SBB Cargo wants to renew its fleet with up to 129 modern main­line loco­mo­ti­ves by 2035. At the same time, it is com­plai­ning about high fixed costs in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV), has increased its pri­ces exces­si­ve­ly over the last few months and redu­ced its range of ser­vices. This har­bours the acute dan­ger of a shift back to the road. We at the VAP are ques­tio­ning the large order and deman­ding more transparency.

That’s the point:

  • SBB Cargo is inves­t­ing in the future of rail freight transport
  • Price increa­ses and ser­vice cuts are dri­ving away rail freight customers
  • VAP ques­ti­ons eco­no­mic reaso­ning and demands transparency

 

SBB Cargo is investing in the future of rail freight transport

SBB Cargo wants to moder­ni­se its fleet and thus secu­re the future of rail freight trans­port. In a press release dated 26 Sep­tem­ber 2024, it announ­ced the pro­cu­re­ment of up to 129 new main­line loco­mo­ti­ves. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are to be deli­ver­ed bet­ween 2027 and 2035 and will replace the out­da­ted trac­tion vehic­les. SBB Cargo pres­ents its decis­i­on as a neces­si­ty to make rail freight trans­port fit for the future, which is to be wel­co­med. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are more effi­ci­ent, more powerful and equip­ped with inno­va­ti­ve tech­no­lo­gies such as a bat­tery drive for last-mile trans­port. In this way, SBB Cargo aims to redu­ce ope­ra­ting costs by 60% and con­tri­bu­te to the auto­ma­ti­on of freight transport.

Price increases and reduction in services drive away railway customers

We at the VAP are asking our­sel­ves a key ques­ti­on: how does the large-scale pro­cu­re­ment of 129 loco­mo­ti­ves fit in with SBB Cargo’s cur­rent busi­ness deve­lo­p­ment and prac­ti­ces? In recent months, SBB Cargo has con­fron­ted its rail freight cus­to­mers with mas­si­ve price increa­ses and a reduc­tion in ser­vices (see VAP blog artic­le «Total revi­si­on of the GüTG: The mood in the indus­try threa­tens to tip». This mar­ket-dis­tort­ing beha­viour could result in a reduc­tion in rail freight volu­mes and an increased shift to road trans­port. If this actual­ly hap­pens, such an exten­si­ve invest­ment can­not be justified.

VAP questions economic reasoning and demands transparency

Unfort­u­na­te­ly, SBB Cargo is kee­ping a low pro­fi­le on the ope­ra­tio­nal and finan­cial effects of the major pro­ject. This is not exact­ly con­du­ci­ve to con­fi­dence in the state-owned freight trans­port sub­si­dia­ry. After all, we are tal­king about invest­ments in the three-digit mil­li­on range, which must be borne by the rail freight cus­to­mers under the pre­mi­se of eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty. We the­r­e­fo­re con­sider it essen­ti­al that SBB Cargo dis­c­lo­ses its con­side­ra­ti­ons. Fur­ther­mo­re, we sug­gest that it recon­sider the num­ber of loco­mo­ti­ves and con­sider lea­sing or par­ti­al­ly purcha­sing more loco­mo­ti­ves as a sup­ple­ment to the purchase.

Bei­trag Teilen: