In addi­ti­on to the fede­ral govern­ment, the can­tons and large Swiss cities are also incre­asing­ly defi­ning holi­stic freight trans­port con­cepts for their effi­ci­ent, safe and envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly sup­p­ly and dis­po­sal of goods. The freight trans­port indus­try is stri­ving to work in part­ner­ship with the can­tons and cities in order to join forces and fur­ther deve­lop logi­stics loca­ti­ons. City logi­stics within cities and conur­ba­ti­ons is beco­ming incre­asing­ly important. We at the VAP con­sider the fol­lo­wing mea­su­res to be neces­sa­ry so that the strengths of rail freight trans­port can be brought to bear in com­bi­ned and mul­ti­mo­dal transport.

1. Infrastructure development
  • Dedi­ca­ted invest­ments in line exten­si­ons for freight trans­port are neces­sa­ry for long-term com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness. It is impe­ra­ti­ve that these be included in the work for the next STEP expan­si­on stage 2040/45, namely: 
    • Plan­ning and imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Zurich freight bypass line for addi­tio­nal capa­ci­ty and unbund­ling of pas­sen­ger and freight traf­fic, inclu­ding eli­mi­na­ti­on of bot­t­len­ecks in the nodes bet­ween Aarau and Winterthur.
    • Exami­na­ti­on of the com­ple­te unbund­ling of freight and pas­sen­ger traf­fic in the Basel, Gen­e­va and Zurich-Win­ter­thur area as well as the Lau­sanne junction.
  • The Swiss road net­work is in urgent need of moder­ni­sa­ti­on. The mea­su­res adopted by the Fede­ral Coun­cil and Par­lia­ment within the frame­work of the new Natio­nal Roads and Agglo­me­ra­ti­on Trans­port Fund (NAF) and the stra­te­gic deve­lo­p­ment pro­gram­me STEP Natio­nal Roads must be imple­men­ted as quick­ly as pos­si­ble. There is a need for both reno­va­tions and the eli­mi­na­ti­on of bot­t­len­ecks and capa­ci­ty expan­si­ons on the most con­ge­sted stretches.
  • The coor­di­na­ti­on of the super­or­di­na­te and sub­or­di­na­te road net­work must beco­me the focus of atten­ti­on. This means that more resour­ces in the cities and agglo­me­ra­ti­ons must be used direct­ly for the spe­ci­fic needs of city logi­stics than is the case in agglo­me­ra­ti­on pro­gram­mes 1 and 2.
  • For como­dal solu­ti­ons in import/export, the tran­ship­ment capa­ci­ties in Tici­no must be signi­fi­cant­ly increased. To this end, exis­ting ter­mi­nals should be expan­ded and addi­tio­nal new loca­ti­ons near the bor­der should be evaluated.
  • Logi­stics loca­ti­ons must be taken into account in spa­ti­al plan­ning and made more acces­si­ble: This includes access by road (natio­nal, can­to­nal, muni­ci­pal roads), access by rail (net­work capa­ci­ty to the (recei­ving) sta­ti­on) and shun­ting capa­ci­ty for access to the siding from the (recei­ving) sta­ti­on. The lat­ter is curr­ent­ly not legal­ly secu­red. Regio­nal net­work plans would be decisi­ve for this.
2. Regulatory framework for the road
  • The cur­rent road regu­la­ti­ons should be retai­ned in their enti­re­ty. The HVF, the ban on night and Sun­day dri­ving for HGVs, the 40-tonne weight limit and the ban on cabo­ta­ge are undis­pu­ted in the trans­port indus­try and ensu­re fair social and com­pe­ti­ti­ve conditions.
  • The cabo­ta­ge ban in par­ti­cu­lar is cen­tral. Any rela­xa­ti­on of the cur­rent regu­la­ti­ons would threa­ten the exis­tence of the enti­re Swiss trans­port indus­try on rail and road. In addi­ti­on, fatal con­se­quen­ces for the envi­ron­ment and modal shift poli­cy would have to be reckon­ed with. In the cur­rent pro­cess on the pos­si­ble con­clu­si­on of an insti­tu­tio­nal agree­ment, the ban on cabo­ta­ge must the­r­e­fo­re not be tam­pe­red with. It must remain ancho­red in the exis­ting land trans­port agree­ment in its cur­rent form.
  • As a finan­cial incen­ti­ve for mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port, the HVF reim­bur­se­ment in com­bi­ned trans­port on the initi­al or final road leg should be addi­tio­nal­ly increased and now also gran­ted for the com­bi­na­ti­on of road and rail in wagon­load trans­port with goods ins­tead of con­tai­ner transhipment.
  • The (road) trans­port indus­try abroad works with com­ple­te­ly dif­fe­rent cost struc­tures than Swiss trans­port com­pa­nies. The big­gest dif­fe­ren­ces are in the remu­ne­ra­ti­on of dri­vers. The result is so-cal­led “social dum­ping”, which mas­si­ve­ly distorts com­pe­ti­ti­on in the hig­hest-volu­me freight trans­port mar­kets in Euro­pe. In addi­ti­on, there is a need for tigh­ter con­trols on the exis­ting cabo­ta­ge ban, inclu­ding mas­si­ve­ly hig­her fines in the event of infringements.
3. Regulatory framework conditions for the railways
  • In order to use infra­struc­tures for pas­sen­ger and goods trains as effi­ci­ent­ly as pos­si­ble, net­work uti­li­sa­ti­on con­cepts should be fur­ther deve­lo­ped in line with demand. In this way, expen­si­ve invest­ments in infra­struc­tu­re can be avo­ided and nodes can be effec­tively reli­e­ved. The freight trans­port indus­try is pre­pared to dyna­mi­se demand, for exam­p­le in north-south traf­fic, thanks to hour­ly or daily plan­ning. In return, the freight trans­port com­pa­nies demand a dis­cus­sion regar­ding the use of train paths by freight and regio­nal trains at off-peak times early in the mor­ning and late in the evening.
  • Main­ten­an­ce con­cepts of the infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers must take more account of the needs of freight traf­fic at night. The com­pen­sa­ti­on intro­du­ced for line clo­sures due to con­s­truc­tion sites is useful as com­pen­sa­ti­on, but ulti­m­ate­ly the loa­ding indus­try needs more relia­bi­li­ty in the freight rail­ways’ ser­vice pro­vi­si­on. In future, main­ten­an­ce work should the­r­e­fo­re also be plan­ned incre­asing­ly during the day and at weekends with uni­form rest­ric­tions for all modes of transport.
  • In order to streng­then the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail­way in co-modal trans­port chains, the mar­gi­nal costs of infra­struc­tu­re use per train tra­vel­led must be rede­fi­ned, taking into account the dif­fe­rent demands of pas­sen­ger and freight transport.
Entrepreneurial commitment

Freight rail­ways, road hau­liers and the ship­ping indus­try are aware of their respon­si­bi­li­ty for the sup­p­ly of goods in Switz­er­land and have alre­a­dy imple­men­ted various mea­su­res in favour of co- or mul­ti­mo­dal freight trans­port solutions.

  • The part­ner­ship bet­ween SBB Cargo and Swiss Combi streng­thens the shift from road to rail and sus­tain­ab­ly increa­ses capa­ci­ty uti­li­sa­ti­on in sys­tem wagon­load traf­fic and com­bi­ned trans­port. The aim is to fur­ther increase the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail in the cus­to­mers’ logi­stics chain and to use the modes of trans­port accor­ding to their strengths.
  • SBB Cargo, the VAP VAP Swiss Rail Ship­pers Asso­cia­ti­on and the Asso­cia­ti­on of Public Trans­port VöV are deve­lo­ping a joint view of the range of ser­vices offe­red by the freight trans­port indus­try. Within the frame­work of the STEP 2030/35 expan­si­on step, demands such as suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ties, fas­ter train paths and upgrading and new con­s­truc­tion of freight trans­port faci­li­ties and sta­ti­ons were pushed through.
  • Road freight trans­port is con­ti­nuous­ly incre­asing its effi­ci­en­cy through inter­nal opti­mi­sa­ti­ons (e.g. plan­ning, dis­patching, digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on). The num­ber of unpro­duc­ti­ve empty runs is at a very low level. Howe­ver, a con­sidera­ble part of the effi­ci­en­cy gains achie­ved is lost again due to pro­duc­ti­vi­ty los­ses as a result of incre­asing con­ges­ti­on on the enti­re road network.
More dialogue for more sustainability and efficiency

Switzerland’s trans­port com­pa­nies and ship­pers are com­mit­ted to sus­tainable and effi­ci­ent freight trans­port as a con­tri­bu­ti­on to an eco­lo­gi­cal and com­pe­ti­ti­ve Switz­er­land. The modal shift from road to rail in tran­sit traf­fic from bor­der to bor­der and a sen­si­ble (multi-) modal split should be fur­ther streng­the­ned. The VAP and its part­ner orga­ni­sa­ti­ons sup­port a part­ner­ship-based, dyna­mic rela­ti­onship bet­ween the aut­ho­ri­ties and indus­try play­ers and are pre­pared to par­ti­ci­pa­te actively in the work.

Bei­trag Teilen: