contact with the VAP?

We have been mem­bers of the VAP for seve­ral years and app­re­cia­te the work of the association.

What strengths do you see in the VAP?

The asso­cia­ti­on is inno­va­ti­ve in the deve­lo­p­ment of new sys­tems or infra­struc­tures and adhe­res to the gui­de­lines of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port FOT. It is com­mit­ted on behalf of the owners of sys­tems or wagons both to the expan­si­on of the rail net­work and to the impro­ve­ment of trans­port ser­vices by the freight rail­ways. Thanks to the exten­si­ve legal exper­ti­se of the VAP, we were able to con­clude an ideal fol­low-up agree­ment for our com­pa­ny and the con­ti­nua­tion of our acti­vi­ties on the rail­ways. As a result, we were able to opti­mi­se rail pro­duc­tion at our site in St-Prex and mini­mi­se ope­ra­ting costs. I con­sider the VAP to be an excel­lent neu­tral nego­tia­ting partner.

What did you appreciate most during the cooperation?

The pro­fes­sio­nal approach, the com­pe­ten­ces in the rail­way and legal field, the know­ledge in the ope­ra­tio­nal field as well as the rela­ti­ons with poli­tics. All this con­tri­bu­ted to a quick and opti­mal solution.

What else would you like to see from the VAP?

That it should be even more com­mit­ted to the deve­lo­p­ment of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic. The deli­very win­dows, for exam­p­le, are far too nar­row. The capa­ci­ties for freight trans­port on the rail net­work must be increased overall.

Who would you recommend to work with the VAP?

Any com­pa­ny that wants to build a rail faci­li­ty in its ope­ra­ti­ons cent­re. The VAP can be useful to all com­pa­nies that have a rail­way infra­struc­tu­re but do not have the neces­sa­ry know­ledge to nego­tia­te and con­clude con­tracts in this area.

Where do you see the most urgent need for action in rail transport?

As men­tio­ned, we need an ope­ning of the time win­dows for freight wagons. The num­ber of goods trains must increase, for exam­p­le through a clock­face time­ta­ble. Rail freight trans­port should even­tual­ly come up to the level of pas­sen­ger trans­port. In addi­ti­on, we must ensu­re our con­nec­tion to Euro­pe. We must not be iso­la­ted from Europe.

What are the advantages of rail freight transport?

It is con­side­red the safest mode of trans­port, which is why it is pre­fer­red throug­hout Euro­pe. Rail is the best alter­na­ti­ve to road, just look at the CO2 foot­print. Large quan­ti­ties can be trans­por­ted by rail with just one train. And even at night or in the early morning.

What do you wish for the future of rail freight transport in Switzerland?

That the rail freight net­work can be main­tai­ned and expan­ded. Only in this way can we increase the envi­ron­men­tal com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty of freight trans­port. It would also be desi­ra­ble to push ahead with inno­va­tions. This will enable us to remain com­pe­ti­ti­ve in the future, as inno­va­tions can redu­ce costs for ope­ra­ti­on, shun­ting, admi­nis­tra­ti­ve tasks and other things. Over­all, it is important to impro­ve the ope­ra­ti­on of sin­gle wagons and thus the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail net­work. We have to prepa­re rail freight for the future so that we are not over­run by trucks one day.

 

Good to know: The VAP advises and accompanies

VAP mem­bers bene­fit from our in-depth exper­ti­se in all areas of freight trans­port at natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal level as well as from our net­wor­king with busi­ness and poli­tics. In the years 2020 to 2022, we sup­port­ed our mem­bers with the fol­lo­wing services:

  • 25 con­sul­ta­ti­ons on regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments (for exam­p­le, diver­si­on agreements).
  • 20 con­sul­ta­ti­ons on auditing
  • 53 ope­ra­ting regulations
  • 32 admi­nis­tra­ti­ons of sidings of muni­ci­pa­li­ties and associations
  • 117 con­s­truc­tion con­sul­ta­ti­ons such as rene­wals, exten­si­ons, sub­s­idy, appr­oval pro­ce­du­res, qua­li­ty and cost con­trol, long-term neu­tral main­ten­an­ce and finan­cial planning

 

 
Outsourcing the last mile and making it non-discriminatory

Outsourcing the last mile and making it non-discriminatory

Free access to the last mile is cru­cial for freight rail­ways. Curr­ent­ly, it is impo­sed by law. In our opi­ni­on, it should be enab­led ins­tead of impo­sed. For this to hap­pen, the last mile would have to be spun off from SBB Cargo and be the respon­si­bi­li­ty of an inde­pen­dent body. Ulti­m­ate­ly, what is nee­ded is a frame­work that can be descri­bed with just one term: Mar­ket economy.
That’s the point:
  • Why free access to the last mile is important
  • Pre­ven­ting dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on ins­tead of fight­ing it
  • Redis­tri­bu­ting and refo­cu­sing forces
 
Importance of the last mile
Ser­ving the last mile (local deli­very) is sole­ly in the hands of a local or regio­nal pro­vi­der. Accor­din­gly, non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to the last mile deter­mi­nes whe­ther an offer is com­pe­ti­ti­ve in the main run or not. Whoe­ver pro­vi­des ser­vices in local deli­very by rail is obli­ged to do so in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. This is the inten­ti­on of Artic­le 6a of the Freight Trans­port Ordi­nan­ce (see box). 
Article 6a of the Freight Transport Ordinance (GüTV)
All com­pa­nies that pro­vi­de (par­ti­al) ser­vices over the last mile must pro­vi­de their local deli­very ser­vices by rail in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. This means that they must also pro­vi­de their ser­vices for third par­ties, pro­vi­ded that capa­ci­ties are available for this. In addi­ti­on to the freight rail­ways, this obli­ga­ti­on con­cerns siding ope­ra­tors with their own rol­ling stock and per­son­nel, spe­cia­li­sed per­son­nel lea­sing com­pa­nies and shun­ting ser­vice pro­vi­ders. Shun­ting and other ser­vices rela­ted to short-distance deli­very, such as tech­ni­cal inspec­tions or brake tests, are con­side­red last-mile ser­vices.

> Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on from Rail­Com in Ger­man or French

 
Preventing discrimination instead of fighting it
Art. 6a GüTV reli­es on regu­la­ti­ons, mar­ket con­trols and legal reme­dies. Howe­ver, it would make more sense to pre­vent dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on by having a sin­gle pro­vi­der ensu­re the ser­vice of the first/last mile. Ide­al­ly, this would be the infra­struc­tu­re mana­ger who does not other­wi­se pro­vi­de trans­port ser­vices. In a mar­ket envi­ron­ment, rail freight access to sidings, local and cen­tral mar­shalling yards, free loa­ding faci­li­ties or ter­mi­nals is regu­la­ted in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. The allo­ca­ti­on of train paths and the ope­ra­ti­on of sys­tem-rele­vant infra­struc­tures are the respon­si­bi­li­ty of inde­pen­dent insti­tu­ti­ons. Sys­tem lea­der­ship by a sin­gle large ope­ra­tor – as is curr­ent­ly the case with SBB Cargo – does not exist. The boun­da­ries bet­ween sin­gle wagon­loads and block trains are abo­lished, and the last mile is mana­ged by an infra­struc­tu­re mana­ger.
Reorganisation of forces
In order to achie­ve the ideal state descri­bed above, roles have to be redis­tri­bu­ted and forces have to be bund­led. Such a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on will only suc­ceed if the fol­lo­wing frame­work con­di­ti­ons are created: 
  • SBB Cargo reta­ins its role as net­work pro­vi­der for the time being. It is respon­si­ble for the plan­ning of net­work traf­fic and ensu­res the effi­ci­ent bund­ling of traf­fic with indi­vi­du­al wagons or wagon groups. In pro­vi­ding the ser­vices, it limits its­elf to the main trans­port runs bet­ween for­ma­ti­on and mar­shalling yards, inso­far as it does not pro­cu­re these from third parties.
  • The enti­re rail­way infra­struc­tu­re such as the net­work, com­bi­ned trans­port ter­mi­nals and local mar­shalling yards are free­ly acces­si­ble to freight railways.
  • The ser­vice of the first/last mile is a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry ser­vice of the infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers for all freight rail­ways. The sys­tem-rele­vant resour­ces of SBB Cargo, such as trac­tion units, shun­ting teams, shun­ting tracks/stations, shun­ting ser­vices or inter­nal ope­ra­tio­nal chan­ges, are available to these.
  • This crea­tes com­pe­ti­ti­on with equal play­ers and trans­pa­rent costs. You can read more about this in our publi­ca­ti­on «From inte­gra­ted to mar­ket-based rail­ways» (in german).
Forum Sidings 2022 – Review

Forum Sidings 2022 – Review

For the first time since 2018, the Siding Forum was held again on 15 Novem­ber 2022. The spea­k­ers agreed: sidings can very well be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly, as long as the ope­ra­tors invest money and time in plan­ning, exper­ti­se and safety.

That’s what it’s all about:
  • Sidings can be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly. But it requi­res money and planning.
  • Prag­ma­tic safe­ty checks make it pos­si­ble to compa­re theo­ry and practice.
  • The exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence within the indus­try and the expert sup­port pro­vi­ded by the VAP are welcomed.

 

Critical view

In the first part of the forum we brought up the new roles in wagon­load traf­fic. In his wel­co­me address, VAP Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral Frank Fur­rer took a cri­ti­cal look at the cur­rent con­sul­ta­ti­on pro­cess. He cal­led on those pre­sent to con­tri­bu­te their ideas for suc­cessful rail freight trans­port in indus­try dis­cus­sions. What is nee­ded is a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on of the roles of the play­ers on the last mile, in dis­tri­bu­ti­on and in pro­duc­tion. There is also a need for a more fle­xi­ble use of resour­ces such as wagons and loco­mo­ti­ves through new busi­ness models. A study by the VAP in 2013 alre­a­dy show­ed at that time that com­pe­ti­ti­on-ori­en­ted coope­ra­ti­on leads to a sys­tem with more effi­ci­ent ser­vice pro­vi­si­on and more traffic.

Operation

Tho­mas Kel­ler, Head of Logi­stics at Per­len Papier AG, spoke about the suc­cessful ope­ra­ti­on of the sidings. He descri­bed the recruit­ment of qua­li­fied employees as a major chall­enge for his sidings in Gisikon/Root. The neces­sa­ry trai­ning costs a lot of money and requi­res far-sigh­ted plan­ning. Other fac­tors are the com­plex ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons and the main­ten­an­ce of the company’s own loco­mo­ti­ves. Tho­mas Kel­ler shared with the guests his expe­ri­en­ces with Artic­le 6a of the Freight Trans­port Ordi­nan­ce and Rail­Com. Thanks to good advice from the VAP, it was pos­si­ble to find an ade­qua­te spe­cial solu­ti­on for access to the Per­len Papier AG siding, accor­ding to which no use by third par­ties is pos­si­ble becau­se the faci­li­ties are not sui­ta­ble for this and expan­si­on pro­jects exist.

Safety checks

Ueli Remund, mem­ber of the siding staff at Plan­zer Trans­port AG, used the orga­ni­sa­ti­on and pro­ces­ses as an exam­p­le to show how important clean docu­men­ta­ti­on and safe­ty checks are, e.g. to ensu­re safe­ty and tracea­bi­li­ty. Such docu­men­ta­ti­on is essen­ti­al for the suc­cessful ope­ra­ti­on of rail­way sidings. Plan­zer nee­ded to refi­ne the inter­nal con­trols of the sidings. Ueli Remund recom­men­ded hiring the VAP expert ser­vice pro­vi­der to do this if the exper­ti­se is lack­ing in-house.

Maintenance

Hein­rich Mau­rer, Head of Real Estate at mobi­log AG, high­ligh­ted main­ten­an­ce and its relia­ble plan­ning with the sup­port of the VAP, using the exam­p­le of the company’s own siding. This is an important part of the trans­port logi­stics; after all, 70% of the inbound volu­me is deli­ver­ed by rail. mobi­log AG deci­ded to load onto the train after the Gott­hard tun­nel was clo­sed for a long time due to an acci­dent. Hein­rich Mau­rer con­siders this decis­i­on to have been the right one in the long term.

Duty of supervision

In the second part, Hen­rik Lipp­mann, lead audi­tor at the FOT’s Safe­ty Super­vi­si­on Sec­tion, repor­ted on the expe­ri­ence gai­ned from the safe­ty super­vi­si­on of adjoi­ning com­pa­nies. This super­vi­so­ry duty brings added value to the com­pa­nies. Many rail­way ope­ra­tors are not fami­li­ar with the rail­way, which is why the audits are often tan­ta­mount to advice. The online siding direc­to­ry is an important tool. Siding owners can use this to file docu­ments digi­tal­ly, set up auto­ma­tic noti­fi­ca­ti­ons and for other useful func­tions. Hen­rik Lipp­mann also pro­vi­ded infor­ma­ti­on about the upco­ming chan­ges in the 2024 amend­ment cycle to the Dri­ving Ser­vice Regu­la­ti­ons (FDV), which will lead to sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons in the shun­ting area of the sidings.

Dialogue

In the panel dis­cus­sion, the spea­k­ers dis­cus­sed the topic “Safe­ty in rea­li­ty and theo­ry – are there dif­fe­ren­ces?”. Inte­res­ted ship­pers, freight rail­ways and ser­vice pro­vi­ders took part in the forum. They were able to take away valuable insights and prac­ti­cal tips from the pre­sen­ta­ti­ons and the dis­cus­sion. And, of cour­se, net­wor­king was not negle­c­ted at the sub­se­quent stand-up lunch.

 

In the interview: Matthias Grieder

In the interview: Matthias Grieder

VAP: Mr Grie­der, what is your col­la­bo­ra­ti­on with the VAP like?
Mat­thi­as Grie­der: We have regu­lar dealings with Gene­ral Secre­ta­ry Frank Fur­rer. For exam­p­le, he is the repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of the Ris­tet-Ber­ger­moos track coope­ra­ti­ve and has repre­sen­ted it in a joint deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject for this indus­tri­al area on the muni­ci­pal ter­ri­to­ry of Urdorf and Bir­mensdorf. He has also been invol­ved in the draf­ting of the par­ti­al revi­si­on 2022 of the can­to­nal struc­tu­re plan and is always invol­ved in various logi­stics-rela­ted working groups. Frank Fur­rer brings both the per­spec­ti­ve of the siding owners and the over­all natio­nal view of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics. He sup­ports us with his enorm­ous exper­ti­se and his exten­si­ve pro­fes­sio­nal-poli­ti­cal net­work. I find this coope­ra­ti­on very plea­sant and fruitful.

Where do you see the most urgent need for action for rail freight trans­port?
In my opi­ni­on, the most important and at the same time most dif­fi­cult task is to secu­re rail/road tran­ship­ment areas in urban areas. Here’s an exam­p­le: where the “Euro­pa­al­lee” now stands behind Zurich’s main rail­way sta­ti­on, there used to be a pos­tal dis­tri­bu­ti­on cent­re with ten tracks. With the rede­ve­lo­p­ment of the area, the enti­re sup­p­ly infra­struc­tu­re as well as large logi­stics areas that would have been important for ensu­ring the future sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal of the city of Zurich were lost. Freight traf­fic and logi­stics faci­li­ties are moving out of the city and are incre­asing­ly being dis­pla­ced to the Mit­tel­land. These dis­tri­bu­ti­on cen­tres are often not acces­si­ble by rail. As a result, more and more trucks and deli­very vans are dri­ving from there into the city, which puts addi­tio­nal strain on the con­ges­ti­on belt around the agglomerations.

The Spa­ti­al Plan­ning Act also requi­res den­ser buil­ding in exis­ting sett­le­ment areas. The addi­tio­nal traf­fic cau­sed by popu­la­ti­on growth must be hand­led on exis­ting trans­port areas. This means that these areas must be used more effi­ci­ent­ly and areas must also be made available for sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal. The more den­se­ly one builds, the more important it beco­mes to design attrac­ti­ve out­door spaces. A ground-level sup­p­ly sys­tem impairs this attrac­ti­ve­ness. That is why it is important to check early on in the site plan­ning pro­cess how above-ground areas can be reli­e­ved of deli­very traf­fic and how deli­very and waste dis­po­sal can be inte­gra­ted into under­ground faci­li­ties. Good examp­les of such solu­ti­ons are the new Cir­cle at Zurich Air­port or the Sihl­ci­ty shop­ping centre.

What is the situa­ti­on with the sidings?
The pro­blem is simi­lar here. Sidings and swit­ches are con­stant­ly being dis­mant­led and their ser­vice redu­ced. This crea­tes a down­ward spi­ral: fewer tracks, less rail trans­port volu­me, less rail loa­ding, less sin­gle wagon loads, less demand-ori­en­ted rail ser­vices. On the other hand, this means more road trans­port, more traf­fic jams, more noise and more CO2. In the long term, this trend must be reversed.

How could the pro­blem be sol­ved?
We need solu­ti­ons that bund­le ship­ments even more and bring them effi­ci­ent­ly through the con­ges­ti­on belt into the cen­tres. Approa­ches to bypass or drive under the con­ges­ti­on. We also need ser­vice con­cepts for fast and direct ser­vice. And we need bet­ter finan­cial incen­ti­ves that streng­then the rail­ways and do not allow sin­gle-wagon load traf­fic to dwind­le. With its excel­lent infra­struc­tures, the rail­way has a great oppor­tu­ni­ty here and can ful­fil this task. But new inno­va­ti­ve modes of trans­port, such as the digi­tal over­all logi­stics sys­tem Cargo Sous Ter­rain (CST), can also trans­port large quan­ti­ties wit­hout pla­cing an addi­tio­nal bur­den on road trans­port. All these sys­tems can be lin­ked via com­mon digi­tal plat­forms and made even more efficient.

How do such solu­ti­ons come about?
Only if all par­ties com­ple­te­ly rethink and coope­ra­te in part­ner­ship. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, today every com­pa­ny cal­cu­la­tes for its­elf in iso­la­ti­on and is focu­sed on short-term pro­fit maxi­mi­sa­ti­on. The rail­ways con­cen­tra­te on the pro­fi­ta­ble block train traf­fic and negle­ct the cos­t­ly sin­gle wagon traf­fic, which can con­tri­bu­te signi­fi­cant­ly to a shift from road to rail. Road hau­liers focus their fleets on the most cost-effec­ti­ve pro­duc­tion, usual­ly with smal­ler vehic­les, and opti­mi­se their tours intern­al­ly. This is despi­te the fact that vehic­le kilo­me­t­res could be redu­ced through coope­ra­ti­on with com­pe­ti­tors. Real estate stra­te­gies or con­cepts of both pri­va­te lan­dow­ners and the public sec­tor do not allow for inno­va­ti­ve solu­ti­ons for a ver­ti­cal divi­si­on of use and thus pre­vent solu­ti­ons for a space-saving and effi­ci­ent sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal in urban areas.

A net­work­ed way of thin­king is miss­ing in the eco­no­my, in poli­tics, in admi­nis­tra­ti­ons and also in the trai­ning of trans­port and spa­ti­al planners.

Has the pan­de­mic not trig­ge­red a rethink?
Yes, Covid-19 has made peo­p­le more aware of the rele­van­ce of a func­tio­ning sup­p­ly sys­tem. The topic of freight trans­port and logi­stics has beco­me much more important. Experts had been deal­ing with these com­plex inter­re­la­ti­onships long befo­re the pan­de­mic, and poli­ti­ci­ans are also beco­ming more and more aware of the issue. We try to draw atten­ti­on to these inter­re­la­ti­onships again and again. Some­ti­mes even with suc­cess, as for exam­p­le with the Sihl­ci­ty shop­ping cent­re on the site of the for­mer “Zür­cher Papier­fa­brik an der Sihl” in Zurich-Wie­di­kon. Here, the plan­ners have inte­gra­ted the sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal sys­tems into the base­ment right next to the gara­ge ent­rance. From there, it is fine­ly dis­tri­bu­ted ver­ti­cal­ly upwards. This is exact­ly the direc­tion we have to think in when plan­ning sites: away from pie­ces of cake and towards lay­ers of cake. In this way, a com­bi­ned use of urban or peri-urban areas beco­mes possible.

How can trans­ship­ment areas and loca­ti­ons be secu­red in the long term?
Logi­stics areas in urban areas are rare, and there will hard­ly be any new ones. The public sec­tor is try­ing to secu­re exis­ting trans­ship­ment areas through ent­ries in the struc­tu­re plan. Howe­ver, these plan­ning spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons are not bin­ding on the pro­per­ty owner. The only way to secu­re land, to which pri­va­te lan­dow­ners are also obli­ga­ted, would be through a cor­re­spon­ding zoning ordi­nan­ce or through an increased purcha­se of the cor­re­spon­ding land by the can­tons and cities. These stri­ve for lon­ger-term objec­ti­ves with a lon­ger plan­ning hori­zon, such as secu­ring the sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal of goods, and are not so profit-driven.

How could the eco­no­my be more invol­ved in the pre­pa­ra­ti­on of spa­ti­al plan­ning con­cepts?
The inclu­si­on of eco­no­mic actors in the deve­lo­p­ment of sites is cen­tral to the future of freight trans­port. After all, they have to imple­ment site deve­lo­p­ment. In the Can­ton of Zurich we alre­a­dy invol­ve the busi­ness repre­sen­ta­ti­ves in the ana­ly­sis phase within the frame­work of working groups, alt­hough as a can­ton we have no legal man­da­te for freight trans­port plan­ning, but only act in an advi­so­ry and sup­port­i­ve capa­ci­ty. In the can­ton of Zurich we have laid down gui­de­lines for the deve­lo­p­ment of freight trans­port in a can­to­nal freight trans­port and logi­stics con­cept. We are cer­tain­ly play­ing a pio­nee­ring role here. But other can­tons such as Aar­gau, Bern, Vaud or Basel-City are also acting in a pro­gres­si­ve man­ner. We learn from each other through regu­lar exch­an­ges via the SBB Cargo plat­form and the freight trans­port group of the Swiss Asso­cia­ti­on of Cities.

In your opi­ni­on, what does opti­mal uti­li­sa­ti­on of the infra­struc­tu­re by pas­sen­ger and freight traf­fic look like?
I think that we should con­ti­nue to pur­sue and opti­mi­se the cur­rent approach with sepa­ra­te train paths for pas­sen­ger and freight traf­fic in the net­work uti­li­sa­ti­on con­cept. I am rather scep­ti­cal about a fle­xi­ble allo­ca­ti­on of train paths, becau­se freight traf­fic could lite­ral­ly get lost in the pro­cess. The need for infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on has been reco­g­nis­ed, as the expan­si­on step 2040 shows.

Where do you see the big­gest tasks in infra­struc­tu­re?
In the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the infra­struc­tu­re, the spe­cial needs of freight trans­port must be taken into account. The Zurich sub­ur­ban sta­ti­on node is alre­a­dy com­ple­te­ly over­loa­ded today and rail traf­fic in the Zurich area will con­ti­nue to increase. The­r­e­fo­re, bypas­ses must be crea­ted, such as the freight tun­nel from the Lim­mat­tal mar­shalling yard into the Furt­tal and on towards eas­tern Switz­er­land. Rail freight trans­ports coming from the Mit­tel­land and wan­ting to con­ti­nue in the direc­tion of Kno­nau­er Amt also have to make a U‑turn in the Zurich preli­mi­na­ry sta­ti­on with a hair­pin bend. This places an addi­tio­nal bur­den on the infra­struc­tu­re seve­ral times over. Short­cuts” are nee­ded here to bypass hot spots. For exam­p­le, the Lim­mat­tal mar­shalling yard could be con­nec­ted direct­ly to Zug and Lucer­ne via Kno­nau­er Amt. Such pro­jects are of cour­se enorm­ously expen­si­ve and can only be imple­men­ted in the long term. Nevert­hel­ess, the plan­ning cour­se must alre­a­dy be set today.

What do you wish for the future of Swiss rail freight trans­port?
I very much hope that the oppor­tu­ni­ties offe­red by rail for shif­ting traf­fic from road to rail will also be exploi­ted in natio­nal trans­port. This requi­res a trend rever­sal with fas­ter and more effi­ci­ent ser­vice con­cepts, espe­ci­al­ly in sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic. Inno­va­ti­ve ser­vice con­cepts that are demand-ori­en­ted and effi­ci­ent are nee­ded here.

What are these?
Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on offers oppor­tu­ni­ties that are curr­ent­ly not being exploi­ted in rail freight trans­port. For exam­p­le, freight rail­ways know via digi­tal codes exact­ly when, where and for how long their goods are park­ed. They should make this know­ledge available to their cus­to­mers in the form of ship­ment track­ing throug­hout the enti­re trans­port chain from sen­der to reci­pi­ent. This would signi­fi­cant­ly increase their attractiveness.

Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on are also cru­cial for the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail freight. Of cour­se, short distances of a few kilo­me­t­res, as we often encoun­ter in Switz­er­land, are not very sui­ta­ble for rail. But if you auto­ma­te cer­tain pro­ces­ses – for exam­p­le with the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling (DAK) or through auto­ma­ted rel­oa­ding of swap bodies – effi­ci­en­cy could be signi­fi­cant­ly increased. Pri­va­te wagon owners would have to imple­ment such solu­ti­ons in order to keep their fleets more pro­fi­ta­ble and to shor­ten run­ning times.

Why does freight rail have such a hard time being com­pe­ti­ti­ve?
That is a dif­fi­cult ques­ti­on. One would have to ana­ly­se very careful­ly why rail freight is so uncom­pe­ti­ti­ve and which mea­su­res are effec­ti­ve for more attrac­ti­ve offers or lower costs. Such a study could be a task of the VAP.

Spea­king of the VAP: What could we do bet­ter?
I know Frank Fur­rer and I know what the VAP logo looks like. But I hard­ly per­cei­ve the VAP as an over­all orga­ni­sa­ti­on. Here I see poten­ti­al for opti­mi­sa­ti­on. Moreo­ver, I am always invi­ted to inte­res­t­ing and meaningful events. But for us admi­nis­tra­ti­ve staff, the admi­nis­tra­ti­ve effort for the appr­oval of an event with costs is so great that we often refrain from par­ti­ci­pa­ting. That is actual­ly a pity.

To whom would you recom­mend coope­ra­ti­on with the VAP?
All can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties in Switz­er­land. For the admi­nis­tra­ti­ons, the VAP is a com­pe­tence part­ner and infor­mant that sup­ports the trans­fer of know-how; espe­ci­al­ly thanks to its natio­nal over­all view. For siding owners, the VAP is an important repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of their inte­rests, com­mit­ted to the expan­si­on of rail­way ser­vices, the pre­ser­va­ti­on of faci­li­ties and the safe­guar­ding of areas.

 

Mr Grie­der, thank you very much for the interview.

Per­so­nal details

Mat­thi­as Grie­der is a trai­ned spa­ti­al and trans­port plan­ner and has been pro­ject mana­ger for freight trans­port and logi­stics at the Office for Mobi­li­ty of the Can­ton of Zurich for four years.

 

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

On 9 June 2021, the annu­al can­to­nal con­fe­rence of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV) took place – unfort­u­na­te­ly again as a video con­fe­rence. In addi­ti­on to the foun­ding part­ners of IG WLV (VAP, Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV/UTP), SBB Cargo), a large num­ber of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from indi­vi­du­al can­tons took part.

To start with, VöV and SBB Cargo pre­sen­ted the cur­rent situa­ti­on – espe­ci­al­ly in the con­text of the Covid 19 cri­sis – and poin­ted out the chal­lenges ahead. The VAP then pre­sen­ted the three main objec­ti­ves on behalf of IG WLV, from which three clus­ters of action can be deri­ved. IG WLV is curr­ent­ly working inten­si­ve­ly on the con­cre­ti­sa­ti­on and con­cre­te imple­men­ta­ti­on of these goals.

Technology/Automation cluster

IG WLV is pushing for the rapid intro­duc­tion of nati­on­wi­de and non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on in Switz­er­land. This is done in close coor­di­na­ti­on and coope­ra­ti­on with Euro­pe. It advo­ca­tes the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the moti­on Ditt­li 20.3221 vis-à-vis the indus­try, poli­tics and admi­nis­tra­ti­on (cf. blog post «Pro­gress for auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port»).

Production/efficiency cluster

The IG WLV defi­nes key per­for­mance indi­ca­tors and draws up a con­cept that depicts esti­ma­tes of demand flows in wagon­load traf­fic for the coming years. It is also con­side­ring how addi­tio­nal volu­mes could be gene­ra­ted that com­bi­ne plan­ning secu­ri­ty, dyna­mism and cooperation.

Policy cluster

IG WLV is working on a con­cept for CO2 reduc­tion (see blog­post «Moti­on CO2-free rail freight»). It will repre­sent this con­cept vis-à-vis the fede­ral govern­ment, indus­try play­ers and can­tons and pro­mo­te its implementation.

Findings from 2020

After defi­ning the tar­get areas, the par­ti­ci­pan­ts reflec­ted on the fin­dings from last year’s can­to­nal con­fe­rence. Atten­ti­on was given to the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Data: Various chal­lenges to obtain the right data – quan­ti­ta­ti­ve and qua­li­ta­ti­ve – for future con­cepts and planning.
  • Loca­ti­ons and legal bases: Tasks and obli­ga­ti­ons of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on, can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties and opti­mal use of exis­ting and future logi­stics areas.
  • Free loa­ding: Con­side­ra­ti­on of all free loa­ding in an over­all con­cept that includes the respec­ti­ve finan­cing needs and tools.
  • Expan­si­on steps/STEP: Brin­ging tog­e­ther the con­cerns of all actors from poli­tics and busi­ness, cross-can­to­nal coor­di­na­ti­on and use of the same basic tools.
Best Practice

In an inte­res­t­ing con­tri­bu­ti­on, the can­tons of Vaud and Zurich pre­sen­ted their chal­lenges and approa­ches to solu­ti­ons for opti­mi­sing and impro­ving logi­stics oppor­tu­ni­ties. These could be used as best prac­ti­ces or inte­res­t­ing start­ing points in the future.

Further round table discussions

All the infor­ma­ti­on and impul­ses were dis­cus­sed in grea­ter depth at two round tables with the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Round table 1: Solu­ti­on approa­ches to the chal­lenges of the fin­dings from 2020
  • Round table 2: Best prac­ti­ce of the can­tons of Zurich and Vaud; pos­si­ble blue­print for fur­ther steps towards opti­mi­sed, inte­gra­ted freight trans­port logistics

Details on the con­cre­te results of the panel dis­cus­sions and on pos­si­ble mea­su­res can be found in the next blog post.