The VAP promotes freight transport by rail.

The VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of Ship­pers cam­paigns for mar­ket-ori­en­ted frame­work con­di­ti­ons and an attrac­ti­ve Swiss rail freight sys­tem. Rele­vant topics:

Freight industry

  • How do we shape the future of freight trans­port?
  • What moves the freight industry?
  • An over­view of the play­ers in rail freight transport.

Network

Here you will find useful infor­ma­ti­on on rail­roads, their orga­niza­ti­on and net­work access.

Financing

Infor­ma­ti­on on finan­cial sup­port and char­ges in freight transport.

Sites

Ever­y­thing about free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals, sidings or even mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs.

Interoperability

The VAP is com­mit­ted to har­mo­ni­zing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run effort­less­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Sustainability

For a far-sigh­ted future, various areas need to be desi­gned sustainably.

Innovation

How can we drive inno­va­ti­on in freight transport?

Operations

In favor of fair com­pe­ti­ti­on, we want to uti­li­ze the strength of all modes of trans­port and com­bi­ne them opti­mal­ly. Becau­se this makes the route shorter – and more eco­no­mic­al – for everyone.

​Events

Here you will find fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments on our events Forum Freight Trans­port, our Gene­ral Assem­bly and others.

Agenda for the spring session 2023

Agenda for the spring session 2023

In the spring ses­si­on from 27 Febru­ary to 17 March 2023, some indus­try-rele­vant agen­da items were on the agen­da. Here is a brief over­view with our cri­ti­cal appraisal.

This is what it’s all about:
  • More fun­ding for the rol­ling high­way (Rola).
  • Com­ple­ti­on of the Swiss trans­port hub
  • Deve­lo­p­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund

 

Accompanied combined transport (Rolling Road, Rola)

On 8 March 2023, the Natio­nal Coun­cil trea­ted the Fede­ral Coun­cil Dis­patch of 30 Sep­tem­ber 2022 on the amend­ment of the Freight Traf­fic Trans­fer Act and on a fede­ral decree on a pay­ment frame­work for the pro­mo­ti­on of accom­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port (Fede­ral Coun­cil busi­ness 22.064). Our assess­ment: There is a lack of tech­no­lo­gy-neu­tral pro­mo­ti­on of trans­port, espe­ci­al­ly also in sel­ec­ted regi­ons with volu­me poten­ti­al. Qua­li­ty con­trol should also be exten­ded to con­ven­tio­nal trans­port. We would have con­side­red the exten­si­on of the ROLA until 2026 as pro­po­sed by the Fede­ral Coun­cil to be expe­di­ent. In the spring ses­si­on, the Natio­nal Coun­cil voted in favour of con­ti­nuing the ROLA until 2028. The upper cham­ber appro­ved 106 mil­li­on Swiss francs for the years 2024 to 2028. The pro­po­sal now goes to the Coun­cil of States.

«Swiss transport hub»

On 9 March 2023, the Fede­ral Coun­cil dealt in the second ins­tance with moti­on 22.4258 «Per­spec­ti­ve Rail 2050: A focus also on the rea­li­sa­ti­on and com­ple­ti­on of the Swiss trans­port hub». From the point of view of freight trans­port, this moti­on is one-sided and does not lead to the desi­red results, as a mixed use of pas­sen­ger trans­port with high-speed trains and freight trans­port does not work due to exces­si­ve speed dif­fe­ren­ces on the Swiss infra­struc­tu­re. There is a risk of a dete­rio­ra­ti­on in the qua­li­ty of freight trans­port, which fun­da­men­tal­ly con­tra­dicts Switz­er­lan­d’s envi­ron­men­tal, ener­gy and sup­p­ly goals. The VAP, howe­ver, sup­ports Rail 2050 in prin­ci­ple. The Coun­cil of Sta­tes has accept­ed the pro­po­sal. The prio­ri­ti­sa­ti­on of the long-distance net­work was a mat­ter for dis­cus­sion; trans­port with short and medi­um distances should also be taken into account accor­din­gly. Trans­port Minis­ter Albert Rösti sta­ted that the dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween Par­lia­ment and the Fede­ral Coun­cil were not great and pro­mi­sed that the Fede­ral Coun­cil would pre­sent the mes­sa­ge on the «Rail Per­spec­ti­ve 2050» stra­tegy at the end of the sum­mer and take the moti­on into account.

Rail infrastructure fund

Mat­thi­as Michel, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, has sub­mit­ted the inter­pel­la­ti­on 22.4367 «Deve­lo­p­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund». This was dis­cus­sed in the Coun­cil of Sta­tes on 9 March 2023. We are of the opi­ni­on that the rail infra­struc­tu­re fund is healt­hy and curr­ent­ly see no need for action for the VAP. The liqui­di­ty of the fund is less cri­ti­cal than the rea­di­ness for exe­cu­ti­on of the pro­jects and the con­s­truc­tion or main­ten­an­ce under ongo­ing ope­ra­ti­ons. Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Albert Rösti also con­firms that, accor­ding to cur­rent fore­casts, the fund will be able to finan­ce ope­ra­ti­ons, sub­s­tance main­ten­an­ce and the deci­ded expan­si­ons until the end of 2030.

No stabilisation of SBB despite CHF 3 billion in additional federal funding

No stabilisation of SBB despite CHF 3 billion in additional federal funding

With moti­on 22.3008, Par­lia­ment wants to amend the Fede­ral Act on Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBBG) and grant SBB finan­cial aid of CHF 1.2 bil­li­on to com­pen­sa­te for pan­de­mic-rela­ted reve­nue short­falls in long-distance trans­port and to reli­e­ve the finan­cial bur­den on long-distance trans­port with a reduc­tion in train path pri­ces of CHF 1.7 bil­li­on. Here is a first cri­ti­cal look.

This is what it’s all about:
  • VAP rejects capi­tal sub­s­idy of a total of 3 bil­li­on francs to SBB – entre­pre­neu­ri­al respon­si­bi­li­ty is needed
  • Main­tai­ning the SBB mono­po­ly in long-distance traf­fic is pro­ble­ma­tic from a Euro­pean poli­cy point of view – an order­ly migra­ti­on stra­tegy is nee­ded to open up the market.
  • The amend­ment of the law should demand more entre­pre­neu­ri­al respon­si­bi­li­ty and pro­vi­de for moni­to­ring of SBB in long-distance traffic.
  • LSVA must not be misu­s­ed for reser­ves in the BIF

 

Moti­on 22.3008 “Sup­port for the imple­men­ta­ti­on of SBB invest­ments and a long-term visi­on in Covid 19 times” calls for a draft law accor­ding to which SBB’s defi­ci­ts cau­sed by the Covid 19 pan­de­mic would be con­side­red extra­or­di­na­ry and SBB would be gran­ted cor­re­spon­ding finan­cial aid. This should enable the invest­ments to be car­ri­ed out as plan­ned in accordance with the decis­i­ons of the Fede­ral Assembly.

Initial situation

The poli­ti­cal­ly appro­ved exten­si­ons to the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re will lead to an expan­si­on of ser­vices. This requi­res invest­ments in rol­ling stock. The expan­si­on of ser­vices – at least in the initi­al phase – is recor­ding defi­ci­ts in long-distance and regio­nal trans­port; the lat­ter is finan­ced by the cor­re­spon­ding cre­dit decis­i­ons in regio­nal pas­sen­ger trans­port (RPV) by the fede­ral govern­ment and the cantons.

During the pan­de­mic, long-distance trans­port suf­fe­r­ed large defi­ci­ts which, unli­ke RPV, were not finan­ced. Ins­tead, the Fede­ral Coun­cil took the view that it was in the entre­pre­neu­ri­al risk area of pro­fi­ta­ble long-distance trans­port to bear the con­se­quen­ces of the pandemic.

Invest­ments by the SBB in invest­ment pro­per­ties near sta­ti­ons requi­re large sums of money, but over­all they increase the attrac­ti­ve­ness of the rail pas­sen­ger ser­vice. This igno­res the fact that rail freight traf­fic suf­fers at loca­ti­ons in conur­ba­ti­on cen­tres; where invest­ment pro­per­ties are built, logi­stics loca­ti­ons dis­ap­pear (Zurich Jus­ti­ce Cent­re, Euro­pa-Allee Zurich, etc.). SBB Real Estate bene­fi­ted from a gene­rous ope­ning balan­ce sheet and gene­ra­tes sub­stan­ti­al pro­fits. These are used for the pen­si­on fund (PF), which regu­lar­ly attracts media atten­ti­on with the hig­hest con­ver­si­on rates.

Proposal of the Federal Council

The Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses a one-off capi­tal con­tri­bu­ti­on of CHF 1.25 bil­li­on (los­ses in long-distance traf­fic from 2020 to 2022). This means that SBB does not have to make any entre­pre­neu­ri­al con­tri­bu­ti­on, just as it does in the RPV.

The Fede­ral Coun­cil also pro­po­ses the wai­ver of con­tri­bu­ti­on mar­gins in the years 2023 to 2029 amoun­ting to 1.7 bil­li­on francs in order to raise pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty in long-distance traf­fic to an appro­pria­te level (4 to 8% return on sales). These must be com­pen­sa­ted for as miss­ing reve­nues in infra­struc­tu­re by addi­tio­nal ope­ra­ting con­tri­bu­ti­ons to SBB Infra­struc­tu­re from the Rail Infra­struc­tu­re Fund (BIF). Accor­ding to the Fede­ral Coun­cil, the liqui­di­ty in the BIF is suf­fi­ci­ent for this.

Fur­ther­mo­re, the finan­cing instru­ments are to be cor­rec­ted. The pre­vious gran­ting of vault loans, which led to SBB’s indeb­ted­ness out­side the debt brake, is to be repla­ced in future by loans via the fede­ral bud­get. This means that par­lia­ment will now deci­de on loans, and at the same time the debt brake will apply. The chan­ge is to take effect from a debt level to be defi­ned, as of the end of 2023: CHF 11.7 bil­li­on. Expan­si­on steps that lead to unpro­fi­ta­ble ser­vice expan­si­ons will the­r­e­fo­re be sub­ject to the debt brake. After the capi­tal injec­tion of CHF 1.25 bil­li­on, vault loans can con­ti­nue to be gran­ted until the thres­hold of CHF 11.7 bil­li­on is excee­ded again.

The liqui­di­ty of the BIF is to be addi­tio­nal­ly ensu­red. To this end, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses that two-thirds of the HVF be pla­ced in the BIF. The fede­ral share of the HVF should only be used to off­set the unco­ver­ed costs from road trans­port once a reser­ve of CHF 300 mil­li­on has been shown.

Our assessment

We reject a capi­tal sub­s­idy, as this would mean that SBB would not have to make any entre­pre­neu­ri­al con­tri­bu­ti­on to the con­se­quen­ces of the pan­de­mic in its own eco­no­mic and mono­po­li­sed long-distance traf­fic. At the very least, moni­to­ring of SBB’s entre­pre­neu­ri­al acti­vi­ties in long-distance traf­fic should be intro­du­ced to accom­pa­ny the capi­tal subsidy.

The cor­rec­tion of the finan­cing instru­ments is neces­sa­ry. Since the state-owned enter­pri­se has a de facto state gua­ran­tee, vault loans should no lon­ger be pos­si­ble in future. Ins­tead, par­lia­ment should deci­de on loans in com­pli­ance with the debt brake and in awa­re­ness of this state gua­ran­tee. We the­r­e­fo­re reject the reser­va­ti­on of the debt cei­ling of CHF 11.7 bil­li­on with the opti­on of fur­ther vault loans. Unless the upper limit is noti­ce­ab­ly redu­ced again.

Ensu­ring the liqui­di­ty of the BIF is unneces­sa­ry in view of suf­fi­ci­ent reser­ves. By wai­ving con­tri­bu­ti­on mar­gins, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on is redu­cing the entre­pre­neu­ri­al pres­su­re on SBB. At the same time, it main­ta­ins SBB’s mono­po­ly in long-distance trans­port. This is high­ly pro­ble­ma­tic in terms of Euro­pean poli­cy, as the EU has libe­ra­li­sed long-distance trans­port and expects Switz­er­land to adopt this libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on step. We the­r­e­fo­re demand a migra­ti­on stra­tegy from the Fede­ral Coun­cil for the ope­ning of the mar­ket in Switz­er­land and, in par­al­lel, moni­to­ring of the entre­pre­neu­ri­al acti­vi­ties of the SBB in long-distance traffic.

We also reject the misu­se of the HVF to ensu­re the reser­ve of the BIF. The HVF is inten­ded to com­pen­sa­te for the envi­ron­men­tal costs of road trans­port and to con­tri­bu­te to a more cli­ma­te-fri­end­ly choice of trans­port mode. As an incen­ti­ve tax, it is not levied for infra­struc­tu­re expan­si­on and main­ten­an­ce.
-and main­ten­an­ce of infra­struc­tu­re, from which pas­sen­ger trans­port essen­ti­al­ly bene­fits. On the con­tra­ry, the HVF should be ear­mark­ed for rail freight trans­port and for mea­su­res for the cli­ma­te-fri­end­ly deve­lo­p­ment of road transport.

Alter­na­ti­ves such as adjus­t­ments to the offer, fore­go­ing invest­ments or sel­ling assets are men­tio­ned in the con­sul­ta­ti­on docu­ments but rejec­ted. We do not agree with this assess­ment. Non-ope­ra­tio­nal assets such as Gate­way Basel Nord and other com­bi­ned trans­port tran­ship­ment com­pa­nies, all of which must be available on a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry basis in accordance with Art. 8 GüTG, could be sold. Sales of SBB’s other real estate port­fo­lio would also be pos­si­ble wit­hout ope­ra­tio­nal rest­ric­tions. Reduc­tions in ser­vices in the off-peak hours would also con­tri­bu­te to easing the con­s­truc­tion site situa­ti­on at night.

Innovation in rail transport: DAC as a pioneer

Innovation in rail transport: DAC as a pioneer

In step with Euro­pe and with sub­stan­ti­al à fonds perdu finan­cing, the migra­ti­on to DAK will suc­ceed. We at the VAP are joi­ning forces with the BAV, VöV, part­ner com­pa­nies and coor­di­na­ted with Euro­pean insti­tu­ti­ons to deve­lop the pro­ject for the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of Swiss rail freight trans­port. In this blog artic­le we pre­sent a cur­rent overview.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Why DAC migra­ti­on is so important for Swiss rail freight.
  • What rea­li­stic and fair finan­cing must look like.
  • How a smooth, cross-bor­der migra­ti­on of DAC can be achieved.

In Switz­er­land, the poli­ti­cal dis­cus­sion on the future of rail freight trans­port has been initia­ted. Until mid-Febru­ary 2023, the fede­ral govern­ment will con­sult on the ques­ti­on: how much freight trans­port by rail do we want in the future? A key ele­ment of this is the com­pre­hen­si­ve moder­ni­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port by means of a modern digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC) – this is inten­ded to com­pre­hen­si­ve­ly renew pre­vious labour-inten­si­ve and time-con­sum­ing work pro­ces­ses in rail freight trans­port. Thanks to digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on, rail freight trans­port should then beco­me more effi­ci­ent, more powerful and thus more com­pe­ti­ti­ve, and in future play a lea­ding role in mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics. The inno­va­ti­on of rail freight trans­port is a Euro­pean mat­ter, as Switz­er­land is part of the inter­ope­ra­ble Euro­pean rail­way net­work. Trans­ports should also con­ti­nue to take place across bor­ders wit­hout obs­ta­cles. This is why Swiss com­pa­nies are actively invol­ved in the EU’s Euro­pe’s Rail inno­va­ti­on programme.

We would like to take this oppor­tu­ni­ty to give you an inte­rim update on our cur­rent work and challenges.

General

The VAP is com­mit­ted to very close coor­di­na­ti­on with the Euro­pean pro­ject – Euro­pean DAC Deli­very Pro­gram (EDDP) of Euro­pe’s Rail. Why?

Euro­pean freight trans­port urgen­tly needs com­pre­hen­si­ve inno­va­ti­on to be able to sur­vi­ve in the high­ly com­pe­ti­ti­ve trans­port sec­tor in the future or to be part of a modern sup­p­ly chain – the DAC is the key pro­ject for this.
Most wagon fleets are used or ren­ted out inter­na­tio­nal­ly and accor­din­gly the migra­ti­on must be coor­di­na­ted across bor­ders.
The tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons, which are defi­ned at EU level, apply to all count­ries and must also be appli­ed in Switz­er­land.
A com­mon purcha­sing poli­cy for the new cou­plings helps to redu­ce the unit price and one can fall back on uni­form requi­re­ments.
The chal­lenges – with a few excep­ti­ons – are iden­ti­cal in many count­ries. Regar­ding the migra­ti­on time­line, there are major dif­fe­ren­ces.
Inter­na­tio­nal coor­di­na­ti­on means opti­mal use / deploy­ment of limi­t­ed resour­ces and experts.

In Switz­er­land, we are curr­ent­ly focu­sing on important preli­mi­na­ry work for the con­cre­ti­sa­ti­on of the over­all migra­ti­on and also on the con­tents for the mes­sa­ge, which will be the basis for the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the migration.

Financing

VöV, VAP and SBB, as important repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of the rail­way indus­try, agree that such a large invest­ment for the DAC migra­ti­on must be sup­port­ed with appro­pria­te finan­cing tools and mechanisms.

There is agree­ment that a pre­do­mi­nant “à fonds perdu” par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on of the fede­ral govern­ment and sup­ple­men­ta­ry inte­rest-free loans are neces­sa­ry. Fur­ther­mo­re, the VAP in par­ti­cu­lar repea­ted­ly poin­ted out the need for a clean cost-bene­fit balan­ce. It ulti­m­ate­ly found its way into the agree­ments on the DAC with the BAV. As is well known, the invest­ments in the DAC migra­ti­on are main­ly incur­red by the vehic­le owners, while the bene­fits will only mate­ria­li­se much later after full imple­men­ta­ti­on. On the one hand, it is the­r­e­fo­re neces­sa­ry to regu­la­te the lon­ger phase of pre-finan­cing until the bene­fits begin to accrue. Above all, howe­ver, the bene­fits will be felt first and fore­most by the rail­way under­ta­kings (RUs) and the infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers (IMs). They will bene­fit from more effi­ci­ent pro­ces­ses, whe­re­as vehic­le owners will see litt­le bene­fit. The invest­ment must be borne joint­ly by the actors in accordance with the poten­ti­al bene­fits. In view of the mar­ket con­di­ti­ons, it will only be pos­si­ble to a limi­t­ed ext­ent to gene­ra­te this pro­cess through hig­her ren­tal inco­me. The finan­cing con­cerns a time span of at least 15 years. Con­se­quent­ly, we sug­gested that the draft law should defi­ne appro­pria­te mecha­nisms for joint finan­cing accor­ding to the actu­al bene­fits that accrue, in a bin­ding and fair man­ner for all par­ties invol­ved, on the basis of “cost-bene­fit analyses”.

To this end, the VAP – tog­e­ther with the umbrel­la orga­ni­sa­ti­on of the UIP – will con­tri­bu­te data and facts on invest­ment and cost/benefit plan­ning and actively participate.

The con­cre­te finan­cing moda­li­ties within the EU are still open at pre­sent; solu­ti­ons still have to be found in par­ti­cu­lar regar­ding the par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on of the EU and the mem­ber states.

Engineering

For a suc­cessful and effi­ci­ent imple­men­ta­ti­on of the DAC migra­ti­on, com­pe­tent engi­nee­ring is requi­red, which defi­nes the con­ver­si­on mea­su­res for the spe­ci­fic fleet, pro­vi­des the tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for the orders and the con­ver­si­on work, and defi­nes the veri­fi­ca­ti­on for qua­li­ty assu­rance. In the coming months, the Euro­pean EDDP pro­gram­me will work tog­e­ther to deve­lop the neces­sa­ry foun­da­ti­ons. On this basis, the pre­re­qui­si­tes for the natio­nal DAC migra­ti­on must be work­ed out.

Migration

Each coun­try must carry out exten­si­ve pre­pa­ra­to­ry work so that the infor­ma­ti­on and basics are available at time X of effec­ti­ve imple­men­ta­ti­on. Accor­din­gly, the pro­ject deals with the fol­lo­wing ques­ti­ons, among others:

Deter­mi­na­ti­on of work­shop capacities

  • Neces­sa­ry “pop-up” workshops
  • Neces­sa­ry resources

Owner-spe­ci­fic plan­ning of the conversion

  • Vehic­le type and fleet sizes
  • Cri­ti­cal ele­ments and pos­si­ble solu­ti­ons in coope­ra­ti­on with EDDP
  • Owner-spe­ci­fic scheduling

Data and infor­ma­ti­on pool

  • Updating the vehic­le regis­ter as a basis for funding
  • Time­ly pro­vi­si­on of infor­ma­ti­on to indi­vi­du­al actors / stake­hol­der groups

Mate­ri­al pool

  • Pro­cu­re­ment of com­pon­ents for DAC migration
  • Plan­ning of mate­ri­al quan­ti­ties and deli­very dates
  • Coor­di­na­ti­on of mate­ri­al flows to the con­ver­si­on workshops
  • Ensu­ring sup­port in ope­ra­ti­on (repair material)

Curr­ent­ly we see a focus on the loco­mo­ti­ves to be con­ver­ted, as these are pri­ma­ri­ly on natio­nal rou­tes in the WLV and must be equip­ped with DAC trains at the start of operation.

In Switz­er­land, as is alre­a­dy the case with SBB-Cargo, fur­ther “pilot trans­ports” will be plan­ned as early as pos­si­ble in order to be able to intro­du­ce the resul­ting fin­dings and results at EU level and to be able to advan­ce the pro­ject as a whole.

Organisation

On the one hand, the VAP has increased the resour­ces in the Gene­ral Secre­ta­ri­at, on the other hand it is repre­sen­ted with its mem­bers in various natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal mee­tings and working groups.

For the future or the effec­ti­ve imple­men­ta­ti­on we see some chal­lenges in the design and staf­fing of the over­all orga­ni­sa­ti­on – be it in the inter­na­tio­nal con­text (where is which aspect coor­di­na­ted or also moni­to­red) as well as in the cross-sec­to­ral orga­ni­sa­ti­on of Swiss DAC migration.

Did you know that…
  • …wit­hout DAC, no freight train – WLV, block train or Rola – will be able to run on fully equip­ped ETCS Level 3 (Euro­pean Train Con­trol Sys­tem) lines in future, as the tech­ni­cal requi­re­ments, espe­ci­al­ly train inte­gri­ty, are not met. The infra­struc­tu­re upgrade to ETCS Level 3 will main­ly take place on busy main lines and will enable an increase in capa­ci­ty with the dyna­mic block. Allo­wing trains to con­ti­nue to run wit­hout train inte­gri­ty on sec­tions of line ope­ra­ted in this way will invol­ve a great deal of effort.
  • …the DAC will be an important com­po­nent for digi­tal data exch­an­ge and sus­tainable logi­stics, in the sense of cus­to­mers and the cli­ma­te, can only be rea­li­sed with the par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on of all play­ers. This is the reason why the VAP is in any case com­mit­ted to the rea­li­sa­ti­on of a data plat­form based on “MODIG”. With DAC we achie­ve an increase in effi­ci­en­cy of the enti­re “sup­p­ly chain”.
  • …DAC will allow the tra­di­tio­nal WLV to be run more effi­ci­ent­ly and will help to make it self-sus­tai­ning at the latest after the migra­ti­on has been completed.

→ To learn more about the DAC pro­gram­me, click on: https://rail-research.europa.eu/european-dac-delivery-programme/

Subsidising wagonload traffic: preventing distortion of competition and discrimination

Subsidising wagonload traffic: preventing distortion of competition and discrimination

We com­ment on the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s con­sul­ta­ti­on draft “Fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the frame­work con­di­ti­ons for Swiss freight trans­port”. We cri­ti­cal­ly assess the pro­po­sals from the point of view of freight rail cus­to­mers and demons­tra­te the neces­si­ty of a legal inde­pen­dence of sys­tem transport.

Yes and but to variant 1

With vari­ant 1, the Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to digi­ta­li­se rail freight trans­port with auto­ma­tic digi­tal cou­pling (DAK). In this way, it posi­ti­ons rail as part of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics. Accom­pany­ing this, it pro­vi­des for spa­ti­al plan­ning mea­su­res, invest­ment aid and tran­ship­ment and loa­ding incen­ti­ves that cushion the addi­tio­nal costs of the sys­tem break bet­ween rail and other modes of trans­port. Until auto­ma­ti­on is imple­men­ted, the Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to com­pen­sa­te for the unco­ver­ed costs of sys­tem traf­fic. We wel­co­me the thrust of vari­ant 1 in essence, but have reser­va­tions and note a fun­da­men­tal need for adjustment.

Making the subsidised first/last mile independent

We want to and must make sys­tem trans­port more sus­tainable. This requi­res a rede­sign of all pro­ces­ses, incen­ti­ve instru­ments, mar­ket mecha­nisms and inter­faces within mul­ti­mo­dal freight logi­stics. The goal must be a self-suf­fi­ci­ent and mar­ket-based sys­tem that does not dis­cri­mi­na­te against any freight rail­ways and is relia­bly available to ship­pers.[1] Until this new con­cept is imple­men­ted, we agree to tem­po­ra­ry finan­cial aid for SBB Car­go’s net­work traf­fic. This finan­cial aid is based on per­for­mance-rela­ted, com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral and non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry incen­ti­ves – and on making the first/last mile inde­pen­dent in a legal­ly inde­pen­dent SBB com­pa­ny. This is the only way to gua­ran­tee Switz­er­lan­d’s secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly and the future via­bi­li­ty of the railways.

Preventing distortion of competition and discrimination

By trans­fer­ring respon­si­bi­li­ty for sys­tem traf­fic to SBB Cargo, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is mono­po­li­sing around 70% of the freight trans­port volu­me. At the same time, SBB Cargo is also the main pro­vi­der of block train and com­bi­ned trans­port ser­vices. This com­bi­na­ti­on of inte­rests can lead to dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on against sys­tem and block train cus­to­mers on the one hand, but also to dis­tor­ti­ons of com­pe­ti­ti­on vis-à-vis other pro­vi­ders of block train and com­bi­ned trans­port ser­vices on the other – irre­spec­ti­ve of the com­pen­sa­ti­on paid to sys­tem trans­port. This con­sists of the nati­on­wi­de ser­vice of tran­ship­ment and loa­ding faci­li­ties and should the­r­e­fo­re be legal­ly inde­pen­dent. Since the cor­re­spon­ding ser­vices and resour­ces are alre­a­dy com­bi­ned in an inde­pen­dent orga­ni­sa­tio­nal unit today, the trans­for­ma­ti­on effort would remain low. Howe­ver, the Fede­ral Coun­cil would have to spe­ci­fy Art. 9a para. 7 of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG).

Consistently supervise new system operator

During the limi­t­ed phase of public com­pen­sa­ti­on, but also after­wards, the sys­tem ope­ra­tor should be con­sis­t­ent­ly moni­to­red in terms of per­for­mance, qua­li­ty, pro­duc­ti­vi­ty and costs. Care must be taken to ensu­re that the finan­cial aid is quick­ly redu­ced and that SBB Car­go’s busi­ness model is moder­nis­ed. This pre­vents dis­ad­van­ta­ges and ensu­res smooth, nati­on­wi­de sys­tem traf­fic in the long term. Tar­ge­ted moni­to­ring of the deve­lo­p­ment of volu­mes and cus­to­mer struc­tu­re should gua­ran­tee the lat­ter in par­ti­cu­lar in the long term. Such moni­to­ring requi­res an amend­ment to Art. 9a GüTG.

Addi­tio­nal back­ground infor­ma­ti­on and opi­ni­ons can be found in our respon­se to the con­sul­ta­ti­on on the «Wei­ter­ent­wick­lung der Rah­men­be­din­gun­gen für den Schwei­zer Güter­trans­port».


[1] Cf. video “Rail freight trans­port of the future”: www.cargorail.ch/#video

«An excellent neutral negotiation partner»

«An excellent neutral negotiation partner»

The Vetro­pack Group is a lis­ted and fami­ly-run glass pack­a­ging manu­fac­tu­rer in Switz­er­land. We at the VAP accom­pa­nied Vetro­pack during the nego­tia­ti­ons on the new siding con­tract and the rene­wal of the sidings. We talk about this coope­ra­ti­on and the future of rail freight trans­port with Phil­ip­pe Clerc, Head of the Vetro­pack site in St-Prex.

Mr Clerc, how did the collaboration between Vetropack and VAP come about?

Phil­ip­pe Clerc: First we car­ri­ed out an ope­ra­tio­nal ana­ly­sis to prove that Vetro­pack had been allo­ca­ted too many tracks. VAP’s exper­ti­se and nego­tia­ting skills meant that we were able to make signi­fi­cant savings on the siding con­tract and renewal.

How important are the sidings for Vetropack?

The con­di­ti­ons of our mar­ket are beco­ming incre­asing­ly dif­fi­cult. If we want to remain a lea­der here, we have to beco­me more agile and fas­ter. The VAP has hel­ped us to impro­ve the over­all manage­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re and the pro­duc­tion pro­ces­ses. This helps us to increase our com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness and Switz­er­lan­d’s secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly. Vetro­pack’s stra­tegy is based on the deve­lo­p­ment of a green fac­to­ry. Here we want to make the best pos­si­ble use of sus­tainable ener­gy in order to signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce our CO2 emis­si­ons. Rail as a mode of trans­port is an essen­ti­al part of this stra­tegy. Our cus­to­mers app­re­cia­te the fact that we are incre­asing­ly using rail. They appro­ve of our method of trans­port in the area of glass recycling.

How did the VAP support you?

The VAP actively sup­port­ed us in nego­tia­ting the siding dos­sier with SBB Infra­struc­tu­re. Thanks to its excel­lent legal exper­ti­se, we were able to nego­tia­te a good con­tract. This enables us to con­ti­nue our envi­ron­men­tal stra­tegy by expan­ding rail transport.

How did you experience the cooperation with the VAP?

The VAP repres­ents the inte­rests of the owners of rail­way sidings. Thanks to its neu­tra­li­ty, it can effec­tively sup­port its mem­bers. It has hel­ped us to find an opti­mal solu­ti­on so that we can con­ti­nue to use our rail­way tracks.

Did you have any previous contact with the VAP?

We have been mem­bers of the VAP for seve­ral years and app­re­cia­te the work of the association.

What strengths do you see in the VAP?

The asso­cia­ti­on is inno­va­ti­ve in the deve­lo­p­ment of new sys­tems or infra­struc­tures and adhe­res to the gui­de­lines of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port FOT. It is com­mit­ted on behalf of the owners of sys­tems or wagons both to the expan­si­on of the rail net­work and to the impro­ve­ment of trans­port ser­vices by the freight rail­ways. Thanks to the exten­si­ve legal exper­ti­se of the VAP, we were able to con­clude an ideal fol­low-up agree­ment for our com­pa­ny and the con­ti­nua­tion of our acti­vi­ties on the rail­ways. As a result, we were able to opti­mi­se rail pro­duc­tion at our site in St-Prex and mini­mi­se ope­ra­ting costs. I con­sider the VAP to be an excel­lent neu­tral nego­tia­ting partner.

What did you appreciate most during the cooperation?

The pro­fes­sio­nal approach, the com­pe­ten­ces in the rail­way and legal field, the know­ledge in the ope­ra­tio­nal field as well as the rela­ti­ons with poli­tics. All this con­tri­bu­ted to a quick and opti­mal solution.

What else would you like to see from the VAP?

That it should be even more com­mit­ted to the deve­lo­p­ment of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic. The deli­very win­dows, for exam­p­le, are far too nar­row. The capa­ci­ties for freight trans­port on the rail net­work must be increased overall.

Who would you recommend to work with the VAP?

Any com­pa­ny that wants to build a rail faci­li­ty in its ope­ra­ti­ons cent­re. The VAP can be useful to all com­pa­nies that have a rail­way infra­struc­tu­re but do not have the neces­sa­ry know­ledge to nego­tia­te and con­clude con­tracts in this area.

Where do you see the most urgent need for action in rail transport?

As men­tio­ned, we need an ope­ning of the time win­dows for freight wagons. The num­ber of goods trains must increase, for exam­p­le through a clock­face time­ta­ble. Rail freight trans­port should even­tual­ly come up to the level of pas­sen­ger trans­port. In addi­ti­on, we must ensu­re our con­nec­tion to Euro­pe. We must not be iso­la­ted from Europe.

What are the advantages of rail freight transport?

It is con­side­red the safest mode of trans­port, which is why it is pre­fer­red throug­hout Euro­pe. Rail is the best alter­na­ti­ve to road, just look at the CO2 foot­print. Large quan­ti­ties can be trans­por­ted by rail with just one train. And even at night or in the early morning.

What do you wish for the future of rail freight transport in Switzerland?

That the rail freight net­work can be main­tai­ned and expan­ded. Only in this way can we increase the envi­ron­men­tal com­pa­ti­bi­li­ty of freight trans­port. It would also be desi­ra­ble to push ahead with inno­va­tions. This will enable us to remain com­pe­ti­ti­ve in the future, as inno­va­tions can redu­ce costs for ope­ra­ti­on, shun­ting, admi­nis­tra­ti­ve tasks and other things. Over­all, it is important to impro­ve the ope­ra­ti­on of sin­gle wagons and thus the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail net­work. We have to prepa­re rail freight for the future so that we are not over­run by trucks one day.

 

Good to know: The VAP advises and accompanies

VAP mem­bers bene­fit from our in-depth exper­ti­se in all areas of freight trans­port at natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal level as well as from our net­wor­king with busi­ness and poli­tics. In the years 2020 to 2022, we sup­port­ed our mem­bers with the fol­lo­wing services:

  • 25 con­sul­ta­ti­ons on regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments (for exam­p­le, diver­si­on agreements).
  • 20 con­sul­ta­ti­ons on auditing
  • 53 ope­ra­ting regulations
  • 32 admi­nis­tra­ti­ons of sidings of muni­ci­pa­li­ties and associations
  • 117 con­s­truc­tion con­sul­ta­ti­ons such as rene­wals, exten­si­ons, sub­s­idy, appr­oval pro­ce­du­res, qua­li­ty and cost con­trol, long-term neu­tral main­ten­an­ce and finan­cial planning

 

 
Switzerland risks isolation in international rail traffic

Switzerland risks isolation in international rail traffic

From 2024, Switz­er­land will lose access to the EU plat­form for har­mo­nis­ed appr­oval pro­ce­du­res for new rol­ling stock. This is tan­ta­mount to a fur­ther step towards iso­la­ti­on in inter­na­tio­nal rail trans­port. Unless Euro­pean-Hel­ve­tic rela­ti­ons normalise.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Access to “One Stop Shop” will only be exten­ded until the end of 2023
  • From then on, the EU will treat Switz­er­land as a third country.
  • This jeo­par­di­ses modal shift, digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and automation

 

The decis­i­on of the joint com­mit­tee on the land trans­port agree­ment with the EU on the fourth rail­way packa­ge has so far secu­red Switz­er­land access to the “One Stop Shop” (OSS) data­ba­se of the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy (ERA). OSS con­ta­ins com­mon sim­pli­fied pro­ce­du­res for vehic­le appr­ovals and safe­ty cer­ti­fi­ca­tes in cross-bor­der rail traf­fic. Accor­ding to the FOT (cf. publi­ca­ti­on in ger­man), this access will only be exten­ded until the end of 2023.

This decis­i­on is due to the unre­sol­ved issues in the bila­te­ral rela­ti­onship bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. Sepa­ra­te pro­ce­du­res are expec­ted to take effect from 2024. The same appli­es to the agree­ments on bor­der ope­ra­ting routes.

It is urgen­tly neces­sa­ry for Switz­er­land to cle­ar­ly decla­re its sup­port for coope­ra­ti­on with the Euro­pean sta­tes. Other­wi­se, both the modal shift and the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port are at risk.

Consultation on surface rail freight transport: two variants, many question marks

Consultation on surface rail freight transport: two variants, many question marks

The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s report on the «Future ori­en­ta­ti­on of rail freight trans­port in the area» was sent out for con­sul­ta­ti­on. In it, the eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port is pre­sen­ted as impos­si­ble wit­hout any evi­dence. As alter­na­ti­ves, the fede­ral govern­ment envi­sa­ges shif­ting rail freight trans­port to the road in the medi­um term or sub­si­di­sing it per­ma­nent­ly. We think: It’s more com­pli­ca­ted than that.

That’s the point:
  • Two vari­ants and what they do not take into account
  • Fun­da­men­tal reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on of the net­work necessary
  • Out­sour­cing of the last mile cen­tral to more competition

 

The fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port in the coun­try is curr­ent­ly the sub­ject of hea­ted deba­te. On 2 Novem­ber 2022, the Fede­ral Coun­cil sub­mit­ted its dis­patch on the «Fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the frame­work con­di­ti­ons for Swiss freight trans­port» for con­sul­ta­ti­on. The report sug­gests that there will be no more sin­gle wagon­load trans­port wit­hout finan­cial sup­port; block trains will not be sub­si­di­sed any­way. The Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses two options:

  • The sin­gle wagon­load trans­port in the area is fur­ther deve­lo­ped and moder­nis­ed through digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, auto­ma­ti­on and the crea­ti­on of a data exch­an­ge plat­form. Loca­ti­ons that are neces­sa­ry for suc­cessful area ser­vice will be bet­ter inte­gra­ted into the spa­ti­al plan­ning of the can­tons and the fede­ral govern­ment. Until the moder­ni­sa­ti­on mea­su­res take effect, the sin­gle wagon­load trans­port­will be finan­ci­al­ly sup­port­ed by orde­ring the ser­vice in the form of invest­ment and ope­ra­ting contributions.
  • The sin­gle wagon­load trans­port in the area will be dis­con­tin­ued. The rail sys­tem will be redu­ced to block trains, resul­ting in a mas­si­ve down­si­zing of SBB Cargo.

Both vari­ants are sup­port­ed by the migra­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK), the pro­mo­ti­on of mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty and Rhine navi­ga­ti­on, and the finan­cing of cli­ma­te-neu­tral dri­ves on rail and Rhine.

Fundamental reorganisation instead of rhetoric

The sin­gle wagon­load trans­port in the area com­pri­ses a good 70% of the traf­fic volu­me in inland trans­port by rail. The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s ques­ti­on as to whe­ther it should be pre­ser­ved is the­r­e­fo­re rather rhe­to­ri­cal. Howe­ver, his con­clu­si­on that it can be suc­cessful­ly ope­ra­ted by SBB Cargo after moder­ni­sa­ti­on with the help of DAK is not a rea­li­stic opti­on eit­her. Rather, the rail freight trans­port in the area must be fun­da­men­tal­ly res­truc­tu­red and ope­ned up to other mar­ket play­ers. In this respect, the Fede­ral Coun­cil’s report falls far short of the expec­ta­ti­ons of cus­to­mers and its own announcements.

Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on will make rail freight trans­port more effi­ci­ent and, above all, more inte­res­t­ing for the logi­stics indus­try: For the first time, rail freight trans­port can be inte­gra­ted online into the logi­stics chains of the eco­no­my and into the train pro­tec­tion of the infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers. The DAK in con­junc­tion with the state data exch­an­ge plat­form in accordance with the Fede­ral Mobi­li­ty Data Infra­struc­tu­re Act (MODIG) is thus THE cen­tral lever for the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail freight trans­portand suc­cess fac­tor num­ber one of this legis­la­ti­ve proposal.

Howe­ver, the sin­gle wagon­load trans­port, which has been a mono­po­ly of the SBB since the rail­way reform in 1999, must be fun­da­men­tal­ly res­truc­tu­red. The roles and pro­ces­ses must be com­ple­te­ly ret­hought. This inter­nal rene­wal requi­res the invol­vement of other mar­ket play­ers in order to design a ser­vice with lower fixed costs and cor­re­spon­din­gly hig­her fle­xi­bi­li­ty. In this respect, the Fede­ral Coun­cil falls behind its report of 30 March 2022. While in its dia­gram there it show­ed a new inter­play of the various play­ers in the rail freight trans­port sys­tem (p. 50/75), in the draft mes­sa­ge it mere­ly pro­po­ses a con­ti­nua­tion of the curr­ent­ly not very suc­cessful model of «all ser­vices from a sin­gle source» of SBB Cargo. Once again, the ques­ti­on of the future via­bi­li­ty of a broad range of ser­vices in the sin­gle wagon­load trans­port in Switz­er­land is equa­ted with the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the state-owned com­pa­ny SBB Cargo.

In fact, cus­to­mers want a vari­ant 1+. In addi­ti­on to the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port and pro­mo­tio­nal mea­su­res for more mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty, this also includes the reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. This includes the neu­tra­li­sa­ti­on and finan­cial sup­port of short-distance deli­very (last mile), the crea­ti­on of a neu­tral digi­tal boo­king and data exch­an­ge plat­form and the pos­si­bi­li­ty of inte­gra­ting pri­va­te wagon­load services.

Industry united for big changes

The IG Wagon­load Trans­port inte­rest group calls for an effi­ci­ent net­work offer (hub and spoke) with more com­pe­ti­ti­on and less dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on. The Fede­ral Coun­cil should take up our com­mon visi­on of rail freight trans­port – which, by the way, was sup­port­ed by the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port FOT – in the defi­ni­ti­ve Fede­ral Coun­cil mes­sa­ge (cf. VAP blog post «Cri­ti­cal view of the fede­ral govern­men­t’s long-term per­spec­ti­ve»). The same appli­es to the con­so­li­da­ted posi­ti­on of the freight rail­way mana­gers of the VöV on how the rail freight trans­port can be ope­ra­ted suc­cessful­ly in the long term in the area (cf. blog­post «Indus­try deve­lo­ps joint solu­ti­on»).

The Fede­ral Coun­cil expects a com­mon stance from the freight trans­port indus­try. It should take a more dif­fe­ren­tia­ted look at their joint assess­ment and the num­e­rous nuan­ces of the rail freight trans­port in the area when sha­ping its future and take grea­ter account of them.

Outsourcing the last mile and making it non-discriminatory

Outsourcing the last mile and making it non-discriminatory

Free access to the last mile is cru­cial for freight rail­ways. Curr­ent­ly, it is impo­sed by law. In our opi­ni­on, it should be enab­led ins­tead of impo­sed. For this to hap­pen, the last mile would have to be spun off from SBB Cargo and be the respon­si­bi­li­ty of an inde­pen­dent body. Ulti­m­ate­ly, what is nee­ded is a frame­work that can be descri­bed with just one term: Mar­ket economy.
That’s the point:
  • Why free access to the last mile is important
  • Pre­ven­ting dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on ins­tead of fight­ing it
  • Redis­tri­bu­ting and refo­cu­sing forces
 
Importance of the last mile
Ser­ving the last mile (local deli­very) is sole­ly in the hands of a local or regio­nal pro­vi­der. Accor­din­gly, non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to the last mile deter­mi­nes whe­ther an offer is com­pe­ti­ti­ve in the main run or not. Whoe­ver pro­vi­des ser­vices in local deli­very by rail is obli­ged to do so in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. This is the inten­ti­on of Artic­le 6a of the Freight Trans­port Ordi­nan­ce (see box). 
Article 6a of the Freight Transport Ordinance (GüTV)
All com­pa­nies that pro­vi­de (par­ti­al) ser­vices over the last mile must pro­vi­de their local deli­very ser­vices by rail in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. This means that they must also pro­vi­de their ser­vices for third par­ties, pro­vi­ded that capa­ci­ties are available for this. In addi­ti­on to the freight rail­ways, this obli­ga­ti­on con­cerns siding ope­ra­tors with their own rol­ling stock and per­son­nel, spe­cia­li­sed per­son­nel lea­sing com­pa­nies and shun­ting ser­vice pro­vi­ders. Shun­ting and other ser­vices rela­ted to short-distance deli­very, such as tech­ni­cal inspec­tions or brake tests, are con­side­red last-mile ser­vices.

> Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on from Rail­Com in Ger­man or French

 
Preventing discrimination instead of fighting it
Art. 6a GüTV reli­es on regu­la­ti­ons, mar­ket con­trols and legal reme­dies. Howe­ver, it would make more sense to pre­vent dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on by having a sin­gle pro­vi­der ensu­re the ser­vice of the first/last mile. Ide­al­ly, this would be the infra­struc­tu­re mana­ger who does not other­wi­se pro­vi­de trans­port ser­vices. In a mar­ket envi­ron­ment, rail freight access to sidings, local and cen­tral mar­shalling yards, free loa­ding faci­li­ties or ter­mi­nals is regu­la­ted in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner. The allo­ca­ti­on of train paths and the ope­ra­ti­on of sys­tem-rele­vant infra­struc­tures are the respon­si­bi­li­ty of inde­pen­dent insti­tu­ti­ons. Sys­tem lea­der­ship by a sin­gle large ope­ra­tor – as is curr­ent­ly the case with SBB Cargo – does not exist. The boun­da­ries bet­ween sin­gle wagon­loads and block trains are abo­lished, and the last mile is mana­ged by an infra­struc­tu­re mana­ger.
Reorganisation of forces
In order to achie­ve the ideal state descri­bed above, roles have to be redis­tri­bu­ted and forces have to be bund­led. Such a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on will only suc­ceed if the fol­lo­wing frame­work con­di­ti­ons are created: 
  • SBB Cargo reta­ins its role as net­work pro­vi­der for the time being. It is respon­si­ble for the plan­ning of net­work traf­fic and ensu­res the effi­ci­ent bund­ling of traf­fic with indi­vi­du­al wagons or wagon groups. In pro­vi­ding the ser­vices, it limits its­elf to the main trans­port runs bet­ween for­ma­ti­on and mar­shalling yards, inso­far as it does not pro­cu­re these from third parties.
  • The enti­re rail­way infra­struc­tu­re such as the net­work, com­bi­ned trans­port ter­mi­nals and local mar­shalling yards are free­ly acces­si­ble to freight railways.
  • The ser­vice of the first/last mile is a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry ser­vice of the infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers for all freight rail­ways. The sys­tem-rele­vant resour­ces of SBB Cargo, such as trac­tion units, shun­ting teams, shun­ting tracks/stations, shun­ting ser­vices or inter­nal ope­ra­tio­nal chan­ges, are available to these.
  • This crea­tes com­pe­ti­ti­on with equal play­ers and trans­pa­rent costs. You can read more about this in our publi­ca­ti­on «From inte­gra­ted to mar­ket-based rail­ways» (in german).
Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Power shortage (Part 4): Emergency measures are concretised

Ener­gy secu­ri­ty is and remains one of our top issues. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is curr­ent­ly con­cre­ti­sing the manage­ment mea­su­res in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge in the form of pre­pared ordi­nan­ces. Spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons are envi­sa­ged for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies, inclu­ding rail freight trans­port. The FOT is pre­pa­ring a draft ordi­nan­ce for public trans­port tog­e­ther with the working group of indus­try asso­cia­ti­ons, while the VAP repres­ents the inte­rests of freight transport.

This is what it’s all about:
  • Fede­ral Coun­cil has plan of mea­su­res for secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly drawn up
  • Gra­du­al quota sys­tem to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shutdowns
  • Next step: pre­pa­ra­ti­on of spe­ci­fic draft ordinances
  • Trac­tion cur­rent will beco­me more expen­si­ve next year

 

At its mee­ting on 23 Novem­ber 2022, the Fede­ral Coun­cil dis­cus­sed the manage­ment mea­su­res to be taken in the event of an elec­tri­ci­ty shorta­ge. For the draft ordi­nan­ces with gra­dua­ted
mea­su­res until 12 Decem­ber 2022. The sys­tem lea­der rail com­men­ted on behalf of the industry.

Avoiding the worst with each level of measures

With the mea­su­res adopted so far, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is streng­thening the secu­ri­ty of elec­tri­ci­ty sup­p­ly: main­tai­ning hydro­power reser­ves, pro­vi­ding ther­mal reser­ve power plants, incre­asing the trans­mis­si­on capa­ci­ty of the elec­tri­ci­ty grids. In addi­ti­on, it wants to prepa­re gra­dua­ted mea­su­res to redu­ce elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on. Calls for eco­no­mic­al elec­tri­ci­ty con­sump­ti­on and the ener­gy-saving alli­ance of the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty are inten­ded to raise awa­re­ness among com­pa­nies across the board.

Should a cri­ti­cal power sup­p­ly bot­t­len­eck occur during the win­ter peri­od, the Fede­ral Coun­cil will regu­la­te the power sup­p­ly with tem­po­ra­ry mea­su­res. In the event of a cri­sis, it would issue tar­ge­ted con­sump­ti­on rest­ric­tions with the help of decrees. This is inten­ded to ensu­re grid sta­bi­li­ty and thus the sup­p­ly of elec­tri­ci­ty. The aim of each stage is to avoid even more dra­stic measures.

Quota system to prevent grid shutdowns

The Fede­ral Coun­cil sees the quota sys­tem as a key mea­su­re to pre­vent cri­ti­cal grid shut­downs. In order to ensu­re its effec­ti­ve­ness, it does not want to exempt any elec­tri­ci­ty purchasers.

Howe­ver, it envi­sa­ges spe­cial pro­vi­si­ons for licen­sed public trans­port com­pa­nies. Public trans­port as a core ser­vice should be gua­ran­teed for as long as pos­si­ble. In order to ensu­re its func­tio­ning even in the event of power shorta­ges, mea­su­res are to be imple­men­ted accor­ding to the «public trans­port manage­ment model».

Management measures for public transport

In a working group of VöV, SBB, BAV and VAP, we have work­ed out the gra­dua­ted mea­su­res for pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port in the last few months. In the case of a power quota, freight logi­stics should basi­cal­ly be main­tai­ned and sca­led as quick­ly as pos­si­ble accor­ding to the deve­lo­p­ment of demand. The indus­try must prepa­re to react quick­ly. For it is impos­si­ble to pre­dict today in which areas decrea­ses or increa­ses in demand will occur. Based on the “public trans­port manage­ment model”, our working group will deve­lop a cor­re­spon­ding draft ordi­nan­ce of gra­dua­ted manage­ment mea­su­res for public trans­port. We at the VAP sup­port the approach that has been deve­lo­ped, espe­ci­al­ly the spe­cial mea­su­res for public transport.

Traction current will become more expensive

The fact that trac­tion cur­rent is not excluded from sud­den tur­bu­len­ces is shown by the latest announce­ment of the SBB. Here, the ener­gy divi­si­on announ­ces a serious defi­cit of CHF 180 mil­li­on for 2022. Accor­ding to SBB, as a result of the per­sis­tent drought in the sum­mer, 90% of the rail­way’s elec­tri­ci­ty could not be gene­ra­ted from its own hydro­elec­tric power plants as usual. SBB had to buy expen­si­ve elec­tri­ci­ty on the mar­ket at short notice.

After nego­tia­ti­ons with the BAV, the SBB will raise the elec­tri­ci­ty price for 2023 by 3 cen­ti­mes to 13.5 cen­ti­mes per kilo­watt hour. The BAV wants to pass on the hig­her elec­tri­ci­ty costs in the train path price to the various trans­port sec­tors on a dif­fe­ren­tia­ted basis. In long-distance traf­fic the full amount of 3 cen­ti­mes will be pas­sed on, in regio­nal and freight traf­fic only a part with 1 cen­ti­me. The fact that SBB’s appli­ca­ti­on for full defi­cit covera­ge with a surchar­ge of 10 cen­ti­mes was not appro­ved by the FOT may be good news for the rail­way com­pa­nies for the time being. But the uncer­tain­ty of fur­ther surchar­ges remains, and this will also have an influence on future offer calculations.

Transparency needed

We belie­ve that the pro­vi­si­on of elec­tri­cal ener­gy at a pre­dic­ta­ble cost rate is cen­tral to the future design of offers. The recent price tur­bu­len­ces alre­a­dy seem very adven­tur­ous; even more so when one looks back at the many years with a posi­ti­ve balan­ce. We expect a trans­pa­rent review of the recent events.

No results found.