The Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Natio­nal Coun­cil (KVF‑N) unani­mously sup­ports the pro­po­sal for the finan­cial sta­bi­li­sa­ti­on of the Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBBG). In con­trast to the Fede­ral Coun­cil, it is of the opi­ni­on that there is no need to chan­ge the sys­tem for gran­ting vault loans to SBB. In doing so, the KVF‑N also dis­re­gards all of the VAP’s recommendations.

This is the issue:

  • 3 bil­li­on finan­cial injec­tion for SBB
  • SBBG par­ti­al revi­si­on refer­red to the Natio­nal Council
  • The industry’s voice remains unheard
  • Still no mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on in sight

 

3 billion financial injection for SBB

In its report of 16 Decem­ber 2022 on moti­on 22.3008 «Sup­port­ing the imple­men­ta­ti­on of SBB invest­ments and a long-term visi­on in Covid-19 times», the fede­ral govern­ment pro­po­ses to cover SBB’s defi­ci­ts in long-distance trans­port with a one-off capi­tal injec­tion of an esti­ma­ted CHF 1.25 bil­li­on. It also wants to ease the track access char­ges for long-distance trans­port with a fur­ther CHF 1.7 bil­li­on. It is also pro­po­sing a revi­si­on of the finan­cing instruments.

SBBG partial revision referred to the National Council

The KVF‑N has unani­mously refer­red the bill to amend the SBBG to the Natio­nal Coun­cil. The majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee also rejects a chan­ge in the sys­tem of finan­cing instru­ments, as bud­get loans, unli­ke tre­asu­ry loans, are sub­ject to the debt brake. It is of the opi­ni­on that the resul­ting com­pe­ti­ti­ve situa­ti­on with other fede­ral expen­dit­u­re is not desi­ra­ble with regard to public trans­port ser­vices. The Natio­nal Coun­cil will deci­de on the KVF‑N pro­po­sal in the 2023 win­ter session.

Voice of the industry remains unheard

As published in our media release of 30 March 2023, we at the VAP reject the pro­po­sed extra­or­di­na­ry res­truc­tu­ring of long-distance trans­port with around 3 bil­li­on tax­pay­ers’ money. On the other hand, we wel­co­me the pro­po­sed cor­rec­tion of the finan­cing instru­ments, i.e. the wai­ver of the gran­ting of vault loans to SBB bypas­sing the fede­ral debt brake. In the blog posts «SBB should take respon­si­bi­li­ty ins­tead of a CHF 3 bil­li­on finan­cial packa­ge» and «No sta­bi­li­sa­ti­on of SBB despi­te CHF 3 bil­li­on in addi­tio­nal fede­ral funds», we sum­ma­ri­se the industry’s posi­ti­on and our cor­re­spon­ding arguments.

Still no market liberalisation in sight

If the bill is accept­ed, the Natio­nal Coun­cil would fur­ther con­so­li­da­te the SBB mono­po­ly in long-distance trans­port. This is pro­ble­ma­tic in terms of Euro­pean poli­cy, as the EU is deman­ding that Switz­er­land open up the long-distance trans­port mar­ket. This unful­fil­led demand overs­ha­dows the nego­tia­ti­ons with the EU on the exten­si­on of the tem­po­ra­ry coope­ra­ti­on with the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy ERA for one-stop-shop aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­ons and more inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. Com­pared to EU mem­ber sta­tes, Switz­er­land does not yet have full mar­ket access; the Swiss rail­way net­work is curr­ent­ly not an inte­gra­ted part of the Euro­pean interop net­work. For this reason, the freight trans­port-rela­ted asso­cia­ti­ons Astag, CFS and we at the VAP are cal­ling for a natio­nal migra­ti­on stra­tegy to open up the mar­ket in line with the EU. If the Natio­nal Coun­cil votes in favour of the KVF‑N moti­on, it will push this issue even fur­ther away.

Adden­dum 20.12.2023, update from the win­ter ses­si­on:
In the win­ter ses­si­on, a majo­ri­ty of the Natio­nal Coun­cil agreed to grant the Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBB) a one-off capi­tal sub­s­idy of CHF 1.15 bil­li­on to redu­ce debt. This amount was alre­a­dy included in the 2024 bud­get. In con­trast, the Natio­nal Coun­cil rejec­ted the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sal to switch from tre­asu­ry loans to fede­ral bud­get loans when a cer­tain level of debt is rea­ched. This was based on the argu­ment that app­ly­ing the debt brake to bud­get loans could delay the expan­si­on. The cham­ber also deci­ded to set the appro­pria­te reser­ve for the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund (BIF) at a mini­mum of CHF 300 mil­li­on, with a maxi­mum of two thirds of the net reve­nue from the per­for­mance-rela­ted heavy vehic­le char­ge (LSVA) flowing into the fund. The Natio­nal Coun­cil has thus igno­red all of the VAP’s recom­men­da­ti­ons. The bill now goes to the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, which will hop­eful­ly take cor­rec­ti­ve action.

Bei­trag Teilen: