The Natio­nal Council’s Preli­mi­na­ry Con­sul­ta­ti­on Com­mit­tee (KVF‑N) is pro­po­sing that the Coun­cil appro­ve the cre­dits for the intro­duc­tion of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK) and the tem­po­ra­ry com­pen­sa­ti­on for sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV), inclu­ding the orde­ring of freight trans­port, as part of its 24.017 busi­ness. It also makes some cru­cial cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons to the legal text: Com­pe­ti­ti­on is to be pro­mo­ted more inten­si­ve­ly and cross-sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on bet­ween sub­si­di­sed and self-sub­si­di­sed ser­vices is to be pre­ven­ted through the dis­clo­sure of key figu­res and finan­cial flows in the annu­al reports of the rail freight com­pa­nies. In addi­ti­on, the KVF‑N wants to expli­cit­ly include inland water­way trans­port in the draft law in order to crea­te more legal certainty.

On the other hand, the goal of incre­asing the share of rail freight trans­port added to the law is not very effec­ti­ve. This mes­sa­ge should rather be direc­ted at the mar­ket-domi­na­ting, state-owned SBB, which con­ti­nues to drive traf­fic away from the rail­ways with its cur­rent offer and pri­cing policy.This under­mi­nes the last of the cus­to­mers’ trust in the effi­ci­en­cy and will of the state railway.In fact, the mea­su­res envi­sa­ged in the pro­po­sal are more effec­ti­ve than ambi­tious targets:Rail freight trans­port can gain mar­ket share through the plan­ned digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and the trans­for­ma­ti­on from a 19th cen­tu­ry sys­tem into the 21st cen­tu­ry.
The increased pro­mo­ti­on of com­pe­ti­ti­on bet­ween rail freight com­pa­nies, in com­bi­na­ti­on with the tem­po­ra­ry com­pen­sa­ti­on for EWLV, could soon lead to a broa­der range of ser­vices and gro­wing mar­ket share for rail. In this respect, the more pre­cise pro­po­sals of the KVF‑N are likely to be far more effec­ti­ve than non-bin­ding modal shift tar­gets, which are also con­tra­ry to the constitution.

Reg­rett­ab­ly, the pro­po­sals for more trans­pa­ren­cy and com­pe­ti­ti­on in the con­s­truc­tion and ope­ra­ti­on of tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties did not recei­ve a majority.

Bei­trag Teilen: