That’s what it’s all about:

  • Net­work uti­li­sa­ti­on con­cept and plan (NNK/NNP) secu­re train paths for goods trains in the long term
  • Unu­sed freight train paths – demand from pas­sen­ger transport
  • Moti­on 23.4259 Method for deter­mi­ning train paths for long-las­ting con­s­truc­tion sites
  • Tem­po­ra­ry fle­xi­bi­li­sa­ti­on only with bin­ding agree­ment to solve the bottleneck

 

Network utilisation concept and plan (NNK/NNP) secure train paths for goods trains in the long term

As part of the «Finan­cing the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re» bill in 2013, infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on tar­gets for freight trans­port were defi­ned in Art. 48a lit. b of the Rail­way Act (EBG). These include impro­ve­ments for dome­stic, import and export traf­fic as well as impro­ving the avai­la­bi­li­ty of train paths. As part of the draft revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act, the so-cal­led net­work uti­li­sa­ti­on con­cept and the net­work uti­li­sa­ti­on plan were intro­du­ced in 2015 as a means of secu­ring available freight train paths. With these instru­ments, the long-term expan­si­on and uti­li­sa­ti­on plan­ning of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re is desi­gned to ensu­re the avai­la­bi­li­ty of a mini­mum num­ber of train paths per hour and direc­tion on the various net­work sec­tions for freight and pas­sen­ger trans­port. The ser­vice con­cepts and rol­ling time­ta­ble plan­ning must be deve­lo­ped along these available train paths. If, through skilful capa­ci­ty plan­ning in the time­ta­ble pro­ce­du­re, more train paths are ulti­m­ate­ly available in the annu­al time­ta­ble than pro­vi­ded for in the NNK/NNP, they are also available to the train path allo­ca­ti­on body for allocation.

Unused freight train paths – demand from passenger transport

As freight trans­port, unli­ke pas­sen­ger trans­port, can­not be plan­ned in the long term and depends on cur­rent mar­ket con­di­ti­ons, secu­red freight train paths are regu­lar­ly not uti­li­sed. This is unpro­ble­ma­tic as long as there are no con­flicts with pas­sen­ger trans­port. Howe­ver, in the case of con­s­truc­tion sites, as is regu­lar­ly the case on the Swiss net­work due to ongo­ing expan­si­on and neces­sa­ry main­ten­an­ce work, con­flicts are prac­ti­cal­ly ine­vi­ta­ble. If freight train paths are actual­ly not used in such con­stel­la­ti­ons, the pas­sen­ger trans­port indus­try and the can­tons are under­stan­d­a­b­ly very unhappy.

Motion 23.4259 Method for determining train paths for long-term roadworks

With moti­on 23.4259, NR Cot­tier FDP/NE is asking the Fede­ral Coun­cil for a method to impro­ve the allo­ca­ti­on of train paths in the event of long-term con­s­truc­tion sites. The aim is to crea­te the pos­si­bi­li­ty of allo­ca­ting unu­sed freight train paths to pas­sen­ger trans­port for the dura­ti­on of con­s­truc­tion sites. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is asking Par­lia­ment to reject the moti­on, as the desi­red fle­xi­bi­li­ty is pro­vi­ded by the cur­rent plan­ning sys­tem. Unu­sed freight train paths can be allo­ca­ted to pas­sen­ger transport.

Temporary flexibilisation only with a binding agreement to solve the bottleneck

The petitioner’s con­cern is under­stan­da­ble. The VAP has also signal­led to the can­tons on various occa­si­ons that it will not refu­se the desi­red fle­xi­bi­li­sa­ti­on of train paths. Howe­ver, this can­not mean a fun­da­men­tal ren­un­cia­ti­on of secu­ring freight trans­port rou­tes à la longue. Rather, an appro­pria­te solu­ti­on must be agreed for each con­flict on a case-by-case basis. In the case of struc­tu­ral con­flicts in par­ti­cu­lar, for exam­p­le as a result of unfo­re­seen expan­si­ons in pas­sen­ger trans­port ser­vices that are not of a tem­po­ra­ry natu­re and the­r­e­fo­re pre­clude the future safe­guar­ding of the freight train path con­cer­ned, a cor­re­spon­ding struc­tu­ral solu­ti­on must be agreed as part of the next expan­si­on phase. Howe­ver, this is legal­ly dif­fi­cult to imple­ment, as it is Par­lia­ment that deci­des on the expan­si­on stages and cre­dits and not the affec­ted can­tons and indus­try representatives.

Pos­si­ble solu­ti­ons are curr­ent­ly being sought at a round table, using the exam­p­le of the ser­vice bet­ween Neu­châ­tel and Gen­e­va. The VAP will par­ti­ci­pa­te as a repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of cus­to­mers, who can also order train paths, in an endea­vour to find balan­ced solutions.

At the end of 2023, the FOT also star­ted work on the eva­lua­ti­on of NNK and NNP. The aim is to eva­lua­te the instru­ments that have now been in use for a con­sidera­ble peri­od of time with regard to any need for impro­ve­ment. The VAP is actively invol­ved in this working group.

 

Bei­trag Teilen: