The VAP promotes freight transport by rail.

The VAP Asso­cia­ti­on of Ship­pers cam­paigns for mar­ket-ori­en­ted frame­work con­di­ti­ons and an attrac­ti­ve Swiss rail freight sys­tem. Rele­vant topics:

Freight industry

  • How do we shape the future of freight trans­port?
  • What moves the freight industry?
  • An over­view of the play­ers in rail freight transport.

Network

Here you will find useful infor­ma­ti­on on rail­roads, their orga­niza­ti­on and net­work access.

Financing

Infor­ma­ti­on on finan­cial sup­port and char­ges in freight transport.

Sites

Ever­y­thing about free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals, sidings or even mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs.

Interoperability

The VAP is com­mit­ted to har­mo­ni­zing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run effort­less­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Sustainability

For a far-sigh­ted future, various areas need to be desi­gned sustainably.

Innovation

How can we drive inno­va­ti­on in freight transport?

Operations

In favor of fair com­pe­ti­ti­on, we want to uti­li­ze the strength of all modes of trans­port and com­bi­ne them opti­mal­ly. Becau­se this makes the route shorter – and more eco­no­mic­al – for everyone.

​Events

Here you will find fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments on our events Forum Freight Trans­port, our Gene­ral Assem­bly and others.

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

IG WLV: Set goals, develop measures

On 9 June 2021, the annu­al can­to­nal con­fe­rence of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV) took place – unfort­u­na­te­ly again as a video con­fe­rence. In addi­ti­on to the foun­ding part­ners of IG WLV (VAP, Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV/UTP), SBB Cargo), a large num­ber of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from indi­vi­du­al can­tons took part.

To start with, VöV and SBB Cargo pre­sen­ted the cur­rent situa­ti­on – espe­ci­al­ly in the con­text of the Covid 19 cri­sis – and poin­ted out the chal­lenges ahead. The VAP then pre­sen­ted the three main objec­ti­ves on behalf of IG WLV, from which three clus­ters of action can be deri­ved. IG WLV is curr­ent­ly working inten­si­ve­ly on the con­cre­ti­sa­ti­on and con­cre­te imple­men­ta­ti­on of these goals.

Technology/Automation cluster

IG WLV is pushing for the rapid intro­duc­tion of nati­on­wi­de and non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on in Switz­er­land. This is done in close coor­di­na­ti­on and coope­ra­ti­on with Euro­pe. It advo­ca­tes the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the moti­on Ditt­li 20.3221 vis-à-vis the indus­try, poli­tics and admi­nis­tra­ti­on (cf. blog post «Pro­gress for auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port»).

Production/efficiency cluster

The IG WLV defi­nes key per­for­mance indi­ca­tors and draws up a con­cept that depicts esti­ma­tes of demand flows in wagon­load traf­fic for the coming years. It is also con­side­ring how addi­tio­nal volu­mes could be gene­ra­ted that com­bi­ne plan­ning secu­ri­ty, dyna­mism and cooperation.

Policy cluster

IG WLV is working on a con­cept for CO2 reduc­tion (see blog­post «Moti­on CO2-free rail freight»). It will repre­sent this con­cept vis-à-vis the fede­ral govern­ment, indus­try play­ers and can­tons and pro­mo­te its implementation.

Findings from 2020

After defi­ning the tar­get areas, the par­ti­ci­pan­ts reflec­ted on the fin­dings from last year’s can­to­nal con­fe­rence. Atten­ti­on was given to the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Data: Various chal­lenges to obtain the right data – quan­ti­ta­ti­ve and qua­li­ta­ti­ve – for future con­cepts and planning.
  • Loca­ti­ons and legal bases: Tasks and obli­ga­ti­ons of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on, can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties and opti­mal use of exis­ting and future logi­stics areas.
  • Free loa­ding: Con­side­ra­ti­on of all free loa­ding in an over­all con­cept that includes the respec­ti­ve finan­cing needs and tools.
  • Expan­si­on steps/STEP: Brin­ging tog­e­ther the con­cerns of all actors from poli­tics and busi­ness, cross-can­to­nal coor­di­na­ti­on and use of the same basic tools.
Best Practice

In an inte­res­t­ing con­tri­bu­ti­on, the can­tons of Vaud and Zurich pre­sen­ted their chal­lenges and approa­ches to solu­ti­ons for opti­mi­sing and impro­ving logi­stics oppor­tu­ni­ties. These could be used as best prac­ti­ces or inte­res­t­ing start­ing points in the future.

Further round table discussions

All the infor­ma­ti­on and impul­ses were dis­cus­sed in grea­ter depth at two round tables with the fol­lo­wing focal points:

  • Round table 1: Solu­ti­on approa­ches to the chal­lenges of the fin­dings from 2020
  • Round table 2: Best prac­ti­ce of the can­tons of Zurich and Vaud; pos­si­ble blue­print for fur­ther steps towards opti­mi­sed, inte­gra­ted freight trans­port logistics

Details on the con­cre­te results of the panel dis­cus­sions and on pos­si­ble mea­su­res can be found in the next blog post.

ECM certification of locomotives

ECM certification of locomotives

News and terminology

From 16 June 2022, owners of loco­mo­ti­ves will also have to pre­sent an ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­te for their vehic­les. The acro­nym ECM stands for “Enti­ty in char­ge of main­ten­an­ce” and descri­bes the enti­ty respon­si­ble for main­ten­an­ce. ECMs regis­tered for these vehic­les in the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy Data­ba­se for Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and Safe­ty (ERADIS) regis­ter must com­ply with the pro­vi­si­ons of the Euro­pean Safe­ty Direc­ti­ve and the cor­re­spon­ding imple­men­ting regulation.

Does this also affect you?

This new regu­la­ti­on affects mem­bers of the VAP who have their own loco­mo­ti­ves for shun­ting ser­vices in their sidings. Howe­ver, the imple­men­ting regu­la­ti­on excludes the fol­lo­wing vehic­les from its scope:

  • Steam loco­mo­ti­ves and his­to­ri­cal vehicles
  • Loco­mo­ti­ves or vehic­les that run within the siding wit­hout ente­ring the sta­ti­on via the siding with flank protection
  • Two-way vehic­les

This means that you do not need ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on eit­her for the use of two-way vehic­les or for the use of loco­mo­ti­ves exclu­si­ve­ly within the sidings. If, on the other hand, your loco­mo­ti­ves run out­side the flank pro­tec­tion in trans­fer tracks of the sta­ti­on, you must obtain an ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­te for them.

Caution when waiving certification

Important to know: If a loco­mo­ti­ve wit­hout an assi­gned ECM is to be taken to the work­shop, you must arran­ge a spe­cial trans­port for it with an appro­pria­te ope­ra­ting con­cept. Alter­na­tively, you can carry out a pig­gy­back trans­port on a lorry. There are the­r­e­fo­re cer­tain dis­ad­van­ta­ges to not having ECM certification.

ECM certification

Loco­mo­ti­ve owners can eit­her seek ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on them­sel­ves or dele­ga­te the ECM func­tion to a ser­vice pro­vi­der. The fol­lo­wing com­pa­nies offer sup­port, both for cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and for taking over the ECM func­tion for locomotives:

Legal basis

Direc­ti­ve (EU) 2016/798 on rail­way safe­ty and the updated imple­men­ting regu­la­ti­on (EU) 2019/779 of 16 May 2019 regu­la­te the uni­form requi­re­ments for ECMs. The regu­la­ti­on now pro­vi­des for a scope of appli­ca­ti­on for all types of vehic­les. Included are the vehic­le cate­go­ries freight wagons, loco­mo­ti­ves, mul­ti­ple units, pas­sen­ger coa­ches, high-speed vehic­les, construction/maintenance vehic­les and others.

Transitional provisions

The fol­lo­wing tran­si­tio­nal pro­vi­si­ons apply to exis­ting cer­ti­fi­ca­tes and atte­sta­ti­ons of con­for­mi­ty under the old ECM Regu­la­ti­on 445/2011:

ECM function and exemptions

An ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on cer­ti­fies that the requi­re­ments of the Imple­men­ting Regu­la­ti­on are met. In the con­text of issuing the safe­ty cer­ti­fi­ca­te for rail­way under­ta­kings (RUs) or safe­ty aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­ons for infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers, cor­re­spon­ding ECM cer­ti­fi­ca­tes may also be issued. These apply to RUs and infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers that are ente­red as ECMs in the regis­ter for their own vehic­les and main­tain these vehic­les exclu­si­ve­ly for their own ope­ra­ti­ons. Accor­din­gly, these vehic­les are not freight wagons and do not run in other trains. In this case, the RU or the infra­struc­tu­re mana­ger can­not per­form an ECM func­tion for other vehic­les. For ECMs respon­si­ble for the main­ten­an­ce of freight wagons, cer­ti­fi­ca­ti­on is man­da­to­ry wit­hout excep­ti­on. Any enti­ty cer­ti­fied for the rele­vant scope can act as a regis­tered ECM.

Strengthen modal shift and diversity of supply

Strengthen modal shift and diversity of supply

A mar­ket-ori­en­ted varie­ty of ser­vices and the role of rail freight in modal shift are up for deba­te. After SBB Cargo announ­ced a fur­ther savings pro­gram­me, Charles Juil­lard, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, and the Com­mis­si­on for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons SR have resor­ted to the instru­ment of the pos­tu­la­te and cal­led on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to exami­ne and report. Both issues are curr­ent­ly being dealt with in the Coun­cil of States.

Postulate 21.3198: Better use of railway facilities

The pos­tu­la­te 21.3198 «Freight trans­port. Why not make bet­ter use of exis­ting rail­way faci­li­ties?» by Charles Juil­lard, mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes for the Euro­pean Peo­p­le’s Party (EPP), ins­tructs the Fede­ral Coun­cil to sub­mit a report on the deve­lo­p­ment of freight trans­port in Switz­er­land – espe­ci­al­ly by rail. In doing so, it should exami­ne the mea­su­res that could favour a shift of freight trans­port from road to rail. This demand arose against the back­ground that in recent years the num­ber of ser­vice points and faci­li­ties for the trans­fer of goods from road to rail has been ste­adi­ly redu­ced, favou­ring road trans­port for reasons of sim­pli­ci­ty and time savings. This deve­lo­p­ment con­tra­dicts the man­da­te of modal shift and noise abatement.

Details on Pos­tu­la­te 21.3198 «Freight trans­port. Why not make bet­ter use of exis­ting rail­way faci­li­ties?» can be found here.

Postulate 21.3597: Future of freight transport

With the pos­tu­la­te 21.3597 «Future of freight trans­port», the Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes ins­tructs the Fede­ral Coun­cil to sub­mit a report on the future direc­tion of rail freight trans­port poli­cy by the end of the first quar­ter of 2022 at the latest. The Com­mis­si­on demands details on the import and export of goods by rail and the con­tri­bu­ti­on of rail freight trans­port, modal shift and sus­tainable ori­en­ta­ti­on of the sup­p­ly chain. It wants an assess­ment of SBB Car­go’s mar­ket-ori­en­ted and area- and cost-cove­ring ser­vices, as well as its orga­ni­sa­tio­nal struc­tu­re, modal shift effects, trans­port per­for­mance, infra­struc­tures, ser­vice points and the needs of the ship­ping indus­try. The Fede­ral Coun­cil’s report should also address the effects and pro­s­pects of the stra­te­gic rea­lignment of SBB Cargo and iden­ti­fy poli­ti­cal sce­na­ri­os for fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment, any need for legis­la­ti­ve action and the need for invest­ment in new rol­ling stock, auto­ma­ti­on and digitalisation.

Details on pos­tu­la­te 21.3597 «Future of freight traf­fic» can be read here.

Committed to stronger rail

We at the VAP sup­port both of the above pos­tu­la­tes and, for envi­ron­men­tal and ener­gy poli­cy reasons, are com­mit­ted to a balan­ced modal split and a high diver­si­ty of ser­vices. Within the frame­work of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), we are curr­ent­ly working on a fit­ness pro­gram­me for rail freight trans­port. This includes more inten­si­ve coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween freight rail­ways and SBB Cargo in the inte­rests of cus­to­mers. Tog­e­ther with the FOT, we are also in the pro­cess of dri­ving for­ward and rapidly imple­men­ting the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on of rail freight. Par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on is being paid to the Digi­tal Auto­ma­tic Cou­pling DAK (cf. Pro­gress for Auto­ma­ti­on in Rail Freight Traf­fic). Also in coope­ra­ti­on with the FOT, we are curr­ent­ly dra­wing up a con­cept for the con­tri­bu­ti­on of rail freight trans­port to the reduc­tion of CO2 emis­si­ons. You can also find more infor­ma­ti­on on this in our spe­cia­list blog.

Motion pandemic-related financial aid

Motion pandemic-related financial aid

With its moti­on 21.3594 «Miti­ga­ting the effects of the pan­de­mic on rail freight trans­port», the Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes wants the Fede­ral Coun­cil to pro­vi­de finan­cial sup­port to rail freight trans­port com­pa­nies for the effects of Covid-19 in 2021 on the basis of Artic­le 9a of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG) and to apply to Par­lia­ment for a sup­ple­men­ta­ry cre­dit for this purpose.

You can read the exact wor­ding of moti­on 21.3594 «Miti­ga­ting the effects of the pan­de­mic on rail freight trans­port» here.

Prevent price increases

We at the VAP wel­co­me rene­wed finan­cial aid to SBB Cargo and, if neces­sa­ry, to other freight rail­ways – on con­di­ti­on that SBB Cargo does not increase pri­ces for 2021 and with­draws price increa­ses alre­a­dy agreed for sub­se­quent years. Par­ti­cu­lar men­ti­on should be made of the reduc­tion in train path pri­ces as of 1 Janu­ary 2021, which will reli­e­ve the freight rail­ways of a total of around CHF 30 mil­li­on per year. In this deba­te, it is cru­cial that the joint efforts of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV) to increase pro­duc­ti­vi­ty at SBB Cargo make pro­gress and are not delay­ed or negle­c­ted by Covid-19.

What the VAP says about mobility pricing

What the VAP says about mobility pricing

The context

Traf­fic is incre­asing. Accor­din­gly, the exis­ting capa­ci­ties of the trans­port infra­struc­tures will not always and ever­y­whe­re be suf­fi­ci­ent to satis­fy the demand for trans­port. The fede­ral govern­ment, can­tons, muni­ci­pa­li­ties and trans­port com­pa­nies are imple­men­ting a wide range of mea­su­res to ensu­re that mobi­li­ty remains pos­si­ble in the future (e.g. traf­fic manage­ment, expan­si­on). Nevert­hel­ess, many of these mea­su­res have rea­ched their limits.

One mea­su­re to reme­dy traf­fic con­ges­ti­on has so far remain­ed lar­ge­ly unu­sed in Switz­er­land: dif­fe­ren­tia­ted pri­cing sys­tems, for exam­p­le in the form of mobi­li­ty char­ges that vary in time or place. This would be tan­ta­mount to tur­ning away from uni­form or flat-rate fares. So-cal­led mobi­li­ty pri­cing influen­ces trans­port demand and mobi­li­ty beha­viour and thus ulti­m­ate­ly enables tar­ge­ted manage­ment of exis­ting trans­port capacities.

The legal basis

With the draft «Fede­ral Act on Pilot Pro­jects on Mobi­li­ty Pri­cing» of 3 Febru­ary 2021, the Fede­ral Depart­ment of the Envi­ron­ment, Trans­port, Ener­gy and Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (DETEC) wants to crea­te a legal basis so that can­tons, cities or muni­ci­pa­li­ties can carry out local and time-limi­t­ed pilot pro­jects on mobi­li­ty pri­cing with com­pul­so­ry char­ges. Such pro­jects should pro­vi­de fin­dings on new forms of pri­cing to spe­ci­fi­cal­ly influence trans­port demand and mobi­li­ty beha­viour in moto­ri­sed pri­va­te trans­port and public transport.

State­ment of the VAP

The VAP sup­ports the basic prin­ci­ples for­mu­la­ted in the fede­ral govern­men­t’s con­cep­tu­al work, in par­ti­cu­lar the prin­ci­ple of «pay as you use» with full com­pen­sa­ti­on. Accor­din­gly, trans­port users should not pay more, but pay dif­fer­ent­ly. We also sup­port the approa­ches of inter­mo­da­li­ty and dis­tri­bu­ti­on effects, accor­ding to which road and rail are fully included and accor­ding to the same cri­te­ria, but mobi­li­ty remains afforda­ble; all this within the frame­work of a gra­dua­ted, trans­pa­rent and com­pre­hen­si­ble struc­tu­re of the elements.

Howe­ver, the VAP rejects capa­ci­ty manage­ment on exis­ting infra­struc­tures wit­hout full com­pen­sa­ti­on. Like­wi­se, mobi­li­ty pri­cing must not be used to avoid traf­fic or to steer the modal split, as the con­sti­tu­ti­on offers no room for this.

Modal shift suc­ceeds if there are cor­re­spon­din­gly favoura­ble offers and incen­ti­ves. Mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons in par­ti­cu­lar hold con­sidera­ble poten­ti­al for this. The­r­e­fo­re, modal shift can be achie­ved with impro­ved frame­work con­di­ti­ons and infra­struc­tu­re capa­ci­ties for mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons. In addi­ti­on to pure rail freight trans­port, spe­cial atten­ti­on should be paid to mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons Rhine-rail, Rhine-road, road-rail, pipe­line-rail, pipe­line-road and cor­re­spon­ding solu­ti­ons in the area of city logi­stics. Here, gene­rous reim­bur­se­ments of mobi­li­ty char­ges for addi­tio­nal trans­ship­ments of goods and con­tai­ners bet­ween modes of trans­port can help to avoid exter­nal effects and redu­ce envi­ron­men­tal pollution.

Within the frame­work of the Cargo Forum Switz­er­land, we addres­sed our state­ment on the «Fede­ral Law on Pilot Pro­jects on Mobi­li­ty Pri­cing» (in ger­man) to Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga on 17 May 2021.

Draft law has methodological shortcomings

DETEC’s draft hard­ly spe­ci­fies the expe­ri­men­tal arran­ge­ments and the hypo­the­ses to be tes­ted in detail. The influence of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on in pilot pro­jects with com­pul­so­ry levies is limi­t­ed to the exami­na­ti­on and appr­oval of the pro­jects. In this respect, its influence is very limi­t­ed with regard to a broad-based gain in know­ledge accor­ding to Art. 17 of the draft. Not even the com­pa­ra­bi­li­ty of seve­ral pilot pro­jects with each other is assu­med. Thus, no cor­rob­ora­ted fin­dings from dif­fe­rent regi­ons on indi­vi­du­al the­ses can be expec­ted. In the case of pilot pro­jects with vol­un­t­a­ry par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on, imple­men­ta­ti­on even seems pos­si­ble wit­hout an exami­na­ti­on accor­ding to Art. 26, pro­vi­ded that fede­ral con­tri­bu­ti­ons are wai­ved. These short­co­mings need to be rectified.

The law distin­gu­is­hes bet­ween pilot pro­jects in the area of moto­ri­sed indi­vi­du­al trans­port and those in public trans­port (Art. 3, Art. 6 and Art. 9). This distinc­tion is incom­pa­ti­ble with the basic prin­ci­ples of Mobi­li­ty Pri­cing. Pilot pro­jects are to be arran­ged in such a way that pri­va­te trans­port and public trans­port can be tes­ted out, as it were.

The law con­cei­ves the vol­un­t­a­ry or obli­ga­to­ry Mobi­li­ty Pri­cing levy in addi­ti­on to the levies curr­ent­ly in force (cf. Art. 11 Pro­hi­bi­ti­on of tariff reduc­tions). This con­tra­dicts the requi­re­ment of compensation.

In Art. 12, the law only pro­vi­des for an anony­mous levy for pilot pro­jects in the area of public trans­port. This requi­re­ment must also apply to moto­ri­sed pri­va­te transport.

Heavy goods traf­fic on rail and road over 3.5 t total weight is not the sub­ject of the pilot pro­jects. Accor­din­gly, those respon­si­ble for the freight trans­port pro­jects can only gather very limi­t­ed experience.

Overall concept with performance-based pricing called for

We are aware that the exis­ting finan­cing mecha­nisms do not allow for per­for­mance-based pri­cing of mobi­li­ty. As a result, the true costs and the degree of self-finan­cing vary great­ly bet­ween the dif­fe­rent modes of trans­port and bet­ween heavy goods and pas­sen­ger trans­port, and they con­tain false incen­ti­ves for mobi­li­ty and spa­ti­al deve­lo­p­ment in Switzerland.

The VAP the­r­e­fo­re recom­mends an over­all con­cept for the future design of mobi­li­ty levies. In doing so, the mea­su­res for indi­vi­du­al sub-goals should be revi­sed while avo­i­ding con­flicts of goals and taking into account all tech­ni­cal developments.

As the voice of the ship­ping indus­try, we adhe­re to the fol­lo­wing premises:

  • Logi­stics and freight trans­port – espe­ci­al­ly road freight trans­port – are essen­ti­al ele­ments of a suc­cessful inter­na­tio­nal­ly net­work­ed busi­ness loca­ti­on in Switz­er­land and the sup­p­ly of Switz­er­land. Sett­le­ment, trans­port and infra­struc­tu­re poli­cy must con­ti­nue to gua­ran­tee these.
  • (Freight) traf­fic is hand­led in a way that is as needs-ori­en­ted as pos­si­ble and as envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly and resour­ce-saving as possible.
  • Frame­work con­di­ti­ons and infra­struc­tu­re deve­lo­p­ment con­tri­bu­te to the achie­ve­ment of the first two pre­mi­ses with incen­ti­ves, suf­fi­ci­ent infra­struc­tu­re capa­ci­ties and the pro­mo­ti­on of innovations.
  • Infra­struc­tu­re and trans­port costs are sub­ject to the pol­lu­ter pays prin­ci­ple. Ide­al­ly, all trans­port users in pas­sen­ger and freight trans­port cover their ope­ra­ting and infra­struc­tu­re costs as well as extern­al­ly cau­sed costs (balan­ce principle).

 

DETEC con­sul­ta­ti­on draft and expl­ana­to­ry report (in ger­man): https://www.astra.admin.ch/astra/de/home/themen/mobility-pricing/vernehmlassungsunterlagen.html

SBB Cargo Magazine: VAP President Josef Dittli in conversation

SBB Cargo Magazine: VAP President Josef Dittli in conversation

Dési­rée Baer, CEO of SBB Cargo, and Josef Ditt­li, Mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and Pre­si­dent of the VAP Swiss Rail Ship­pers Asso­cia­ti­on, talk about the future of Swiss rail freight. They agree that digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and auto­ma­ti­on should signi­fi­cant­ly increase the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty of rail. The fede­ral govern­ment should play a sup­port­ing role in this.

→ Click here for the inter­view (in german)

Noise reduction and automation make rail more attractive

Noise reduction and automation make rail more attractive

A con­sidera­ble poten­ti­al for more sus­taina­bi­li­ty in rail freight trans­port lies in noise aba­te­ment. Noise must be fur­ther redu­ced so that an increase in rail freight trans­port can be rea­li­sed wit­hout signi­fi­cant increa­ses in noise. This will then bene­fit the envi­ron­ment and the popu­la­ti­on. The spea­k­ers at the Noise Rese­arch Forum 2021 explai­ned which con­cepts and mea­su­res are curr­ent­ly being exami­ned and are promising.

At the Noise Rese­arch Forum 2021, the focus was on an essen­ti­al aspect of future-proof rail freight trans­port: auto­ma­ti­on. For rail to beco­me more attrac­ti­ve for freight trans­port, it must beco­me more effi­ci­ent and sus­tainable. One exam­p­le of this is the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAK). It repres­ents a major mile­stone in auto­ma­ti­on and allows for a con­sidera­ble increase in effi­ci­en­cy in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port. If rail freight trans­port beco­mes more cost-effec­ti­ve, the share of rail in the total volu­me of traf­fic can increase, which favours CO2 reduction.

The manage­ment of infra­struc­tu­re and traf­fic must also be incre­asing­ly auto­ma­ted and digi­ta­li­sed. Real-time infor­ma­ti­on for cus­to­mers on the trans­port or safe ope­ra­ti­on of the wagons used and the cor­rect loa­ding as well as semi-auto­no­mous ope­ra­ti­on of the sidings streng­then rail freight trans­port. Start-up finan­cing would faci­li­ta­te the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, while at the same time sub­si­dies could be reduced.

The VAP makes a signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­on to streng­thening the inno­va­ti­ve strength and the will to trans­form of its mem­bers. Only in this way can rail freight trans­port beco­me more attrac­ti­ve and deve­lop into a valid alter­na­ti­ve to the road. To this end, the VAP sup­ports its mem­bers in the imple­men­ta­ti­on of auto­ma­ti­on in Switz­er­land, always in coor­di­na­ti­on with deve­lo­p­ments and requi­re­ments in Europe.

Detailed information from the Railway Noise Research Forum 2021

Rudolf Sper­lich, Vice-Direc­tor of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), wel­co­med the par­ti­ci­pan­ts and loo­ked back on the deve­lo­p­ment of noise reme­dia­ti­on to clas­si­fy the forum. He explai­ned Switz­er­lan­d’s pio­nee­ring role in Euro­pe and noted that the pro­gram­me had been imple­men­ted very suc­cessful­ly in terms of costs and dead­lines. Howe­ver, becau­se the effect fell just short of the sta­tu­to­ry reme­dia­ti­on tar­get, the par­lia­ment unani­mously adopted addi­tio­nal mea­su­res in 2013. Inno­va­ti­on assis­tance and depart­ment­al rese­arch are two of these sup­ple­men­ta­ry instru­ments that will expi­re in 2025. For this reason, a wealth of ideas, net­wor­king and the will to inno­va­te are once again cal­led for in order to help the new, inte­res­t­ing approa­ches to suc­cess or to broad application.

Paul Stef­fen, Vice Direc­tor at the Fede­ral Office for the Envi­ron­ment (FOEN), poin­ted out in his wel­co­me address the need for fur­ther inno­va­tions in the rail­ways. Inno­va­ti­on is still neces­sa­ry, not only for the health of resi­dents, but also to streng­then the envi­ron­men­tal advan­ta­ge of rail over road and thus to main­tain mar­ket share in freight transport.

Det­lef Schli­ckel­mann, repre­sen­ta­ti­ve of the VAP Swiss Rail Ship­pers Asso­cia­ti­on, explai­ned that the noise reme­dia­ti­on pro­ject ended in 2016 with the com­mis­sio­ning of the last 4,000 or so refur­bis­hed wagons. The indus­try had suc­cessful­ly orga­nis­ed the enti­re pro­cess of series engi­nee­ring, appr­oval, con­ver­si­on incl. mate­ri­al pool and finan­cing under the pro­ject manage­ment of the VAP. Schli­ckel­mann added that the digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pler (DAK) pro­ject would crea­te a great increase in effi­ci­en­cy in Euro­pean rail freight trans­port and that the VAP wan­ted to write a second suc­cess story for the pro­gress of rail freight trans­port with the rapid imple­men­ta­ti­on of the DAK project.

Rail­way noise rese­arch accor­ding to the Fede­ral Rail­way Noise Aba­te­ment Act (BGLE)
Fredy Fischer, Depu­ty Head of the Noise and NIR Divi­si­on at the FOEN, empha­sis­ed in his intro­duc­to­ry pre­sen­ta­ti­on how important it is for the rail­ways to beco­me even quie­ter. He cal­led on the indus­try repre­sen­ta­ti­ves to crea­te a com­mon visi­on of the quiet rail­way. If this requi­red rese­arch or deve­lo­p­ment, he said, the fede­ral govern­ment would be happy to sup­port projects.

5L demons­tra­tor train
Jens-Erik Gal­diks, head of fleet tech­no­lo­gy at SBB Cargo, used the “5L demons­tra­tor train” pro­ject to show that cur­rent tech­no­lo­gies can redu­ce the noise of freight wagons by a fur­ther 6 dB. Here, it is important to keep an eye on and con­sider the cost-bene­fit ratio. Other effects such as wear reduc­tion are also signi­fi­cant. These com­mer­cial effects do not neces­s­a­ri­ly accrue to the inves­tor. The­r­e­fo­re, a balan­ce of bene­fits bet­ween infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers, rail­way under­ta­kings and wagon kee­pers must be crea­ted. Jens-Erik Gal­diks fur­ther sta­ted that a fur­ther noise reduc­tion of freight wagons would be dis­pro­por­tio­na­te at pre­sent and that other mea­su­res such as opti­mi­sa­ti­on of loco­mo­ti­ves should be pursued.

Over­all opti­mi­sed inno­va­ti­ve freight wagon
Dr Hanno Schell, Head of Inno­va­ti­on at VTG Rail Euro­pe GmbH, spoke about the goal of desig­ning a quie­ter freight wagon. The first step was to redu­ce the weight by 800 kg and the sound from 83 dB(A) to 76 dB(A). VTG fur­ther deve­lo­ped the bogie of the type RC25NT-H‑D from the com­pa­ny ELH Eisen­bahn­lauf­wer­ke Halle GmbH & Co. KG fur­ther. It repla­ced the fric­tion dam­ping with hydrau­lic dam­ping. This enab­led it to save 200 kg per bogie in the cross beam at the draw­bar. VTG also instal­led Bona­trans wheel­sets with a noise-redu­cing BASF coa­ting. A wel­ded steel disc was used for the disc brake, which is 49 kg ligh­ter than con­ven­tio­nal cast discs; a fur­ther 13 kg could be saved on the disc brake cali­per. Various tests have alre­a­dy been car­ri­ed out in Switz­er­land with the quie­ter bogie. All in all, it would allow hig­her dri­ving speeds, take more weight and, thanks to the hydrau­lic dam­ping, have very good run­ning characteristics.

Com­po­si­te wheel­set
Pro­fes­sor Masoud Mota­val­li, head of the Struc­tu­ral Engi­nee­ring Depart­ment at the Swiss Fede­ral Labo­ra­to­ries for Mate­ri­als Test­ing and Rese­arch (Empa), spoke about the use of light­weight and high-strength fibre-rein­forced pla­s­tics to pro­du­ce a com­po­si­te wheel­set and a com­po­si­te bogie. A fea­si­bi­li­ty study show­ed that the desi­gned wheel­set was 40% ligh­ter than the con­ven­tio­nal metal ver­si­on. In addi­ti­on, a noise reduc­tion of 3 dB was achie­ved. The car­bon fibre-rein­forced pla­s­tics are cor­ro­si­on-resistant, have a very long ser­vice life and high fati­gue strength, but are much more expen­si­ve com­pared to clas­sic mate­ri­als. Masoud Mota­val­li the­r­e­fo­re pro­po­ses to design an enti­re bogie out of com­po­si­tes, becau­se this would make opti­mi­sed pri­cing more fea­si­ble. He is con­vin­ced that a mas­si­ve weight reduc­tion would be pos­si­ble and the self-dam­ping of the mate­ri­al would redu­ce the num­ber of dam­pers. In addi­ti­on, other inno­va­tions could be incor­po­ra­ted, for exam­p­le self-stee­ring, which would redu­ce the wear and tear on the tracks. All this would bring a signi­fi­cant noise reduc­tion com­pared to con­ven­tio­nal bogies.

Deve­lo­p­ment of a super­s­truc­tu­re simu­la­ti­on tool
In his pre­sen­ta­ti­on, Jean Marc Wun­der­li, Head of the Acoustics/Noise Reduc­tion Depart­ment at Empa, pre­sen­ted a nume­ri­cal model for the simu­la­ti­on of roll­over pro­ces­ses, which simu­la­tes the resul­ting cont­act forces, the struc­tu­ral vibra­ti­ons and final­ly the radia­ted air­bor­ne sound in three modu­les. Mr Wun­der­li empha­sis­ed that simu­la­ti­on tools that model­led the sound gene­ra­ti­on and radia­ti­on of the rol­ling noise of rail­ways in a phy­si­cal­ly cor­rect man­ner were a man­da­to­ry pre­re­qui­si­te for opti­mi­sa­ti­ons to the vehic­le and super­s­truc­tu­re. Due to the high com­ple­xi­ty of the sys­tem and the part­ly con­tra­dic­to­ry requi­re­ments (noise, vibra­ti­ons, wear, posi­tio­nal sta­bi­li­ty …), a trial-and-error approach was not expedient.

“Rail pads – less rol­ling noise and more pro­tec­tion
Hol­ger Frau­en­rath, pro­fes­sor at the Insti­tu­te of Mate­ri­als Sci­ence at the Ecole Poly­tech­ni­que Fédé­ra­le de Lau­sanne (EPFL), pre­sen­ted a pro­ject to deve­lop new types of rail pads. These should enable both bet­ter pro­tec­tion of the rail­way super­s­truc­tu­re and a noise reduc­tion of at least 1 dB (A) com­pared to con­ven­tio­nal rail pads. The mul­ti­di­sci­pli­na­ry pro­ject team brings tog­e­ther rese­ar­chers from EPFL, HEIG Yver­don and Empa from the fields of mate­ri­als sci­ence, nume­ri­cal simu­la­ti­on, vibroa­cou­stics, envi­ron­men­tal engi­neers and rail­way experts from SBB. Based on an expe­ri­men­tal model­ling chain ran­ging from the mate­ri­al pro­per­ties to the beha­viour of a rail pad as a com­po­nent to the sys­tem beha­viour in the track, new multi-mate­ri­al rail pads with a soft core with high dam­ping capa­ci­ty bet­ween 200 and 2’000 Hz are deve­lo­ped. These will be opti­mi­sed for a good balan­ce bet­ween mecha­ni­cal sta­bi­li­ty, noise reduc­tion and per­ma­nent way pro­tec­tion. Designs are curr­ent­ly being tes­ted to Euro­pean stan­dards and pre­pared for the final deve­lo­p­ment phase, which will invol­ve the pro­duc­tion of engi­nee­ring-scale pro­to­ty­pes for field tri­als in the track from March 2022. The new rail pads will be of inte­rest both for redu­ced noise pol­lu­ti­on in den­se­ly popu­la­ted count­ries and for rail­way ope­ra­tors, as they should redu­ce the costs of main­tai­ning the per­ma­nent way.

Opti­mi­sed con­cre­te slee­per, opti­mi­sed inter­me­dia­te layer
Dr Chris­ti­an Czol­be, Seni­or Engi­neer Acou­stics at PROSE AG, show­ed that noise along rail­way lines depends on both the rol­ling stock and the com­pon­ents in the track. For the infra­struc­tu­re, it the­r­e­fo­re makes sense to take mea­su­res that increase rail dam­ping and redu­ce rail noise. In a rese­arch pro­ject, PROSE deve­lo­ped acou­sti­cal­ly opti­mi­sed con­cre­te slee­pers tog­e­ther with Vigier Rail and exami­ned two pro­mi­sing pro­to­ty­pes in a test track. In ano­ther pro­ject, an incon­spi­cuous and bare­ly visi­ble com­po­nent bet­ween rail and slee­per was opti­mi­sed. Dr. Chris­ti­an Czol­be sta­ted that the deve­lo­ped Bate­gu inter­me­dia­te layer unites a long­stan­ding demand of the rail­way indus­try: it dam­pens the dyna­mic impact loads in the super­s­truc­tu­re and redu­ces noise at the same time. With a mea­su­red noise reduc­tion of up to 5 dB (A), it would be signi­fi­cant­ly quie­ter along the line, which resi­dents could per­cei­ve and con­firm imme­dia­te­ly after its instal­la­ti­on. It also pro­tects the track super­s­truc­tu­re and thus leads to a reduc­tion in life cycle costs – a win-win situa­ti­on for the rail­way indus­try and resi­dents. The new Bate­gu inter­me­dia­te layer has pas­sed all rele­vant stan­dard and field tests as well as the fati­gue strength tests and is now available for safe series use in the rail­way infrastructure.

Mea­su­re­ment of acou­stic rough­ness
Flo­ri­an Mauz, rese­arch asso­cia­te and doc­to­ral stu­dent at ETH Zurich, pre­sen­ted a deve­lo­p­ment approach for an opti­cal mea­su­ring device for mea­su­ring acou­stic rough­ness on rails. In the future, it should be pos­si­ble to mea­su­re the rough­ness from the moving train. By cle­ver­ly com­bi­ning seve­ral sen­sors, the mea­su­re­ment result could be opti­mi­sed. Flo­ri­an Mauz show­ed the test setup and the series of tests in a labo­ra­to­ry envi­ron­ment. Soon the approach would be tes­ted on a moving train and vali­da­ted for its accuracy.

The link to the Forum’s web­site is www.laermforschung-eisenbahn.ch.

Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on on the depart­ment­al rail­way rese­arch and the award cri­te­ria can be found on the FOEN web­site (in ger­man, french or italian).

Swiss Wagonload Transport Interest Group – for a start

Swiss Wagonload Transport Interest Group – for a start

In 2018, the VAP, tog­e­ther with SBB Cargo and the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port (VöV/UTP), foun­ded the Swiss Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group – IG WLV Schweiz for short. This blog post kicks off a series of posts that pro­vi­de ans­wers to such and simi­lar ques­ti­ons: What do the stake­hol­ders want to achie­ve? What were the trig­gers and foun­da­ti­ons? Where do we stand today? What are the poten­ti­al bene­fits for VAP members?

How it all began

Accor­ding to the press release «Out­sour­cing of SBB Cargo should bring more com­pe­ti­ti­on» of the Com­mit­tees for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (TTC) of Janu­ary 2017, they agreed to the draft bill «Orga­ni­sa­ti­on of the Rail­way Infra­struc­tu­re» (OBI, in ger­man) of the Fede­ral Coun­cil. Howe­ver, the KVF pro­po­sed to their coun­cil­lors by 14 votes to 11 that the draft be refer­red back to the Fede­ral Coun­cil and revi­sed in some points. Among other things, SBB Cargo should be out­sour­ced in a hol­ding struc­tu­re in order to achie­ve more com­pe­ti­ti­on and streng­then freight trans­port in this way. In addi­ti­on, the KVF recom­men­ded that sys­tem lea­der­ship should also be regu­la­ted for freight transport.

This was the birth of IG WLV, so to speak. In addi­ti­on, Artic­le 3a of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG) (in ger­man) was amen­ded during the con­sul­ta­ti­ons on OBI. Accor­ding to this, the actors in rail freight trans­port are to joint­ly deve­lop gui­de­lines for achie­ving the goals of the GüTG. For exam­p­le, in favour of tech­ni­cal inno­va­tions, effi­ci­en­cy impro­ve­ments in pro­duc­tion pro­ces­ses or for impro­ved inte­gra­ti­on of rail freight trans­port into the logi­stics economy.

Strong wagonload traffic, satisfied customers

The inte­rest group aims to pro­mo­te the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of wagon­load traf­fic in Switz­er­land. In the com­mon inte­rest, it pur­sues the goal of pro­vi­ding the ser­vices of the rail­way sys­tem more effec­tively and effi­ci­ent­ly and thus enab­ling a self-sus­tai­ning and sus­tainable deve­lo­p­ment of rail freight trans­port in the sense of the GüTG. The sys­tem of wagon­load traf­fic is to be ali­gned with the strengths of the rail­way and the needs of the cus­to­mers and is to be regard­ed as an inte­gral part of the over­all logi­stics. Both rail pro­vi­ders and cus­to­mers should bene­fit equal­ly from its eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty and reliability.

Exchange of information and planning for the future

Since its foun­da­ti­on, the stake­hol­ders of IG WLV have exch­an­ged views on various topics in board mee­tings. In addi­ti­on, in regu­lar work­shops they shed light on the con­cre­te chal­lenges and hurd­les of the rail­way sys­tem, such as the deve­lo­p­ment pos­si­bi­li­ties in sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic or the reasons why cus­to­mers are dis­sa­tis­fied with the cur­rent situa­ti­on. The IG WLV is curr­ent­ly working on a joint con­cept with direc­tions and cor­re­spon­ding goals as well as con­cre­te mea­su­res for the coming years.

A lot planned, a lot to do

Whe­ther cus­to­mers, poli­ti­ci­ans or dia­lo­gue groups: Over­all, the expec­ta­ti­ons of the IG WLV are high. VAP Gene­ral Secre­ta­ry Frank Fur­rer talks about the cur­rent state of deve­lo­p­ments in an inter­view with the trans­port workers’ union. The road from a decla­ra­ti­on of intent to con­cre­te results is long and rocky. The IG WLV wants to smooth this path so that cus­to­mers can count on a bet­ter rail­way sys­tem and poli­ti­ci­ans reco­g­ni­se the added value of increased effi­ci­en­cy and cooperation.

No results found.