129 new locomotives for SBB Cargo: how does it work?

129 new locomotives for SBB Cargo: how does it work?

SBB Cargo wants to renew its fleet with up to 129 modern main­line loco­mo­ti­ves by 2035. At the same time, it is com­plai­ning about high fixed costs in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV), has increased its pri­ces exces­si­ve­ly over the last few months and redu­ced its range of ser­vices. This har­bours the acute dan­ger of a shift back to the road. We at the VAP are ques­tio­ning the large order and deman­ding more transparency.

That’s the point:

  • SBB Cargo is inves­t­ing in the future of rail freight transport
  • Price increa­ses and ser­vice cuts are dri­ving away rail freight customers
  • VAP ques­ti­ons eco­no­mic reaso­ning and demands transparency

 

SBB Cargo is investing in the future of rail freight transport

SBB Cargo wants to moder­ni­se its fleet and thus secu­re the future of rail freight trans­port. In a press release dated 26 Sep­tem­ber 2024, it announ­ced the pro­cu­re­ment of up to 129 new main­line loco­mo­ti­ves. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are to be deli­ver­ed bet­ween 2027 and 2035 and will replace the out­da­ted trac­tion vehic­les. SBB Cargo pres­ents its decis­i­on as a neces­si­ty to make rail freight trans­port fit for the future, which is to be wel­co­med. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are more effi­ci­ent, more powerful and equip­ped with inno­va­ti­ve tech­no­lo­gies such as a bat­tery drive for last-mile trans­port. In this way, SBB Cargo aims to redu­ce ope­ra­ting costs by 60% and con­tri­bu­te to the auto­ma­ti­on of freight transport.

Price increases and reduction in services drive away railway customers

We at the VAP are asking our­sel­ves a key ques­ti­on: how does the large-scale pro­cu­re­ment of 129 loco­mo­ti­ves fit in with SBB Cargo’s cur­rent busi­ness deve­lo­p­ment and prac­ti­ces? In recent months, SBB Cargo has con­fron­ted its rail freight cus­to­mers with mas­si­ve price increa­ses and a reduc­tion in ser­vices (see VAP blog artic­le «Total revi­si­on of the GüTG: The mood in the indus­try threa­tens to tip». This mar­ket-dis­tort­ing beha­viour could result in a reduc­tion in rail freight volu­mes and an increased shift to road trans­port. If this actual­ly hap­pens, such an exten­si­ve invest­ment can­not be justified.

VAP questions economic reasoning and demands transparency

Unfort­u­na­te­ly, SBB Cargo is kee­ping a low pro­fi­le on the ope­ra­tio­nal and finan­cial effects of the major pro­ject. This is not exact­ly con­du­ci­ve to con­fi­dence in the state-owned freight trans­port sub­si­dia­ry. After all, we are tal­king about invest­ments in the three-digit mil­li­on range, which must be borne by the rail freight cus­to­mers under the pre­mi­se of eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty. We the­r­e­fo­re con­sider it essen­ti­al that SBB Cargo dis­c­lo­ses its con­side­ra­ti­ons. Fur­ther­mo­re, we sug­gest that it recon­sider the num­ber of loco­mo­ti­ves and con­sider lea­sing or par­ti­al­ly purcha­sing more loco­mo­ti­ves as a sup­ple­ment to the purchase.

The digitalisation of rail freight transport is picking up speed

The digitalisation of rail freight transport is picking up speed

Poli­ti­ci­ans are adap­ting the frame­work con­di­ti­ons for the migra­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK) and the tech­no­lo­gy for the future stan­dard is being defi­ned step by step. Switz­er­land is har­mo­ni­s­ing its intro­duc­tion pro­cess with that in Euro­pe. As indus­try play­ers, we at the VAP want to drive for­ward the aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on for com­mer­cial trans­port and are the­r­e­fo­re taking on a key role in the coor­di­na­ti­on and docu­men­ta­ti­on of the cor­re­spon­ding projects.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Coun­cil of Sta­tes gives green light for DAK and sin­gle wagon­load transport
  • GüTG har­mo­nis­ed with Euro­pean timetable
  • Tech­no­lo­gy must prove its­elf as a standard
  • Swiss indus­try takes on pio­nee­ring role
  • Two stages, one goal: net­wor­king with the future
  • VAP trans­forms expe­ri­ence into prac­ti­cal solutions

 

Council of States gives green light for DAK and single wagonload transport

The deve­lo­p­ments sur­roun­ding the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port are lite­ral­ly run­ning on seve­ral tracks. A cour­se was set in the poli­ti­cal pro­cess on 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024. On this day in the autumn ses­si­on of the Swiss par­lia­ment, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes dis­cus­sed the total revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act and appro­ved the CHF 180 mil­li­on cre­dit com­mit­ment for the intro­duc­tion of the DAK as well as the CHF 260 mil­li­on cre­dit com­mit­ment for the moder­ni­sa­ti­on of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. The First Coun­cil has thus taken up the most important key points of the Fede­ral Council’s dis­patch of 10 Janu­ary 2024 and, with a broad majo­ri­ty, has expli­cit­ly spo­ken out in favour of the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of freight trans­port with the inno­va­ti­on that has been refi­ned over many years. Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Albert Rösti said in his speech to the full Coun­cil: «In addi­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling, fur­ther con­cre­te moder­ni­sa­ti­on steps should be taken, such as boo­king plat­forms.» We explain why this com­ment reflects a holi­stic per­spec­ti­ve on the DAK in our blog post «Data eco­sys­tems: Indus­try round table with Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Rösti» .

GüTG harmonised with European roadmap

The plan­ning of the revi­sed GüTG and the cor­re­spon­ding ordi­nan­ce har­mo­ni­s­es with the Euro­pean road­map. They are expec­ted to come into force bet­ween the end of 2026 and the begin­ning of 2027. The bud­get­ed fede­ral funds for DAC migra­ti­on will then be available. The stake­hol­ders of the Euro­pean DAC Deli­very Pro­gram­me (EDDP) of Europe’s Rail want to roll out DAC migra­ti­on on a large scale from 2028. This imple­men­ta­ti­on pro­gram­me brings tog­e­ther rail­way under­ta­kings, infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers, wagon kee­pers and the rail sup­p­ly indus­try, main­ten­an­ce bodies, indus­try orga­ni­sa­ti­ons, rail rese­arch cen­tres and poli­ti­cal insti­tu­ti­ons. This inte­gra­ted joint pro­gram­me builds on rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment results and pilot pro­jects and aims to ensu­re the neces­sa­ry mea­su­res for a rapid, tech­ni­cal­ly and eco­no­mic­al­ly fea­si­ble Euro­pe-wide DAC roll-out.

Technology must prove itself as a standard

In order to achie­ve this ambi­tious goal, a deve­lo­ped and ope­ra­tio­nal­ly pro­ven tech­no­lo­gy is requi­red. Here, too, the EDDP has alre­a­dy done con­sidera­ble ground­work and com­mu­ni­ca­ted the «DAC Basis Packa­ge» as the future sys­tem stan­dard for Euro­pean rail freight trans­port at the begin­ning of 2024. The EDDP envi­sa­ges pilot trains throug­hout Euro­pe to refi­ne and com­pre­hen­si­ve­ly test the tech­no­lo­gy of the «DAC Basis Packa­ge». The star­ter packa­ge con­ta­ins the fol­lo­wing components:

  • DAC (mechanical/pneumatic) inclu­ding energy/data system
  • Reco­g­nis­ing the train composition
  • Auto­ma­tic brake test
  • Train com­ple­ten­ess test
  • Auto­ma­tic uncou­pling (in the train from the loco­mo­ti­ve or from the car­ria­ge side)

An important sys­tem decis­i­on is still pen­ding: For the data trans­mis­si­on tech­no­lo­gy in the train, the opti­ons Sin­gle via Ether­net and Power­line+ are in the final sel­ec­tion. As suc­cessful tests with Power­line+ have alre­a­dy been car­ri­ed out in Switz­er­land, a pilot train with this tech­no­lo­gy that is ready for appr­oval is now to be rea­li­sed in the near future.

Swiss industry takes on pioneering role

Switz­er­land wants to make a sub­stan­ti­al con­tri­bu­ti­on to the Euro­pean DAK deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject coor­di­na­ted by the EDDP and coor­di­na­te it clo­se­ly with the EDDP’s Euro­pean orga­ni­sa­ti­ons. The Swiss rail­way indus­try is the­r­e­fo­re pre­pa­ring to push ahead with sys­tem inte­gra­ti­on for the appr­oval of com­mer­cial appli­ca­ti­ons. The tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons and func­tion­al scope of the «DAC Basis Packa­ge» and the Power­line+ trans­mis­si­on tech­no­lo­gy form the basis for the Swiss pro­ject team’s fur­ther work. Accor­din­gly, the FOT, VAP and VöV will extend their joint­ly signed decla­ra­ti­on of intent on auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port accordingly.

Two stages, one goal: networking with the future

Switzerland’s con­tri­bu­ti­on to the intro­duc­tion of DAK will take place in two stages. First­ly, sys­tem inte­gra­ti­on on the Swiss pio­neer train is to be dri­ven for­ward rapidly until it is ready for appr­oval and its sui­ta­bi­li­ty for ever­y­day use will then be demons­tra­ted in com­mer­cial ope­ra­ti­ons. The fede­ral govern­ment will sup­port the deve­lo­p­ment with fun­ding in accordance with Artic­le 10 of the Goods Trans­port Act.

  • The EP3 deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject to rea­li­se the appr­oval of a first pio­neer train with the «DAC Basic Packa­ge» func­tions has begun. The aim is to obtain a FOT ope­ra­ting licence for defi­ned com­mer­cial jour­neys on the Swiss stan­dard-gauge net­work by mid-2026. To this end, around 30 moti­va­ted Swiss­rail mem­bers, SBB Cargo, the FOT and VAP repre­sen­ta­ti­ves announ­ced their inten­ti­on on 30 August 2024 to joint­ly make rail freight trans­port com­pe­ti­ti­ve and pro­mo­te Swiss DAC tech­no­lo­gy to the out­side world. With EP3, the indus­try play­ers want to play a key role in defi­ning the future Euro­pean stan­dard for rail freight trans­port. It is now time to move bey­ond fun­da­men­tal dis­cus­sions and deve­lop ope­ra­tio­nal­ly via­ble solu­ti­ons. The new sys­tems must be robust, sui­ta­ble for ever­y­day use and afforda­ble so that goods trains can ope­ra­te suc­cessful­ly in the future.
  • Fol­lo­wing the com­ple­ti­on of EP3, the EP4 deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject aims to bring seve­ral DAK trains onto the Swiss rail sys­tem for com­mer­cial jour­neys in the peri­od from 2026 to 2027. Initi­al dis­cus­sions with ship­pers have alre­a­dy taken place. Iso­la­ted trans­port ope­ra­ti­ons are being sought that are sui­ta­ble for an early DAK con­ver­si­on as pio­neer trains. The aim of this second stage is to gather ope­ra­ting expe­ri­ence and fur­ther opti­mi­sa­ti­on in real ope­ra­ti­ons. The pio­neer trains are inten­ded to give stake­hol­ders and inves­tors invol­ved a con­cre­te pic­tu­re of the future pos­si­bi­li­ties with DAC and the asso­cia­ted digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight transport.
VAP transforms experience into practical solutions

We at the VAP will coor­di­na­te and docu­ment the afo­re­men­tio­ned pro­jects for all inte­res­ted par­ties and stake­hol­ders. In this way, we want to ensu­re a broad exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence and full prac­ti­ca­bi­li­ty right down to the sidings and logi­stics of the eco­no­my. Our mem­bers – above all the ship­pers and wagon kee­pers – are actively invol­ved in both stages of deve­lo­p­ment. In this way, fin­dings from pilot pro­jects can be sca­led and syn­er­gies can be uti­li­sed for all indus­try players.

Autumn session 2024: transport policy on the agenda

Autumn session 2024: transport policy on the agenda

In the autumn ses­si­on from 9 to 27 Sep­tem­ber 2024, Par­lia­ment dis­cus­sed various trans­port poli­cy issues. Par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on was paid to the revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG). This bill stands in stark con­trast to SBB Cargo’s de facto solo effort.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Rail infra­struc­tu­re 2025–2028
  • Rösti and Bur­kart warn against dra­stic tariff increases
  • Fur­ther finan­cial injec­tion for SBB
  • Relo­ca­ti­on tar­gets for the expan­si­on of the NEAT fee­der lines

 

Maintain and further develop rail infrastructure from 2025 to 2028

On 23 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Natio­nal Coun­cil was the first cham­ber to dis­cuss Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­sal 24.045 ‘Finan­cing the ope­ra­ti­on and main­ten­an­ce of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re, sys­tem tasks in this area and invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties in the years 2025–2028’. On 15 May 2024, the Fede­ral Coun­cil reques­ted a total pay­ment frame­work of CHF 16.442 bil­li­on for the upco­ming tasks, around CHF 2 bil­li­on more than in the pre­vious period.

With this pro­po­sal, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is set­ting the tar­gets for the ope­ra­ti­on, main­ten­an­ce and tech­ni­cal deve­lo­p­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re finan­ced by the fede­ral govern­ment for the years 2025 to 2028. For the third time, finan­cing will come enti­re­ly from the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund (BIF). The Natio­nal Coun­cil appro­ved the cre­dit while rejec­ting a mino­ri­ty moti­on to increase the cre­dit by 500 million.

At the same time, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­sed exten­ding the exis­ting frame­work cre­dit for invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties by one year from 2021 to 2024. This is becau­se the rea­li­sa­ti­on of major pro­jects has been delayed.It also envi­sa­ges a four-year com­mit­ment cre­dit of CHF 185 mil­li­on for invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to faci­li­ties for the hand­ling of goods in com­bi­ned trans­port (CT) and to sidings. This is to be used to finan­ce the con­s­truc­tion, expan­si­on and rene­wal of the fol­lo­wing components:

  • CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties and sidings in Switz­er­land that com­ply with the con­cept for the trans­port of goods by rail in accordance with Artic­le 3 GüTG
  • CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties abroad that are neces­sa­ry to achie­ve the modal shift objec­ti­ve in accordance with Artic­le 3 GVVG
  • Port faci­li­ties for the tran­ship­ment of CT goods

The Natio­nal Coun­cil appro­ved the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sal by 194 votes to 1. The mat­ter will now go to the Coun­cil of States.

Controversial developments in the debate on rail freight transport

On 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes was the first cham­ber to dis­cuss the total revi­si­on of the GüTG. We repor­ted on the latest deve­lo­p­ments in our blog post «Deba­te on Swiss rail freight trans­port threa­tens to derail».

With the revi­si­on, the legis­la­tor wants to enable more com­pe­ti­ti­on on the rail­ways, streng­then sin­gle wagon­load trans­port and pre­vent mar­ket-dis­tort­ing dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on. It wants to moder­ni­se the out­da­ted sys­tem through auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, con­ti­nue to pro­vi­de finan­cial sup­port for the con­s­truc­tion and rene­wal of pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties and reim­bur­se the HVF to freight pay­ers as a new hand­ling fee.

After a detail­ed dis­cus­sion, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes voted in favour of the bill by 35 votes to 3 with 3 abstentions.

This decis­i­on is in the con­text of the cur­rent mood of Swiss rail freight cus­to­mers. SBB sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo has been caus­ing con­s­ter­na­ti­on among ship­pers for seve­ral weeks with dis­pro­por­tio­na­te price increa­ses – while offe­ring the same or worse ser­vices. The con­se­quen­ces of this con­tro­ver­si­al beha­viour are fatal. Many pri­va­te-sec­tor ship­pers are being forced to shift up to 10% of their freight trans­port volu­me back to the roads becau­se trans­port by rail is no lon­ger pro­fi­ta­ble. SBB Cargo, on the other hand, offers no wil­ling­ness to dis­cuss the deve­lo­p­ment of alternatives.This beha­viour con­tra­dicts the efforts of the GüTG revi­si­on and the con­sen­sus that was agreed bet­ween poli­ti­ci­ans, busi­ness and the state rail­way befo­re the par­lia­men­ta­ry con­sul­ta­ti­on. In his speech, Coun­cil­lor of Sta­tes Thier­ry Bur­kart, FDP/AG, who is also Pre­si­dent of ASTAG, empha­sis­ed that SBB’s pri­cing poli­cy is not only geared towards what is per­haps neces­sa­ry, but also towards what is pos­si­ble in the mar­ket in order to avoid a shift back to road trans­port despi­te sub­si­dies. In his speech, Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Rösti also refer­red to three key ele­ments in this con­text: loa­ding flat rates, increased effi­ci­en­cy and pri­ces, which should be opti­mi­sed. These three areas are nee­ded to ensu­re pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty in the end and to pre­vent any relo­ca­ti­on. Based on his dis­cus­sions with important ship­pers, he belie­ves that the situa­ti­on can be cal­med to some ext­ent and a solu­ti­on found.

Further financial injection for the Swiss Federal Railways

On 11 and 19 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and on 16 and 23 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Natio­nal Coun­cil again dis­cus­sed the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sed amend­ments to the Fede­ral Act on Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBBG). After the last dis­cus­sion, dif­fe­ren­ces remain­ed regar­ding Art. 20 on finan­cing instru­ments. SBB should now be able to finan­ce invest­ments out­side the area of the Infra­struc­tu­re divi­si­on entit­led to com­pen­sa­ti­on by means of inte­rest-bea­ring and repa­ya­ble loans from the Fede­ral Tre­asu­ry as long as it com­pli­es with the net debt requi­re­ments defi­ned in the Fede­ral Council’s stra­te­gic objec­ti­ves. If SBB’s bor­ro­wing requi­re­ments for these invest­ments exceed the net debt requi­re­ments set out in para. 1, they must be cover­ed by capi­tal con­tri­bu­ti­ons from the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on. The Fede­ral Coun­cil shall apply to the Fede­ral Assem­bly for the neces­sa­ry capi­tal injec­tions as part of its budget.

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes came to the con­clu­si­on that the finan­cial sup­port for SBB should be redu­ced. In the second round of deli­be­ra­ti­ons on Wed­nes­day, it voted in favour of a reduc­tion to CHF 850 mil­li­on wit­hout oppo­si­ti­on and then released the spen­ding brake. Mari­an­ne Maret (centre/VS), Pre­si­dent of the Trans­port Com­mit­tee, explai­ned that SBB had reco­ver­ed more quick­ly from the cri­sis, while the fede­ral government’s finan­cial situa­ti­on was dete­rio­ra­ting. The Natio­nal Coun­cil fol­lo­wed the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and appro­ved the redu­ced capi­tal sub­s­idy for SBB. It also iro­ned out the dif­fe­ren­ces on loans by agre­e­ing to a more fle­xi­ble upper limit for vault loans.

The Coun­cils’ decis­i­ons must be view­ed in a broa­der con­text. In order to res­to­re balan­ce to the finan­cial imba­lan­ce of the fede­ral ope­ra­ti­on, a majo­ri­ty of the Natio­nal Coun­cil agreed in the 2023 win­ter ses­si­on to grant SBB a one-off capi­tal injec­tion in the amount of the long-distance trans­port los­ses of CHF 1.15 bil­li­on to redu­ce debt. Sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo, which has alre­a­dy recei­ved exten­si­ve finan­cial sup­port in the wake of the Covid pan­de­mic, will also bene­fit from this finan­cial injec­tion. It is about to con­clude a ser­vice agree­ment to com­pen­sa­te for its net­work traf­fic, which it obvious­ly can­not hand­le on its own. The pri­va­te sec­tor play­ers, on the other hand, have neither recei­ved Covid funds nor do they have non-essen­ti­al resour­ces and invest­ments to streng­then their invest­ment capacity.

Balance sought between modal shift targets for the expansion of the NEAT feeder lines

The three moti­ons 24.3389 «Advan­cing the expan­si­on of the NRLA fee­der lines on the left bank of the Rhine in the inte­rests of modal shift», 24.3390 «Sta­bi­li­sing com­bi­ned trans­port on the north-south axis by pro­vi­ding buf­fer tracks» and 24.3391 «For a grea­ter modal shift to medi­um trans­port distances» came befo­re the Coun­cil of Sta­tes on 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024. The sub­mit­ting Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons wants to opti­mi­se the fee­der lines to the NRLA.

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopted the first two moti­ons, but rejec­ted the third. Their adop­ti­on pre­sup­po­sed a modal shift man­da­te for dome­stic traf­fic as well, which is not pro­vi­ded for in the constitution.

In prin­ci­ple, we wel­co­me effi­ci­ent rou­ting on the north-south cor­ri­dor in terms of secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly, alter­na­ti­ve capa­ci­ties in the event of road­works, punc­tua­li­ty and qua­li­ty of rail freight trans­port. VAP Pre­si­dent and mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes Josef Ditt­li alre­a­dy expres­sed this opi­ni­on at the anni­ver­sa­ry mee­ting with for­mer Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Adolf Ogi in autumn 2021 (see blog post «25 years of the “Trea­ty of Luga­no” – a look into the future»).

Howe­ver, we cri­ti­cise the one-sided focus of the moti­ons on CT. Those respon­si­ble for the modal shift are thus miss­ing the oppor­tu­ni­ty to pro­mo­te other forms of mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port bey­ond sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. This is in clear con­trast to the joint poli­cy of the DACH sta­tes (Ger­ma­ny-Aus­tria-Switz­er­land) to rapidly intro­du­ce digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK). Fur­ther­mo­re, the moti­ons con­tra­dict the revi­si­on of the GüTG (see above), as they pur­sue envi­ron­men­tal and ener­gy poli­cy objec­ti­ves not only in import, export and dome­stic trans­port, but also in transit.

We at the VAP demand that the Fede­ral Coun­cil also cla­ri­fy and pre­sent the poten­ti­al with other mul­ti­mo­dal modes of trans­port in the next modal shift report. Qua­li­ty moni­to­ring should also be intro­du­ced for con­ven­tio­nal goods trains, as has been the case in CT for years. The distinc­tion bet­ween com­bi­ned and con­ven­tio­nal trans­port must be abo­lished. The GüTG intro­du­ces finan­cial sup­port for import, export and dome­stic trans­port. In tran­sit, howe­ver, only unac­com­pa­nied CT (UCT) should con­ti­nue to recei­ve finan­cial sup­port. We belie­ve that this approach is not com­pa­ti­ble with the objec­ti­ves of the GüTG. This is becau­se the con­sti­tu­tio­nal man­da­te in the Güter­ver­kehrs­ver­la­ge­rungs­ge­setz (GVVG) defi­nes the modal shift in tran­sit as a shift to rail, not to UCT. Only Art. 8 GVVG intro­du­ces the addi­ti­on ‘pri­ma­ri­ly’ for the pro­mo­ti­on of UCT, to the detri­ment of other mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons with a rail com­po­nent (see box).

Art. GVVG Pro­mo­ti­on of rail freight trans­port (ver­si­on in accordance with No. I of the Fede­ral Act of 16 June 2023, in force since 1 Jan. 2024)

1 In order to achie­ve the modal shift objec­ti­ve, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may adopt sup­port mea­su­res. These mea­su­res pri­ma­ri­ly pro­mo­te unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port. These mea­su­res must not have any dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry effects on Swiss and for­eign trans­port com­pa­nies in freight transport.amit das Ver­la­ge­rungs­ziel erreicht wird, kann der Bund För­der­mass­nah­men beschlies­sen. Dabei wird in ers­ter Linie der unbe­glei­te­te kom­bi­nier­te Ver­kehr geför­dert. Diese Mass­nah­men dür­fen keine dis­kri­mi­nie­ren­den Aus­wir­kun­gen auf die schwei­ze­ri­schen und aus­län­di­schen Trans­port­un­ter­neh­men im Güter­ver­kehr haben.

2 In unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port, the avera­ge level of com­pen­sa­ti­on per con­sign­ment trans­por­ted must decrease from year to year.

3 Accom­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port (Rol­ling High­way) may be sub­si­di­sed until the end of 2028.

4 The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may con­tri­bu­te to the operator’s liqui­da­ti­on costs in the year fol­lo­wing the ces­sa­ti­on of Rol­ling High­way operations.

 

Total revision of the GüTG: The mood in the industry threatens to tip over

Total revision of the GüTG: The mood in the industry threatens to tip over

The Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes (KVF‑S) has con­cluded its deli­be­ra­ti­ons on the total revi­si­on of the Goods Trans­port Act (GüTG). Like the Fede­ral Coun­cil, it wants to impro­ve the frame­work con­di­ti­ons in favour of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. Howe­ver, SBB Cargo’s cur­rent beha­viour, with mas­si­ve price increa­ses and a reduc­tion in ser­vices, con­tra­dicts these efforts and puts ship­pers in a dan­ge­rous dilemma.

This is the issue:

  • What has hap­pen­ed so far
  • A clear yes to mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty and competition
  • Con­tro­ver­si­al beha­viour of SBB Cargo
  • The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has a duty
  • Tog­e­ther out of the dilemma

 

What has happened so far

We have alre­a­dy repor­ted in detail on the KVF‑S’s initi­al pro­po­sals on the Fede­ral Council’s dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act (total revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Act on Freight Trans­port by Rail and Ship­ping Com­pa­nies) in our blog post ‘Now or never: ground­brea­king deba­te on Swiss rail freight trans­port’. As com­mu­ni­ca­ted on 21 June 2024, the preli­mi­na­ry con­sul­ta­ti­on com­mit­tee wants to streng­then com­pe­ti­ti­on in freight trans­port in a tar­ge­ted man­ner, regu­la­te RailCom’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for enfor­cing a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry offer in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV) and spe­ci­fy the con­tent of the gui­de­lines for rail freight trans­port as the basis for the EWLV ser­vice agreement.

A clear yes to multimodality and competition

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes Com­mit­tee has now com­ple­ted its detail­ed deli­be­ra­ti­ons. In its latest media release dated 20 August 2024, it calls on the legis­la­tor to sti­pu­la­te in the regu­la­ti­ons that loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons are pas­sed on to ship­pers and reci­pi­ents and that inter­nal com­pa­ny ser­vices are made trans­pa­rent and monitored.Finally, a majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee sug­gests that an exten­si­on of the EWLV sub­s­idy should be deci­ded by Par­lia­ment and not by the Fede­ral Coun­cil. In this way, the KVF‑S would like to ensu­re that the finan­cial com­pe­tence and the decis­i­on on a pos­si­ble exten­si­on of sup­port are at the same level

Controversial behaviour of SBB Cargo

Ship­pers’ tem­pers are curr­ent­ly run­ning high over the beha­viour of the SBB sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo, which cle­ar­ly runs coun­ter to the efforts of the KVF‑S and the Fede­ral Council’s pre­vious state­ments. The mono­po­ly pro­vi­der demands a surchar­ge of 20% to 60% for its ser­vices – quite natu­ral­ly and wit­hout cost trans­pa­ren­cy or the pos­si­bi­li­ty of redu­cing costs from the sys­tem tog­e­ther with the rail freight ope­ra­tors. Even if the GüTG is amen­ded as pro­po­sed and the Coun­cil of Sta­tes appro­ves the pro­po­sals of the KVF‑S, there is an acute dan­ger that ship­pers will shift their trans­port ope­ra­ti­ons to the road on a large scale. As such a stra­te­gic reo­ri­en­ta­ti­on does not hap­pen over­night, they will adapt their logi­stics con­cepts over the next two years. In this case, both the bill its­elf and the fede­ral fun­ding requi­red for it would be obso­le­te – as would a par­lia­men­ta­ry deba­te on the mat­ter in the 2024 autumn session.

The federal government has a duty

In order to avoid unju­s­ti­fied mar­ket dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on and a shift to the road, ship­pers could also ori­en­ta­te their logi­stics con­cepts towards alter­na­ti­ve rail ser­vices offe­red by inno­va­ti­ve and cou­ra­ge­ous rail freight com­pa­nies and shift their trans­port volu­mes from a state mono­po­ly to mar­ket-based com­pe­ti­ti­on. This would be in line with the aim of the KVF‑S, which calls for more com­pe­ti­ti­on through ser­vice agree­ments and revi­sed gui­de­lines on EWLV. It is the­r­e­fo­re not insi­gni­fi­cant­ly the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the fede­ral govern­ment to initia­te appro­pria­te mea­su­res in the orde­ring pro­cess as soon as pos­si­ble, to invi­te pri­va­te freight rail­ways to sub­mit offers and to sup­port them in their development.

Together out of the dilemma

The indus­try must find a way out of the cur­rent dilem­ma befo­re the deba­te escala­tes. It is now up to the indus­try play­ers and the fede­ral govern­ment to work tog­e­ther to enable more com­pe­ti­ti­on and fun­da­men­tal­ly moder­ni­se the EWLV. To do this, they must work hand in hand to chan­ge the orga­ni­sa­ti­on of the EWLV sys­tem, open it up more to third-party pro­vi­ders and deve­lop it fur­ther on an equal foo­ting. The pri­va­te sec­tor has alre­a­dy come up with some attrac­ti­ve solu­ti­ons. If Par­lia­ment says yes to the pro­mo­ti­on of EWLV and thus streng­thens intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on, ship­pers and rail freight com­pa­nies could refrain from defi­ant reac­tions. Ins­tead, they could – tog­e­ther with the SBB – seize the oppor­tu­ni­ty to final­ly break away from the mono­po­li­stic EWLV and deve­lop a self-eco­no­mic, broad-based net­work offer.

Now or never: groundbreaking debate on Swiss rail freight transport

Now or never: groundbreaking debate on Swiss rail freight transport

In the spring, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes’ Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (KVF‑S) took up the total revi­si­on of the Goods Trans­port Act (GüTG) and trig­ge­red ground-brea­king dis­cus­sions on Swiss dome­stic goods trans­port in Par­lia­ment. Tog­e­ther with other stake­hol­ders, we at the VAP will help shape this deba­te. Our aim is to find a workab­le com­pro­mi­se and to empha­sise the inte­rests of our members.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Good news for parliament
  • First pro­po­sals from the KVF‑S
  • Lively dia­lo­gue bet­ween the stake­hol­ders concerned
  • Chal­lenges for the eco­no­my and Euro­pean logi­stics as a whole
  • Pain thres­hold reached
  • This is the way forward

 

Good news for parliament

On 9 Febru­ary 2024, the Swiss Fede­ral Coun­cil published its dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act (total revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Act on the Trans­port of Goods by Rail and Ship­ping Com­pa­nies). In our view, par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on should be paid to the fol­lo­wing finan­cial aspects

  • Ope­ra­ting char­ges: In order to main­tain sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV) at the cur­rent nati­on­wi­de level during the con­ver­si­on phase, the Fede­ral Coun­cil plans to sub­si­di­se it finan­ci­al­ly on a degres­si­ve basis for a limi­t­ed peri­od of eight years. At the end of this peri­od, the aim is to achie­ve self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy. It is reques­t­ing CHF 260 mil­li­on for the first four years.
    More on this in the freight trans­port factsheet.
  • Incen­ti­ves for ship­pers: The plan is to intro­du­ce unli­mi­t­ed tran­ship­ment and loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons and to com­pen­sa­te for the unco­ver­ed costs of the orde­red freight trans­port ser­vices for a total of CHF 60 mil­li­on per year.
Initial proposals of the KVF‑S

The KVF‑S, as the preli­mi­na­ry advi­so­ry com­mit­tee of the First Coun­cil, adopted the total revi­si­on of the GüTG this spring after con­sul­ting the indus­try, inclu­ding the VAP. The dis­cus­sions in par­lia­ment over the coming weeks and months will be ground­brea­king for the future of rail freight trans­port across the coun­try. In its detail­ed deli­be­ra­ti­ons, the com­mit­tee exami­ned num­e­rous points. The majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee is of the opi­ni­on that the total revi­si­on of the GüTG is sui­ta­ble for ensu­ring and impro­ving sus­tainable inter­ac­tion bet­ween the various modes of trans­port for Swiss trans­port poli­cy. It sug­gests making the fol­lo­wing chan­ges to the content:

  • Expli­cit streng­thening of com­pe­ti­ti­on in freight transport
  • Clear regu­la­ti­on of RailCom’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for revie­w­ing and enfor­cing the non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry pro­vi­si­on of EWLV services
  • Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­on of the con­tent of the gui­de­lines for rail freight trans­port (basis for the ser­vice agree­ment in the EWLV)
  • Trans­fer of aut­ho­ri­ty to extend cer­tain pro­vi­si­ons (in par­ti­cu­lar com­pen­sa­ti­on) from the Fede­ral Coun­cil to Parliament

The com­mit­tee is expec­ted to fina­li­se the detail­ed dis­cus­sion with addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on from the admi­nis­tra­ti­on at its next mee­ting. The mat­ter will then go to the ple­na­ry ses­si­on of the Coun­cil of States.

Lively dialogue between the stakeholders concerned

Over the past few weeks, we have held dis­cus­sions – with the sup­port of our mem­bers – with the stake­hol­ders of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) and the SBB Cargo sub­si­dia­ry of Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBB). Alex­an­der Muhm, CEO of SBB Cargo, pre­sen­ted the rough con­cept for a trans­for­ma­ti­on towards self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy to the VAP’s Exe­cu­ti­ve Com­mit­tee. Muhm’s pre­sen­ta­ti­on trig­ge­red an inten­si­ve dis­cus­sion bet­ween the par­ties invol­ved and fur­ther talks on the pos­si­bi­li­ties and risks.

Challenges for the economy and European logistics as a whole

A look at the sta­tis­tics shows that the trans­fer figu­res in Switz­er­land and Euro­pe are sta­gna­ting or even shrin­king slight­ly. There are many reasons for this. In Ger­ma­ny, there is great uncer­tain­ty about poten­ti­al invest­ment pro­gram­mes and the timing of a noti­ceable eco­no­mic upturn. Italy and France are strugg­ling with mode­st growth figu­res and high levels of debt. This, com­bi­ned with con­su­mer sen­ti­ment, is having a direct impact on com­pa­nies and their finan­cial situation.

In logi­stics, in addi­ti­on to the clo­sure of the Suez Canal or natu­ral dis­as­ters, there are other enorm­ous chal­lenges such as major con­s­truc­tion sites (e.g. on the Ger­man rail net­work) and cor­re­spon­ding diver­si­on traf­fic or hig­her track pri­ces. All of this is fuel­ling ope­ra­ting costs and put­ting pres­su­re on the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail­ways. The state of over­all Euro­pean logi­stics is important inso­far as the majo­ri­ty of goods used in Switz­er­land ori­gi­na­te from abroad and influence the EWLV in and through Switzerland.

Pain threshold reached

Since our foun­da­ti­on, we have been com­mit­ted to attrac­ti­ve, com­pe­ti­ti­ve and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted rail freight trans­port and thus to the best pos­si­ble modal shift to rail. We are com­mit­ted to this goal eit­her as a part­ner to num­e­rous freight trans­port stake­hol­ders or with our own ideas and pro­jects. In trans­port poli­cy, we advo­ca­te suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ty on all infra­struc­tures, favoura­ble logi­stics loca­ti­ons and sen­si­ble frame­work conditions.

In view of glo­bal com­pe­ti­ti­on and the cur­rent frame­work con­di­ti­ons for the Swiss eco­no­my, the ship­ping indus­try as our mem­ber­ship does not have to or can­not afford mas­si­ve­ly hig­her costs on the rail­way. Our mem­bers can no lon­ger cushion the impact of mista­kes such as the lack of (invest­ment) stra­tegy in the area of rol­ling stock over the last 20 years, the ongo­ing dis­mant­ling of infra­struc­tu­re faci­li­ties (dis­mant­ling of tracks, con­s­truc­tion of invest­ment pro­per­ties) or insuf­fi­ci­ent inte­gra­ti­on into over­all con­cepts from the per­spec­ti­ve of users and cus­to­mers. The con­se­quen­ces of such mista­kes, such as mas­si­ve price increa­ses (bey­ond infla­ti­on), are fatal for the eco­no­my and socie­ty. The com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail com­pared to road is dwind­ling and the opti­mi­sa­ti­on of the modal split is being thrown into dis­ar­ray. In addi­ti­on, incre­asing cost sha­ring for the ope­ra­tio­nal use of ser­vice points can send the wrong signals.

For our mem­bers, the pain thres­hold has long since been rea­ched. We are pre­pared to pro­vi­de signi­fi­cant sup­port for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment and trans­for­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port. Pro­vi­ded that those respon­si­ble ensu­re com­ple­te trans­pa­ren­cy regar­ding costs and their break­down and take mea­su­res within a fair, com­pa­ti­ble and har­mo­nis­ed framework.

The way forward

We are taking the fin­dings from the num­e­rous dis­cus­sions with the KVF‑S and other stake­hol­ders as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to initia­te num­e­rous acti­vi­ties within our mem­ber­ship and orga­ni­se fur­ther coor­di­na­ti­on mee­tings. Anyo­ne who would like to talk to us about logi­stics as the back­bone of the Swiss eco­no­my is cor­di­al­ly invi­ted to join the dialogue.

Joy at SBB, concern at SBB Cargo

Joy at SBB, concern at SBB Cargo

SBB is in excel­lent finan­cial health. This was com­mu­ni­ca­ted on 11 March 2024 with the 2023 annu­al accounts. Only sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo is still con­side­red a pro­blem child and is to recei­ve finan­cial sup­port. We at the VAP think so: This must not be tan­ta­mount to per­ma­nent sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on of sin­gle wagon­load traf­fic (EWLV). And the pro­po­sed finan­cial injec­tion of CHF 1.25 bil­li­on is inva­lid in view of the 2023 annu­al accounts.

That’s the point:

  • 2023 results: black and record-breaking
  • Eter­nal pro­blem child remains in deficit
  • Record results and bil­li­ons in aid – how does that fit together?
  • Cor­po­ra­te respon­si­bi­li­ty required

 

2023 results: black and record-breaking

1.3 mil­li­on tra­vel­lers, CHF 269 mil­li­on pro­fit, 9.9 % addi­tio­nal reve­nue from pas­sen­ger trans­port, 92.5 % punc­tua­li­ty despi­te 20,000 con­s­truc­tion sites, debt down to CHF 11.3 bil­li­on, all invest­ments finan­ced from cash flow: SBB’s 2023 finan­cial year is burs­t­ing with good news and super­la­ti­ves. For the first time in the post-Covid era, SBB is back in the black. This plea­sing per­for­mance is pri­ma­ri­ly due to a record num­ber of pas­sen­gers and sub­stan­ti­al pro­fits from SBB Real Estate. It is the­r­e­fo­re not sur­pri­sing that those respon­si­ble are loo­king to the future with confidence.

Eternal problem child remains loss-making

The finan­cial situa­ti­on in the freight trans­port divi­si­on of the re-natio­na­li­sed SBB Cargo looks much less rosy. Alt­hough the 2023 result of SBB Cargo Switz­er­land impro­ved by CHF 148 mil­li­on com­pared to the pre­vious year to minus CHF 40 mil­li­on, this is main­ly due to impairm­ents from 2022. Trans­port per­for­mance fell by 7.5 % com­pared to the pre­vious year. Accor­ding to SBB, the main dri­vers were price pres­su­re, the struc­tu­ral defi­cit in the EWLV and the eco­no­mic slowdown.

The only thing that remains unclear is how high this so-cal­led struc­tu­ral defi­cit should actual­ly be quan­ti­fied. In the poli­ti­cal deba­te, SBB speaks of CHF 80 to 100 mil­li­on, while the 2023 Annu­al Report sta­tes CHF 40 mil­li­on. Has SBB Cargo gene­ra­ted a pro­fit of CHF 40 to 60 mil­li­on in block train transport?

Record results and billions in aid – how does that fit together?

Peter Füg­lis­ta­ler, Direc­tor of the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT), gives a plau­si­ble ans­wer to this ques­ti­on in his com­ment on Lin­ke­dIn: «I don’t know». The fact that SBB is doing well finan­ci­al­ly is inde­ed com­men­da­ble. After all, ship­pers want strong part­ners in the trans­port busi­ness. Nevert­hel­ess, we at the VAP are sti­cking to our posi­ti­on: SBB Cargo’s finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties should not be con­fu­sed with the neces­sa­ry moder­ni­sa­ti­on and res­truc­tu­ring of EWLV. In Janu­ary 2024, the Fede­ral Coun­cil right­ly reques­ted mea­su­res for the moder­ni­sa­ti­on of the nati­on­wi­de EWLV in its «Mes­sa­ge on the Freight Trans­port Act» (see blog post «Set­ting the right track for inland freight trans­port by rail»). Ins­tead of a reor­ga­ni­sa­ti­on con­tri­bu­ti­on to the EWLV, we are cal­ling for tar­ge­ted, degres­si­ve and tem­po­ra­ry bridging fun­ding for a sus­tainable trans­for­ma­ti­on of the EWLV towards self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy. Only in this way can the EWLV moder­ni­se and grow.

Entrepreneurial responsibility required

Par­lia­ment is curr­ent­ly dis­cus­sing the «Dis­patch on the amend­ment of the Fede­ral Act on Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (sus­tainable finan­cing of SBB)». Accor­ding to this, the fede­ral govern­ment is to cover SBB’s pan­de­mic-rela­ted defi­ci­ts in long-distance trans­port. VAP Pre­si­dent and Coun­cil­lor of Sta­tes Josef Ditt­li com­men­ted: «Why should the fede­ral govern­ment, which has just announ­ced line­ar cuts and plans to make cuts, use tax­pay­ers’ money to sup­port a state-owned com­pa­ny that is achie­ving record results? This is where I make an urgent appeal to the cor­po­ra­te respon­si­bi­li­ty of those involved.» 

Setting the right track for inland freight transport by rail

Setting the right track for inland freight transport by rail

The Fede­ral Coun­cil released its mes­sa­ge on the Goods Trans­port Act to the Par­lia­ment in Janu­ary. It aims to moder­ni­ze the com­pre­hen­si­ve sin­gle-wagon load trans­port (EWLV) and estab­lish the foun­da­ti­on for its eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty. Despi­te various reser­va­tions, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses invest­ment sub­si­dies, tem­po­ra­ry ope­ra­ting com­pen­sa­ti­ons, and incen­ti­ves for shippers.

Key Points:

  • Fede­ral Coun­cil aims for eco­no­mic viability
  • EWLV to under­go fun­da­men­tal res­truc­tu­ring and modernization
  • Sup­port for EWLV ope­ra­ti­on during the moder­niza­ti­on phase
  • BAV cri­ti­ci­zes indus­try guidelines
  • Over­view of the proposal
  • What’s next
 
Federal Council aims for economic viability

On Janu­ary 10, 2024, the Fede­ral Coun­cil adopted the mes­sa­ge on the Goods Trans­port Act (in Ger­man) for Par­lia­ment. We, from VAP, wel­co­me the con­tin­ued pur­su­it of the favor­ed Vari­ant 1. With this pro­po­sal, the Fede­ral Coun­cil intends to moder­ni­ze rail freight trans­port tech­ni­cal­ly and orga­niza­tio­nal­ly, streng­then mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port chains, and bet­ter inte­gra­te ship­ping. The over­ar­ching goals are to enhan­ce sup­p­ly secu­ri­ty nati­on­wi­de, pro­mo­te mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty, and con­tri­bu­te to the fede­ral envi­ron­men­tal and ener­gy tar­gets. This invol­ves secu­ring cur­rent area covera­ge, gra­du­al­ly incre­asing the share of rail freight trans­port, and lay­ing the ground­work for eco­no­mic­al­ly inde­pen­dent operation.

EWLV to undergo fundamental restructuring and modernization

The basis for this is a com­pre­hen­si­ve res­truc­tu­ring of the EWLV, or net­work traf­fic, with asso­cia­ted tech­no­lo­gi­cal moder­niza­ti­on (espe­ci­al­ly digi­tiza­ti­on), inte­gra­ti­on into the Swiss logi­stics sys­tem, and the estab­lish­ment of non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on. The lat­ter is expec­ted to signi­fi­cant­ly impro­ve the qua­li­ty and effi­ci­en­cy of logi­stics ser­vices and sim­pli­fy future inno­va­tions. The pro­po­sal allo­ca­tes invest­ment funds of CHF 180 mil­li­on for the intro­duc­tion of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK). Addi­tio­nal invest­ment funds are ear­mark­ed for digi­ti­zed pro­cess opti­miza­ti­ons, data exch­an­ge plat­forms, and simi­lar initiatives.

Support for EWLV operation during the modernization phase

To main­tain cur­rent area covera­ge, the ope­ra­ti­on will be finan­ci­al­ly sup­port­ed for eight years during the moder­niza­ti­on phase. Alle­gedly unco­ver­ed costs will be cover­ed, and com­pen­sa­ti­ons will decrease in line with the pro­gress of the res­truc­tu­ring, deter­mi­ned in multi-year per­for­mance agree­ments with all freight rail­ways invol­ved in net­work traffic.

BAV criticizes industry guidelines

To ensu­re the suc­cess of this trans­for­ma­ti­on and sta­ble EWLV ope­ra­ti­on during the res­truc­tu­ring phase, the indus­try has pro­po­sed gui­de­lines for spe­ci­fic mea­su­res and sup­port cri­te­ria. Howe­ver, the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (BAV) cri­ti­ci­zes these as insuf­fi­ci­ent and demands fur­ther revi­si­ons. It par­ti­cu­lar­ly high­lights the lack of per­spec­ti­ve for a com­pre­hen­si­ve rede­sign to enhan­ce effi­ci­en­cy and uti­liza­ti­on, fore­se­e­ing a ten­den­cy towards struc­tu­ral main­ten­an­ce and fur­ther ser­vice reduc­tion. The VAP under­stands the BAV’s reser­va­tions, as the gui­de­lines repre­sent a com­pro­mi­se bet­ween ship­pers and freight rail­ways, with signi­fi­cant con­ces­si­ons made by VAP in the inte­rest of the cause. Sub­stan­ti­al revi­si­ons are now neces­sa­ry, espe­ci­al­ly from the per­spec­ti­ve of freight trans­port cus­to­mers as users of logi­stics services.

We are pre­pared to signi­fi­cant­ly sup­port fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment. A com­pre­hen­si­ve ope­ra­tio­nal con­trol sys­tem is seen as a cru­cial pre­re­qui­si­te for this trans­for­ma­ti­on, ser­ving as an eva­lua­ti­on tool for the effec­ti­ve­ness of mea­su­res and incen­ti­ves, along with the estab­lish­ment of a digi­tal plat­form. The trans­for­ma­ti­on should be metho­di­cal­ly struc­tu­red and imple­men­ted in a tar­ge­ted man­ner as a project.

Overview of the proposal
  • Invest­ment sub­si­dies: The Fede­ral Coun­cil allo­ca­tes CHF 180 mil­li­on for the intro­duc­tion of DAK, cove­ring appro­xi­m­ate­ly one-third of the res­truc­tu­ring costs. The con­ver­si­on of rol­ling stock must be coor­di­na­ted across Euro­pe and is expec­ted to be com­ple­ted by 2033. DAK is anti­ci­pa­ted to sub­stan­ti­al­ly impro­ve the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty and qua­li­ty of rail freight trans­port.
    DAK Facts­heet (PDF, 971 kB)
  • Ope­ra­ting com­pen­sa­ti­ons: To main­tain EWLV at the cur­rent com­pre­hen­si­ve level during the res­truc­tu­ring phase, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­ses to finan­ci­al­ly sup­port it for eight years on a degres­si­ve basis. By the end of this peri­od, eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty should be achie­ved. For the first four years, it requests CHF 260 mil­li­on.
    Freight Trans­port Facts­heet (PDF, 712 kB)
  • Incen­ti­ves for ship­pers: Per­ma­nent­ly plan­ned are hand­ling and loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons, along with com­pen­sa­ti­on for the unco­ver­ed costs of the orde­red freight trans­port ser­vice, tota­ling CHF 60 mil­li­on per year.

Read the com­ple­te mes­sa­ge on the Goods Trans­port Act.

What’s next
  • In the first half of 2024, open points bet­ween BAV and the indus­try will be dis­cus­sed, and gui­de­lines will be sup­ple­men­ted and cla­ri­fied accordingly.
  • Within this frame­work and fol­lo­wing the appr­oval of the revi­sed law, a ten­de­ring pro­cess for various ser­vice packa­ges within net­work traf­fic is expec­ted to start by the end of 2024.
  • Nego­tia­ti­ons on poten­ti­al per­for­mance agree­ments are plan­ned for 2025, allo­wing any sup­port mea­su­res to take effect in early 2026.

For fur­ther details, refer to this joint press release from VAP, LITRA, ASTAG, IG Kom­bi­nier­ter Ver­kehr, and VöV.

Ready for the next level of digitalisation

Ready for the next level of digitalisation

Wit­hout digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAC) there is no digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and wit­hout digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on there is no com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness. This is how the moder­ni­sa­ti­on of the rail freight sec­tor could be descri­bed. Howe­ver, it’s not quite that simp­le. Here is an over­view of the sta­tus quo and the next steps to be taken.

This is what it’s all about:

  • Com­bi­ning hard­ware and soft­ware in a tar­ge­ted manner
  • Finan­cing must pro­vi­de the initi­al spark
  • «Manage­ment Deploy­ment DAK-CH» coor­di­na­tes the migration
  • Test phase: Switz­er­land at the forefront
 
Combining hardware and software in a targeted manner

The DAK gets the com­pre­hen­si­ve digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of the rail­way rol­ling. This is becau­se it offers more than just fully auto­ma­tic cou­pling or various track­ing func­tions for indi­vi­du­al wagons. It enables a leap for­ward in Swiss rail freight trans­port by sup­p­ly­ing power and data to the enti­re train. But that’s not all. Data eco­sys­tems are also requi­red for digi­tal­ly inspi­red busi­ness models in rail freight trans­port. The state mobi­li­ty data infra­struc­tu­re «MODI» is set­ting a good exam­p­le here (see blog post «Data eco­sys­tems: Sha­ring data to dou­ble its added value»). In order to com­bi­ne hard­ware and soft­ware in such a way that the rail freight sec­tor beco­mes com­pe­ti­ti­ve in mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics, high initi­al invest­ments are requi­red. Pri­va­te com­pa­nies in the freight trans­port sec­tor will not be able to bear this alone.

Funding must provide the initial impetus

In Switz­er­land, the Fede­ral Coun­cil adopts its dis­patch on freight trans­port in Janu­ary 2024 and for­wards it to Par­lia­ment. A cen­tral com­po­nent of this bill is the fun­ding for migra­ti­on to the DAK. The Fede­ral Coun­cil envi­sa­ges a fun­ding con­tri­bu­ti­on of CHF 180 mil­li­on. The cal­cu­la­ted invest­ment volu­me for nati­on­wi­de DAC migra­ti­on in Switz­er­land amounts to CHF 500 mil­li­on. We at the VAP are taking a lea­ding role in the plan­ning of finan­cial resour­ces. The fede­ral govern­ment wants to finan­ce the MODI data eco­sys­tem for the first 10 years and then char­ge user fees. The Euro­pean Union (EU) has also yet to fund DAC migra­ti­on. The EU Com­mis­si­on intends to pro­vi­de around EUR 200 mil­li­on for the plan­ned field tests from 2026.

«Management Deployment DAK-CH» coordinates the migration

The cross-indus­try com­mit­tee «Manage­ment Deploy­ment DAK-CH» will be respon­si­ble for coor­di­na­ting the migra­ti­on imple­men­ta­ti­on in Switz­er­land. Among other things, this com­mit­tee is respon­si­ble for the acti­ve exch­an­ge with Europe’s Rail, the plan­ning of work­shop capa­ci­ties, the mate­ri­al dis­po­si­ti­on and the veri­fi­ca­ti­on of the con­ver­si­ons. It must sche­du­le the con­ver­si­on of the vehic­les in advan­ce tog­e­ther with the kee­pers, as well as with the rail­way com­pa­nies and other logi­stics play­ers. In the mean­ti­me, the rail freight com­pa­nies should deter­mi­ne their requi­re­ments for con­ver­ted wagons accor­ding to the volu­me of traffic.

Test phase: Switzerland at the forefront

The func­tions and pro­ces­ses of the DAK must be har­mo­nis­ed throug­hout Euro­pe. One mile­stone is the defi­ni­ti­on of the «Star­ter Packa­ge». This defi­nes which func­tions the DAK migra­ti­on will start with in Euro­pe. Switz­er­land is curr­ent­ly actively invol­ved in ope­ra­tio­nal tests of new sys­tems and is con­tri­bu­ting pio­nee­ring results to the Euro­pean working groups. Here is an over­view of the cur­rent tests and pro­jects with Swiss participation:

  • The EU is having the rail tech­no­lo­gy spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons drawn up for the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the «Gree­ning Freight Traf­fic Packa­ge» of the Euro­pean DAC Deli­very Pro­gram­me (EDDP). Switz­er­land is actively invol­ved here.
  • With «Power-Line-Plus», data is sent via the power sup­p­ly lines. The Lucer­ne Uni­ver­si­ty of Appli­ed Sci­en­ces and Arts is con­duc­ting ope­ra­tio­nal tests tog­e­ther with SBB Cargo and pro­vi­ding key insights into data trans­mis­si­on qua­li­ty. From 2024, proof of ope­ra­tio­nal sui­ta­bi­li­ty is to be pro­vi­ded with all the func­tions of the «Star­ter Packa­ge» and trans­mis­si­on via «Power-Line-Plus», making com­mer­cial jour­neys pos­si­ble. The FOT is sup­port­ing this deve­lo­p­ment financially.
  • From 2026, exten­si­ve field tests for the ope­ra­tio­nal sui­ta­bi­li­ty and relia­bi­li­ty of the DAK are plan­ned in Euro­pe with around 100 trains. After that, the aim is to migra­te DAK effi­ci­ent­ly, inclu­ding in Switzerland.
  • MODI con­sists of two main ele­ments: The Natio­nal Data Net­wor­king Infra­struc­tu­re Mobi­li­ty (NADIM) enables the stan­dar­di­sed exch­an­ge of mobi­li­ty data. The natio­nal geo­da­ta infra­struc­tu­re «Trans­port Net­work CH» can ensu­re a stan­dar­di­sed, digi­tal repre­sen­ta­ti­on of Switzerland’s enti­re trans­port sys­tem. MODI is curr­ent­ly only inten­ded for pas­sen­ger trans­port. Howe­ver, freight trans­port could also bene­fit from this, for exam­p­le through the digi­tal net­wor­king of public aut­ho­ri­ties, trans­port and spa­ti­al plan­ning aut­ho­ri­ties and all stake­hol­ders invol­ved. For this reason, the VAP is in close cont­act with the respon­si­ble offices of the fede­ral admi­nis­tra­ti­on in order to quick­ly inte­gra­te freight trans­port into the project.
Partial revision of SBBG: responsibility and market liberalisation further delayed

Partial revision of SBBG: responsibility and market liberalisation further delayed

The Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Natio­nal Coun­cil (KVF‑N) unani­mously sup­ports the pro­po­sal for the finan­cial sta­bi­li­sa­ti­on of the Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBBG). In con­trast to the Fede­ral Coun­cil, it is of the opi­ni­on that there is no need to chan­ge the sys­tem for gran­ting vault loans to SBB. In doing so, the KVF‑N also dis­re­gards all of the VAP’s recommendations.

This is the issue:

  • 3 bil­li­on finan­cial injec­tion for SBB
  • SBBG par­ti­al revi­si­on refer­red to the Natio­nal Council
  • The industry’s voice remains unheard
  • Still no mar­ket libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on in sight

 

3 billion financial injection for SBB

In its report of 16 Decem­ber 2022 on moti­on 22.3008 «Sup­port­ing the imple­men­ta­ti­on of SBB invest­ments and a long-term visi­on in Covid-19 times», the fede­ral govern­ment pro­po­ses to cover SBB’s defi­ci­ts in long-distance trans­port with a one-off capi­tal injec­tion of an esti­ma­ted CHF 1.25 bil­li­on. It also wants to ease the track access char­ges for long-distance trans­port with a fur­ther CHF 1.7 bil­li­on. It is also pro­po­sing a revi­si­on of the finan­cing instruments.

SBBG partial revision referred to the National Council

The KVF‑N has unani­mously refer­red the bill to amend the SBBG to the Natio­nal Coun­cil. The majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee also rejects a chan­ge in the sys­tem of finan­cing instru­ments, as bud­get loans, unli­ke tre­asu­ry loans, are sub­ject to the debt brake. It is of the opi­ni­on that the resul­ting com­pe­ti­ti­ve situa­ti­on with other fede­ral expen­dit­u­re is not desi­ra­ble with regard to public trans­port ser­vices. The Natio­nal Coun­cil will deci­de on the KVF‑N pro­po­sal in the 2023 win­ter session.

Voice of the industry remains unheard

As published in our media release of 30 March 2023, we at the VAP reject the pro­po­sed extra­or­di­na­ry res­truc­tu­ring of long-distance trans­port with around 3 bil­li­on tax­pay­ers’ money. On the other hand, we wel­co­me the pro­po­sed cor­rec­tion of the finan­cing instru­ments, i.e. the wai­ver of the gran­ting of vault loans to SBB bypas­sing the fede­ral debt brake. In the blog posts «SBB should take respon­si­bi­li­ty ins­tead of a CHF 3 bil­li­on finan­cial packa­ge» and «No sta­bi­li­sa­ti­on of SBB despi­te CHF 3 bil­li­on in addi­tio­nal fede­ral funds», we sum­ma­ri­se the industry’s posi­ti­on and our cor­re­spon­ding arguments.

Still no market liberalisation in sight

If the bill is accept­ed, the Natio­nal Coun­cil would fur­ther con­so­li­da­te the SBB mono­po­ly in long-distance trans­port. This is pro­ble­ma­tic in terms of Euro­pean poli­cy, as the EU is deman­ding that Switz­er­land open up the long-distance trans­port mar­ket. This unful­fil­led demand overs­ha­dows the nego­tia­ti­ons with the EU on the exten­si­on of the tem­po­ra­ry coope­ra­ti­on with the Euro­pean Rail­way Agen­cy ERA for one-stop-shop aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­ons and more inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty bet­ween Switz­er­land and the EU. Com­pared to EU mem­ber sta­tes, Switz­er­land does not yet have full mar­ket access; the Swiss rail­way net­work is curr­ent­ly not an inte­gra­ted part of the Euro­pean interop net­work. For this reason, the freight trans­port-rela­ted asso­cia­ti­ons Astag, CFS and we at the VAP are cal­ling for a natio­nal migra­ti­on stra­tegy to open up the mar­ket in line with the EU. If the Natio­nal Coun­cil votes in favour of the KVF‑N moti­on, it will push this issue even fur­ther away.

Adden­dum 20.12.2023, update from the win­ter ses­si­on:
In the win­ter ses­si­on, a majo­ri­ty of the Natio­nal Coun­cil agreed to grant the Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBB) a one-off capi­tal sub­s­idy of CHF 1.15 bil­li­on to redu­ce debt. This amount was alre­a­dy included in the 2024 bud­get. In con­trast, the Natio­nal Coun­cil rejec­ted the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sal to switch from tre­asu­ry loans to fede­ral bud­get loans when a cer­tain level of debt is rea­ched. This was based on the argu­ment that app­ly­ing the debt brake to bud­get loans could delay the expan­si­on. The cham­ber also deci­ded to set the appro­pria­te reser­ve for the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund (BIF) at a mini­mum of CHF 300 mil­li­on, with a maxi­mum of two thirds of the net reve­nue from the per­for­mance-rela­ted heavy vehic­le char­ge (LSVA) flowing into the fund. The Natio­nal Coun­cil has thus igno­red all of the VAP’s recom­men­da­ti­ons. The bill now goes to the Coun­cil of Sta­tes, which will hop­eful­ly take cor­rec­ti­ve action.