The VAP promotes freight transport by rail.

The VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of Ship­pers cam­paigns for mar­ket-ori­en­ted frame­work con­di­ti­ons and an attrac­ti­ve Swiss rail freight sys­tem. Rele­vant topics:

Freight industry

  • How do we shape the future of freight trans­port?
  • What moves the freight industry?
  • An over­view of the play­ers in rail freight transport.

Network

Here you will find useful infor­ma­ti­on on rail­roads, their orga­niza­ti­on and net­work access.

Financing

Infor­ma­ti­on on finan­cial sup­port and char­ges in freight transport.

Sites

Ever­y­thing about free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals, sidings or even mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs.

Interoperability

The VAP is com­mit­ted to har­mo­ni­zing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run effort­less­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Sustainability

For a far-sigh­ted future, various areas need to be desi­gned sustainably.

Innovation

How can we drive inno­va­ti­on in freight transport?

Operations

In favor of fair com­pe­ti­ti­on, we want to uti­li­ze the strength of all modes of trans­port and com­bi­ne them opti­mal­ly. Becau­se this makes the route shorter – and more eco­no­mic­al – for everyone.

​Events

Here you will find fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments on our events Forum Freight Trans­port, our Gene­ral Assem­bly and others.

«We want to be faster and better than the others in the future as well.»

«We want to be faster and better than the others in the future as well.»

In June 2022, the take­over of the fami­ly busi­ness WASCOSA by Swiss Life and Vau­ban was announ­ced. We wan­ted to know more about the back­ground to this sale and the visi­on of WASCOSA from the for­mer owner and future Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors Phil­ipp Müller.

Mr Müller, the news of the sale of your successful family business came as a surprise. What will change?

Phil­ipp Mül­ler: Less than you might think at first glan­ce. With this step we have secu­red the future of WASCOSA. Of cour­se there will be a chan­ge from a fami­ly-run to an invest­ment-dri­ven com­pa­ny. But the spi­rit of WASCOSA will remain. We want to con­ti­nue to act fas­ter and bet­ter than others, to be suc­cessful as a team and to put cus­to­mers’ inte­rests befo­re our own. These goals are deman­ding, but doable.

What prompted you to take this step?

The suc­ces­si­on plan and secu­ring the future of the com­pa­ny. Neither of our child­ren was inte­res­ted in suc­cee­ding me. So we had to find an exter­nal solu­ti­on to this ques­ti­on. Eight years ago, we had alre­a­dy hired a CEO from out­side the fami­ly, Peter Bal­zer. In addi­ti­on, our mar­ket is curr­ent­ly under­go­ing an enorm­ous shake­out. Of the ten lar­gest car ren­tal com­pa­nies in Euro­pe, we are the only ones who have not expe­ri­en­ced a mer­ger or take­over. Those who are still in the game are con­stant­ly get­ting big­ger, making major long-term invest­ments and taking high finan­cial risks. We sim­ply nee­ded more finan­cial strength for WASCOSA to be able to sur­vi­ve as an SME in this mar­ket. We found these strong finan­cial part­ners in Swiss Life and Vauban.

What other solutions were on the table?

At first we con­side­red a mino­ri­ty share­hol­ding by third-party share­hol­ders. Howe­ver, this did not result in an opti­mal solu­ti­on for the par­ties invol­ved. Sel­ling to a com­pe­ti­tor was never on the table. In the end, long-term coope­ra­ti­on with a strong finan­cial part­ner pro­ved to be the most sustainable.

«WASCOSA has estab­lished its­elf from a small, unknown ren­tal com­pa­ny to a suc­cessful sup­pli­er of freight car sys­tems throug­hout Euro­pe through inno­va­ti­on, cus­to­mer pro­xi­mi­ty and agility.»

What experiences from the past will shape the future of the company?

WASCOSA has estab­lished its­elf from a small, unknown ren­tal com­pa­ny to a suc­cessful pro­vi­der of freight car sys­tems throug­hout Euro­pe through inno­va­ti­on, cus­to­mer pro­xi­mi­ty and agi­li­ty. We want to main­tain this lat­ter posi­ti­on. One exam­p­le of our inno­va­ti­ve strength: there is curr­ent­ly a strong trend towards modu­lar freight car con­cepts. We intro­du­ced such con­cepts 15 years ago. Now that the trend is cat­ching on, we are ready for the mar­ket. In the last 60 years of our com­pa­ny, an uncom­pro­mi­sing cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on has made the dif­fe­rence in our daily busi­ness. We want to keep it that way too. It is in the inte­rest of the new owners that WASCOSA remains at its core what it has always been: an inno­va­ti­ve and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted company.

How will you master this change process?

The par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on of Swiss Life and Vau­ban as third-party share­hol­ders was deri­ved from an inten­si­ve stra­tegy pro­cess with around 15 employees. After the decis­i­on was made, we intro­du­ced the new share­hol­ders to the com­pa­ny at a one-day event. Throug­hout the enti­re stra­tegy pro­cess, we wan­ted to avoid uncer­tain­ty, mis­trust and false assump­ti­ons on the part of manage­ment and employees. We suc­cee­ded in doing so, and we are doing ever­y­thing we can to ensu­re that we also suc­ceed under the new owner­ship. CEO Peter Bal­zer and I will still be on the Board of Direc­tors. This is a strong mes­sa­ge with regard to con­ti­nui­ty and the future of WASCOSA.

«The DAC is a key pro­ject with enorm­ous poten­ti­al to move freight wagon trans­port for­ward.»

Where do you see the most urgent need for action in rail freight transport?

There are dif­fe­rent start­ing points. We need suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ties on the net­work, i.e. more train paths. In addi­ti­on, coun­try-spe­ci­fic obs­ta­cles should be remo­ved. And final­ly, rail freight trans­port is depen­dent on tar­ge­ted finan­cial sup­port to get inno­va­tions rol­ling, for exam­p­le the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC).

Speaking of DAC: what do you think about it?

It is a key pro­ject with enorm­ous poten­ti­al to move freight wagon trans­port for­ward. Howe­ver, we have litt­le influence on this high­ly poli­ti­cal topic. We have been working on the elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on of freight wagons for seve­ral years. Here, of cour­se, the DAC gives us an addi­tio­nal boost.

Is the real added value of the DAC recognised by the industry?

Our indus­try is not too keen on inno­va­ti­on and also not very future-ori­en­ted. The auto­ma­ti­on of cou­pling by the DAC has arri­ved. I am not so sure about its poten­ti­al for digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. As always, it pro­ba­b­ly first needs someone to lead the way and make the effi­ci­en­cy gains clear.

You have been involved in the VAP’s Executive Committee (GLA) for years. How do you describe the work of the VAP?

The VAP is cha­rac­te­ri­sed by a high level of com­pe­tence and a plea­sant working rela­ti­onship. The asso­cia­ti­on’s acti­vi­ties are dri­ven by the cause and not by the ego of indi­vi­du­als. The VAP is the lea­der in some areas. This is shown by the high level of par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on at home and abroad in events such as the forums. This inte­rest pro­ves that the VAP takes up poli­ti­cal, eco­no­mic or legal issues proac­tively and con­s­truc­tively. I found the get-tog­e­ther at the GLA very posi­ti­ve. In the dia­lo­gue with SBB, the asso­cia­ti­on shows stay­ing power. Here, pas­sen­ger trans­port comes first, then infra­struc­tu­re, then real estate and only then rail freight. That makes it all the more important to keep at it. The pati­ence and con­stant coope­ra­ti­on of Frank Fur­rer’s team stand out.

What strengths do you attribute to the VAP?

One of its main strengths is the large num­ber of ship­pers among its mem­bers. The VAP net­works all the play­ers in freight trans­port. In addi­ti­on, it offers the ship­pers’ indus­try a high­ly inte­res­t­ing and rele­vant plat­form. I think that you can only make suc­cessful poli­cy if you repre­sent all interests.

How has the VAP supported you and your WASCOSA?

We have had very good expe­ri­en­ces with the VAP. It has even sup­port­ed us com­pe­tent­ly and suc­cessful­ly all the way to the Fede­ral Court.

What else would you like to see from the VAP?

That it beco­mes more visi­ble in the media. The VAP could appear more pro­min­ent­ly as an opi­ni­on-lea­ding expert on rail trans­port and thus increase its public pro­fi­le, just like the TCS or ASTAG.

To whom would you recommend cooperation with the VAP?

Ever­yo­ne who is inte­res­ted in rail freight trans­port. I am thin­king above all of asso­cia­ti­ons from other modes of trans­port. For a long time now it has no lon­ger been just about rail ver­sus road, but about sen­si­ble mul­ti­mo­dal co-existence.

What has not yet come up in this conversation?

The topic of sus­taina­bi­li­ty. Rail freight trans­port is one of the most important dri­vers and car­ri­ers of sus­tainable trans­port. Inci­den­tal­ly, this was also one of the reasons why I took over from my father-in-law at WASCOSA 30 years ago.

 

Mr Müller, thank you very much for the interesting interview.
Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Economic advantages of a competitive freight railway

Freight trans­port plays a cru­cial role for the natio­nal eco­no­my as it enables the exch­an­ge of goods and ser­vices. In view of the chal­lenges such as limi­t­ed road capa­ci­ty and cli­ma­te chan­ge, the shift of freight trans­port to rail is beco­ming incre­asing­ly important. Here we explain the eco­no­mic bene­fits of a modal shift.

Limited road capacity:

The road infra­struc­tu­re is limi­t­ed and is alre­a­dy rea­ching its limits in many regi­ons. Due to the increased use of HGVs in freight trans­port, traf­fic on the roads con­ti­nues to rise, lea­ding to con­ges­ti­on, delays and increased trans­port costs. Shif­ting freight traf­fic to the rail­ways reli­e­ves the roads. This enables more effi­ci­ent use of exis­ting infra­struc­tu­re and redu­ces the need for expen­si­ve road extensions.

Climate change and environmental pollution:

The trans­port sec­tor con­tri­bu­tes signi­fi­cant­ly to CO2 emis­si­ons and other harmful envi­ron­men­tal impacts. Com­pared to road trans­port, rail trans­port is more envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly, as trains pro­du­ce on avera­ge fewer emis­si­ons per tonne-kilo­met­re. In addi­ti­on, rail trans­port redu­ces noise levels and mini­mi­ses air pol­lu­ti­on in urban areas, resul­ting in an impro­ved qua­li­ty of life for the population.

Efficiency and economy:

Rail offers high effi­ci­en­cy in freight trans­port as trains can carry lar­ger loads than trucks. By using goods trains, large quan­ti­ties of goods can be trans­por­ted in one go, which leads to an opti­mi­sa­ti­on of trans­port costs. This allows com­pa­nies to impro­ve their logi­stics pro­ces­ses and increase the effi­ci­en­cy of their sup­p­ly chains. A more effi­ci­ent freight trans­port con­nec­tion leads to lower trans­port costs, which in turn increa­ses the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of com­pa­nies and has a posi­ti­ve impact on the natio­nal eco­no­my. Through digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, the neces­sa­ry freight wagons can be effi­ci­ent­ly net­work­ed, thus avo­i­ding fixed costs.

Safety and accident prevention:

Shif­ting freight trans­port to rail con­tri­bu­tes to incre­asing road safe­ty. Com­pared to road trans­port, acci­dents in rail trans­port are less fre­quent and gene­ral­ly have a lower impact on life, health and the envi­ron­ment. Redu­cing HGV traf­fic on the roads mini­mi­ses poten­ti­al sources of dan­ger and increa­ses safe­ty for other road users.

Experienced logistics experts needed

Inde­pen­dent and sec­tor-spe­ci­fic logi­stics experts are nee­ded who spe­cia­li­se in spe­ci­fic pro­ducts. The rail­ways should con­cen­tra­te on ope­ra­ting the trains, while the over­all logi­stics are in the spe­cia­li­sed hands of the logi­stics experts.

Electricity shortage: take precautions and develop scenarios

Electricity shortage: take precautions and develop scenarios

Ener­gy tran­si­ti­on, geo­po­li­ti­cal cri­ses, sup­p­ly shorta­ges – these and other fac­tors could lead to an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. The large con­su­mers are cal­led upon to deve­lop sce­na­ri­os for a quota sys­tem. We at the VAP are actively working on this.

Elec­tri­ci­ty is available – that was taken for gran­ted in Switz­er­land for deca­des. This is now being cal­led into ques­ti­on: on the one hand, the repla­ce­ment of fos­sil fuels by sus­tainable ener­gy sources will limit the available ener­gy resour­ces in the coming years. On the other hand, geo­po­li­ti­cal con­flicts and sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks may have an addi­tio­nal nega­ti­ve impact on their avai­la­bi­li­ty, as the cur­rent situa­ti­on shows us.

Active participation required

Against this back­ground, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has cal­led on all large con­su­mers to coope­ra­te in the pre­pa­ra­ti­ons for a pos­si­ble elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. If an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge does inde­ed occur, the rail sec­tor will have to rest­rict pas­sen­ger trans­port ser­vices. Freight trans­port is to be main­tai­ned in line with demand.

Freight transport plays a key role

The rail­ways play a sys­tem-rele­vant role in freight trans­port with dome­stic, import and export traf­fic for the sup­p­ly of the eco­no­my and socie­ty. If a mas­si­ve power shorta­ge occurs, the freight logi­stics capa­bi­li­ty should basi­cal­ly remain int­act. Howe­ver, it must adapt to the chan­ged demand.

This is also the great unknown. At pre­sent it is not pos­si­ble to draw up relia­ble sce­na­ri­os for the deve­lo­p­ment of demand in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. Cer­tain­ly, the demand for trans­port capa­ci­ty will chan­ge noti­ce­ab­ly both in Switz­er­land and in our neigh­bou­ring count­ries. But depen­ding on the sec­tor, it may fall as well as rise.

Viewing rail operations as a system

To ensu­re that rail freight traf­fic can con­ti­nue to roll even in a cri­sis situa­ti­on, the sec­tor must react to the chan­ged demand in a time­ly man­ner with an adapt­ed trans­port offer. This is only pos­si­ble if the enti­re rail ope­ra­ti­on is view­ed as a sys­tem. In other words, all ope­ra­tio­nal­ly rele­vant func­tions must remain functional.

Scenarios in progress

In order to curb ener­gy con­sump­ti­on in the event of a cri­sis, pas­sen­ger trans­port will be gui­ded by the redu­ced time­ta­bles that it has alre­a­dy drawn up and imple­men­ted in the pan­de­mic year 2020. In freight trans­port, pos­si­ble sce­na­ri­os are being deve­lo­ped in close dia­lo­gue with the logi­stics sec­tor and with a view to the eco­no­mic sup­p­ly of the coun­try. Accor­ding to the man­da­te, coor­di­na­ted sce­na­ri­os should be available by the end of 2022. We at the VAP are actively con­tri­bu­ting our know­ledge and expe­ri­ence to this process.

Investing in the future with the DAC

Investing in the future with the DAC

The digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAC) is much more than what its name sug­gests. It is the basis for the com­ple­te digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in Switz­er­land – and thus a far-sigh­ted invest­ment in the future. 

Rail freight 4.0 

We at VAP are com­mit­ted to a com­pe­ti­ti­ve rail freight sys­tem in order to ensu­re that our mem­bers have a free choice of trans­port mode. To this end, we are acti­ve at various levels. One is the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling, or DAC for short. With this, Euro­pean rail freight can reach the next dimen­si­on of modernisation. 

The DAC allows auto­ma­tic cou­pling, as the name sug­gests. But that is by far not all. We should rethink Swiss rail freight trans­port with its cross-sys­tem pro­ces­ses as a whole. In this view, the DAC enables a con­ti­nuous power and data trans­fer in the train. Such a trans­fer is the pre­re­qui­si­te for the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port. It is tan­ta­mount to a quan­tum leap in qua­li­ty and cus­to­mer bene­fit, as all data is available digi­tal­ly via all inter­faces and logi­stics par­ti­ci­pan­ts. Digi­tal train con­trol will also lead to a ground­brea­king fle­xi­bi­li­sa­ti­on of net­work use and thus to a signi­fi­cant increase in net­work capa­ci­ty. This offers rail freight trans­port the uni­que oppor­tu­ni­ty to play a key role in mul­ti­mo­dal logistics. 

Genuine innovation for 100 years

The last real inno­va­ti­on in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port was elec­tri­fi­ca­ti­on. It was 100 years ago. As a result, the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail freight has ste­adi­ly decli­ned. With the invest­ment in the DAC, rail freight trans­port can now catch up on seve­ral stages of deve­lo­p­ment at once. Becau­se it offers new func­tions with ground­brea­king advan­ta­ges (cf. Figu­re 1). 

Figu­re 1: The DAC brings more bene­fits than the auto­ma­ti­on of the cou­pling process.

Rail freight transport as the backbone of supply

Rail freight trans­port is a cen­tral com­po­nent of the sup­p­ly of goods. In Switz­er­land alone, we expect freight trans­port volu­mes to grow by 30 per­cent by 2050. Trans­port capa­ci­ties on road and rail are limi­t­ed. Capa­ci­ty expan­si­on is main­ly pos­si­ble through impro­ved inter­faces of the mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. And rail freight trans­port also has a lot to offer in terms of sus­taina­bi­li­ty. Trans­port accounts for one third of green­house gas emis­si­ons each year. With the Green Deal in Euro­pe and the long-term Cli­ma­te Stra­tegy 2050 in Switz­er­land, poli­ti­ci­ans have set ambi­tious goals. Low-emis­si­on rail trans­port is pro­ving to be extre­me­ly competitive.

Support needed

Lea­ding rail freight trans­port into a new era of pro­gress with the DAC can­not be achie­ved sin­gle-han­dedly. Our indus­try is depen­dent on sup­port. This includes, on the one hand, poli­ti­cal com­mit­ment to ensu­re seam­less coor­di­na­ti­on bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. On the other hand, it requi­res finan­cial sup­port. Becau­se the indus­try play­ers can­not bear the high initi­al invest­ments alone. The added value of the DAC is desi­gned for the long term and dis­tri­bu­ted among seve­ral mar­ket par­ti­ci­pan­ts (cf. Figu­re 2). In our view, a deli­be­ra­te start-up finan­cing by the fede­ral govern­ment is impe­ra­ti­ve. But the over­ri­ding goal must remain self-sustainability.

Figu­re 2: The bene­fits of the DAC can be seen in the long term and are dis­tri­bu­ted among seve­ral mar­ket participants.

Considered retrofitting

We con­sider it sen­si­ble to retro­fit the exis­ting fleet of wagons rest­ric­tively and to con­cen­tra­te on young and mar­ket-rele­vant wagons. Wagon owners should only retro­fit their wagons if this is che­a­per over time than buy­ing new ones. In addi­ti­on, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on should pro­vi­de for a scrap­ping allo­wan­ce for wagons that have not been writ­ten off, the use of which the wagon kee­per can deci­de hims­elf. The fact is that a large num­ber of wagons must be con­ver­ted in a coor­di­na­ted man­ner within a short peri­od of time so that the wagons remain com­pa­ti­ble with each other and the DAC unfolds its added value as soon as possible.

You can find more on the sub­ject in this pre­sen­ta­ti­on.

Ensure Switzerland-EU interoperability

Ensure Switzerland-EU interoperability

On 24 June 2022, the Joint Com­mit­tee on Land Trans­port ack­now­led­ged the importance of har­mo­nis­ed rules for Switz­er­land-EU land trans­port. We think: More is nee­ded for sus­tainable inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. What is nee­ded now is a coor­di­na­ted trans­port policy.

In 1999, Switz­er­land con­cluded a land trans­port agree­ment with the Euro­pean Union (EU). This gua­ran­tees mutu­al mar­ket access for trans­por­ters from both sides of the Swiss bor­der. The regu­la­ti­ons for cross-bor­der goods trans­port by rail and road have been harmonised.

Switzerland partially left out

With the NRLA, Switz­er­land expan­ded the Euro­pean rail cor­ri­dor into a flat rail­way and suc­cessful­ly imple­men­ted its modal shift poli­cy with the Distance-rela­ted Heavy Vehic­le Fee (HVF) and a ban on cabo­ta­ge, night and Sun­day dri­ving. The modal split in tran­sal­pi­ne tran­sit traf­fic is over 70% in favour of rail, which is con­side­red an inter­na­tio­nal bench­mark. Howe­ver, this plea­sing per­for­mance record should not hide the fact that, com­pared to mem­ber sta­tes, Switz­er­land does not curr­ent­ly have full mar­ket access. The Swiss rail­way net­work is not yet an inte­gra­ted part of the Euro­pean Interop network.

Sticking to the Agreement on Land Transport

At its half-year mee­ting on 24 June 2022, the Joint Com­mit­tee on Land Trans­port empha­sis­ed the importance of the agree­ment. Howe­ver, unre­sol­ved poli­ti­cal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU are blo­cking its fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment. Such fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment is urgen­tly nee­ded within the frame­work of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU Rail­way Packa­ge.

Since 2019, Switz­er­lan­d’s coope­ra­ti­on with the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA) has been gover­ned by a tem­po­ra­ry tran­si­tio­nal solu­ti­on. The Joint Com­mit­tee dis­cus­sed a fur­ther exten­si­on of this tran­si­tio­nal solu­ti­on. This would faci­li­ta­te Switz­er­lan­d’s pro­ce­du­ral invol­vement in sim­pli­fied aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­ons for cross-bor­der traf­fic as well as its tech­ni­cal par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in inno­va­ti­on pro­jects for the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of the railways.

Federal Council in demand

We at the VAP are con­vin­ced that Swiss rail freight trans­port must expand its mar­ket access and not miss the boat on Euro­pean inno­va­ti­on. With this credo, Josef Ditt­li, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, sub­mit­ted inter­pel­la­ti­on 22.3566 on 9 June 2022. He is asking the Fede­ral Coun­cil to ans­wer the fol­lo­wing questions:

  1. How does the Fede­ral Coun­cil intend to ensu­re the neces­sa­ry con­ti­nua­tion of the rail packa­ges within the frame­work of the EU-CH land trans­port agreement?
  2. How does the Fede­ral Coun­cil intend to achie­ve the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge in Switz­er­land and secu­re free cross-bor­der rail traf­fic in the long term?
  3. How does the Fede­ral Coun­cil intend to achie­ve Switz­er­lan­d’s early full mem­ber­ship in the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy ERA?
  4. How does the Fede­ral Coun­cil intend to secu­re and com­ple­te the Swiss seat in the EU RISC as an important manage­ment and decis­i­on-making body?
Ensure full interoperability

For the eco­no­my in gene­ral and for our mem­bers in par­ti­cu­lar, it is cru­cial that pre­vious achie­ve­ments are secu­red in the long term. We con­sider it abso­lut­e­ly neces­sa­ry that Switz­er­land is repre­sen­ted as an equal part­ner in cen­tral Euro­pean bodies as soon as pos­si­ble and that trans­port poli­cy in cross-bor­der trans­port is coordinated.

Future of rail freight transport in the area

Future of rail freight transport in the area

Shaping rail freight transport for the future
The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s report  Bericht «Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the area»[1] of March 2022 pro­vi­des a wel­co­me oppor­tu­ni­ty to rethink the Swiss rail freight trans­port sys­tem with its inter­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and cross-sys­tem pro­ces­ses as a whole. A holi­stic new con­cep­ti­on starts not only with the (start-up) finan­cing of the EMLV or the DAC, but with all pro­ces­ses, incen­ti­ve instru­ments, mar­ket mecha­nisms and inter­faces of mul­ti­mo­dal freight logi­stics in Switz­er­land. The goal must be a self-sus­tai­ning, mar­ket-based rail freight trans­port sys­tem that includes all freight rail­ways wit­hout dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on on the basis of intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on and sup­ports ship­pers as a relia­ble part­ner. In this con­text, any finan­cing based on the pro­ven model in tran­sit traf­fic must pri­ma­ri­ly bene­fit the cus­to­mers of all freight rail­ways and offer per­for­mance-based, com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral incen­ti­ves wit­hout any dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on. Only in this way and only with com­bi­ned forces can inno­va­tions and invest­ments by the pri­va­te sec­tor in rail freight trans­port deve­lop. And only in this way can rail freight trans­port in the coun­try­si­de be made fit for the future.
Federal Council considers long-term financial support
Accor­ding to the report, the Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to main­tain sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic (SCC) in the future and does not rule out long-term finan­cial sup­port. Accor­ding to the defi­ni­ti­on of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic com­pri­ses the trans­port of groups of wagons in unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port (UCT) and con­ven­tio­nal rail freight wagons bund­led tog­e­ther for the main run. The Boards of Direc­tors of SBB AG and SBB Cargo AG assess in their Finan­cial Report 2021[2] a sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on of their rail freight ser­vices as neces­sa­ry and pro­ba­ble. The Fede­ral Coun­cil and the fede­ral com­pa­nies are thus appar­ent­ly in agree­ment that finan­cial sup­port for rail freight trans­port is neces­sa­ry in the area. Howe­ver, they base their assess­ment of volu­me and finan­cial via­bi­li­ty sole­ly on infor­ma­ti­on from SBB Cargo. The other freight rail­ways, most of which are orga­nis­ed in the pri­va­te sec­tor, are not included in this assess­ment. In our view, a new per­spec­ti­ve is urgen­tly nee­ded here.
Adopting a new perspective
SBB Cargo has been ope­ra­ting nati­on­wi­de rail freight ser­vices as a mono­po­ly since the 1999 Rail Reform I – with litt­le suc­cess, as a review 25 years after the par­lia­men­ta­ry decis­i­on shows. This must chan­ge: The freight rail­ways acti­ve throug­hout Switz­er­land and their cus­to­mers can join forces and, under the lea­der­ship of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IGWLV)[3], rede­sign rail freight trans­port in Switzerland.
Abbildung 1, Seite 51 im Bericht «Zukünftige Ausrichtung des Schienengüterverkehrs in der Fläche»

Figu­re 1, page 51 in the report «Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the area».

For the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port in the area, the report pres­ents two direc­tions (Figu­re 1): one invol­ves the dis­con­ti­nua­tion of EMLV, the other the finan­cial pro­mo­ti­on of EMLV. From the VAP’s point of view, this is too nar­row a view. A chan­ge of per­spec­ti­ve is neces­sa­ry in two respects: First, actors need to rede­fi­ne their under­stan­ding of their roles and rethink their pro­ces­ses. Second­ly, a neu­tral view of the finan­cial situa­ti­on is nee­ded. For neither the envi­sa­ged tech­ni­cal advan­ces (key­word digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling DAC) nor the purely inter­nal view of SBB Cargo can bring about a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on. This should also be the focus of the cur­rent dis­cus­sion about the future. The orga­ni­sa­tio­nal form shown in the report (Figu­re 2) repres­ents a men­tal jum­ping-off point for working out fur­ther vari­ants of directions.

Abbildung 2, Seite 50 im Bericht «Zukünftige Ausrichtung des Schienengüterverkehrs in der Fläche»

Figu­re 2, page 50 in the report «Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the area».

Fact-based decisions

In order to assess the finan­cing requi­re­ments of regio­nal rail freight trans­port, it is impe­ra­ti­ve to have an ana­ly­sis of the eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty car­ri­ed out by exter­nal neu­tral experts. If sur­face rail freight is inde­ed unpro­fi­ta­ble, a distinc­tion must be made as to whe­ther SBB Car­go’s mono­po­ly posi­ti­on or the sys­tem its­elf is respon­si­ble. The neu­tral third party must also exami­ne whe­ther eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty, as requi­red by the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG[4]), is curr­ent­ly being pur­sued at all. Only when a detail­ed ana­ly­sis of the cur­rent situa­ti­on is available can par­lia­ment deci­de on appro­pria­te measures.

Limit funding

If finan­cial sup­port pro­ves to be undoub­ted­ly appro­pria­te, it should be con­side­red as tem­po­ra­ry finan­cing for a fun­da­men­tal new con­cept – not as per­ma­nent sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on. Tem­po­ra­ry start-up fun­ding can sup­port the deve­lo­p­ment of a com­pe­ti­ti­ve rail freight trans­port sys­tem until its simul­ta­neous digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on and the com­mis­sio­ning of new net­work ele­ments from the 2035 expan­si­on stage have been com­ple­ted. Per­ma­nent fun­ding, on the other hand, would under­mi­ne the mar­ket-based incen­ti­ves for com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy of rail freight trans­port and make fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port in Switz­er­land impossible.

 

[1]Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of sur­face rail freight traf­fic”, Fede­ral Coun­cil report in respon­se to KVF‑S pos­tu­la­te 21.3597 of 10 May 2021. In 1999, with Rail Reform I, Par­lia­ment trans­fer­red the mono­po­ly for the ope­ra­ti­on of sur­face rail freight traf­fic to SBB Cargo AG. Its share of rail freight traf­fic in dome­stic, import and export traf­fic is around 60%. The remai­ning 40% is car­ri­ed in block trains via sidings and terminals.

[2] «SBB Finan­cial Report 2021», chap­ter «Bewer­tungs­un­si­cher­hei­ten rund um die Coro­na­pan­de­mie und um das Geschäfts­feld Cargo Schweiz», p. 84.

[3] The Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IGWLV) was foun­ded in 2018. It repres­ents the inte­rests of VöV, SBB Cargo and VAP with the man­da­te to moder­ni­se rail freight trans­port in the area and make it more effi­ci­ent, in accordance with Art. 3a of the Freight Trans­port Act. Pre­si­dent: Frank Fur­rer, Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral VAP, Vice Pre­si­dent: Dési­rée Baer, CEO SBB Cargo –> Reports on IG WLV

[4]«Bun­des­ge­setz über den Güter­trans­port durch Bahn- und Schiff­fahrts­un­ter­neh­men (Güter­trans­port­ge­setz, GüTG)» Art. 2 Para. 2

Freight Transport Forum: the industry stands together for progress in rail freight transport

Freight Transport Forum: the industry stands together for progress in rail freight transport

On 3 May 2022, the popu­lar Freight Trans­port Forum final­ly took place again after three years. The most important play­ers and repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from the ship­ping indus­try from all over Euro­pe met to refresh their exper­ti­se and exch­an­ge ideas with col­le­agues across com­pa­nies. The chan­ces of making rail freight trans­port fit for the future in a joint effort are good!

Interesting approaches

The freight trans­port mas­ter plans and rail freight trans­port in par­ti­cu­lar, which were laun­ched in Ger­ma­ny and Aus­tria, pro­vi­de a com­pre­hen­si­ve over­view of the poli­ti­cal stra­te­gies and mea­su­res. Some­thing com­pa­ra­ble is lack­ing in Switz­er­land; ins­tead, there is still a strong focus on the indi­vi­du­al modes of trans­port. The VAP the­r­e­fo­re con­ti­nues to pur­sue an over­all view of freight trans­port and logi­stics, in close coope­ra­ti­on with eco­no­mie­su­is­se and ASTAG. Aus­tria pres­ents an amend­ment to the Waste Manage­ment Act. This sti­pu­la­tes that trans­ports of waste with a total weight of more than ten ton­nes, start­ing from a defi­ned trans­port distance (decre­asing bet­ween 1.1.2023 and 1.1.2026 from 300, 200, 100 km), must in future be car­ri­ed out by rail or by other means of trans­port with equi­va­lent or lower pol­lutant or green­house gas poten­ti­al (e.g. pro­pul­si­on by fuel cell or elec­tric motor). Simi­lar deve­lo­p­ments can also be seen in the can­ton of Zurich, for exam­p­le in the Ordi­nan­ce on the Trans­port of Excava­ted Mate­ri­al and Aggre­ga­tes by Rail of 3 Febru­ary 2021, which requi­res that a signi­fi­cant pro­por­ti­on of excava­ted mate­ri­al must be trans­por­ted by rail – or else a sub­sti­tu­te levy is paya­ble. In prin­ci­ple, we wel­co­me such regu­la­ti­ons to achie­ve the envi­ron­men­tal goals, but we do not con­sider a spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­on of the choice of means of trans­port by means of gent­le coer­ci­on to be very effec­ti­ve. Rather, the VAP stri­ves to make the rail­ways fit and attrac­ti­ve for ship­pers, so that pater­na­lism is not necessary.

We the­r­e­fo­re con­sider the com­mon inte­rest in pro­mo­ting digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on to be very posi­ti­ve. As never befo­re, the play­ers in the ship­ping indus­try stand united for pro­gress. It is impres­si­ve how the various play­ers net­work­ed across Euro­pe have deci­ded in favour of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and want to use this lever tog­e­ther to make rail freight trans­port fit for the future. Various pre­sen­ta­ti­ons show­ed that the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling (DAC) not only brings con­sidera­ble reli­ef for mecha­ni­cal work, but is above all a switch for the con­nec­ti­vi­ty of an enti­re train. This is the pre­re­qui­si­te for digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, which is so important for rail freight trans­port and which has long since taken place in other indus­tries. With more effi­ci­ent and trans­pa­rent pro­ces­ses, rail can beco­me com­pe­ti­ti­ve along­side other modes of trans­port. The motto is col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and coo­pe­ti­ti­on, which we at the VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of Ship­pers also support.

VAP mem­bers can down­load the spea­k­ers’ pre­sen­ta­ti­ons here with their per­so­nal login.

The course of the forum in detail

The mor­ning revol­ved around the ques­ti­on «Trans­port poli­cy in the green rush?». Gil­les Peter­hans, Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral of UIP explai­ned the trans­port poli­cy issues at Euro­pean level. Malte Law­renz, Chair­man of VPI Ger­ma­ny, show­ed the trans­port poli­cy frame­work for Ger­ma­ny, how prio­ri­ty should be given to rail and what fun­ding is nee­ded to be able to imple­ment the mas­ter plan for rail freight trans­port. Frank Petut­s­ch­nig, Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral VPI Aus­tria, pre­sen­ted the situa­ti­on in Aus­tria on the same topic, where the focus is on the over­all view of freight trans­port, name­ly the most effi­ci­ent choice of trans­port mode in terms of ener­gy demand per tonne. Dési­rée Baer, CEO of SBB Cargo, added to the situa­ti­on of the trans­port poli­cy frame­work in Switz­er­land with her pre­sen­ta­ti­on and intro­du­ced the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), the plat­form for coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween rail­ways and shippers.

In the sub­se­quent panel dis­cus­sion it beca­me clear that the cour­se for the future of rail freight trans­port has been set for inno­va­ti­on and that the next step is to defi­ne how the invest­ments will be finan­ced. It beca­me clear that the inno­va­tions affect all play­ers and that a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve approach is the­r­e­fo­re the right way for­ward. Coope­ra­ti­on and com­pe­ti­ti­on – or coo­pe­ti­ti­on – are two other buz­zwords that are not only desi­red by the rail actors, but also in the inter­ac­tion bet­ween rail and road.

The after­noon was divi­ded into the two exci­ting key topics «Inno­va­tions & pos­si­ble imple­men­ta­ti­on» and «Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on with con­cre­te mea­su­res». Jürg Lüt­scher, expert in inno­va­ti­on and regu­la­ti­on at the VAP, spoke about the auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in Switz­er­land. He empha­sis­ed the importance of opti­mi­sing pro­ces­ses and inter­faces in the cour­se of inno­va­ti­on, the so-cal­led inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty. Ralf Mar­xen, Head of Exter­nal Tech­ni­cal Affairs at Deut­sche Bahn AG, spoke about the path to the intel­li­gent goods train: «From Shift2Rail to Euro­pe’s Rail». He poin­ted out important mile­sto­nes for inno­va­ti­on, with the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling (DAC) taking on the key func­tion for digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and enab­ling, for exam­p­le, auto­ma­ted pro­ces­ses and moni­to­ring, as well as pre­cise cus­to­mer com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on, thus rai­sing the ser­vice level of the trans­port of goods by rail many times over. Ste­fan Hagen­lo­cher, Mana­ging Direc­tor of HWH and TIS Pro­ject Mana­ger, who was con­nec­ted live via video chan­nel, show­ed what the Tech­ni­cal Inno­va­ti­on Cir­cle for Rail Freight Trans­port (TIS) requi­res for digi­tal and com­pe­ti­ti­ve rail freight trans­port. He cle­ar­ly com­mu­ni­ca­ted that there will be no com­ple­te auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port wit­hout DAC and that stan­dar­di­s­a­ti­on of the tech­ni­cal aspects and a coor­di­na­ted migra­ti­on stra­tegy are essential.

The two wagon hire com­pa­nies Niko Davids, Chief Digi­tal Offi­cer, VTG AG, and Chris­toph Becker, Head of ECM II and Safe­ty Manage­ment at Was­co­sa AG, demons­tra­ted their digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on stra­te­gies to streng­then the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail freight trans­port. Their mes­sa­ge too – espe­ci­al­ly as the two com­pe­ti­tors were alre­a­dy sen­ding out a signal with their joint appearance: «Col­la­bo­ra­ti­on and coo­pe­ti­ti­on: digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on is not a pro­ject for one indi­vi­du­al! Only through acti­ve and open coope­ra­ti­on will there be a bene­fit for the sec­tor!»

Jörg Bisang, Head of Pro­duct Manage­ment ZKE, impres­sed with the pos­si­bi­li­ties that digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of tech­ni­cal vehic­le con­trol with «Way­si­de Intel­li­gence» alre­a­dy brings today, and cal­led on RUs and wagon kee­pers to make use of these possibilities.

In the con­clu­ding panel dis­cus­sion it then also beca­me clear that ever­yo­ne wants to focus tog­e­ther on the migra­ti­on of the DAC, in the sense of inter­ope­ra­ble inno­va­ti­on. This coope­ra­ti­on con­cerns the enti­re rail­way sys­tem, which is why it is important to work tog­e­ther on this not as com­pe­ti­tors, but as an inno­va­ti­on team that exch­an­ges ideas about their goals. Quick and cou­ra­ge­ous decis­i­ons can enable effi­ci­ent implementation.

We look back on a suc­cessful Freight Trans­port Forum, where ever­yo­ne enjoy­ed final­ly being able to meet and exch­an­ge ideas in the «real world» again.

4th EU railway package: Making the most of the innovation boost

4th EU railway package: Making the most of the innovation boost

Cli­ma­te pro­tec­tion is at the top of the poli­ti­cal agen­da in Euro­pe. A high demand for mobi­li­ty of peo­p­le and trans­port of goods has been lea­ding to mas­si­ve cli­ma­te-dama­ging emis­si­ons in our inten­si­ve­ly indus­tria­li­sed regi­on for a long time. On the way to net zero, poli­cy­ma­kers expect the rail sec­tor to con­sis­t­ent­ly exploit its advan­ta­ges and make a sub­stan­ti­al con­tri­bu­ti­on to more resour­ce-effi­ci­ent logi­stics. Thanks to inno­va­ti­on, we have the chan­ce to make the pro­duc­tion of freight trans­port more effi­ci­ent, ergo more cost-effec­ti­ve and more cus­to­mer-fri­end­ly, and on top of that, we increase the avai­la­bi­li­ty of train paths on our exis­ting rail networks.

Railway sector must digitalise

The con­di­ti­ons for mee­ting these poli­ti­cal expec­ta­ti­ons are actual­ly good. Euro­pe has a dense rail net­work on which the rail­ways can move large mas­ses with low ener­gy and space requi­re­ments com­pared to other modes of trans­port, and the important cen­tres are all con­nec­ted. Howe­ver, many stan­dards and working methods in the rail­way sec­tor are mas­si­ve­ly out­da­ted. And the spe­ci­fic cha­rac­te­ristics of the indi­vi­du­al count­ries some­ti­mes diver­ge dia­me­tri­cal­ly. This is a major reason why the increase in per­for­mance deman­ded by the rail sec­tor has so far fai­led to mate­ria­li­se. The rail sec­tor can only con­vin­cin­g­ly ful­fil the high poli­ti­cal expec­ta­ti­ons – to take on the key role in the imple­men­ta­ti­on of cli­ma­te poli­cy – if it fun­da­men­tal­ly renews its­elf. To do so, it needs a sys­tem-wide inno­va­ti­on push and har­mo­nis­ed sove­reign rules in line with the state of the art.

EU-wide harmonised interoperability

This is where the tech­ni­cal pil­lar of the 4th EU Rail­way Packa­ge comes into play. It aims at a sys­te­ma­tic har­mo­ni­sa­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal stan­dard gauge traf­fic. The mem­ber sta­tes are cal­led upon to apply the inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty stan­dards con­sis­t­ent­ly and to har­mo­ni­se the cor­re­spon­ding appr­oval pro­ce­du­res inter­na­tio­nal­ly. In this way, the exis­ting hurd­les for cross-bor­der traf­fic will be remo­ved and the way ope­ned for joint Euro­pean inno­va­ti­on steps. This makes the tech­ni­cal pil­lar decisi­ve for suc­cessful inno­va­tions in the Euro­pean rail sector.

These com­pri­se four the­ma­tic fields and will signi­fi­cant­ly impro­ve the mar­ket posi­ti­on of rail trans­port in the coming years:

  • Inter­na­tio­nal­ly har­mo­nis­ed sove­reign regulations
  • Cross-bor­der com­pa­ti­ble tech­ni­cal systems
  • Inter­na­tio­nal­ly har­mo­nis­ed pro­ces­ses for safe­ty-rele­vant activities
  • Joint acti­vi­ties for sys­tem-wide gui­ded fur­ther development
  • Auto­ma­ti­on beco­mes marketable

Euro­pe’s Rail Joint Under­ta­king (EU-Rail) has initia­ted an important cross-Euro­pean deve­lo­p­ment with the Euro­pean Freight Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pler Deli­very Pro­gram (EDDP). This is inten­ded to enable digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on in freight trans­port. The deve­lo­p­ment work should be so far advan­ced by 2025 that digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­plers are available ready for series pro­duc­tion for the upco­ming migra­ti­on of rol­ling stock.

Switzerland in the middle

From both an eco­no­mic and a geo­gra­phi­cal per­spec­ti­ve, it makes sense for Switz­er­land to par­ti­ci­pa­te actively and con­sis­t­ent­ly in the ongo­ing EU acti­vi­ties – even more so in the con­text of the tug-of-war over the insti­tu­tio­nal frame­work agree­ment. The trig­ge­red revi­si­on of the Swiss Rail­way Act (EBG) for the auto­no­mous adapt­a­ti­on of our sove­reign regu­la­ti­ons to the estab­lished Interop and Safe­ty Direc­ti­ve of the 4th EU Rail­way Packa­ge is a wel­co­me impe­tus for actively tack­ling the envi­sa­ged inno­va­ti­on packa­ges now. The Swiss rail­way sec­tor should and will use this inno­va­ti­on push to its advan­ta­ge as soon as pos­si­ble, in order to remain a com­pe­ti­ti­ve part­ner in the high­ly com­pe­ti­ti­ve trans­port sec­tor in the future.

Modal shift: In transit on the right track

Modal shift: In transit on the right track

The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s “Modal shift report July 2019 – June 2021″ pres­ents the deve­lo­p­ment of tran­sal­pi­ne freight traf­fic and envi­ron­men­tal pol­lu­ti­on on the tran­sal­pi­ne tran­sit axes. It then exami­nes the sta­tus of imple­men­ta­ti­on of the modal shift instru­ments and accom­pany­ing mea­su­res. Based on this, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses various mea­su­res to sup­port the modal shift. Final­ly, it makes an assess­ment of the con­ti­nua­tion of the modal shift poli­cy in the coming report­ing periods.

Transit success story

The 2021 modal shift report shows that the direc­tion taken in the deve­lo­p­ment of tran­sal­pi­ne freight trans­port is the right one. Moni­to­ring and report­ing are pro­ving their worth. Nevert­hel­ess, much remains to be done. The num­ber of tran­sal­pi­ne jour­neys by heavy goods vehic­les in 2021 is just under 900,000, which still cle­ar­ly exceeds the legal requi­re­ment of 650,000. Fur­ther mea­su­res are urgen­tly nee­ded, espe­ci­al­ly in view of the upco­ming decar­bo­ni­sa­ti­on of trans­port to achie­ve the 2050 cli­ma­te targets.

Much done, much to do

We at the VAP belie­ve that pre­vious mea­su­res need to be shar­pe­ned and, in par­ti­cu­lar, that the finan­cial sup­port mea­su­res need to be expan­ded in a tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral way. Today, it is done in unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port. Other forms of rail trans­port are not pro­mo­ted. Of cour­se, we have to accept the limits of modal shift in tran­sit and ensu­re that forces are bund­led here. Nevert­hel­ess, it is the task of poli­tics and busi­ness to explo­re the poten­ti­al for fur­ther modal shift in tran­sit. This is what we have done below.

Potential No. 1: Multimodality

Road, rail and sea com­ple­ment each other per­fect­ly. Ship­pers can com­bi­ne these modes of trans­port to crea­te effi­ci­ent, mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons, with rail freight trans­port being con­side­red the back­bone of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. Accor­din­gly, the pro­mo­ti­on of mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty should be tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral. Today, main­ly unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port is pro­mo­ted, but not con­ven­tio­nal rail freight. The result: the share of wagon­load trans­port in tran­sit is falling.

Abbildung 1: Entwicklung des Modalsplits im alpenquerenden Güterverkehr 1984 bis 2020

 

 

In our view, this is a missed oppor­tu­ni­ty. This is becau­se the “Fede­ral Act on the Trans­fer of Tran­sal­pi­ne Heavy Goods Traf­fic from Road to Rail” (GVVG)1 allows the pro­mo­ti­on of all rail freight traf­fic. We belie­ve that all com­bi­ned forms of road, rail and sea trans­port are part of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics and must be trea­ted equal­ly both finan­ci­al­ly and in terms of infrastructure.

Potential No. 2: Quality monitoring

Curr­ent­ly, only unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port is sub­ject to moni­to­ring. The aim is to deter­mi­ne the qua­li­ty of tran­sit traf­fic. In tran­sit traf­fic, howe­ver, there is no qua­li­ty moni­to­ring in wagon­load traf­fic. We also see this as a second missed oppor­tu­ni­ty. Becau­se, as I said, the GVVG pro­vi­des for the pro­mo­ti­on of all rail freight trans­port. So the qua­li­ty of all mul­ti­mo­dal trans­ports should be moni­to­red. This appli­es equal­ly to con­tai­ners, semi-trai­lers, cover­ed wagons, tank wagons and others.

Abbildung 2: Entwicklung der Pünktlichkeit im alpenquerenden kombinierten Schienengüterverkehr 2019 bis 2021

 

Potential No. 3: Connectivity and productivity

The Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV) and we at the VAP are tack­ling the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port as part of a major pro­ject (cf. moti­on “Trans­port­ing goods more effi­ci­ent­ly by rail through auto­ma­ti­on” by Josef Ditt­li, Mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and VAP Pre­si­dent). With the help of digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies, con­sign­ments can be tra­cked in real time, the fle­xi­bi­li­ty of the freight rail­ways can be increased, tem­pe­ra­tu­re checks can be car­ri­ed out, and thus the qua­li­ty of the enti­re rail freight trans­port can be mas­si­ve­ly impro­ved. Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on also allows digi­tal train con­trol and train inte­gri­ty. Thanks to the eli­mi­na­ti­on of fixed signals, it enables signi­fi­cant capa­ci­ty increa­ses in the exis­ting rail­way net­work wit­hout addi­tio­nal expan­si­on mea­su­res. Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on are thus essen­ti­al com­pon­ents of a future-ori­en­ted modal shift policy.

Potential No. 4: Train path prices

At pre­sent, train-path pri­ces are not set accor­ding to the pol­lu­ter-pays prin­ci­ple. In other words, freight trans­port has to co-finan­ce expen­si­ve stan­dards for pas­sen­ger trans­port. In an inter­na­tio­nal com­pa­ri­son, the train path pri­ces in Switz­er­land are very high and thus out­side a rea­li­stic value crea­ti­on in rail freight trans­port. After the tem­po­ra­ry price reduc­tions in the con­text of the Covid mea­su­res, in which the train path price ten­ded towards prac­ti­cal­ly zero in the Euro­pean envi­ron­ment, the train path price remains well away from the Euro­pean bench­mark. The­r­e­fo­re, we con­sider a per­ma­nent reduc­tion of the track access char­ges to be an urgent and effi­ci­ent sup­port measure.

Potential No. 5: Performance-related heavy vehicle charge (HVF)

Curr­ent­ly, two thirds of the pro­ceeds from the HVF are cre­di­ted to the Rail Infra­struc­tu­re Fund (BIF). This cor­re­sponds to one bil­li­on Swiss francs annu­al­ly. We pro­po­se a review of the ear­mar­king of the HVF for expan­si­ons in the inte­rest of freight trans­port. Alt­hough the HVF is sup­po­sed to limit the growth of heavy road traf­fic and pro­mo­te the shift of freight traf­fic to the rail­ways, it is often deci­ded to use the reve­nue for expan­si­ons in favour of pas­sen­ger traf­fic. For com­pa­ri­son: the nor­t­hern bypass of Zurich alone costs 1 bil­li­on Swiss francs to close capa­ci­ties in the east-west axis. The con­s­truc­tion pro­ject was dis­cus­sed in the AS 2035, but the Sta­del­ho­fen sta­ti­on with a com­pa­ra­ble cost was given priority.

Potential No. 6: Access routes

Traf­fic on the fee­der lines is con­stant­ly incre­asing. In order to make them attrac­ti­ve for freight traf­fic, the Fede­ral Coun­cil insists on com­pli­ance with the exis­ting expan­si­on agree­ments with neigh­bou­ring count­ries. In addi­ti­on, the Fede­ral Coun­cil was alre­a­dy ins­truc­ted in moti­on 20.3003 State trea­ty for a Neat access route on the left bank of the Rhine to rea­li­se an effi­ci­ent alter­na­ti­ve route on the left bank of the Rhine (flat rail­way) by means of a state trea­ty with France and Bel­gi­um. This should now be given prio­ri­ty. We are in favour of co-finan­cing the Karls­ru­he-Basel sec­tion on the left bank of the Rhine for the rapid rea­li­sa­ti­on of an alter­na­ti­ve route. This is the only way to impro­ve the qua­li­ty of the nor­t­hern access route in the short term. The KVF‑N has allo­wed its­elf to be con­vin­ced by these argu­ments and has sub­mit­ted moti­on 22.300 “Con­ti­nua­tion of the suc­cessful modal shift poli­cy and gua­ran­tee of natio­nal sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty thanks to expan­si­on of the Wörth-Stras­bourg NEAT fee­der on the left bank of the Rhine”.

Potential No. 7: Alternatives

Natu­ral­ly, there are cer­tain limits to modal shift. Accor­din­gly, efforts should be con­cen­tra­ted on sui­ta­ble trans­port. Rail and road com­ple­ment each other. Envi­ron­men­tal­ly com­pa­ti­ble drive tech­no­lo­gies decisi­ve­ly advan­ce the sus­tainable deve­lo­p­ment of road trans­port. We the­r­e­fo­re advo­ca­te the pro­mo­ti­on of envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly drive sys­tems with free­dom of choice for owners. The design of the HVF would pro­mo­te envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly tech­no­lo­gies and gua­ran­tee invest­ment secu­ri­ty for ten years. The trans­port of dan­ge­rous goods over the Sim­plon Pass should be secu­red with an indus­try solu­ti­on. Read more about this in the blog artic­le “Trans­port of dan­ge­rous goods on the Sim­plon”.

Abbildung 3: Alpenquerender Strassengüterverkehr 2019: Anzahl Fahrten nach Quell-/Zielregion

 

At its mee­ting in early April 2022, the KVF‑N will deal with the ques­ti­on of addi­tio­nal sup­port for tran­sal­pi­ne freight trans­port. On behalf of the com­mis­si­on, the admi­nis­tra­ti­on will show in an addi­tio­nal report which opti­ons are available for finan­cing such a mea­su­re in addi­ti­on to an adjus­t­ment of the train path pri­ces. It is to be hoped that these addi­tio­nal mea­su­res will alre­a­dy take into account all rail traf­fic in tran­sit in a tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral manner.

1 Cf. Art 8 GVVG

No results found.