The VAP promotes freight transport by rail.

The VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of Ship­pers cam­paigns for mar­ket-ori­en­ted frame­work con­di­ti­ons and an attrac­ti­ve Swiss rail freight sys­tem. Rele­vant topics:

Freight industry

  • How do we shape the future of freight trans­port?
  • What moves the freight industry?
  • An over­view of the play­ers in rail freight transport.

Network

Here you will find useful infor­ma­ti­on on rail­roads, their orga­niza­ti­on and net­work access.

Financing

Infor­ma­ti­on on finan­cial sup­port and char­ges in freight transport.

Sites

Ever­y­thing about free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals, sidings or even mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs.

Interoperability

The VAP is com­mit­ted to har­mo­ni­zing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run effort­less­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Sustainability

For a far-sigh­ted future, various areas need to be desi­gned sustainably.

Innovation

How can we drive inno­va­ti­on in freight transport?

Operations

In favor of fair com­pe­ti­ti­on, we want to uti­li­ze the strength of all modes of trans­port and com­bi­ne them opti­mal­ly. Becau­se this makes the route shorter – and more eco­no­mic­al – for everyone.

​Events

Here you will find fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments on our events Forum Freight Trans­port, our Gene­ral Assem­bly and others.

Winter session 2022

Winter session 2022

On 6 Decem­ber 2022, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopted two moti­ons in the second ins­tance. They are important for modal shift in tran­sit, but also con­cern the Basel-North ports route, which is cen­tral for import and export traf­fic. We at the VAP sup­port both moti­ons and encou­ra­ge the exten­si­on of state sup­port to con­ven­tio­nal rail freight transport.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopts two moti­ons in favour of the freight cor­ri­dor through Switzerland
  • We at the VAP sup­port the con­tents of the moti­ons – and set priorities
  • Becau­se con­ven­tio­nal rail freight trans­ports are curr­ent­ly still being excluded

 

Promotion of the freight corridor through Switzerland

With the moti­on 22.3013 «Streng­thening the attrac­ti­ve­ness and com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the freight cor­ri­dor through Switz­er­land», the Fede­ral Coun­cil is to spe­ci­fi­cal­ly extend the sup­port mea­su­res in tran­sit to cer­tain regi­ons and groups of goods. We at the VAP sup­port this moti­on. Howe­ver, it excludes con­ven­tio­nal rail freight trans­port and its untap­ped poten­ti­al. This defi­ci­en­cy should be cor­rec­ted as soon as possible.

Artic­le 8 of the Freight Traf­fic Shift Act (in ger­man) allows the pro­mo­ti­on of all – i.e. tran­sal­pi­ne – freight traf­fic in tran­sit. Accor­din­gly, the Fede­ral Coun­cil should be ins­truc­ted to pro­mo­te all freight traf­fic and to pro­vi­de the pro­mo­ti­on instru­ments con­sis­ting of finan­cial sup­port, qua­li­ty moni­to­ring and the expan­si­on of access rou­tes for con­ven­tio­nal traf­fic as well. For these, too, the tar­ge­ted exten­si­on of sup­port mea­su­res to cer­tain regi­ons and freight groups makes sense. By sti­cking to the dogma of «com­bi­ned trans­port», Switz­er­land is miss­ing out on inte­res­t­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties for an addi­tio­nal shift from road to rail.

The Fede­ral Coun­cil should design the sup­port instru­ments in a tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral way and extend them to all freight trans­port in tran­sit, regard­less of the type of production.

Expansion of the Wörth-Strasbourg Neat feeder road on the left bank of the Rhine

Moti­on 22.3000 «Con­ti­nua­tion of the suc­cessful modal shift poli­cy and gua­ran­tee of sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty thanks to expan­si­on of the Wörth-Stras­bourg cor­ri­dor on the left bank of the Rhine» calls on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to take care of the elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on and upgrading of the affec­ted sec­tion of the line to NEAT stan­dards. It is con­side­ring the pos­si­bi­li­ty of fun­ding from Switzerland.

We in the VAP sup­port this moti­on, as we did with moti­on 20.3003 «State trea­ty for a Neat access route on the left bank of the Rhine». An effi­ci­ent rou­ting of the flat rail­way in the nor­t­hern approach to the NRLA is urgen­tly nee­ded in terms of sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty, alter­na­ti­ve capa­ci­ty for con­s­truc­tion pha­ses, punc­tua­li­ty and qua­li­ty. Elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on and the intro­duc­tion of the NRLA stan­dard on the affec­ted sec­tion of track, tog­e­ther with the simul­ta­neous expan­si­on of the Kan­nen­feld and Schüt­zen­matt tun­nels to 4 met­res, will allow an initi­al sub­stan­ti­al increase in capa­ci­ty on the nor­t­hern approach to the NRLA.

 

Click here for the SDA news item of 6 Decem­ber 2022 (in german)

Forum Sidings 2022 – Review

Forum Sidings 2022 – Review

For the first time since 2018, the Siding Forum was held again on 15 Novem­ber 2022. The spea­k­ers agreed: sidings can very well be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly, as long as the ope­ra­tors invest money and time in plan­ning, exper­ti­se and safety.

That’s what it’s all about:
  • Sidings can be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly. But it requi­res money and planning.
  • Prag­ma­tic safe­ty checks make it pos­si­ble to compa­re theo­ry and practice.
  • The exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence within the indus­try and the expert sup­port pro­vi­ded by the VAP are welcomed.

 

Critical view

In the first part of the forum we brought up the new roles in wagon­load traf­fic. In his wel­co­me address, VAP Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral Frank Fur­rer took a cri­ti­cal look at the cur­rent con­sul­ta­ti­on pro­cess. He cal­led on those pre­sent to con­tri­bu­te their ideas for suc­cessful rail freight trans­port in indus­try dis­cus­sions. What is nee­ded is a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on of the roles of the play­ers on the last mile, in dis­tri­bu­ti­on and in pro­duc­tion. There is also a need for a more fle­xi­ble use of resour­ces such as wagons and loco­mo­ti­ves through new busi­ness models. A study by the VAP in 2013 alre­a­dy show­ed at that time that com­pe­ti­ti­on-ori­en­ted coope­ra­ti­on leads to a sys­tem with more effi­ci­ent ser­vice pro­vi­si­on and more traffic.

Operation

Tho­mas Kel­ler, Head of Logi­stics at Per­len Papier AG, spoke about the suc­cessful ope­ra­ti­on of the sidings. He descri­bed the recruit­ment of qua­li­fied employees as a major chall­enge for his sidings in Gisikon/Root. The neces­sa­ry trai­ning costs a lot of money and requi­res far-sigh­ted plan­ning. Other fac­tors are the com­plex ope­ra­ting regu­la­ti­ons and the main­ten­an­ce of the com­pany’s own loco­mo­ti­ves. Tho­mas Kel­ler shared with the guests his expe­ri­en­ces with Artic­le 6a of the Freight Trans­port Ordi­nan­ce and Rail­Com. Thanks to good advice from the VAP, it was pos­si­ble to find an ade­qua­te spe­cial solu­ti­on for access to the Per­len Papier AG siding, accor­ding to which no use by third par­ties is pos­si­ble becau­se the faci­li­ties are not sui­ta­ble for this and expan­si­on pro­jects exist.

Safety checks

Ueli Remund, mem­ber of the siding staff at Plan­zer Trans­port AG, used the orga­ni­sa­ti­on and pro­ces­ses as an exam­p­le to show how important clean docu­men­ta­ti­on and safe­ty checks are, e.g. to ensu­re safe­ty and tracea­bi­li­ty. Such docu­men­ta­ti­on is essen­ti­al for the suc­cessful ope­ra­ti­on of rail­way sidings. Plan­zer nee­ded to refi­ne the inter­nal con­trols of the sidings. Ueli Remund recom­men­ded hiring the VAP expert ser­vice pro­vi­der to do this if the exper­ti­se is lack­ing in-house.

Maintenance

Hein­rich Mau­rer, Head of Real Estate at mobi­log AG, high­ligh­ted main­ten­an­ce and its relia­ble plan­ning with the sup­port of the VAP, using the exam­p­le of the com­pany’s own siding. This is an important part of the trans­port logi­stics; after all, 70% of the inbound volu­me is deli­ver­ed by rail. mobi­log AG deci­ded to load onto the train after the Gott­hard tun­nel was clo­sed for a long time due to an acci­dent. Hein­rich Mau­rer con­siders this decis­i­on to have been the right one in the long term.

Duty of supervision

In the second part, Hen­rik Lipp­mann, lead audi­tor at the FOT’s Safe­ty Super­vi­si­on Sec­tion, repor­ted on the expe­ri­ence gai­ned from the safe­ty super­vi­si­on of adjoi­ning com­pa­nies. This super­vi­so­ry duty brings added value to the com­pa­nies. Many rail­way ope­ra­tors are not fami­li­ar with the rail­way, which is why the audits are often tan­ta­mount to advice. The online siding direc­to­ry is an important tool. Siding owners can use this to file docu­ments digi­tal­ly, set up auto­ma­tic noti­fi­ca­ti­ons and for other useful func­tions. Hen­rik Lipp­mann also pro­vi­ded infor­ma­ti­on about the upco­ming chan­ges in the 2024 amend­ment cycle to the Dri­ving Ser­vice Regu­la­ti­ons (FDV), which will lead to sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons in the shun­ting area of the sidings.

Dialogue

In the panel dis­cus­sion, the spea­k­ers dis­cus­sed the topic “Safe­ty in rea­li­ty and theo­ry – are there dif­fe­ren­ces?”. Inte­res­ted ship­pers, freight rail­ways and ser­vice pro­vi­ders took part in the forum. They were able to take away valuable insights and prac­ti­cal tips from the pre­sen­ta­ti­ons and the dis­cus­sion. And, of cour­se, net­wor­king was not negle­c­ted at the sub­se­quent stand-up lunch.

 

The rail sector must reinvent itself

The rail sector must reinvent itself

Rail is not exact­ly famous for its wil­ling­ness to inno­va­te. This must and will chan­ge if it wants to remain sus­tainable as a trans­port mode. At the 7th Inter­na­tio­nal Rail­way Forum IRFC 2022, the experts pre­sen­ted a wide range of initia­ti­ves, inno­va­tions and reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­ons. We have sum­ma­ri­sed and cri­ti­cal­ly app­rai­sed the most important ones here.

 

This is what it’s all about:
  • Imple­men­ting the Green Deal requi­res inno­va­ti­on, new tech­no­lo­gies and a com­pre­hen­si­ve moder­ni­sa­ti­on of the rail sector
  • The sca­la­bi­li­ty of inno­va­tions can only be achie­ved through coope­ra­ti­on and coordination.
  • Switz­er­land must not miss the boat on EU inno­va­ti­on programmes

 

Under the Czech Pre­si­den­cy of the Coun­cil of the EU, the EU Minis­ter of Trans­port hos­ted the IRFC in Pra­gue from 5 to 7 Octo­ber 2022. The motto of the con­gress was: “Buil­ding a new gene­ra­ti­on of rail­ways tog­e­ther”. The Czech Minis­ter of Trans­port, Mar­tin Kupka, empha­sis­ed the key role of rail­ways for the suc­cessful imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Green Deal. With this, the EU has defi­ned a clear ans­wer to the advan­cing cli­ma­te chan­ge. Traf­fic and trans­port in Euro­pe are to beco­me CO2-neu­tral by 2050. With the 2050 cli­ma­te tar­gets, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is stri­ving to replace fos­sil fuels in Switz­er­land within a com­pa­ra­ble timeframe.

For a few years now, a para­digm shift has been taking place in the rail sec­tor. Poli­ti­ci­ans are set­ting dead­lines and issuing con­cre­te man­da­tes to the sec­tors. In order for the Euro­pean rail­ways to be able to react accor­ding to the man­da­tes, more coope­ra­ti­on is nee­ded in the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of new tech­no­lo­gies and their imple­men­ta­ti­on. The tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th rail­way packa­ge forms the basis for the crea­ti­on of the plan­ned uni­fied Euro­pean rail­way system.

Until new tech­no­lo­gies have rea­ched their appli­ca­ti­on matu­ri­ty, it is first neces­sa­ry to coor­di­na­te inno­va­ti­on (cf. figu­re) and to con­duct tar­ge­ted rese­arch to deve­lop the sci­en­ti­fic basis. To this end, the EU has built up effi­ci­ent and com­pe­tent orga­ni­sa­ti­ons in recent years: The “Hori­zon” pro­gram­me leads and finan­ces various rese­arch pro­jects. Thanks to cross-sec­to­ral net­wor­king, the results and fin­dings should be made available to a wide range of users in a time­ly man­ner. Within the frame­work of the inno­va­ti­on part­ner­ship Euro­pe’s Rail Joint Under­ta­king (EU-Rail), inno­va­ti­ve new approa­ches based on rese­arch results are given con­cre­te form. The important pro­jects for rail ope­ra­ti­ons and tech­no­lo­gy are based on the two pil­lars “Sys­tem Pil­lar” and “Tech­ni­cal Pil­lar”. The Rail­way Agen­cy ERA defi­nes the new uni­form spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Euro­pean rail­way appli­ca­ti­ons and thus ensu­res inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. Thanks to this poo­ling of know­ledge, solu­ti­ons ready for inter­na­tio­nal appli­ca­ti­on can be deve­lo­ped in a short time.

Energy of the future is renewable

Until now, indus­tria­li­sed eco­no­mies have main­ly used fos­sil fuels. For a long time, these were available on the inter­na­tio­nal mar­ket at low pri­ces. With the Green Deal, the EU wants to redu­ce trans­port-rela­ted emis­si­ons by 90% by 2050 and shift 75% of the trans­port volu­me from road to rail or water­ways. The important ener­gy sources of the future are hydro­gen and elec­tri­ci­ty, both pro­du­ced from rene­wa­ble resources.

Modern data communication is digital

Indus­tria­li­sed pro­ces­ses func­tion suc­cessful­ly when the neces­sa­ry data is direct­ly and imme­dia­te­ly available to all par­ti­ci­pan­ts. The cur­rent use of data is still limi­t­ed; for many sub-pro­ces­ses, the data is coll­ec­ted again and again. Such solo efforts are resour­ce- and time-inten­si­ve as well as error-prone. In future, data should be available to all aut­ho­ri­sed par­ti­ci­pan­ts wit­hout media dis­con­ti­nui­ty and in real time. Direct access to data is cen­tral to the rea­li­sa­ti­on of auto­ma­ted pro­ces­ses, as is effec­ti­ve data pro­tec­tion. Cyber secu­ri­ty is beco­ming the core issue of modern data communication.

Reorganisation of the railway system called for

Rail­ways were essen­ti­al to indus­tria­li­sa­ti­on in the 19th and early 20th cen­tu­ries. It was not until the midd­le of the 20th cen­tu­ry that road and air trans­port pushed back the rail­ways in trans­port thanks to their suc­cessful inno­va­ti­ve steps. The decisi­ve fac­tors were intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and rigo­rous cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on. The cus­to­mers’ most important ques­ti­on was: How can we ful­fil our needs more easi­ly, more com­for­ta­b­ly and more chea­p­ly? And they recei­ved sui­ta­ble ans­wers on the road.

Today, the rail­ways must final­ly ask them­sel­ves the same ques­ti­on. The rail­way is an effi­ci­ent and resour­ce-saving trans­port sys­tem with num­e­rous advan­ta­ges. In a direct com­pa­ri­son of the ener­gy requi­red, the elec­tri­fied rail­way is the clear win­ner over the road. Under the same gene­ral con­di­ti­ons, the rail­way requi­res 10 times less ener­gy than the road. Important Euro­pean rail­way lines are alre­a­dy elec­tri­fied, so that the requi­red trac­tion ener­gy can be used with high effi­ci­en­cy. Today, a wide­ly rami­fied net­work of lines con­nects the important regi­ons of Euro­pe, a large part of the lines are stan­dard gauge, only in a few Euro­pean regi­ons are devia­ting gau­ges in ope­ra­ti­on today.

In order for the plan­ned shift of traf­fic to the rail­ways to actual­ly be rea­li­sed, a cul­tu­ral chan­ge in the rail­ways towards intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on is first nee­ded, as well as a com­pre­hen­si­ve and sys­te­ma­tic rene­wal of the rail­way system:

  • TEN‑T: The EU has defi­ned the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work to con­nect all major Euro­pean cen­tres. Trains are to be able to run wit­hout obs­ta­cles on a uni­form, har­mo­nis­ed infra­struc­tu­re; on secon­da­ry lines, hydro­gen or bat­tery ope­ra­ti­on can ensu­re the desi­red CO2 neu­tra­li­ty. The expan­si­on of the rail­way net­work is being car­ri­ed out with two dif­fe­rent empha­ses: For pas­sen­ger trans­port, a high-speed net­work is to be built that con­nects the important cen­tres and enables attrac­ti­ve tra­vel times. For freight trans­port, the neces­sa­ry train paths are to be made available so that rail freight trans­port can grow in accordance with the poli­ti­cal requi­re­ments. The freight rail­ways must more than dou­ble their trans­port capa­ci­ty in the coming deca­des. They can only achie­ve this ambi­tious goal with the help of inno­va­ti­on. In addi­ti­on, the cor­ri­dor mana­gers must be equip­ped with com­pre­hen­si­ve com­pe­ten­ces so that the cur­rent cher­ry-picking of the natio­nal, inte­gra­ted­ly mana­ged state rail­ways comes to an end.
  • Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and stan­dar­di­s­a­ti­on: The various Euro­pean rail­way sys­tems are still sub­ject to a multi­tu­de of often dif­fe­rent natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons. Com­pli­ance with these still signi­fi­cant­ly rest­ricts free cross-bor­der rail traf­fic and enables unfair com­pe­ti­ti­ve advan­ta­ges in the natio­nal mar­ket. Despi­te the tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons of inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSI), natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons still mas­si­ve­ly hin­der cross-bor­der traf­fic. The EU has made the eli­mi­na­ti­on of these natio­nal rules an important lea­der­ship task with the “rules clea­ning-up pro­gram­me”. This is a cru­cial pro­gram­me of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge to crea­te the Sin­gle Euro­pean Rail­way Area (SERA). While the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA) is respon­si­ble for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the Tech­ni­cal Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty (TSIs), the rail­way sec­tor has to update and deve­lop the rela­ted stan­dards and norms. In the desi­red ideal case, the TSIs and the stan­dards should suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fy all rail­way sub­sys­tems in all par­ti­ci­pa­ting Euro­pean count­ries. Switz­er­land also reli­es con­sis­t­ent­ly on the TSI in the stan­dard gauge sec­tor. It has adopted the first ele­ments of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge within the frame­work of the cur­rent over­land trans­port agree­ment. As the dia­lo­gue bet­ween the EU and Switz­er­land is curr­ent­ly at a standstill, the plan­ned con­ti­nua­tion is unfort­u­na­te­ly not pos­si­ble at present.
  • Digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK): The rail­ways must replace their his­to­ri­cal­ly grown but out­da­ted stan­dards such as the clas­sic screw cou­pling in favour of modern digi­ta­li­sed sys­tems – such as the DAK4 – across the board. This forms a decisi­ve basis for future com­pre­hen­si­ve auto­ma­ti­on in the rail sec­tor. Even more important, howe­ver, is the net­wor­king of all actors along the enti­re logi­stics chain – bey­ond the mere rail run – thanks to the pos­si­bi­li­ties of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. Free­ly acces­si­ble data and boo­king plat­forms open up uni­ma­gi­ned increa­ses in effi­ci­en­cy and qua­li­ty. The mem­bers of the VAP and SBB are also actively con­tri­bu­ting to the suc­cess of this important pro­ject with their know-how.
  • Ener­gy: In the field of ener­gy, the neces­sa­ry pro­ces­ses for the CO2-neu­tral pro­duc­tion, dis­tri­bu­ti­on and simp­le use of hydro­gen are being work­ed on. For ope­ra­ti­on on lon­ger, non-elec­tri­fied rail­way lines, hydro­gen is a pro­mi­sing ener­gy source that can quick­ly replace fos­sil fuels.
Marathon with hurdles

With the Green Deal, the EU has defi­ned a com­pre­hen­si­ve pro­gram­me to crea­te a CO2-neu­tral Euro­pe. Howe­ver, the mem­ber sta­tes have dif­fe­rent start­ing points, prio­ri­ties and inte­rests. Con­se­quent­ly, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of this ambi­tious pro­gram­me will have to over­co­me a num­ber of hurd­les. It remains to be seen whe­ther the natio­nal inte­rests of the state rail­ways can be suf­fi­ci­ent­ly set aside in favour of a com­mon Euro­pean solution.

The rail­way is to play a key role in Euro­pean pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the future. It has some con­vin­cing advan­ta­ges. But it must also over­co­me an aver­si­on to rene­wal, chan­ge and com­pe­ti­ti­on that has deve­lo­ped over many deca­des. The com­part­ment­a­li­sa­ti­on of mar­kets, espe­ci­al­ly by the state rail­ways, con­ti­nues to be a major obs­ta­cle in many places. By sti­cking to natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons, often under the pre­text of safe­ty con­side­ra­ti­ons, state rail­ways want to con­ti­nue to pro­tect them­sel­ves from unwan­ted inter­na­tio­nal com­pe­ti­ti­on. It is up to the mem­ber sta­tes to help the Euro­pean idea achie­ve a breakth­rough and to put a stop to unfair prac­ti­ces by their state railways.

The rail sec­tor must set new stan­dards through inno­va­ti­on. It must stan­dar­di­se and stream­li­ne its regu­la­to­ry envi­ron­ment inter­na­tio­nal­ly. When deve­lo­ping new sys­tems, large sup­pli­ers to the rail sec­tor must not try to gain a one-sided mar­ket advan­ta­ge through exclu­si­ve, incom­pa­ti­ble pro­ducts. For sus­tainable migra­ti­on suc­cess, the sec­tor needs com­pa­ti­ble, matu­re and relia­ble inno­va­ti­ve pro­ducts. The manu­fac­tu­r­ers have not exact­ly distin­gu­is­hed them­sel­ves in this respect in recent years.

Whe­ther the inten­ded shift of trans­port to rail will be fea­si­ble on the plan­ned scale depends on the finan­cial resour­ces that can be deploy­ed. There will be no bul­ging EU cof­fers for the migra­ti­on from which the indi­vi­du­al com­pa­nies can help them­sel­ves as nee­ded. The indi­vi­du­al mem­ber sta­tes will have to con­tri­bu­te to the rene­wal and expan­si­on of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re with sub­stan­ti­al start-up finan­cing. This also appli­es to Switz­er­land. Core pro­jects such as the DAK must be inter­na­tio­nal­ly coor­di­na­ted, other­wi­se their effect will fizz­le out wit­hout a sound.

Switzerland is part of Europe

Switz­er­land, too, can only gain from acti­ve par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in these EU pro­gram­mes. The Swiss stan­dard gauge net­work with its major tran­sit axes con­tri­bu­tes to the trans-Euro­pean rail net­work of the EU. It forms an important part of the uni­form inter­ope­ra­ble Euro­pean sys­tem SERA. Since many of the Swiss trans­ports are cross-bor­der, inter­ope­ra­ble solu­ti­ons are indis­pensable. Switz­er­land has ful­fil­led its plan­ned tar­get with the con­ti­nuous expan­si­on of the north-south trans­ver­sals as announ­ced. The Swiss rail­way net­work must be fur­ther expan­ded for dome­stic traf­fic in order to be able to cope with the growth tar­get in freight trans­port in the future. Our experts can actively make valuable con­tri­bu­ti­ons to deve­lo­p­ment and com­pe­te with the best inter­na­tio­nal­ly. Our rail­way com­pa­nies can streng­then their mar­ket posi­ti­on with new con­cepts, espe­ci­al­ly in import and export traffic.

The VAP sup­ports joint acti­vi­ties to fur­ther deve­lop the rail sec­tor into an important part­ner in the mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port sys­tem. In this con­text, coope­ra­ti­on at Euro­pean level and intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on is a cru­cial pre­re­qui­si­te to achie­ve the poli­ti­cal goals on time. In terms of trans­port, we are so clo­se­ly lin­ked with neigh­bou­ring count­ries that our eco­no­my needs obs­ta­cle-free cross-bor­der traf­fic and trans­port ser­vices. From an ener­gy point of view, rail is pre­desti­ned for lon­ger distances. The poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU con­ti­nue to hin­der the urgen­tly nee­ded inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on. The rail­way indus­try is well advi­sed to actively seek and cul­ti­va­te pro­fes­sio­nal exch­an­ge despi­te the hurd­les. We can only have a suc­cessful rail­way future together.

Rail freight transport in the territory: the industry develops a joint solution

Rail freight transport in the territory: the industry develops a joint solution

The freight rail­ways of the umbrel­la orga­ni­sa­ti­on of public trans­port (VöV) and we at the VAP are hol­ding inten­si­ve talks on the upco­ming reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on and moder­ni­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the ter­ri­to­ry and its sus­tainable pro­mo­ti­on. Here is a sum­ma­ry of the state of the deba­te and the advan­ta­ges of an incen­ti­ve-based fun­ding model.

Those respon­si­ble for rail freight at VöV and we at the VAP, as the voice of the ship­ping indus­try, want to show tog­e­ther that rail freight trans­port in the ter­ri­to­ry can be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly in the long term. The dis­cus­sions of the indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves on the future of inland trans­port logi­stics are in full swing and should result in a com­mon posi­ti­on on rail freight trans­port when the Fede­ral Coun­cil sends its mes­sa­ge on the “Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port int the ter­ri­to­ry” for consultation.

Building a sustainable network

The indus­try play­ers are stri­ving for an effi­ci­ent net­work offer (hub and spoke). The ope­ra­tors of rail freight trans­port and cus­to­mers in dome­stic trans­port should bene­fit from this in the same way. This requi­res a new dis­tri­bu­ti­on of roles in pro­duc­tion and a sus­tainable finan­cial sup­port model with distinct incen­ti­ve mecha­nisms. This must be com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral and at the same time as simp­le as pos­si­ble. It must not allow any mar­ket and com­pe­ti­ti­on dis­tor­ti­ons bet­ween sub­si­di­sed and non-sub­si­di­sed freight rail­ways and ser­vices or simi­lar dis­ad­van­ta­ges. The sub­s­idy model should con­tain few, but imple­men­ta­ble incen­ti­ve mecha­nisms with maxi­mum effect. Fur­ther­mo­re, it should adapt to deve­lo­p­ments; the reduc­tion path of the sub­si­dies ide­al­ly runs par­al­lel to the AS 2035 and the Zurich bypass line.

Improved framework conditions

In order for the rail freight trans­port to deve­lop its strengths, bet­ter frame­work con­di­ti­ons are nee­ded – irre­spec­ti­ve of the fun­ding model and under­stan­ding of its role. These include:

  • Reduc­tion of the train path price to Euro­pean level
  • Exten­si­on of the reim­bur­se­ment of the HVF to all road-rail-ship transports
  • Exten­si­on of invest­ment sub­si­dies to siding owners and operators
  • Automation/digitalisation, in par­ti­cu­lar through digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC)
  • Free­ly acces­si­ble data and infor­ma­ti­on plat­form for more effi­ci­ent ope­ra­tio­nal handling
Highly effective incentive mechanisms

Indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves envi­sa­ge incen­ti­ves to ship­pers and finan­cing and neu­tra­li­sa­ti­on of the first and last mile. Incen­ti­ves to ship­pers include com­pen­sa­ti­on for new traf­fic, the reope­ning of sidings after lon­ger ope­ra­tio­nal inter­rup­ti­ons, effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ment mea­su­res in shun­ting ope­ra­ti­ons and for own mano­eu­vres on the last mile. The ope­ra­ti­on of the first and last mile is to be finan­ced through com­pen­sa­ti­on to the ser­vice pro­vi­der. The lat­ter offers short-distance ser­vices for all freight rail­way com­pa­nies at defi­ned (stron­gly cost-under-reco­ve­ring) prices.

New role for SBB Cargo

SBB Cargo con­ti­nues to assu­me the role of net­work pro­vi­der. It hand­les main runs and shun­ting, is respon­si­ble for plan­ning net­work traf­fic and ensu­res effi­ci­ent bund­ling of traf­fic with indi­vi­du­al wagons or wagon groups. To this end, SBB Cargo is in sole cont­act with the ship­pers who com­mis­si­on trans­ports in net­work traf­fic and in dia­lo­gue with the ser­vice pro­vi­der who ser­ves the first/last mile.

In the favour of competition

The repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of VöV and VAP advo­ca­te a sus­tainable indus­try solu­ti­on that offers more plan­ning and invest­ment secu­ri­ty and increa­ses the attrac­ti­ve­ness of the rail freight mar­ket. They envi­sa­ge a com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral sup­port mecha­nism that uses exis­ting struc­tures and com­pen­sa­ti­on approa­ches. The indus­try­’s sup­port model can increase its modal shift effect by offe­ring addi­tio­nal incen­ti­ves to third par­ties with a favoura­ble first and last mile. This eli­mi­na­tes the make-or-buy decis­i­on for the freight rail­ways. SBB Cargo can ope­ra­te the net­work on its own. The solu­ti­on, which is emer­ging from the dia­lo­gue bet­ween freight rail­ways and the loa­ding indus­try, is inten­ded to streng­then the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the play­ers and enable inno­va­ti­on and cus­to­mer orientation.

 

It is inte­res­t­ing to note that in 2014, our study had alre­a­dy recom­men­ded “non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry ser­vice of the last mile for all rail­way undertakings”.

  • PDF Sum­ma­ry of our study “From inte­gra­ted to mar­ket-ori­en­ted rail” (in Ger­man, in French)
«BAHN 2050» – A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE

«BAHN 2050» – A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE

The Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to fur­ther streng­then the rail­ways in the long term. To this end, it has revi­sed its long-term rail stra­tegy. It is now focu­sing on impro­ved access to the rail­way and more capa­ci­ty on the east-west axis with new mul­ti­mo­dal tran­ship­ment plat­forms and faci­li­ties for city logi­stics. Here is a cri­ti­cal app­rai­sal of this perspective.

With a view to future expan­si­on steps of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re, the Fede­ral Coun­cil has adapt­ed its long-term rail per­spec­ti­ve from 2012 and published details from the mee­ting of 22 June 2022. Up to now, the Fede­ral Coun­cil has con­cen­tra­ted pri­ma­ri­ly on eli­mi­na­ting bot­t­len­ecks and incre­asing fre­quen­cy. With the upco­ming expan­si­on steps within the frame­work of the BAHN 2050 per­spec­ti­ve, it wants to impro­ve the rail ser­vice pri­ma­ri­ly on short and medi­um distances, for exam­p­le with addi­tio­nal S‑Bahn ser­vices and an upgrade of the sub­ur­ban sta­ti­ons. In this way, it takes into account the fact that the grea­test poten­ti­al for modal shift to rail lies within the agglo­me­ra­ti­ons and in con­nec­tions bet­ween regio­nal cen­tres and agglomerations.

Promoting modal shift in freight transport

In freight trans­port, access to the rail­way is to be impro­ved and capa­ci­ties on the east-west axis increased. This will be achie­ved with new mul­ti­mo­dal tran­ship­ment plat­forms and faci­li­ties for city logi­stics. With the tar­ge­ted modal shift, the Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to streng­then its stra­tegy for achie­ving the cli­ma­te goals and bet­ter coor­di­na­te spa­ti­al and trans­port plan­ning. This aspi­ra­ti­on is expres­sed in its visi­on: «Thanks to the effi­ci­ent use of its strengths, the rail­way makes a major con­tri­bu­ti­on to the 2050 cli­ma­te goal and streng­thens Switz­er­land as a place to live and do business».

Conflict of goals: free choice of transport

The Fede­ral Coun­cil defi­nes one of the main goals of RAIL 2050 as incre­asing the share of rail in the modal split for both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. This goal con­tra­dicts the con­sti­tu­ti­on, which gua­ran­tees the free choice of trans­port mode for dome­stic traf­fic. There is also a con­tra­dic­tion with the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s pre­vious goals, in par­ti­cu­lar with goal 7 of DETEC’s 2040 ori­en­ta­ti­on frame­work, «Future Mobi­li­ty». Accor­ding to this, trans­port users in Switz­er­land are free to deci­de which mobi­li­ty offers they use and combine.

Intramodal competition and market-based offers

For us at the VAP, the modal split is the result of a well thought-out infra­struc­tu­re, trans­port and spa­ti­al plan­ning poli­cy. As the voice of the ship­ping indus­try, we advo­ca­te favoura­ble frame­work con­di­ti­ons that boost intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on on the rail­ways and ensu­re cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on and inno­va­ti­on with mar­ket-based offers. In order for such offers to deve­lop their poten­ti­al, suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ties on the net­work with high-qua­li­ty and inex­pen­si­ve train paths as well as suf­fi­ci­ent­ly well-deve­lo­ped logi­stics loca­ti­ons are neces­sa­ry. This is the only way to increase the share of rail freight trans­port in the modal split. We the­r­e­fo­re warn against ideas of fur­ther net­works and coor­di­na­ted sys­tem train paths by SBB Cargo. These hin­der the desi­red intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and have a cor­re­spon­din­gly nega­ti­ve effect on cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on and innovation.

Ensuring connection to Europe

We wel­co­me the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s focus on short and medi­um distances. Howe­ver, it igno­res the com­plex poten­ti­al of inter­na­tio­nal trans­port. This is reg­rettable. In our opi­ni­on, the BAHN 2050 per­spec­ti­ve should pro­vi­de for a favoura­ble con­nec­tion of the Swiss rail­way net­work to the inter­na­tio­nal cor­ri­dors and the Rhine ports as well as sou­thern ports in the desti­na­ti­on area. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is expli­cit­ly cal­led upon to meet this requi­re­ment by Moti­on 22.3000 «Con­ti­nua­tion of the suc­cessful modal shift poli­cy and gua­ran­tee of natio­nal sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty thanks to the expan­si­on of the Wörth-Stras­bourg Neat fee­der line on the left bank of the Rhine» and Moti­on 20.3003 «State trea­ty for a Neat fee­der line on the left bank of the Rhine».

A clear yes to digitalisation

We con­sider the inten­ti­on to con­sis­t­ent­ly use effi­ci­en­cy gains through auto­ma­ti­on and new tech­no­lo­gies as posi­ti­ve, as well as the goal of fle­xi­bly and opti­mal­ly net­wor­king rail ser­vices with other modes of trans­port and ser­vices as part of over­all mobi­li­ty. In addi­ti­on to the afo­re­men­tio­ned mul­ti­mo­dal tran­ship­ment plat­forms, the frame­work and mar­ket con­di­ti­ons for freight rail­ways play a decisi­ve role here. In addi­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK), this includes open data and boo­king plat­forms in par­ti­cu­lar. With their help, data from the enti­re value chain is recor­ded and exch­an­ged trans­par­ent­ly so that rail freight cus­to­mers can easi­ly book their con­sign­ments and track the flow of goods in real time.

ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

ELECTRICITY SHORTAGE (PART 3): SHARE SAVINGS APPEALS

The elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge is an urgent poli­ti­cal and eco­no­mic issue. That is why we are keen to ensu­re that our mem­bers are kept up to date. In this third blog epi­so­de, we dis­cuss how the rail­way indus­try can respond to the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s calls for savings by taking vol­un­t­a­ry ener­gy-saving measures.

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has set out the tasks for deal­ing with a pos­si­ble ener­gy cri­sis. Depen­ding on how the ener­gy situa­ti­on deve­lo­ps, it can take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. Four levels are pos­si­ble. At pre­sent we are on level 1 “vol­un­t­a­ry savings appeals”. The Fede­ral Office of Trans­port per­forms the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on task in trans­port mat­ters. The Fede­ral Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC) has laun­ched the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance” with a broad-based cam­paign. This alli­ance calls on orga­ni­sa­ti­ons throug­hout Switz­er­land to sup­port efforts for secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly in win­ter and to vol­un­t­a­ri­ly take ener­gy-saving mea­su­res. The goal must be to imple­ment mea­su­res that are as uni­form as pos­si­ble across the indus­try in Switz­er­land. This is best unders­tood by the users of trans­port services.

VAP joins in

We at the VAP endor­se the recom­men­da­ti­on to join the “Ener­gy Saving Alli­ance”. In doing so, we are pas­sing on the wake-up call of the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV) to our mem­bers. At its board mee­ting on 9 Sep­tem­ber 2022, VöV published its recom­men­da­ti­on paper for the rail­way indus­try. In this paper, VöV recom­mends that the rail­way indus­try actively prepa­re for pos­si­ble sce­na­ri­os of an ener­gy shorta­ge and quick­ly imple­ment the first con­cre­te measures.

To ensu­re that the ener­gy-saving mea­su­res can be imple­men­ted in a coor­di­na­ted man­ner by all play­ers in the rail­way indus­try, the working group “Elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in public trans­port” is respon­si­ble for their coor­di­na­ti­on. We are actively invol­ved in this. The working group works clo­se­ly with the SBB and Post­Bus AG Switz­er­land as sys­tem lea­ders. The com­mon goal is to avoid ope­ra­tio­nal rest­ric­tions in both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. Capa­ci­ties are only to be redu­ced in the event of a cor­re­spon­ding decli­ne in demand. We are pre­pa­ring inten­si­ve­ly for fur­ther escala­ti­on levels in various working groups. The public sec­tor should per­cei­ve our indus­try as com­pe­tent and cooperative.

Because energy is scarce

Ener­gy is scar­ce. Let’s not waste it.” Under this cam­paign title, DETEC has sum­ma­ri­sed saving tips for pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als and com­pa­nies. The rail­way indus­try should also save ener­gy vol­un­t­a­ri­ly. This appeal includes imple­men­ta­ti­on mea­su­res for num­e­rous buil­dings used by the rail­ways. They do not rest­rict the range of rail freight ser­vices. Curr­ent­ly, the focus is on lowe­ring the hea­ting tem­pe­ra­tu­re and redu­cing hot water and light­ing. In addi­ti­on, every trans­port com­pa­ny is requi­red to opti­mi­se the ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy of its office and ope­ra­tio­nal buil­dings. The packa­ge will be sup­ple­men­ted by tar­ge­ted savings mea­su­res for employees (train dri­vers, office staff, work­shop staff).

«You won’t go far without courage»

«You won’t go far without courage»

Dr Heiko Fischer pre­si­des over the Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP. The for­mer VTG boss talks to the VAP about the future of Euro­pean rail freight trans­port and the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. He would like to see more enthu­si­asm for the lat­ter and explains why he con­siders the dis­con­ti­nua­tion of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic in Switz­er­land to be fatal.

 

Dr Fischer, where do you see the biggest challenges and where do you see the levers for the European rail market?

There are quite a few. The rail­way infra­struc­tu­re is out­da­ted or in many places a patch­work quilt that has grown his­to­ri­cal­ly. There are still bor­ders bet­ween the sub­sys­tems. Every year that not­hing is done, the pro­blem grows, becau­se the infra­struc­tu­re con­ti­nues to age unwa­ve­rin­gly. This is where I see the adjus­ting screw in the coor­di­na­ti­on of expan­si­on plans, reli­ef rou­tes and cor­re­spon­ding con­s­truc­tion mea­su­res throug­hout Cen­tral Euro­pe. It is true that the trans-Euro­pean net­works pur­sue this inte­gra­ti­ve approach. But secon­da­ry lines and fine dis­tri­bu­ti­on net­works must not be excluded when it comes to invest­ment allo­ca­ti­on, expan­si­on and rene­wal plan­ning, train con­trol sys­tems and regulation.

I see a fur­ther con­trol varia­ble in the com­ple­te digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of the rail­way sec­tor, start­ing with the net­wor­king of the infra­struc­tu­re via the rol­ling stock to the ope­ra­tio­nal busi­ness. There should be a stan­dar­di­sed logic with cor­re­spon­ding inter­faces. As a result, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on can take place in a mea­su­red and tar­ge­ted man­ner. Light­ly loa­ded rou­tes could also be ser­ved by hydro­gen-powered hybrid locomotives.

«Rail freight reli­es on public fun­ding for cer­tain urgen­ci­es, such as basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re deve­lo­p­ment, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, imple­men­ta­ti­on of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap innovations.»

Available capi­tal is also a cor­ner­stone. The rail­way mar­ket does not only need suf­fi­ci­ent pri­va­te capi­tal. For cer­tain urgen­ci­es, it depends on public funds, for exam­p­le for basic digi­ti­sa­ti­on, infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on, elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler DAC and other time-cri­ti­cal leap inno­va­tions. Such invest­ments are bey­ond the finan­cial powers of the pri­va­te sec­tor and most state rail­ways. After all, nobo­dy wants to invest in tech­no­lo­gies that will only bear fruit in the next deca­de, per­haps even with other play­ers in the rail­way sys­tem. This brings me to ano­ther set screw: we also need an ancho­red eco­no­mic under­stan­ding of the mecha­nisms of rail freight trans­port among govern­ments, regu­la­tors and poli­ti­ci­ans. This requi­res a rethink on the part of all those invol­ved in the system.

In what way?

The rail sec­tor is not exact­ly known for thin­king proac­tively and imple­men­ting new things quick­ly. Many see them­sel­ves as vic­tims, be it of the past, of wrong decis­i­ons, of the road, of the wea­ther or of any­thing else. In my opi­ni­on, that abso­lut­e­ly has to chan­ge. After all, we don’t haul goods trains around becau­se we enjoy it, but becau­se we want to gene­ra­te added value for ship­pers and our com­mu­ni­ties. The play­ers in rail freight trans­port need to put the cus­to­mer back in the cent­re of their atten­ti­on and to be aware of their future needs. For the upco­ming chan­ge to actual­ly hap­pen, we need more of a start-up men­ta­li­ty, a “can do” attitude.

What innovations have you driven forward at VTG in recent years, and which of them were groundbreaking?

VTG Con­nect spon­ta­neous­ly comes to mind. This tele­ma­tics tech­no­lo­gy coll­ects rele­vant data on the enti­re fleet and many trans­ports. It crea­tes the basis for effi­ci­ent digi­tal fleet manage­ment, becau­se it makes data usable for cus­to­mers, freight rail­ways and main­ten­an­ce pur­po­ses. With this inno­va­ti­on, we have, so to speak, laun­ched the entry into real-time data trans­mis­si­on in freight trans­port as envi­sa­ged by the DAC.

What importance do you attach to the DAC in the future?

The DAC is a cata­lyst for the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the rail sec­tor. With it, a new con­trol logic and real-time data flows can be map­ped. We are a long way from that today. The DAC does more than auto­ma­te the cou­pling pro­cess. It net­works train dri­vers, cargo, cargo car­ri­ers and ener­gy, i.e. elec­tri­ci­ty. The poten­ti­al of this com­bi­ned with new digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies is immense. The DAC is not only an intel­li­gent train and load con­trol sys­tem, but also a faci­li­ta­tor for other digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on initia­ti­ves such as digi­tal data, train con­trol and boo­king platforms.

«There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even more of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge the ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way business.»

What role will these play in the future?

There will cer­tain­ly be seve­ral plat­forms, becau­se as befo­re, each com­pa­ny will coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on that it can­not or may not share. One or even seve­ral of these plat­forms will emer­ge as cen­tral hubs that mana­ge ope­ra­tio­nal rail­way ope­ra­ti­ons. As such, they will pro­vi­de freight ope­ra­tors with relia­ble infor­ma­ti­on that can be used to redu­ce the distances bet­ween trains, cal­cu­la­te time win­dows and put more ton­na­ge on the track per unit of time. A pan-Euro­pean elec­tro­nic freight traf­fic con­trol sys­tem must not come from a tech giant à la Goog­le, but should deve­lop from within the rail sec­tor its­elf. In this way, we show inno­va­ti­ve strength vis-à-vis other modes of transport.

Per­haps in the future there will even be a super­or­di­na­te body like Euro­con­trol for the cen­tral coor­di­na­ti­on of air traf­fic con­trol. Such a cock­pit could con­trol Euro­pean rail freight traf­fic, give the train dri­vers cer­tain ins­truc­tions, inter­ve­ne if neces­sa­ry and later allow auto­no­mous trains to run. Howe­ver, such quan­tum leaps are only pos­si­ble if digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies with arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence are imple­men­ted and take effect. Only they bring dyna­mism and ensu­re the neces­sa­ry speed, which is abso­lut­e­ly cen­tral to the suc­cess of the digi­tal transformation.

How could rail freight transport in Europe be developed sustainably?

With some­thing that brings the eco­no­mic impact of freight trans­port down to a com­mon deno­mi­na­tor and to which all play­ers com­mit. I can ima­gi­ne that one day there will be a long-term mas­ter plan in the sense of a self-regu­la­ting yet bin­ding decla­ra­ti­on of intent. All par­ti­ci­pa­ting state and non-state rail­ways would have to co-sign it. This mas­ter plan could state that they are working tog­e­ther towards a modal shift. I would remind you of the Gene­ral Con­tract of Use (GCU) of 2006, which regu­la­tes the inter­ac­tion bet­ween wagon kee­pers and rail­way under­ta­kings as wagon ope­ra­tors. The advan­ta­ge of a supra­na­tio­nal agree­ment wit­hout the cha­rac­ter of law is that it can be sup­ple­men­ted or adapt­ed quick­ly and easi­ly. The acces­ses to the NRLA are the best exam­p­le of what should not hap­pen: The com­mu­ni­ty of rail­way sta­tes, inclu­ding Switz­er­land, has com­mit­ted its­elf to expan­ding the north-south axis. When Switz­er­land ope­ned the NRLA tun­nel, other sta­tes had not even star­ted plan­ning. A mas­ter plan for Euro­pean freight trans­port could make this inten­ti­on more bin­ding and make it clear that the Green Deal and modal shift goals are meant serious­ly. Today it is still a pipe dream. Most of the time, ever­yo­ne agrees with the basic demands. But as soon as it comes to working out some­thing con­cre­te from a sin­gle source, opi­ni­ons diverge.

What do you think of the Federal Council’s report on ‘Rail Freight Transport in the Area’? What would it mean if the Federal Council abolished it?

In my opi­ni­on, that would be the big­gest mista­ke in trans­port poli­cy for deca­des. Switz­er­land pro­ves that wagon­load traf­fic works. Howe­ver, it is still too expen­si­ve. But if train for­ma­ti­on and sepa­ra­ti­on are auto­ma­tic, the train line is digi­tal­ly con­trol­led and the mar­ket bene­fits from the many advan­ta­ges of digi­tal offers, then the costs will also go down – and the need for sub­si­dies will decrease. The Fede­ral Coun­cil should think about how to make the offers more attrac­ti­ve for freight rail cus­to­mers. To call the whole thing off even befo­re digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on bears fruit would be cri­mi­nal. Trans­fer­ring rail freight to trucks also costs money and not every freight can be con­tai­ne­ri­sed for block trains. In my opi­ni­on, the Swiss govern­ment should be more con­fi­dent in this area. Those who lack cou­ra­ge have alre­a­dy lost.

We at the VAP are members of the UIP. How would you describe the VAP?

It is a valuable mem­ber asso­cia­ti­on of our Euro­pean wagon kee­per fami­ly. I per­cei­ve it as inno­va­ti­ve and opi­ni­ona­ted. Becau­se of its uni­que mem­ber­ship struc­tu­re, it has a spe­cial weight with us. The VAP repres­ents not only the five lar­gest Swiss wagon kee­pers, but also the inte­rests of ship­pers, sidings and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. This diver­si­ty gene­ra­tes impact and a wealth of ideas among us, and I con­sider it a valuable strength. With its mem­ber diver­si­ty, the VAP can focus its demands more holi­sti­cal­ly on the users and place them with grea­ter aut­ho­ri­ty. I sup­port the VAP’s cli­ent-cent­red approach, which invol­ves the end-user in the dis­cus­sion and decis­i­on-making pro­cess. Euro­pe can bene­fit from the Swiss expe­ri­ence with wagon­load traf­fic or the per­for­mance-based heavy vehic­le char­ge. It is often seen as a “mini­lab” that mir­rors issues for us. Fur­ther­mo­re, the VAP shows us in an exem­pla­ry way how to con­vin­ce the popu­la­ti­on or how to shape some­thing posi­tively as a community.

What can the VAP do better?

Bet­ter is always pos­si­ble. My appeal is not only to the VAP, but to all asso­cia­ti­ons and peo­p­le invol­ved in trans­port poli­cy. We need com­mit­ted peo­p­le who are wil­ling to for­mu­la­te inte­rests with a view to the future. There are enough of those who think in terms of quar­ter­ly balan­ce sheets. But that is no way to win the future.

What do you wish for this future?

More inte­rest, more con­fi­dence. More enthu­si­asm. Ship­pers should be eager to put even more ton­nes on the rails. This is the only way we can achie­ve the ambi­tious modal shift and cli­ma­te tar­gets. The popu­la­ti­on should rea­li­se how important rail freight trans­port is – and that it costs money. After all, an unche­cked flood of lor­ries is not an alter­na­ti­ve. I hope that you from the VAP and we from the UIP will con­ti­nue to stand up for this depar­tu­re day after day.

Dr Fischer, thank you very much for the informative interview.

 

Dr. Heiko Fischer

Dr. Heiko Fischer ser­ved VTG for a total of more than 25 years until 2021, inclu­ding more than 17 years as Chair­man of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Board. Since 2015, he has been Pre­si­dent of the umbrel­la orga­niza­ti­on Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers UIP, based in Brussels, as he was from 2004 to 2007. This repres­ents more than 250 freight wagon kee­pers and main­ten­an­ce cen­tres with more than 223,000 freight wagons, which cover 50% of the tonne-kilo­me­t­res in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port. Dr Heiko Fischer’s for­mer employ­er VTG AG ope­ra­tes the lar­gest pri­va­te freight car fleet in Euro­pe with around 88,500 rail freight cars. In addi­ti­on to hiring out freight wagons and tank con­tai­ners, VTG offers mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics ser­vices and inte­gra­ted digi­tal solutions.

VAP General Assembly of 19 August 2022

VAP General Assembly of 19 August 2022

Our Gene­ral Assem­bly made it clear: 2050 is fast approa­ching. On site and vir­tual­ly, num­e­rous VAP mem­bers and guests fol­lo­wed the sta­tu­to­ry part with a memo­rable ope­ning speech by Pre­si­dent Josef Ditt­li. A spe­cial high­light was the speech by Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga on the importance of rail freight trans­port for Switzerland.

Gene­ral assem­bly, asso­cia­ti­on, freight trans­port – after these words most peo­p­le are men­tal­ly gone. Today, rea­ding on is recom­men­ded. Becau­se on the occa­si­on of our gene­ral assem­bly, it was not only about sta­tu­to­ry mat­ters of the ship­ping indus­try. In her guest speech, Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga gave a note­wor­t­hy signal to the logi­stics indus­try: «For the Fede­ral Coun­cil it is clear: we want to fur­ther streng­then the poten­ti­al that rail has for freight transport.»

Memorable things about then, today and the day after tomorrow
The ope­ning speech by VAP Pre­si­dent Josef Ditt­li gave the par­ti­ci­pan­ts valuable food for thought about ever­y­thing that was, is and should be in rail freight trans­port. He said that rail freight had play­ed a major role in ensu­ring that Switz­er­land sur­vi­ved Coro­na wit­hout any dama­ge in terms of sup­p­ly, becau­se rou­tes with litt­le pas­sen­ger traf­fic sud­den­ly allo­wed it to ope­ra­te as it should be able to in nor­mal times. Ditt­li descri­bed the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler as the epi­to­me of digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port, becau­se it stands for the kind of inno­va­ti­ve fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment that we urgen­tly need. For exam­p­le, so that all freight rail­ways can estab­lish coope­ra­ti­ve and fle­xi­ble net­work trans­port across the board tog­e­ther and wit­hout dis­ad­van­ta­ge. The Pre­si­dent looks to Euro­pe with con­cern. In his opi­ni­on, Switz­er­land must not miss the con­nec­tion to the Euro­pean rail­way sec­tor and the EU inno­va­ti­on pro­gram­mes under any circumstances. 
Landmark decision imminent
We were very plea­sed that the Minis­ter of Trans­port, Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga, agreed to give a guest speech at our Gene­ral Assem­bly. In her speech, she empha­sis­ed that the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on wants to fur­ther streng­then the rail­ways and pay more atten­ti­on to dome­stic trans­port, which is also of great importance for the sup­p­ly of Switz­er­land. “We must impro­ve and fur­ther deve­lop the sys­tem,” said the head of DETEC. She said that the Fede­ral Coun­cil would send a bill on this sub­ject for con­sul­ta­ti­on in the autumn. “We are facing a ground­brea­king decis­i­on. That is why we should not lose sight of what is the reci­pe for Switz­er­lan­d’s suc­cess, what has always made our coun­try strong: That we tack­le the neces­sa­ry chan­ges best tog­e­ther, that we take respon­si­bi­li­ty tog­e­ther: Rail­ways, indus­try and, of cour­se, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on.” The VAP is happy to respond to her invi­ta­ti­on to invol­ve our­sel­ves in the dis­cour­se, not least with its con­tri­bu­ti­on to the dis­cus­sion “Rail Freight Traf­fic 2050″ and the film “Cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted, Inno­va­ti­ve, Pro­fi­ta­ble – Rail Freight Trans­port of the Future”.
Elections successfully held
Of the items on the agen­da that were put to the vote in the sta­tu­to­ry part, all were accept­ed. We wel­co­me the fol­lo­wing new mem­bers to the Board: Titus Büt­ler, Bern­hard Hoff­mann, Bern­hard Kunz. We con­gra­tu­la­te all of them on their elec­tion or re-elec­tion and look for­ward to a con­s­truc­ti­ve coope­ra­ti­on in the Board.
Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Power shortage (part 2): Prepare now for later

Should an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge actual­ly occur in Switz­er­land due to the geo­po­li­ti­cal cri­sis and sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks, it is essen­ti­al that freight trans­port cus­to­mers can con­ti­nue to be ser­ved. This means that the trans­port com­pa­nies must cla­ri­fy their ener­gy needs in the event of a shorta­ge and ans­wer some key ques­ti­ons today.

The Swiss rail­ways play a decisi­ve role in coping with the high demand for both pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port. They depend on a secu­re sup­p­ly of elec­tri­cal energy.

Ensuring supply via rail

If at some point the available trac­tion cur­rent is no lon­ger suf­fi­ci­ent for all sche­du­led trains, jour­neys would have to be can­cel­led accor­din­gly. The ques­ti­on is: which ones? We at the VAP are firm­ly com­mit­ted to ensu­ring that our mem­bers can con­ti­nue to serve all freight trans­port cus­to­mers. The popu­la­ti­on and the eco­no­my depend on relia­ble trans­port chains. That is why freight trains must con­ti­nue to run as long as pos­si­ble even in a power shorta­ge situa­ti­on – as they did, by the way, in the thin­ned-out time­ta­ble during Covid-19.

Political leadership needed

The Swiss rail­way sys­tem is almost exclu­si­ve­ly elec­tri­cal­ly powered. Most of the requi­red trac­tion cur­rent (16.7 Hz) comes from the coun­try­’s own hydro­elec­tric power plants. Shif­ting trans­ports from rail to road when there is a shorta­ge of trac­tion cur­rent is not very pro­mi­sing. In the event of a serious bot­t­len­eck, fos­sil fuels would also beco­me scar­cer. In order to main­tain func­tio­ning trans­port chains, the com­pa­nies invol­ved in rail trans­port also need indus­tri­al elec­tri­ci­ty (50 Hz). Here, too, secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly must be ensu­red. Secu­ri­ty and relia­bi­li­ty are requi­red: The trans­port sec­tor and the freight rail­ways must be able to rely on the poli­ti­cal lea­der­ship in the event of a cri­sis. Becau­se even then, goods trains have to roll as long as there is demand. We want to streng­then this awa­re­ness among decision-makers.

Energy shortage not excluded

Let’s not fool our­sel­ves: An unfa­voura­ble coin­ci­dence of real­ly nega­ti­ve deve­lo­p­ments could mano­eu­vre Switz­er­land into a serious ener­gy shorta­ge situa­ti­on as early as next win­ter. As repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the elec­tri­ci­ty and gas indus­tries explai­ned at the Eco­no­mie­su­is­se web­i­nar on 9 August 2022, ener­gy sup­p­ly is high­ly com­plex and depen­dent on many influences.

The Confederation assumes responsibility

The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on is aware of its respon­si­bi­li­ty. It takes mea­su­res to secu­re the ener­gy sup­p­ly and pre­pa­res for cri­ti­cal sce­na­ri­os of an acute power shorta­ge. Depen­ding on the situa­ti­on, these mea­su­res range from vol­un­t­a­ry, indus­try-spe­ci­fic
indus­try-spe­ci­fic savings appeals to pre­scri­bed manage­ment mea­su­res (quota system).

Determine demand and savings potential

If you think about your own ener­gy needs now, you will be pre­pared for an actu­al elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge and less likely to be sur­pri­sed. So it is time to assess your ener­gy needs, reser­ves, alter­na­ti­ves and savings poten­ti­al. This assess­ment helps to deci­de how, in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge, to redu­ce con­sump­ti­on in line with hig­her-level tar­gets and still con­tri­bu­te to the sup­p­ly of essen­ti­al goods. Con­cre­te ques­ti­ons in the com­pa­ny are, for example:

  • Which acti­vi­ties requi­re how much ener­gy, what is their importance in production?
  • What is the most effec­ti­ve ener­gy-saving potential?
  • How large are the reser­ves, how much ener­gy can be dis­pen­sed with and for how long?
  • Where can we switch to other ener­gy sources and how quickly?
  • Is com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on in the pro­duc­tion chains good? Are the cont­acts up to date?
  • What rest­ric­tions do we imple­ment to meet a quota?
Cooperation and communication

Com­pa­nies should be open about these con­side­ra­ti­ons. After all, it is not pos­si­ble to pre­dict which sce­na­ri­os will actual­ly occur at which point in time. The play­ers in the sec­tor can main­tain the sup­p­ly of important goods as well as pos­si­ble if they coope­ra­te across com­pa­nies and com­mu­ni­ca­te actively. That is why we at the VAP, as repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the ship­pers, are alre­a­dy actively invol­ved in various com­mit­tees and working groups.

No results found.