We have sup­port­ed the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAK) since its begin­nings. That is why we are invol­ved in the inter­na­tio­nal umbrel­la orga­ni­sa­ti­on of wagon kee­pers UIP, the Euro­pean DAC Deli­very Pro­gram­me (EDDP) and the Swiss DAK migra­ti­on pro­ject. Howe­ver, much remains to be done at all levels. Here is an inte­rim update on tech­ni­cal and mar­ket developments.

Here’s what it’s all about:

  • Tech­no­lo­gy still rai­ses questions
  • Fair cost-bene­fit trans­fer sought
  • Rising trans­port pri­ces can bring about a shift back to the roads
  • Coope­ra­ti­on with Euro­pe: a must
  • DAK as basis for fun­da­men­tal sys­tem change

Tog­e­ther with the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), SBB Cargo and the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV), we at the VAP are dri­ving the Swiss DAK pro­ject for­ward. Initi­al fin­dings from this coope­ra­ti­on were recor­ded in the con­cept report “Auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port in Switz­er­land, start­ing with the migra­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling” of 24 Octo­ber 2022. They were also incor­po­ra­ted into the cur­rent con­sul­ta­ti­on draft on the future of Swiss freight trans­port and – with some addi­ti­ons – into the dis­patch that the Fede­ral Coun­cil is pre­pa­ring for par­lia­ment in sum­mer 2023. Num­e­rous work­shops and bila­te­ral dis­cus­sions with the rail freight sec­tor have given rise to ques­ti­ons, cri­ti­cisms and pos­si­ble solu­ti­ons that now need to be explo­red in grea­ter depth.

The technology raises questions

Defi­ning the cou­pling head was a first mile­stone. Now it is time to deve­lop and test the digi­tal ele­ments. Two tech­ni­cal approa­ches are being pur­sued for this. With “Power­line-Plus”, the elec­tri­cal impul­ses and data are trans­mit­ted over the same line with a limi­t­ed num­ber of cont­acts. In Switz­er­land, a con­sor­ti­um of experts will be test­ing this approach in the coming months. In the “Sin­gle Pair Ether­net” (SPE) model, on the other hand, sepa­ra­te lines are nee­ded for power and data transmission.

Ques­ti­ons such as these remain open with both tech­ni­cal approaches:

  • Under what wea­ther and cli­ma­tic con­di­ti­ons is relia­ble ope­ra­ti­on possible?
  • Are there down­ti­mes in data trans­mis­si­on during the num­e­rous ope­ra­tio­nal pro­ces­ses (shun­ting, tra­vel (tight radii, inclines …)?
  • Final­ly, what func­tion­a­li­ties does the digi­tal com­po­nent contain?
  • How will the upward com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty be desi­gned, espe­ci­al­ly from DAK4 to DAK5?
  • How will the Euro­pe-wide com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty of the future DAK rol­ling stock be ensured?
  • Curr­ent­ly, the Euro­pean rail­way sec­tor has only a few experts on this topic, which is a great chall­enge. There is also a need for cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on on mecha­ni­cal aspects such as the force effects of the new cou­pling on the indi­vi­du­al wagon types or the instal­la­ti­on of the DAK in loco­mo­ti­ves due to weight and/or space pro­blems or the safe inte­gra­ti­on into the vehic­le con­trol tech­no­lo­gy. Ques­ti­ons like these must be ans­we­red by 2026.
Cost-benefit transfer can bring about a reverse shift

Invest­ments in DAK migra­ti­on are con­sidera­ble, espe­ci­al­ly for vehic­le owners. We assu­me costs of CHF 20,000 to CHF 40,000 for wagons (depen­ding on wagon type) and CHF 60,000 to CHF 250,000 for loco­mo­ti­ves. Howe­ver, posi­ti­ve effects for the vehic­le owners will only beco­me noti­ceable after com­ple­te migra­ti­on, i.e. after ten years at the ear­liest. This means that costs will rise in the first few years wit­hout addi­tio­nal reve­nue, which will lead to hig­her pri­ces for wagon hire. The rail­way under­ta­kings (RUs) will also have addi­tio­nal expen­ses during the migra­ti­on phase of seve­ral years due to par­al­lel ope­ra­ti­on. High price sen­si­ti­vi­ty could cause a shift back to the roads. We alre­a­dy noti­ced this effect in 2023 with the pas­sed-on price increa­ses due to increased trac­tion cur­rent costs.

We at the VAP are loo­king for solu­ti­ons to these challenges:

  • How can the RUs, as the main win­ners of the DAK, pass on the effi­ci­en­cy gains and cost savings to the vehic­le owners? In mono­po­ly-like struc­tures such as sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic, mar­ket-based mecha­nisms do not work.
  • How high do sub­si­dies (A‑fonds-perdu con­tri­bu­ti­ons, loans, funds) have to be in order to com­pen­sa­te for the une­qual cost-bene­fit trans­fer, and how can a major shift back to the road during migra­ti­on be pre­ven­ted? What hap­pens if sub­si­dies or sub­se­quent finan­cing to the state-owned RUs are almost com­ple­te­ly dis­con­tin­ued with the DAK?

Inves­t­ing in new rol­ling stock is cer­tain­ly con­ceiva­ble or even neces­sa­ry for many wagon owners. But the real ques­ti­on is how exis­ting fleets can be effi­ci­ent­ly con­ver­ted. In doing so, it is important to take the fol­lo­wing aspects into account wit­hout dis­ad­van­ta­ging play­ers through no fault of their own:

  • Even with newer rol­ling stock, there are dif­fi­cul­ties in retro­fit­ting a DAK.
  • The purcha­se of new cars has beco­me 50 per­cent more expen­si­ve due to increased raw mate­ri­al prices.
  • The pro­duc­tion of new cars with DAK has to be star­ted after the spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons have been fina­li­sed. The num­ber of units is limi­t­ed at the begin­ning depen­ding on the type of wagon.
  • Older rol­ling stock with a simp­le con­ver­si­on cau­ses lower addi­tio­nal costs.
  • Dif­fe­rent vehic­le owners own iden­ti­cal types. The con­ver­si­on of the type vehic­le must be inde­pen­dent of the kee­per and the high one-off costs must be covered.
Track to track with Europe

The majo­ri­ty of those invol­ved agree: only in close coope­ra­ti­on with Euro­pe can we mas­ter sus­tainable migra­ti­on. The tech­ni­cal and ope­ra­tio­nal chal­lenges of con­ver­si­on are simi­lar on both sides of the bor­der. Ques­ti­ons about the con­ver­si­on pro­cess up to suc­cessful imple­men­ta­ti­on and finan­cing can only be ans­we­red if all experts and decis­i­on-makers are at the table. Unfort­u­na­te­ly, that is only a handful.

Our con­tri­bu­ti­on from Switz­er­land is to deal with the natio­nal cir­cum­s­tances and to prepa­re the ground­work well. This includes laun­ching pilot trans­ports; the first DAK test trains have been run­ning in Switz­er­land since April 2023. We should gather this expe­ri­ence and incor­po­ra­te it into the pan-Euro­pean project.

We would like to show that effi­ci­ent and sus­tainable inno­va­ti­on at Euro­pean level is only pos­si­ble tog­e­ther, using the fol­lo­wing examples:

  • Coor­di­na­te work­shop capa­ci­ties: Coor­di­na­ti­on bet­ween the count­ries and wagon kee­pers must be ensu­red in order to have the wagons to be con­ver­ted in ope­ra­ti­on (natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal rela­ti­ons) rou­ted to the nea­rest or best pos­si­ble work­shop and retur­ned again.
  • Align fun­ding requi­re­ments. The pre­re­qui­si­te for fun­ding is usual­ly an entry in the vehic­le regis­ter and/or a regis­tered office in the respec­ti­ve coun­try. Howe­ver, as wagons are not always used in that coun­try but move throug­hout Euro­pe, fun­ding must be secu­red for wagon kee­pers in all count­ries at the time of migration.
  • Coor­di­na­te migra­ti­on time­ta­ble. Early migra­ti­on leads to new inter­faces in rail freight trans­port. Spe­ci­fi­cal­ly, a wagon con­ver­ted and fun­ded in Switz­er­land can­not run in Ger­ma­ny as long as the DAK migra­ti­on has not star­ted there and the cor­re­spon­ding import and export trans­ports have not been coor­di­na­ted. In addi­ti­on, the vehic­le owner can only use his fixed assets to a limi­t­ed extent.
  • Bring decis­i­on-making bodies tog­e­ther: The tech­ni­cal solu­ti­ons are adopted in the spe­ci­fied bodies of the EU and then adopted by Switz­er­land. Inte­gra­ting these resour­ces into the EU pro­ject would be more expe­di­ent than having Switz­er­land set up its own organisation.

In order to con­tri­bu­te to the over­all rea­li­sa­ti­on at EU level, we in Switz­er­land must con­cen­tra­te on the pre­pa­ra­to­ry work with all the com­pa­nies con­cer­ned and actively push ahead with our test pha­ses and pilot trans­ports. We can­not afford any tee­thing trou­bles with the pro­ducts and specifications.

Basis for a fundamental system change

The DAK is not a tech­ni­cal under­ta­king, but the begin­ning of the neces­sa­ry digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and inte­gra­ti­on of rail freight trans­port into a sus­tainable logi­stics chain. With the DAK, ele­ments such as auto­ma­tic brake test­ing, auto­ma­tic recor­ding of the wagon sequence, train inte­gri­ty con­trol or elec­t­ro-pneu­ma­tic bra­king are added in addi­ti­on to the cou­pling process.

In order for the DAK to unfold its full tech­ni­cal effect and give rail freight trans­port the neces­sa­ry mar­ket dyna­mics, we have to work on the fol­lo­wing aspects befo­re the start of migration:

  • Rede­fi­ne ope­ra­tio­nal processes
  • Adapt regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments and regu­la­ti­ons and sim­pli­fy timeframes
  • Prepa­re and adapt infra­struc­tu­re and sidings
  • Train affec­ted groups for migra­ti­on and operation
  • Auto­ma­te inspec­tions and maintenance
  • Auto­ma­te trans­port infor­ma­ti­on for shippers
  • Effec­tively pro­tect digi­tal data from unaut­ho­ri­sed access

We at the VAP also aim to launch a data plat­form and exch­an­ge data in the sense of an eco-data sys­tem. We are con­vin­ced that the DAK will only bring the neces­sa­ry and large-scale added value to the rail­way sec­tor with the exch­an­ge of data. We are the­r­e­fo­re very plea­sed that despi­te initi­al scep­ti­cism from the sec­tor, the FOT has taken up this aspect. It also intends to include freight trans­port in the plan­ned Mobi­li­ty Data Infra­struc­tu­re (MODIG). In our next blog on the DAK, you can read about the ext­ent to which the DAK con­tri­bu­tes to an inno­va­ti­ve, self-suf­fi­ci­ent and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted rail freight trans­port sys­tem and how the let­ter K can the­r­e­fo­re be trans­la­ted pri­ma­ri­ly as connectivity.

Bei­trag Teilen: