In the spring, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes’ Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (KVF‑S) took up the total revi­si­on of the Goods Trans­port Act (GüTG) and trig­ge­red ground-brea­king dis­cus­sions on Swiss dome­stic goods trans­port in Par­lia­ment. Tog­e­ther with other stake­hol­ders, we at the VAP will help shape this deba­te. Our aim is to find a workab­le com­pro­mi­se and to empha­sise the inte­rests of our members.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Good news for parliament
  • First pro­po­sals from the KVF‑S
  • Lively dia­lo­gue bet­ween the stake­hol­ders concerned
  • Chal­lenges for the eco­no­my and Euro­pean logi­stics as a whole
  • Pain thres­hold reached
  • This is the way forward

 

Good news for parliament

On 9 Febru­ary 2024, the Swiss Fede­ral Coun­cil published its dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act (total revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Act on the Trans­port of Goods by Rail and Ship­ping Com­pa­nies). In our view, par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on should be paid to the fol­lo­wing finan­cial aspects

  • Ope­ra­ting char­ges: In order to main­tain sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV) at the cur­rent nati­on­wi­de level during the con­ver­si­on phase, the Fede­ral Coun­cil plans to sub­si­di­se it finan­ci­al­ly on a degres­si­ve basis for a limi­t­ed peri­od of eight years. At the end of this peri­od, the aim is to achie­ve self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy. It is reques­t­ing CHF 260 mil­li­on for the first four years.
    More on this in the freight trans­port factsheet.
  • Incen­ti­ves for ship­pers: The plan is to intro­du­ce unli­mi­t­ed tran­ship­ment and loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons and to com­pen­sa­te for the unco­ver­ed costs of the orde­red freight trans­port ser­vices for a total of CHF 60 mil­li­on per year.
Initial proposals of the KVF‑S

The KVF‑S, as the preli­mi­na­ry advi­so­ry com­mit­tee of the First Coun­cil, adopted the total revi­si­on of the GüTG this spring after con­sul­ting the indus­try, inclu­ding the VAP. The dis­cus­sions in par­lia­ment over the coming weeks and months will be ground­brea­king for the future of rail freight trans­port across the coun­try. In its detail­ed deli­be­ra­ti­ons, the com­mit­tee exami­ned num­e­rous points. The majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee is of the opi­ni­on that the total revi­si­on of the GüTG is sui­ta­ble for ensu­ring and impro­ving sus­tainable inter­ac­tion bet­ween the various modes of trans­port for Swiss trans­port poli­cy. It sug­gests making the fol­lo­wing chan­ges to the content:

  • Expli­cit streng­thening of com­pe­ti­ti­on in freight transport
  • Clear regu­la­ti­on of RailCom’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for revie­w­ing and enfor­cing the non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry pro­vi­si­on of EWLV services
  • Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­on of the con­tent of the gui­de­lines for rail freight trans­port (basis for the ser­vice agree­ment in the EWLV)
  • Trans­fer of aut­ho­ri­ty to extend cer­tain pro­vi­si­ons (in par­ti­cu­lar com­pen­sa­ti­on) from the Fede­ral Coun­cil to Parliament

The com­mit­tee is expec­ted to fina­li­se the detail­ed dis­cus­sion with addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on from the admi­nis­tra­ti­on at its next mee­ting. The mat­ter will then go to the ple­na­ry ses­si­on of the Coun­cil of States.

Lively dialogue between the stakeholders concerned

Over the past few weeks, we have held dis­cus­sions – with the sup­port of our mem­bers – with the stake­hol­ders of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) and the SBB Cargo sub­si­dia­ry of Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBB). Alex­an­der Muhm, CEO of SBB Cargo, pre­sen­ted the rough con­cept for a trans­for­ma­ti­on towards self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy to the VAP’s Exe­cu­ti­ve Com­mit­tee. Muhm’s pre­sen­ta­ti­on trig­ge­red an inten­si­ve dis­cus­sion bet­ween the par­ties invol­ved and fur­ther talks on the pos­si­bi­li­ties and risks.

Challenges for the economy and European logistics as a whole

A look at the sta­tis­tics shows that the trans­fer figu­res in Switz­er­land and Euro­pe are sta­gna­ting or even shrin­king slight­ly. There are many reasons for this. In Ger­ma­ny, there is great uncer­tain­ty about poten­ti­al invest­ment pro­gram­mes and the timing of a noti­ceable eco­no­mic upturn. Italy and France are strugg­ling with mode­st growth figu­res and high levels of debt. This, com­bi­ned with con­su­mer sen­ti­ment, is having a direct impact on com­pa­nies and their finan­cial situation.

In logi­stics, in addi­ti­on to the clo­sure of the Suez Canal or natu­ral dis­as­ters, there are other enorm­ous chal­lenges such as major con­s­truc­tion sites (e.g. on the Ger­man rail net­work) and cor­re­spon­ding diver­si­on traf­fic or hig­her track pri­ces. All of this is fuel­ling ope­ra­ting costs and put­ting pres­su­re on the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail­ways. The state of over­all Euro­pean logi­stics is important inso­far as the majo­ri­ty of goods used in Switz­er­land ori­gi­na­te from abroad and influence the EWLV in and through Switzerland.

Pain threshold reached

Since our foun­da­ti­on, we have been com­mit­ted to attrac­ti­ve, com­pe­ti­ti­ve and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted rail freight trans­port and thus to the best pos­si­ble modal shift to rail. We are com­mit­ted to this goal eit­her as a part­ner to num­e­rous freight trans­port stake­hol­ders or with our own ideas and pro­jects. In trans­port poli­cy, we advo­ca­te suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ty on all infra­struc­tures, favoura­ble logi­stics loca­ti­ons and sen­si­ble frame­work conditions.

In view of glo­bal com­pe­ti­ti­on and the cur­rent frame­work con­di­ti­ons for the Swiss eco­no­my, the ship­ping indus­try as our mem­ber­ship does not have to or can­not afford mas­si­ve­ly hig­her costs on the rail­way. Our mem­bers can no lon­ger cushion the impact of mista­kes such as the lack of (invest­ment) stra­tegy in the area of rol­ling stock over the last 20 years, the ongo­ing dis­mant­ling of infra­struc­tu­re faci­li­ties (dis­mant­ling of tracks, con­s­truc­tion of invest­ment pro­per­ties) or insuf­fi­ci­ent inte­gra­ti­on into over­all con­cepts from the per­spec­ti­ve of users and cus­to­mers. The con­se­quen­ces of such mista­kes, such as mas­si­ve price increa­ses (bey­ond infla­ti­on), are fatal for the eco­no­my and socie­ty. The com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail com­pared to road is dwind­ling and the opti­mi­sa­ti­on of the modal split is being thrown into dis­ar­ray. In addi­ti­on, incre­asing cost sha­ring for the ope­ra­tio­nal use of ser­vice points can send the wrong signals.

For our mem­bers, the pain thres­hold has long since been rea­ched. We are pre­pared to pro­vi­de signi­fi­cant sup­port for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment and trans­for­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port. Pro­vi­ded that those respon­si­ble ensu­re com­ple­te trans­pa­ren­cy regar­ding costs and their break­down and take mea­su­res within a fair, com­pa­ti­ble and har­mo­nis­ed framework.

The way forward

We are taking the fin­dings from the num­e­rous dis­cus­sions with the KVF‑S and other stake­hol­ders as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to initia­te num­e­rous acti­vi­ties within our mem­ber­ship and orga­ni­se fur­ther coor­di­na­ti­on mee­tings. Anyo­ne who would like to talk to us about logi­stics as the back­bone of the Swiss eco­no­my is cor­di­al­ly invi­ted to join the dialogue.

Bei­trag Teilen: