Patri­zia Danioth is a lawy­er and nota­ry and has been Pre­si­dent of Rail­Com since 2013. In this inter­view, she gives us an over­view of RailCom’s tasks, her posi­ti­on on the draft legis­la­ti­on for freight trans­port and talks about the future mobi­li­ty infra­struc­tu­re (MODI).

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Rail­Com ensu­res non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to the rail­way network
  • Pro­mo­tes com­pe­ti­ti­on in the rail­way system
  • Sup­ports the streng­thening of the EWLV
  • Access to data for grea­ter trans­pa­ren­cy and innovation

 

Mrs Danioth, what is Rail­Com respon­si­ble for?

Rail­Com ensu­res non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to the rail­way net­work, CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties and local deli­very ser­vices. In this way, Rail­Com con­tri­bu­tes to a com­pe­ti­ti­ve Swiss rail­way sys­tem. Rail­Com also expres­ses its views on issues that fall within its remit as part of the legis­la­ti­ve pro­cess. This is the case with the cur­rent draft legis­la­ti­on on the future of Swiss rail freight transport.

What is RailCom’s posi­ti­on on the cur­rent draft legis­la­ti­on on the future of Swiss rail freight trans­port? Where do you see a need for action?

Rail­Com sup­ports the streng­thening of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port and the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port chains. Howe­ver, Rail­Com iden­ti­fies two cri­ti­cal aspects in par­ti­cu­lar in the draft law on Swiss freight trans­port, which need to be regu­la­ted in a coher­ent man­ner with exis­ting legislation.

What are the cri­ti­cal aspects? What requi­re­ments would the draft legis­la­ti­on have to ful­fil in order to be con­sis­tent with exis­ting legislation?

First­ly, the state sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port must be com­pe­ti­ti­on-neu­tral. Block train trans­port, which is self-suf­fi­ci­ent, must not be cross-sub­si­di­sed by the sub­si­di­sed sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. Such a dis­tor­ti­on of com­pe­ti­ti­on must be pre­ven­ted with the pre­sent draft law on Swiss freight trans­port. Be it that the pro­vi­der of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port makes a finan­cial, legal and orga­ni­sa­tio­nal sepa­ra­ti­on bet­ween the self-eco­no­mic ser­vices of block train trans­port and sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. Be it that stric­ter requi­re­ments as well as con­trol and sanc­tion opti­ons effec­tively pre­vent cross-subsidisation.

The aim of the pro­po­sal is to pro­mo­te an inno­va­ti­ve offe­ring in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port with a high level of cus­to­mer ori­en­ta­ti­on. Fair frame­work con­di­ti­ons are essen­ti­al for this.

Second­ly, exis­ting legis­la­ti­on in the rail­way sec­tor and in freight trans­port sti­pu­la­tes that if a com­pa­ny recei­ves finan­cial sup­port from the state, it must make its ser­vices or access to its faci­li­ties available to third par­ties on a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry basis. Alt­hough the draft law on Swiss freight trans­port pro­vi­des for non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry access to sin­gle wagon­load trans­port ser­vices in prin­ci­ple, it does not yet suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fy this requi­re­ment. This is shown by a com­pa­ri­son with the legis­la­ti­on on the pro­mo­ti­on of CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties or the law on under­ground freight trans­port: For exam­p­le, the legis­la­tor regu­la­tes the rights and obli­ga­ti­ons of the ope­ra­tors of CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties in more detail than those of the net­work pro­vi­der in sin­gle wagon­load transport.

With MODIG, a bill is being draf­ted to ensu­re that the infra­struc­tu­re and ser­vices of public and pri­va­te trans­port can be opti­mal­ly ope­ra­ted and uti­li­sed thanks to a bet­ter flow of infor­ma­ti­on. The mobi­li­ty infra­struc­tu­re (MODI) should one day enable the various play­ers to be net­work­ed and data to be pro­vi­ded and exch­an­ged. What does Rail­Com think of MODI?

Data and data exch­an­ge are an indis­pensable pre­re­qui­si­te for mobi­li­ty. Along­side rail and other trans­port faci­li­ties, data the­r­e­fo­re forms a sys­tem-rele­vant infra­struc­tu­re. Data is also a pre­re­qui­si­te for the uti­li­sa­ti­on of infra­struc­tu­re: Data that is rele­vant for access to the rail net­work, CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties and last-mile ser­vices, for exam­p­le, must be available to all users in a trans­pa­rent and user-fri­end­ly man­ner and be easy to find. The data must be made publicly acces­si­ble in a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry man­ner, i.e. com­ple­te, cor­rect and free of con­tra­dic­tions. MODI can make a signi­fi­cant con­tri­bu­ti­on to this.

MODI and open data in gene­ral also streng­then non-dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on through increased trans­pa­ren­cy, equal tre­at­ment and the pos­si­bi­li­ty of third-party par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on. Open data thus pro­mo­tes eco­no­mic effi­ci­en­cy and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ta­ti­on by streng­thening com­pe­ti­ti­on. The poten­ti­al for inno­va­ti­on in the sec­tor is increased. The pri­va­te­ly ope­ra­ted web­site www.puenktlichkeit.ch, for exam­p­le, allows insightful com­pa­ri­sons to be made on the punc­tua­li­ty of trains.

Mrs Danioth, thank you very much for this interview!

Bei­trag Teilen: