COMPETITION IN RAIL FREIGHT TRANSPORT

We at the VAP are com­mit­ted to a fair, com­pe­ti­ti­ve freight trans­port sys­tem. To this end, we moni­tor, among other things, modal shift and lobby poli­ti­ci­ans for non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry rail.

Informative

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

On 9 June 2021, the annu­al can­to­nal con­fe­rence of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV) took place – unfort­u­na­te­ly again as a video con­fe­rence. In addi­ti­on to the foun­ding part­ners of IG WLV (VAP, Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV/UTP), SBB Cargo), a large num­ber of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from indi­vi­du­al can­tons took part.

To start with, VöV and SBB Cargo pre­sen­ted the cur­rent situa­ti­on – espe­ci­al­ly in the con­text of the Covid 19 cri­sis – and poin­ted out the chal­lenges ahead. The VAP then pre­sen­ted the three main objec­ti­ves on behalf of IG WLV, from which three clus­ters of action can be deri­ved. IG WLV is curr­ent­ly working inten­si­ve­ly on the con­cre­ti­sa­ti­on and con­cre­te imple­men­ta­ti­on of these goals.

Technology/Automation cluster

IG WLV is pushing for the rapid intro­duc­tion of nati­on­wi­de and non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on in Switz­er­land. This is done in close coor­di­na­ti­on and coope­ra­ti­on with Euro­pe. It advo­ca­tes the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the moti­on Ditt­li 20.3221 vis-à-vis the indus­try, poli­tics and admi­nis­tra­ti­on (cf. blog post «Pro­gress for auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port»).

Production/efficiency cluster

The IG WLV defi­nes key per­for­mance indi­ca­tors and draws up a con­cept that depicts esti­ma­tes of demand flows in wagon­load traf­fic for the coming years. It is also con­side­ring how addi­tio­nal volu­mes could be gene­ra­ted that com­bi­ne plan­ning secu­ri­ty, dyna­mism and cooperation.

Policy cluster

IG WLV is working on a con­cept for CO2 reduc­tion (see blog­post «Moti­on CO2-free rail freight»). It will repre­sent this con­cept vis-à-vis the fede­ral govern­ment, indus­try play­ers and can­tons and pro­mo­te its implementation.

Findings from 2020

After defi­ning the tar­get areas, the par­ti­ci­pan­ts reflec­ted on the fin­dings from last year’s can­to­nal con­fe­rence. Atten­ti­on was given to the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Data: Various chal­lenges to obtain the right data – quan­ti­ta­ti­ve and qua­li­ta­ti­ve – for future con­cepts and planning.
  • Loca­ti­ons and legal bases: Tasks and obli­ga­ti­ons of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on, can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties and opti­mal use of exis­ting and future logi­stics areas.
  • Free loa­ding: Con­side­ra­ti­on of all free loa­ding in an over­all con­cept that includes the respec­ti­ve finan­cing needs and tools.
  • Expan­si­on steps/STEP: Brin­ging tog­e­ther the con­cerns of all actors from poli­tics and busi­ness, cross-can­to­nal coor­di­na­ti­on and use of the same basic tools.
Best Practice

In an inte­res­t­ing con­tri­bu­ti­on, the can­tons of Vaud and Zurich pre­sen­ted their chal­lenges and approa­ches to solu­ti­ons for opti­mi­sing and impro­ving logi­stics oppor­tu­ni­ties. These could be used as best prac­ti­ces or inte­res­t­ing start­ing points in the future.

Further round table discussions

All the infor­ma­ti­on and impul­ses were dis­cus­sed in grea­ter depth at two round tables with the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Round table 1: Solu­ti­on approa­ches to the chal­lenges of the fin­dings from 2020
  • Round table 2: Best prac­ti­ce of the can­tons of Zurich and Vaud; pos­si­ble blue­print for fur­ther steps towards opti­mi­sed, inte­gra­ted freight trans­port logistics

Details on the con­cre­te results of the panel dis­cus­sions and on pos­si­ble mea­su­res can be found in the next blog post.

Strengthen modal shift and diversity of supply

Strengthen modal shift and diversity of supply

A mar­ket-ori­en­ted varie­ty of ser­vices and the role of rail freight in modal shift are up for deba­te. After SBB Cargo announ­ced a fur­ther savings pro­gram­me, Charles Juil­lard, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, and the Com­mis­si­on for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons SR have resor­ted to the instru­ment of the pos­tu­la­te and cal­led on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to exami­ne and report. Both issues are curr­ent­ly being dealt with in the Coun­cil of States.

Postulate 21.3198: Better use of railway facilities

The pos­tu­la­te 21.3198 «Freight trans­port. Why not make bet­ter use of exis­ting rail­way faci­li­ties?» by Charles Juil­lard, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes for the Euro­pean Peo­p­le’s Party (EPP), ins­tructs the Fede­ral Coun­cil to sub­mit a report on the deve­lo­p­ment of freight trans­port in Switz­er­land – espe­ci­al­ly by rail. In doing so, it should exami­ne the mea­su­res that could favour a shift of freight trans­port from road to rail. This demand arose against the back­ground that in recent years the num­ber of ser­vice points and faci­li­ties for the trans­fer of goods from road to rail has been ste­adi­ly redu­ced, favou­ring road trans­port for reasons of sim­pli­ci­ty and time savings. This deve­lo­p­ment con­tra­dicts the man­da­te of modal shift and noise abatement.

Details on Pos­tu­la­te 21.3198 «Freight trans­port. Why not make bet­ter use of exis­ting rail­way faci­li­ties?» can be found here.

Postulate 21.3597: Future of freight transport

With the pos­tu­la­te 21.3597 «Future of freight trans­port», the Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes ins­tructs the Fede­ral Coun­cil to sub­mit a report on the future direc­tion of rail freight trans­port poli­cy by the end of the first quar­ter of 2022 at the latest. The Com­mis­si­on demands details on the import and export of goods by rail and the con­tri­bu­ti­on of rail freight trans­port, modal shift and sus­tainable ori­en­ta­ti­on of the sup­p­ly chain. It wants an assess­ment of SBB Car­go’s mar­ket-ori­en­ted and area- and cost-cove­ring ser­vices, as well as its orga­ni­sa­tio­nal struc­tu­re, modal shift effects, trans­port per­for­mance, infra­struc­tures, ser­vice points and the needs of the ship­ping indus­try. The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s report should also address the effects and pro­s­pects of the stra­te­gic rea­lignment of SBB Cargo and iden­ti­fy poli­ti­cal sce­na­ri­os for fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment, any need for legis­la­ti­ve action and the need for invest­ment in new rol­ling stock, auto­ma­ti­on and digitalisation.

Details on pos­tu­la­te 21.3597 «Future of freight traf­fic» can be read here.

Committed to stronger rail

We at the VAP sup­port both of the above pos­tu­la­tes and, for envi­ron­men­tal and ener­gy poli­cy reasons, are com­mit­ted to a balan­ced modal split and a high diver­si­ty of ser­vices. Within the frame­work of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), we are curr­ent­ly working on a fit­ness pro­gram­me for rail freight trans­port. This includes more inten­si­ve coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween freight rail­ways and SBB Cargo in the inte­rests of cus­to­mers. Tog­e­ther with the FOT, we are also in the pro­cess of dri­ving for­ward and rapidly imple­men­ting the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight. Par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on is being paid to the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling DAK (cf. Pro­gress for Auto­ma­ti­on in Rail Freight Traf­fic). Also in coope­ra­ti­on with the FOT, we are curr­ent­ly dra­wing up a con­cept for the con­tri­bu­ti­on of rail freight trans­port to the reduc­tion of CO2 emis­si­ons. You can also find more infor­ma­ti­on on this in our spe­cia­list blog.

SBB Cargo Magazine: VAP President Josef Dittli in conversation

SBB Cargo Magazine: VAP President Josef Dittli in conversation

Dési­rée Baer, CEO of SBB Cargo, and Josef Ditt­li, Mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and Pre­si­dent of the VAP Swiss Rail Ship­pers Asso­cia­ti­on, talk about the future of Swiss rail freight. They agree that digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on should signi­fi­cant­ly increase the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty of rail. The fede­ral govern­ment should play a sup­port­ing role in this.

→ Click here for the inter­view (in german)

Swiss Wagonload Transport Interest Group – for a start

Swiss Wagonload Transport Interest Group – for a start

In 2018, the VAP, tog­e­ther with SBB Cargo and the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV/UTP), foun­ded the Swiss Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group – IG WLV Schweiz for short. This blog post kicks off a series of posts that pro­vi­de ans­wers to such and simi­lar ques­ti­ons: What do the stake­hol­ders want to achie­ve? What were the trig­gers and foun­da­ti­ons? Where do we stand today? What are the poten­ti­al bene­fits for VAP members?

How it all began

Accor­ding to the press release «Out­sour­cing of SBB Cargo should bring more com­pe­ti­ti­on» of the Com­mit­tees for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (TTC) of Janu­ary 2017, they agreed to the draft bill «Orga­ni­sa­ti­on of the Rail­way Infra­struc­tu­re» (OBI, in ger­man) of the Fede­ral Coun­cil. Howe­ver, the KVF pro­po­sed to their coun­cil­lors by 14 votes to 11 that the draft be refer­red back to the Fede­ral Coun­cil and revi­sed in some points. Among other things, SBB Cargo should be out­sour­ced in a hol­ding struc­tu­re in order to achie­ve more com­pe­ti­ti­on and streng­then freight trans­port in this way. In addi­ti­on, the KVF recom­men­ded that sys­tem lea­der­ship should also be regu­la­ted for freight transport.

This was the birth of IG WLV, so to speak. In addi­ti­on, Artic­le 3a of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG) (in ger­man) was amen­ded during the con­sul­ta­ti­ons on OBI. Accor­ding to this, the actors in rail freight trans­port are to joint­ly deve­lop gui­de­lines for achie­ving the goals of the GüTG. For exam­p­le, in favour of tech­ni­cal inno­va­tions, effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ments in pro­duc­tion pro­ces­ses or for impro­ved inte­gra­ti­on of rail freight trans­port into the logi­stics economy.

Strong wagonload traffic, satisfied customers

The inte­rest group aims to pro­mo­te the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of wagon­load traf­fic in Switz­er­land. In the com­mon inte­rest, it pur­sues the goal of pro­vi­ding the ser­vices of the rail­way sys­tem more effec­tively and effi­ci­ent­ly and thus enab­ling a self-sus­tai­ning and sus­tainable deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port in the sense of the GüTG. The sys­tem of wagon­load traf­fic is to be ali­gned with the strengths of the rail­way and the needs of the cus­to­mers and is to be regard­ed as an inte­gral part of the over­all logi­stics. Both rail pro­vi­ders and cus­to­mers should bene­fit equal­ly from its eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty and reliability.

Exchange of information and planning for the future

Since its foun­da­ti­on, the stake­hol­ders of IG WLV have exch­an­ged views on various topics in board mee­tings. In addi­ti­on, in regu­lar work­shops they shed light on the con­cre­te chal­lenges and hurd­les of the rail­way sys­tem, such as the deve­lo­p­ment pos­si­bi­li­ties in sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic or the reasons why cus­to­mers are dis­sa­tis­fied with the cur­rent situa­ti­on. The IG WLV is curr­ent­ly working on a joint con­cept with direc­tions and cor­re­spon­ding goals as well as con­cre­te mea­su­res for the coming years.

A lot planned, a lot to do

Whe­ther cus­to­mers, poli­ti­ci­ans or dia­lo­gue groups: Over­all, the expec­ta­ti­ons of the IG WLV are high. VAP Gene­ral Secre­ta­ry Frank Fur­rer talks about the cur­rent state of deve­lo­p­ments in an inter­view with the trans­port workers’ union. The road from a decla­ra­ti­on of intent to con­cre­te results is long and rocky. The IG WLV wants to smooth this path so that cus­to­mers can count on a bet­ter rail­way sys­tem and poli­ti­ci­ans reco­g­ni­se the added value of increased effi­ci­en­cy and cooperation.

Four private logistics service providers take a stake in SBB Cargo

Four private logistics service providers take a stake in SBB Cargo

The four fami­ly-owned com­pa­nies Gal­li­ker, Plan­zer, Bert­schi and Cami­on Trans­port are taking a 35% stake in SBB Cargo AG under the name «Swiss Combi AG». The com­pa­nies stand for cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on, inno­va­ti­on and mar­ket-ori­en­ted solutions.

SBB Car­go’s cus­to­mers will bene­fit from this accu­mu­la­ted expe­ri­ence as an ope­ra­tor of logi­stics net­works and from its broad cus­to­mer base. The newly foun­ded com­pa­ny has it in its power to coun­ter the fears expres­sed in many quar­ters of fur­ther incre­asing mar­ket domi­nan­ce with com­ple­te trans­pa­ren­cy and com­pe­ti­ti­on-ori­en­ted action. It can help wagon­load traf­fic, SBB’s core busi­ness, to regain momen­tum after years of decline.

It remains to be seen to what ext­ent the law on the orga­ni­sa­ti­on of rail­way infra­struc­tu­re pas­sed last year and the asso­cia­ted ordi­nan­ces will be able to spur the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port as a whole. The frame­work con­di­ti­ons for rail freight trans­port are still poor in the area of plan­ning con­s­truc­tion sites and line clo­sures as well as regu­la­ting the non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry ope­ra­ti­on of sidings and ter­mi­nals. Also, despi­te this invol­vement and the for­mal inde­pen­dence of SBB Cargo, it remains com­ple­te­ly open whe­ther a balan­ced infra­struc­tu­re and real estate poli­cy will be pos­si­ble within the SBB Group in the future or whe­ther it will con­ti­nue to act uni­la­te­ral­ly in favour of pas­sen­ger traffic.

Federal Council puts together package of measures to strengthen modal shift

Federal Council puts together package of measures to strengthen modal shift

With the ope­ning of the Ceneri Base Tun­nel in Decem­ber 2020, ano­ther piece of the puz­zle for an effi­ci­ent north-south con­nec­tion through Switz­er­land will be com­ple­ted. Howe­ver, the expan­si­on of the inter­na­tio­nal freight cor­ri­dor is delay­ed by at least a deca­de. As a result, the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty gains in inter­na­tio­nal com­bi­ned trans­port are only half as great as ori­gi­nal­ly planned.

The Fede­ral Coun­cil ack­now­led­ges the delay­ed imple­men­ta­ti­on in prin­ci­ple and pres­ents a “packa­ge of mea­su­res to streng­then modal shift” in the modal shift report of 13 Novem­ber 2019. Howe­ver, from the per­spec­ti­ve of the Swiss freight trans­port indus­try, the pro­po­sed mea­su­res are not suf­fi­ci­ent. In order to main­tain the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of UCT (Unac­com­pa­nied Com­bi­ned Trans­port) in tran­sal­pi­ne traf­fic and to con­ti­nue the modal shift, the indus­try is cal­ling for addi­tio­nal measures.

Delayed implementation of the modal shift

With the ope­ning of the Ceneri Base Tun­nel in Decem­ber 2020, the NRLA pro­ject will be offi­ci­al­ly com­ple­ted. Howe­ver, the bene­fits for freight traf­fic in Alpi­ne tran­sit through Switz­er­land will only mate­ria­li­se with a con­sidera­ble time delay. Num­e­rous fac­tors con­tri­bu­te to the fact that the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty of the resour­ces used – loco­mo­ti­ves, per­son­nel, rail­way wagons, etc. – can­not be increased by far to the ext­ent and in the time frame ori­gi­nal­ly planned:

  • The delay­ed expan­si­on of the fee­der lines in the north makes it impos­si­ble to ope­ra­te 740 m trains.
  • Fre­quent and inter­na­tio­nal­ly uncoor­di­na­ted con­s­truc­tion sites with diver­si­ons and tem­po­ra­ry capa­ci­ty bot­t­len­ecks pre­vent the expec­ted reduc­tion in tra­vel time and lead to con­ti­nuous­ly incre­asing qua­li­ty defi­ci­ts. The con­se­quen­ces are delays and inef­fi­ci­ent use of resources.
  • Due to the non-coor­di­na­ted inter­na­tio­nal train path plan­ning, the tra­vel time savings in Switz­er­land will fizz­le out at the bor­ders for the time being.
  • The remai­ning gra­di­ents of the line and the ope­ra­tio­nal con­cept of the Gott­hard Base Tun­nel still requi­re the use of a second loco­mo­ti­ve for heavy trains.

Under these con­di­ti­ons, com­bi­ned trans­port ope­ra­tors can rea­li­se at most half of the ori­gi­nal­ly expec­ted pro­duc­ti­vi­ty effects. In order to main­tain the cur­rent volu­me in tran­sal­pi­ne com­bi­ned trans­port and to gain addi­tio­nal traf­fic volu­mes in the medi­um term with regard to the modal shift tar­get, the Swiss freight trans­port indus­try pro­po­ses a lon­ger-term ori­en­ta­ti­on of the modal shift poli­cy until 2030 with addi­tio­nal measures.

Extension of the payment framework for the promotion of transalpine UCT until 2030

In order not to jeo­par­di­se the posi­ti­ve results of the cur­rent modal shift poli­cy, the pro­mo­ti­on of tran­sal­pi­ne UCT must not be sus­pen­ded pre­ma­tu­re­ly. From the mar­ke­t’s point of view, an exten­si­on of the fun­ding mea­su­res until 2030 is neces­sa­ry. Only from 2030 onwards can the plan­ned fur­ther pro­duc­ti­vi­ty effects be expec­ted to be realised.

Fur­ther­mo­re, accor­ding to the moni­to­ring of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port, the qua­li­ty defi­ci­ts of CT trains have con­ti­nuous­ly increased. While 75% of trains were less than one hour late in 2009, only 55% of all trains were late in the first half of 2019. Today, 12% of trains are even delay­ed for 12 hours or more. These qua­li­ty defi­ci­ts, dri­ven by the expan­si­on of the cor­ri­dor infra­struc­tu­re with num­e­rous con­s­truc­tion sites and capa­ci­ty rest­ric­tions, will con­ti­nue to weigh hea­vi­ly on pro­duc­ti­vi­ty until at least 2030.

The 2030 time hori­zon also crea­tes the neces­sa­ry invest­ment secu­ri­ty. Trans­port com­pa­nies will invest in con­tai­ners and cra­neable trai­lers, ope­ra­tors in rail wagons and ter­mi­nals, and rail­way com­pa­nies in loco­mo­ti­ves if lon­ger-term use of these capi­tal goods is ensured.

Subsidies for operating compensation for UCT amounting to CHF 55 million annually from 2024

An effi­ci­ent rail­way infra­struc­tu­re in com­bi­na­ti­on with train path pri­ces at the level of the neigh­bou­ring count­ries Ger­ma­ny and Italy enables Switz­er­land to ope­ra­te com­bi­ned trans­port on its own account – this gui­ding prin­ci­ple still holds true. Howe­ver, the ope­ra­tio­nal and infra­struc­tu­ral con­di­ti­ons on the north-south cor­ri­dor through Switz­er­land do not meet these requi­re­ments eit­her at pre­sent or in the coming years. During this peri­od, com­bi­ned trans­port ope­ra­tors and rail­way com­pa­nies will be able to increase pro­duc­ti­vi­ty by a maxi­mum of half of the ori­gi­nal­ly plan­ned value when the NRLA is completed.

It is true that the Swiss track price revi­si­on 2021 – which lowers the base price for freight trans­port and intro­du­ces dis­counts for long trains – makes a signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­on to sup­port­ing UCT. Nevert­hel­ess, a gap of about half of the ope­ra­ting com­pen­sa­ti­on of the refe­rence year 2018 remains, amoun­ting to CHF 110 million.

Based on this ana­ly­sis of the situa­ti­on, the freight trans­port indus­try demands that unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port (UCT) be sup­port­ed with ope­ra­ting con­tri­bu­ti­ons of CHF 55 mil­li­on per year until 2030. This will enable UCT to main­tain the cur­rent modal shift volu­me and, if neces­sa­ry, to lar­ge­ly absorb traf­fic growth. Should the frame­work con­di­ti­ons impro­ve more quick­ly than assu­med – for exam­p­le through a signi­fi­cant impro­ve­ment in qua­li­ty or a sus­tainable opti­mi­sa­ti­on of the inter­na­tio­nal time­ta­bles – addi­tio­nal traf­fic volu­mes could con­ti­nue to be gai­ned for UCT.

With the expec­ted fur­ther growth of UCT until 2030, the reduc­tion path of sub­si­dies per con­sign­ment would again be signi­fi­cant­ly impro­ved. Whe­re­as in 2011 an avera­ge of CHF 173 in ope­ra­ting sub­si­dies was paid per shifted truck­load, in 2018 this figu­re was still CHF 116. Accor­ding to the ideas of the freight trans­port indus­try, this amount would drop fur­ther to CHF 40–45 per shifted truck by 2030.

Expansion of access routes in the north

The NRLA con­cept for pro­mo­ting rail freight trans­port depends on effi­ci­ent, high-per­for­mance access lines to the base tun­nels in order to ensu­re the sup­p­ly of Euro­pe’s hig­hest-demand eco­no­mic loca­ti­ons. After the com­mis­sio­ning of the 4 m cor­ri­dor, the situa­ti­on will be as follows:

  • 3 access lines in Italy – via Chi­as­so, Luino and Domodossola
  • 2 lines in Switz­er­land – via Gott­hard and Lötsch­berg base tunnels
  • 1 access line north of Basel – via Karls­ru­he – Mann­heim – Colo­gne – Benelux

An alter­na­ti­ve must urgen­tly be crea­ted for the bot­t­len­eck in the north. The only effi­ci­ent alter­na­ti­ve route (flat track) is the route on the left bank of the Rhine via France. It is opti­mal for the high-volu­me Bel­gi­um – Italy route. In addi­ti­on, there is a direct con­nec­tion route with the cor­ri­dor on the right bank of the Rhine, which ser­ves to redu­ce the risk.

Howe­ver, these rou­tes do not yet cor­re­spond to the cor­ri­dor para­me­ters of the Swiss tran­sit axis and the­r­e­fo­re curr­ent­ly only carry a low volu­me of traf­fic. In order to make the capa­ci­ties on these alter­na­ti­ve rou­tes more usable for UCT through Switz­er­land, the Zeebrugge/Antwerp – Stras­bourg – Basel line and the Wörth – Lau­ter­bourg – Stras­bourg cross con­nec­tion must be upgraded to the para­me­ters 740 m train length, 4 m cor­ner height, 2000 t with one loco­mo­ti­ve, ETCS. This would also crea­te a sys­tem in the north with two fee­der lines and an alter­na­ti­ve route on the left bank of the Rhine.

The expan­si­on of a cor­ri­dor-com­pli­ant alter­na­ti­ve route via France is likely to be mana­geable in terms of costs. It is very much in the inte­rest of Switz­er­land and its tran­sit shift poli­cy. To imple­ment it, Switz­er­land needs a poli­ti­cal initia­ti­ve tog­e­ther with France and Bel­gi­um, which should lead to an inter­na­tio­nal trea­ty on infra­struc­tu­re deve­lo­p­ment. Par­lia­ment should call on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to take the cor­re­spon­ding initia­ti­ve in the form of an inter­na­tio­nal trea­ty. In addi­ti­on, the expan­si­on of the Rhine Val­ley rail­way in Ger­ma­ny must be pur­sued with vigour. The com­ple­ti­on of this con­trac­tual­ly agreed capa­ci­ty increase has been post­po­ned until 2040.

No results found.