News

Blog

In the VAP blog you will find cur­rent and worth kno­wing tech­ni­cal infor­ma­ti­on about freight trans­port. Some con­tri­bu­ti­ons are reser­ved for our mem­bers. As such, log in with your login or request a new login.

KVF‑N strengthens rail freight transport with more competition and transparency

KVF‑N strengthens rail freight transport with more competition and transparency

The Natio­nal Council’s Preli­mi­na­ry Con­sul­ta­ti­on Com­mit­tee (KVF‑N) is pro­po­sing that the Coun­cil appro­ve the cre­dits for the intro­duc­tion of digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK) and the tem­po­ra­ry com­pen­sa­ti­on for sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV), inclu­ding the orde­ring of freight trans­port, as part of its 24.017 busi­ness. It also makes some cru­cial cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons to the legal text: Com­pe­ti­ti­on is to be pro­mo­ted more inten­si­ve­ly and cross-sub­si­di­s­a­ti­on bet­ween sub­si­di­sed and self-sub­si­di­sed ser­vices is to be pre­ven­ted through the dis­clo­sure of key figu­res and finan­cial flows in the annu­al reports of the rail freight com­pa­nies. In addi­ti­on, the KVF‑N wants to expli­cit­ly include inland water­way trans­port in the draft law in order to crea­te more legal certainty.

On the other hand, the goal of incre­asing the share of rail freight trans­port added to the law is not very effec­ti­ve. This mes­sa­ge should rather be direc­ted at the mar­ket-domi­na­ting, state-owned SBB, which con­ti­nues to drive traf­fic away from the rail­ways with its cur­rent offer and pri­cing policy.This under­mi­nes the last of the cus­to­mers’ trust in the effi­ci­en­cy and will of the state railway.In fact, the mea­su­res envi­sa­ged in the pro­po­sal are more effec­ti­ve than ambi­tious targets:Rail freight trans­port can gain mar­ket share through the plan­ned digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on and the trans­for­ma­ti­on from a 19th cen­tu­ry sys­tem into the 21st cen­tu­ry.
The increased pro­mo­ti­on of com­pe­ti­ti­on bet­ween rail freight com­pa­nies, in com­bi­na­ti­on with the tem­po­ra­ry com­pen­sa­ti­on for EWLV, could soon lead to a broa­der range of ser­vices and gro­wing mar­ket share for rail. In this respect, the more pre­cise pro­po­sals of the KVF‑N are likely to be far more effec­ti­ve than non-bin­ding modal shift tar­gets, which are also con­tra­ry to the constitution.

Reg­rett­ab­ly, the pro­po­sals for more trans­pa­ren­cy and com­pe­ti­ti­on in the con­s­truc­tion and ope­ra­ti­on of tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties did not recei­ve a majority.

129 new locomotives for SBB Cargo: how does it work?

129 new locomotives for SBB Cargo: how does it work?

SBB Cargo wants to renew its fleet with up to 129 modern main­line loco­mo­ti­ves by 2035. At the same time, it is com­plai­ning about high fixed costs in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV), has increased its pri­ces exces­si­ve­ly over the last few months and redu­ced its range of ser­vices. This har­bours the acute dan­ger of a shift back to the road. We at the VAP are ques­tio­ning the large order and deman­ding more transparency.

That’s the point:

  • SBB Cargo is inves­t­ing in the future of rail freight transport
  • Price increa­ses and ser­vice cuts are dri­ving away rail freight customers
  • VAP ques­ti­ons eco­no­mic reaso­ning and demands transparency

 

SBB Cargo is investing in the future of rail freight transport

SBB Cargo wants to moder­ni­se its fleet and thus secu­re the future of rail freight trans­port. In a press release dated 26 Sep­tem­ber 2024, it announ­ced the pro­cu­re­ment of up to 129 new main­line loco­mo­ti­ves. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are to be deli­ver­ed bet­ween 2027 and 2035 and will replace the out­da­ted trac­tion vehic­les. SBB Cargo pres­ents its decis­i­on as a neces­si­ty to make rail freight trans­port fit for the future, which is to be wel­co­med. The new loco­mo­ti­ves are more effi­ci­ent, more powerful and equip­ped with inno­va­ti­ve tech­no­lo­gies such as a bat­tery drive for last-mile trans­port. In this way, SBB Cargo aims to redu­ce ope­ra­ting costs by 60% and con­tri­bu­te to the auto­ma­ti­on of freight transport.

Price increases and reduction in services drive away railway customers

We at the VAP are asking our­sel­ves a key ques­ti­on: how does the large-scale pro­cu­re­ment of 129 loco­mo­ti­ves fit in with SBB Cargo’s cur­rent busi­ness deve­lo­p­ment and prac­ti­ces? In recent months, SBB Cargo has con­fron­ted its rail freight cus­to­mers with mas­si­ve price increa­ses and a reduc­tion in ser­vices (see VAP blog artic­le «Total revi­si­on of the GüTG: The mood in the indus­try threa­tens to tip». This mar­ket-dis­tort­ing beha­viour could result in a reduc­tion in rail freight volu­mes and an increased shift to road trans­port. If this actual­ly hap­pens, such an exten­si­ve invest­ment can­not be justified.

VAP questions economic reasoning and demands transparency

Unfort­u­na­te­ly, SBB Cargo is kee­ping a low pro­fi­le on the ope­ra­tio­nal and finan­cial effects of the major pro­ject. This is not exact­ly con­du­ci­ve to con­fi­dence in the state-owned freight trans­port sub­si­dia­ry. After all, we are tal­king about invest­ments in the three-digit mil­li­on range, which must be borne by the rail freight cus­to­mers under the pre­mi­se of eco­no­mic via­bi­li­ty. We the­r­e­fo­re con­sider it essen­ti­al that SBB Cargo dis­c­lo­ses its con­side­ra­ti­ons. Fur­ther­mo­re, we sug­gest that it recon­sider the num­ber of loco­mo­ti­ves and con­sider lea­sing or par­ti­al­ly purcha­sing more loco­mo­ti­ves as a sup­ple­ment to the purchase.

The digitalisation of rail freight transport is picking up speed

The digitalisation of rail freight transport is picking up speed

Poli­ti­ci­ans are adap­ting the frame­work con­di­ti­ons for the migra­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK) and the tech­no­lo­gy for the future stan­dard is being defi­ned step by step. Switz­er­land is har­mo­ni­s­ing its intro­duc­tion pro­cess with that in Euro­pe. As indus­try play­ers, we at the VAP want to drive for­ward the aut­ho­ri­sa­ti­on for com­mer­cial trans­port and are the­r­e­fo­re taking on a key role in the coor­di­na­ti­on and docu­men­ta­ti­on of the cor­re­spon­ding projects.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Coun­cil of Sta­tes gives green light for DAK and sin­gle wagon­load transport
  • GüTG har­mo­nis­ed with Euro­pean timetable
  • Tech­no­lo­gy must prove its­elf as a standard
  • Swiss indus­try takes on pio­nee­ring role
  • Two stages, one goal: net­wor­king with the future
  • VAP trans­forms expe­ri­ence into prac­ti­cal solutions

 

Council of States gives green light for DAK and single wagonload transport

The deve­lo­p­ments sur­roun­ding the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight trans­port are lite­ral­ly run­ning on seve­ral tracks. A cour­se was set in the poli­ti­cal pro­cess on 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024. On this day in the autumn ses­si­on of the Swiss par­lia­ment, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes dis­cus­sed the total revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act and appro­ved the CHF 180 mil­li­on cre­dit com­mit­ment for the intro­duc­tion of the DAK as well as the CHF 260 mil­li­on cre­dit com­mit­ment for the moder­ni­sa­ti­on of sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. The First Coun­cil has thus taken up the most important key points of the Fede­ral Council’s dis­patch of 10 Janu­ary 2024 and, with a broad majo­ri­ty, has expli­cit­ly spo­ken out in favour of the digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of freight trans­port with the inno­va­ti­on that has been refi­ned over many years. Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Albert Rösti said in his speech to the full Coun­cil: «In addi­ti­on to digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling, fur­ther con­cre­te moder­ni­sa­ti­on steps should be taken, such as boo­king plat­forms.» We explain why this com­ment reflects a holi­stic per­spec­ti­ve on the DAK in our blog post «Data eco­sys­tems: Indus­try round table with Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Rösti» .

GüTG harmonised with European roadmap

The plan­ning of the revi­sed GüTG and the cor­re­spon­ding ordi­nan­ce har­mo­ni­s­es with the Euro­pean road­map. They are expec­ted to come into force bet­ween the end of 2026 and the begin­ning of 2027. The bud­get­ed fede­ral funds for DAC migra­ti­on will then be available. The stake­hol­ders of the Euro­pean DAC Deli­very Pro­gram­me (EDDP) of Europe’s Rail want to roll out DAC migra­ti­on on a large scale from 2028. This imple­men­ta­ti­on pro­gram­me brings tog­e­ther rail­way under­ta­kings, infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers, wagon kee­pers and the rail sup­p­ly indus­try, main­ten­an­ce bodies, indus­try orga­ni­sa­ti­ons, rail rese­arch cen­tres and poli­ti­cal insti­tu­ti­ons. This inte­gra­ted joint pro­gram­me builds on rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment results and pilot pro­jects and aims to ensu­re the neces­sa­ry mea­su­res for a rapid, tech­ni­cal­ly and eco­no­mic­al­ly fea­si­ble Euro­pe-wide DAC roll-out.

Technology must prove itself as a standard

In order to achie­ve this ambi­tious goal, a deve­lo­ped and ope­ra­tio­nal­ly pro­ven tech­no­lo­gy is requi­red. Here, too, the EDDP has alre­a­dy done con­sidera­ble ground­work and com­mu­ni­ca­ted the «DAC Basis Packa­ge» as the future sys­tem stan­dard for Euro­pean rail freight trans­port at the begin­ning of 2024. The EDDP envi­sa­ges pilot trains throug­hout Euro­pe to refi­ne and com­pre­hen­si­ve­ly test the tech­no­lo­gy of the «DAC Basis Packa­ge». The star­ter packa­ge con­ta­ins the fol­lo­wing components:

  • DAC (mechanical/pneumatic) inclu­ding energy/data system
  • Reco­g­nis­ing the train composition
  • Auto­ma­tic brake test
  • Train com­ple­ten­ess test
  • Auto­ma­tic uncou­pling (in the train from the loco­mo­ti­ve or from the car­ria­ge side)

An important sys­tem decis­i­on is still pen­ding: For the data trans­mis­si­on tech­no­lo­gy in the train, the opti­ons Sin­gle via Ether­net and Power­line+ are in the final sel­ec­tion. As suc­cessful tests with Power­line+ have alre­a­dy been car­ri­ed out in Switz­er­land, a pilot train with this tech­no­lo­gy that is ready for appr­oval is now to be rea­li­sed in the near future.

Swiss industry takes on pioneering role

Switz­er­land wants to make a sub­stan­ti­al con­tri­bu­ti­on to the Euro­pean DAK deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject coor­di­na­ted by the EDDP and coor­di­na­te it clo­se­ly with the EDDP’s Euro­pean orga­ni­sa­ti­ons. The Swiss rail­way indus­try is the­r­e­fo­re pre­pa­ring to push ahead with sys­tem inte­gra­ti­on for the appr­oval of com­mer­cial appli­ca­ti­ons. The tech­ni­cal spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons and func­tion­al scope of the «DAC Basis Packa­ge» and the Power­line+ trans­mis­si­on tech­no­lo­gy form the basis for the Swiss pro­ject team’s fur­ther work. Accor­din­gly, the FOT, VAP and VöV will extend their joint­ly signed decla­ra­ti­on of intent on auto­ma­ti­on in rail freight trans­port accordingly.

Two stages, one goal: networking with the future

Switzerland’s con­tri­bu­ti­on to the intro­duc­tion of DAK will take place in two stages. First­ly, sys­tem inte­gra­ti­on on the Swiss pio­neer train is to be dri­ven for­ward rapidly until it is ready for appr­oval and its sui­ta­bi­li­ty for ever­y­day use will then be demons­tra­ted in com­mer­cial ope­ra­ti­ons. The fede­ral govern­ment will sup­port the deve­lo­p­ment with fun­ding in accordance with Artic­le 10 of the Goods Trans­port Act.

  • The EP3 deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject to rea­li­se the appr­oval of a first pio­neer train with the «DAC Basic Packa­ge» func­tions has begun. The aim is to obtain a FOT ope­ra­ting licence for defi­ned com­mer­cial jour­neys on the Swiss stan­dard-gauge net­work by mid-2026. To this end, around 30 moti­va­ted Swiss­rail mem­bers, SBB Cargo, the FOT and VAP repre­sen­ta­ti­ves announ­ced their inten­ti­on on 30 August 2024 to joint­ly make rail freight trans­port com­pe­ti­ti­ve and pro­mo­te Swiss DAC tech­no­lo­gy to the out­side world. With EP3, the indus­try play­ers want to play a key role in defi­ning the future Euro­pean stan­dard for rail freight trans­port. It is now time to move bey­ond fun­da­men­tal dis­cus­sions and deve­lop ope­ra­tio­nal­ly via­ble solu­ti­ons. The new sys­tems must be robust, sui­ta­ble for ever­y­day use and afforda­ble so that goods trains can ope­ra­te suc­cessful­ly in the future.
  • Fol­lo­wing the com­ple­ti­on of EP3, the EP4 deve­lo­p­ment pro­ject aims to bring seve­ral DAK trains onto the Swiss rail sys­tem for com­mer­cial jour­neys in the peri­od from 2026 to 2027. Initi­al dis­cus­sions with ship­pers have alre­a­dy taken place. Iso­la­ted trans­port ope­ra­ti­ons are being sought that are sui­ta­ble for an early DAK con­ver­si­on as pio­neer trains. The aim of this second stage is to gather ope­ra­ting expe­ri­ence and fur­ther opti­mi­sa­ti­on in real ope­ra­ti­ons. The pio­neer trains are inten­ded to give stake­hol­ders and inves­tors invol­ved a con­cre­te pic­tu­re of the future pos­si­bi­li­ties with DAC and the asso­cia­ted digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on of rail freight transport.
VAP transforms experience into practical solutions

We at the VAP will coor­di­na­te and docu­ment the afo­re­men­tio­ned pro­jects for all inte­res­ted par­ties and stake­hol­ders. In this way, we want to ensu­re a broad exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence and full prac­ti­ca­bi­li­ty right down to the sidings and logi­stics of the eco­no­my. Our mem­bers – above all the ship­pers and wagon kee­pers – are actively invol­ved in both stages of deve­lo­p­ment. In this way, fin­dings from pilot pro­jects can be sca­led and syn­er­gies can be uti­li­sed for all indus­try players.

«I consider the asymmetry of benefits and implementation costs to be the biggest sticking point of the DAK»

«I consider the asymmetry of benefits and implementation costs to be the biggest sticking point of the DAK»

The JOSEF MEYER Rail (JMR) Group spe­cia­li­ses in the main­ten­an­ce and repair of freight wagons and has loca­ti­ons in Switz­er­land and abroad. In an inter­view with the VAP, Dr Domi­nik Suter, owner and Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors, and Ulrich Walt, Group CEO since Sep­tem­ber 2024, talk about the suc­cess fac­tors of an indus­tri­al sec­tor play­er, the asym­me­try of inno­va­tions and the future of Swiss rail freight transport.

VAP: Mr Suter, how did the chan­ge in lea­der­ship come about and what do you expect from Ulrich Walt?

Domi­nik Suter: Vin­zenz Bind­schäd­ler, our pre­vious Mana­ging Direc­tor, has deci­ded to leave JMR at the end of Sep­tem­ber 2024. In Ulrich Walt, a long-stan­ding indus­try expert is taking over the manage­ment of our Group. Tog­e­ther, we want to rea­li­se our visi­on of sus­tain­ab­ly incre­asing the pro­duc­ti­vi­ty of our rail­way cus­to­mers and expand our group of com­pa­nies in an inter­na­tio­nal context.

VAP: You express your brand pro­mi­se with the attri­bu­tes ‘relia­ble’, ‘com­mit­ted’ and ‘inno­va­ti­ve’. Mr Walt, how do you intend to streng­then these attri­bu­tes in the future? Where will you break new ground?

Ulrich Walt: I find these tag­li­nes hel­pful. Alt­hough they are some­what gene­ric, they make it clear what is important to our cus­to­mers. The attri­bu­te ‘relia­ble’ in par­ti­cu­lar is cru­cial in the main­ten­an­ce busi­ness becau­se it has a lot to do with safe­ty. With the attri­bu­te ‘com­mit­ted’, we want to con­so­li­da­te our repu­ta­ti­on as one of the best work­shops in Euro­pe. For exam­p­le, we are con­stant­ly shor­tening lead times and sen­ding out mobi­le main­ten­an­ce teams in Switz­er­land for minor repairs.

I will main­tain our stra­te­gic cour­se. As we are inte­gra­ted into indus­tri­al pro­ces­ses, we can­not revo­lu­tio­ni­se our busi­ness model over­night. Howe­ver, I would like to set new prio­ri­ties. For exam­p­le, we will focus even more stron­gly on our core com­pe­ten­ces of main­ten­an­ce and ECM offe­rings. Intern­al­ly, we are focus­sing more on manage­ment and respon­si­bi­li­ty. And final­ly, we also want to fur­ther opti­mi­se our sys­tems and processes.

The term ‘inno­va­ti­ve’ is gene­ral­ly equa­ted with digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. This is also the sub­ject of lively dis­cus­sion in rail freight trans­port, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in con­nec­tion with digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK). What is your opi­ni­on on this?

Domi­nik Suter: The pro­mo­ti­on of rail trans­port in Euro­pe requi­res not only the main­ten­an­ce of the rail infra­struc­tu­re and the DAK in the short term, but also inno­va­tions in rol­ling stock in the medi­um term. For exam­p­le, years ago we deve­lo­ped low-noise and low-wear freight wagon bogies for signi­fi­cant­ly hig­her speeds tog­e­ther with indus­try part­ners. In a joint ven­ture with PROSE, this has resul­ted in the more cost-effec­ti­ve ‘LEILA Light’ bogie based on a tech­no­lo­gy that is ready for appr­oval. ‘LEILA Light’ offers impres­si­ve advan­ta­ges in terms of noise, wear and tear on the rail infra­struc­tu­re and speed. Howe­ver, as long as the advan­ta­ges in terms of noise, wear and tear on the rail infra­struc­tu­re and speed do not reach the inves­tor, there will be no invest­ment in modern rol­ling stock.

Ulrich Walt: The situa­ti­on is simi­lar with DAK as the most fre­quent­ly cited dri­ver of digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on. When it comes to inno­va­tions for rail trans­port, the ques­ti­on always ari­ses as to whe­ther they should take place on the car­ria­ge or on the infra­struc­tu­re. DAK is revo­lu­tio­ni­s­ing the car­ria­ge. Howe­ver, the bene­fits of this inno­va­ti­on and the costs of imple­men­ting it are dis­tri­bu­ted asym­me­tri­cal­ly, i.e. they are incur­red in dif­fe­rent places. In such a case, it will be dif­fi­cult to achie­ve a breakth­rough. I con­sider this asym­me­try to be the big­gest sti­cking point of the DAK. The regu­la­tor needs to pro­vi­de an impe­tus here. The DAK is well advan­ced in the poli­ti­cal pro­cess, which is why it will pre­vail soo­ner or later.

JMR’s roots go back to the year 1888. Since then, your com­pa­ny has estab­lished its­elf as a relia­ble indus­try play­er. What is the secret of your success?

Domi­nik Suter: The secret of our suc­cess is our employees, who are ‘on fire’ for rail freight trans­port. Some employees have been with us for deca­des, some­ti­mes even their enti­re pro­fes­sio­nal lives. The lean struc­tures with short decis­i­on-making chan­nels and our cus­to­mer-ori­en­ta­ti­on also con­tri­bu­te to our success.

Ulrich Walt: I can only agree with that. We are small and agile, which is why we con­sis­t­ent­ly focus on our cus­to­mers. I would like to add ano­ther suc­cess fac­tor: JMR has an engi­nee­ring back­ground. So we can do more than just main­ten­an­ce, we can even rebuild enti­re sub-assem­blies or bogies if requi­red. Our engi­nee­ring exper­ti­se keeps us in pole position.

Lia­bi­li­ty in rail freight trans­port is curr­ent­ly taking cent­re stage. Recom­men­da­ti­ons have also been made for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment of the ECM Regu­la­ti­on. What do you think about this?

Ulrich Walt: In con­nec­tion with the acci­dent in the Gott­hard Base Tun­nel, the Joint Net­work Secre­ta­ri­at of the Euro­pean Union Agen­cy for Rail­ways ERA and the Swiss Safe­ty Inves­ti­ga­ti­on Board STSB issued recom­men­da­ti­ons. These have alre­a­dy been incor­po­ra­ted into our main­ten­an­ce mea­su­res and our ECM ser­vices. Howe­ver, I see a cer­tain dis­crepan­cy in regu­la­to­ry deve­lo­p­ments. On the one hand, the fede­ral govern­ment wants to pro­mo­te rail freight trans­port, for exam­p­le with the total revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act. At the same time, the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail freight trans­port would be redu­ced by incre­asing the lia­bi­li­ty obli­ga­ti­ons of the owners. Such dis­tor­ti­ons pena­li­se pri­va­te-sec­tor mar­ket play­ers such as JMR becau­se they impo­se addi­tio­nal costs on us.

What strengths do you attri­bu­te to our association?

Ulrich Walt: The VAP is excel­lent­ly net­work­ed with other logi­stics asso­cia­ti­ons and play­ers in the rail indus­try. It has exten­si­ve exper­ti­se that it can use to sup­port its mem­bers. It can also be lever­a­ged for poli­ti­cal initia­ti­ves. I belie­ve that the VAP has beco­me impres­si­ve­ly pro­fes­sio­na­li­sed over the last three deca­des and is now an important voice for the rail freight industry.

What would you like to see for the VAP?

Ulrich Walt: Two things are important to me for the coming months and years. First­ly, I hope for a suc­cessful han­do­ver of ope­ra­tio­nal manage­ment from Dr Frank Fur­rer to Dr Simon Wey. For­t­u­na­te­ly, Mr Fur­rer will remain with the VAP, as he was elec­ted to the Board of Direc­tors at the last Annu­al Gene­ral Mee­ting. This will enable the trans­fer of his enorm­ous wealth of know­ledge and expe­ri­ence and ensu­re con­ti­nui­ty. Simon Wey is an expe­ri­en­ced asso­cia­ti­on man and an out­stan­ding eco­no­mist. This com­bi­na­ti­on should enable him to con­ti­nue the pro­fes­sio­na­li­sa­ti­on of the asso­cia­ti­on. Second­ly, I wish the newly foun­ded VAP sub­si­dia­ry ‘Cargo Rail Con­sul­ting AG’ a suc­cessful start. Over the last few years, the demand for con­sul­tancy ser­vices in this area has beco­me incre­asing­ly appa­rent. This sub­si­dia­ry will cer­tain­ly fur­ther streng­then the association.

Who would you recom­mend working with the VAP?

Domi­nik Suter: All ship­pers and wagon kee­pers and, in gene­ral, anyo­ne who is inte­res­ted in rail freight trans­port or is com­mit­ted to it in Switz­er­land or Euro­pe. The ship­pers bene­fit direct­ly, the wagon hire com­pa­nies indi­rect­ly from a fruitful exch­an­ge and up-to-date infor­ma­ti­on. As a mem­ber, you are at the source of rail freight trans­port exper­ti­se, so to speak.

How do you see the future of rail freight trans­port in Switzerland?

Ulrich Walt: I have noti­ced two oppo­sing trends. On the one hand, the ongo­ing de-indus­tria­li­sa­ti­on of Switz­er­land means that there are fewer and fewer ‘rail-fri­end­ly’ goods that can be trans­por­ted by rail. On the other hand, the sus­taina­bi­li­ty trans­for­ma­ti­on of count­less indus­tries is put­ting rail at the cent­re of atten­ti­on as a cli­ma­te-fri­end­ly mode of trans­port and a valid alter­na­ti­ve to road trans­port. It is true that rail freight trans­port is cum­ber­so­me becau­se much of it is still in the hands of the state. Nevert­hel­ess, I con­sider the future of rail freight trans­port to be pro­mi­sing. The infra­struc­tu­re, effi­ci­en­cy and sus­taina­bi­li­ty bene­fits are there. Freight rail cus­to­mers and legis­la­tors alike have reco­g­nis­ed this.

Domi­nik Suter: Despi­te the cli­ma­te deba­te and the sharp rise in the num­ber of hours of con­ges­ti­on on the motor­ways, we are see­ing a shift back from rail to road. Among other things, this is due to price increa­ses, a lack of slots for freight trans­port and a lack of punc­tua­li­ty. There is an urgent need for action at a poli­ti­cal level. The VAP can beco­me a litt­le lou­der here.

What has not yet been said?

Ulrich Walt: I am deligh­ted to be working for the VAP as CEO of the JMR Group. In my new posi­ti­on, the work of the VAP affects me even more than it did with my pre­vious employ­er. The only dif­fe­rence is that I look at things at JMR from an indus­tri­al perspective.

Thank you, Dr Domi­nik Suter and Ulrich Walt, for this sti­mu­la­ting interview.

 

Dr Domi­nik Suter is the owner of the JOSEF MEYER Rail Group and Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors. He has more than 25 years of manage­ment expe­ri­ence as a CEO, board mem­ber and con­sul­tant, during which he has suc­cessful­ly deve­lo­ped num­e­rous com­pa­nies, inclu­ding inter­na­tio­nal­ly acti­ve indus­tri­al com­pa­nies in Switz­er­land, Ger­ma­ny and Aus­tria, even in dif­fi­cult situations.

 

Ulrich Walt has been Mana­ging Direc­tor of JOSEF MEYER RAIL AG in Rhein­fel­den since 1 Sep­tem­ber 2024. He has 20 years of expe­ri­ence in manage­ment posi­ti­ons in logi­stics in Switz­er­land and abroad. He has work­ed at Allo­ga and Hol­cim Switz­er­land, among others, and was most recent­ly CEO of logi­stics and ser­vice spe­cia­list Fast­log. Ulrich Walt is also Vice Chair­man of the Board of Direc­tors and Chair­man of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Com­mit­tee at VAP.

 

JOSEF MEYER Rail (JMR) was foun­ded in Lucer­ne in 1888. In 1943, the com­pa­ny ope­ned a branch in Rhein­fel­den, Switz­er­land, for the pro­duc­tion of freight wagons and wel­ded assem­blies. With the libe­ra­li­sa­ti­on of the rail­way sec­tor in the 1990s, the com­pa­ny expan­ded its range of acti­vi­ties to include the main­ten­an­ce of rail vehic­les. Today, the JOSEF MEYER Rail Group is a lea­ding expert in the main­ten­an­ce and moder­ni­sa­ti­on of freight wagons, com­plex repairs to pas­sen­ger car­ri­a­ges and loco­mo­ti­ves as well as the pro­duc­tion of com­plex wel­ded assem­blies, small series and spe­cial vehicles.

 

Autumn session 2024: transport policy on the agenda

Autumn session 2024: transport policy on the agenda

In the autumn ses­si­on from 9 to 27 Sep­tem­ber 2024, Par­lia­ment dis­cus­sed various trans­port poli­cy issues. Par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on was paid to the revi­si­on of the Freight Trans­port Act (GüTG). This bill stands in stark con­trast to SBB Cargo’s de facto solo effort.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Rail infra­struc­tu­re 2025–2028
  • Rösti and Bur­kart warn against dra­stic tariff increases
  • Fur­ther finan­cial injec­tion for SBB
  • Relo­ca­ti­on tar­gets for the expan­si­on of the NEAT fee­der lines

 

Maintain and further develop rail infrastructure from 2025 to 2028

On 23 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Natio­nal Coun­cil was the first cham­ber to dis­cuss Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­sal 24.045 ‘Finan­cing the ope­ra­ti­on and main­ten­an­ce of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re, sys­tem tasks in this area and invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties in the years 2025–2028’. On 15 May 2024, the Fede­ral Coun­cil reques­ted a total pay­ment frame­work of CHF 16.442 bil­li­on for the upco­ming tasks, around CHF 2 bil­li­on more than in the pre­vious period.

With this pro­po­sal, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is set­ting the tar­gets for the ope­ra­ti­on, main­ten­an­ce and tech­ni­cal deve­lo­p­ment of the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re finan­ced by the fede­ral govern­ment for the years 2025 to 2028. For the third time, finan­cing will come enti­re­ly from the rail­way infra­struc­tu­re fund (BIF). The Natio­nal Coun­cil appro­ved the cre­dit while rejec­ting a mino­ri­ty moti­on to increase the cre­dit by 500 million.

At the same time, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­po­sed exten­ding the exis­ting frame­work cre­dit for invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties by one year from 2021 to 2024. This is becau­se the rea­li­sa­ti­on of major pro­jects has been delayed.It also envi­sa­ges a four-year com­mit­ment cre­dit of CHF 185 mil­li­on for invest­ment con­tri­bu­ti­ons to faci­li­ties for the hand­ling of goods in com­bi­ned trans­port (CT) and to sidings. This is to be used to finan­ce the con­s­truc­tion, expan­si­on and rene­wal of the fol­lo­wing components:

  • CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties and sidings in Switz­er­land that com­ply with the con­cept for the trans­port of goods by rail in accordance with Artic­le 3 GüTG
  • CT tran­ship­ment faci­li­ties abroad that are neces­sa­ry to achie­ve the modal shift objec­ti­ve in accordance with Artic­le 3 GVVG
  • Port faci­li­ties for the tran­ship­ment of CT goods

The Natio­nal Coun­cil appro­ved the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sal by 194 votes to 1. The mat­ter will now go to the Coun­cil of States.

Controversial developments in the debate on rail freight transport

On 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes was the first cham­ber to dis­cuss the total revi­si­on of the GüTG. We repor­ted on the latest deve­lo­p­ments in our blog post «Deba­te on Swiss rail freight trans­port threa­tens to derail».

With the revi­si­on, the legis­la­tor wants to enable more com­pe­ti­ti­on on the rail­ways, streng­then sin­gle wagon­load trans­port and pre­vent mar­ket-dis­tort­ing dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on. It wants to moder­ni­se the out­da­ted sys­tem through auto­ma­ti­on and digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on, con­ti­nue to pro­vi­de finan­cial sup­port for the con­s­truc­tion and rene­wal of pri­va­te freight trans­port faci­li­ties and reim­bur­se the HVF to freight pay­ers as a new hand­ling fee.

After a detail­ed dis­cus­sion, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes voted in favour of the bill by 35 votes to 3 with 3 abstentions.

This decis­i­on is in the con­text of the cur­rent mood of Swiss rail freight cus­to­mers. SBB sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo has been caus­ing con­s­ter­na­ti­on among ship­pers for seve­ral weeks with dis­pro­por­tio­na­te price increa­ses – while offe­ring the same or worse ser­vices. The con­se­quen­ces of this con­tro­ver­si­al beha­viour are fatal. Many pri­va­te-sec­tor ship­pers are being forced to shift up to 10% of their freight trans­port volu­me back to the roads becau­se trans­port by rail is no lon­ger pro­fi­ta­ble. SBB Cargo, on the other hand, offers no wil­ling­ness to dis­cuss the deve­lo­p­ment of alternatives.This beha­viour con­tra­dicts the efforts of the GüTG revi­si­on and the con­sen­sus that was agreed bet­ween poli­ti­ci­ans, busi­ness and the state rail­way befo­re the par­lia­men­ta­ry con­sul­ta­ti­on. In his speech, Coun­cil­lor of Sta­tes Thier­ry Bur­kart, FDP/AG, who is also Pre­si­dent of ASTAG, empha­sis­ed that SBB’s pri­cing poli­cy is not only geared towards what is per­haps neces­sa­ry, but also towards what is pos­si­ble in the mar­ket in order to avoid a shift back to road trans­port despi­te sub­si­dies. In his speech, Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Rösti also refer­red to three key ele­ments in this con­text: loa­ding flat rates, increased effi­ci­en­cy and pri­ces, which should be opti­mi­sed. These three areas are nee­ded to ensu­re pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty in the end and to pre­vent any relo­ca­ti­on. Based on his dis­cus­sions with important ship­pers, he belie­ves that the situa­ti­on can be cal­med to some ext­ent and a solu­ti­on found.

Further financial injection for the Swiss Federal Railways

On 11 and 19 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and on 16 and 23 Sep­tem­ber 2024, the Natio­nal Coun­cil again dis­cus­sed the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sed amend­ments to the Fede­ral Act on Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBBG). After the last dis­cus­sion, dif­fe­ren­ces remain­ed regar­ding Art. 20 on finan­cing instru­ments. SBB should now be able to finan­ce invest­ments out­side the area of the Infra­struc­tu­re divi­si­on entit­led to com­pen­sa­ti­on by means of inte­rest-bea­ring and repa­ya­ble loans from the Fede­ral Tre­asu­ry as long as it com­pli­es with the net debt requi­re­ments defi­ned in the Fede­ral Council’s stra­te­gic objec­ti­ves. If SBB’s bor­ro­wing requi­re­ments for these invest­ments exceed the net debt requi­re­ments set out in para. 1, they must be cover­ed by capi­tal con­tri­bu­ti­ons from the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on. The Fede­ral Coun­cil shall apply to the Fede­ral Assem­bly for the neces­sa­ry capi­tal injec­tions as part of its budget.

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes came to the con­clu­si­on that the finan­cial sup­port for SBB should be redu­ced. In the second round of deli­be­ra­ti­ons on Wed­nes­day, it voted in favour of a reduc­tion to CHF 850 mil­li­on wit­hout oppo­si­ti­on and then released the spen­ding brake. Mari­an­ne Maret (centre/VS), Pre­si­dent of the Trans­port Com­mit­tee, explai­ned that SBB had reco­ver­ed more quick­ly from the cri­sis, while the fede­ral government’s finan­cial situa­ti­on was dete­rio­ra­ting. The Natio­nal Coun­cil fol­lo­wed the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and appro­ved the redu­ced capi­tal sub­s­idy for SBB. It also iro­ned out the dif­fe­ren­ces on loans by agre­e­ing to a more fle­xi­ble upper limit for vault loans.

The Coun­cils’ decis­i­ons must be view­ed in a broa­der con­text. In order to res­to­re balan­ce to the finan­cial imba­lan­ce of the fede­ral ope­ra­ti­on, a majo­ri­ty of the Natio­nal Coun­cil agreed in the 2023 win­ter ses­si­on to grant SBB a one-off capi­tal injec­tion in the amount of the long-distance trans­port los­ses of CHF 1.15 bil­li­on to redu­ce debt. Sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo, which has alre­a­dy recei­ved exten­si­ve finan­cial sup­port in the wake of the Covid pan­de­mic, will also bene­fit from this finan­cial injec­tion. It is about to con­clude a ser­vice agree­ment to com­pen­sa­te for its net­work traf­fic, which it obvious­ly can­not hand­le on its own. The pri­va­te sec­tor play­ers, on the other hand, have neither recei­ved Covid funds nor do they have non-essen­ti­al resour­ces and invest­ments to streng­then their invest­ment capacity.

Balance sought between modal shift targets for the expansion of the NEAT feeder lines

The three moti­ons 24.3389 «Advan­cing the expan­si­on of the NRLA fee­der lines on the left bank of the Rhine in the inte­rests of modal shift», 24.3390 «Sta­bi­li­sing com­bi­ned trans­port on the north-south axis by pro­vi­ding buf­fer tracks» and 24.3391 «For a grea­ter modal shift to medi­um trans­port distances» came befo­re the Coun­cil of Sta­tes on 24 Sep­tem­ber 2024. The sub­mit­ting Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons wants to opti­mi­se the fee­der lines to the NRLA.

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes adopted the first two moti­ons, but rejec­ted the third. Their adop­ti­on pre­sup­po­sed a modal shift man­da­te for dome­stic traf­fic as well, which is not pro­vi­ded for in the constitution.

In prin­ci­ple, we wel­co­me effi­ci­ent rou­ting on the north-south cor­ri­dor in terms of secu­ri­ty of sup­p­ly, alter­na­ti­ve capa­ci­ties in the event of road­works, punc­tua­li­ty and qua­li­ty of rail freight trans­port. VAP Pre­si­dent and mem­ber of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes Josef Ditt­li alre­a­dy expres­sed this opi­ni­on at the anni­ver­sa­ry mee­ting with for­mer Fede­ral Coun­cil­lor Adolf Ogi in autumn 2021 (see blog post «25 years of the “Trea­ty of Luga­no” – a look into the future»).

Howe­ver, we cri­ti­cise the one-sided focus of the moti­ons on CT. Those respon­si­ble for the modal shift are thus miss­ing the oppor­tu­ni­ty to pro­mo­te other forms of mul­ti­mo­dal trans­port bey­ond sin­gle wagon­load trans­port. This is in clear con­trast to the joint poli­cy of the DACH sta­tes (Ger­ma­ny-Aus­tria-Switz­er­land) to rapidly intro­du­ce digi­tal auto­ma­tic cou­pling (DAK). Fur­ther­mo­re, the moti­ons con­tra­dict the revi­si­on of the GüTG (see above), as they pur­sue envi­ron­men­tal and ener­gy poli­cy objec­ti­ves not only in import, export and dome­stic trans­port, but also in transit.

We at the VAP demand that the Fede­ral Coun­cil also cla­ri­fy and pre­sent the poten­ti­al with other mul­ti­mo­dal modes of trans­port in the next modal shift report. Qua­li­ty moni­to­ring should also be intro­du­ced for con­ven­tio­nal goods trains, as has been the case in CT for years. The distinc­tion bet­ween com­bi­ned and con­ven­tio­nal trans­port must be abo­lished. The GüTG intro­du­ces finan­cial sup­port for import, export and dome­stic trans­port. In tran­sit, howe­ver, only unac­com­pa­nied CT (UCT) should con­ti­nue to recei­ve finan­cial sup­port. We belie­ve that this approach is not com­pa­ti­ble with the objec­ti­ves of the GüTG. This is becau­se the con­sti­tu­tio­nal man­da­te in the Güter­ver­kehrs­ver­la­ge­rungs­ge­setz (GVVG) defi­nes the modal shift in tran­sit as a shift to rail, not to UCT. Only Art. 8 GVVG intro­du­ces the addi­ti­on ‘pri­ma­ri­ly’ for the pro­mo­ti­on of UCT, to the detri­ment of other mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics solu­ti­ons with a rail com­po­nent (see box).

Art. GVVG Pro­mo­ti­on of rail freight trans­port (ver­si­on in accordance with No. I of the Fede­ral Act of 16 June 2023, in force since 1 Jan. 2024)

1 In order to achie­ve the modal shift objec­ti­ve, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may adopt sup­port mea­su­res. These mea­su­res pri­ma­ri­ly pro­mo­te unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port. These mea­su­res must not have any dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry effects on Swiss and for­eign trans­port com­pa­nies in freight transport.amit das Ver­la­ge­rungs­ziel erreicht wird, kann der Bund För­der­mass­nah­men beschlies­sen. Dabei wird in ers­ter Linie der unbe­glei­te­te kom­bi­nier­te Ver­kehr geför­dert. Diese Mass­nah­men dür­fen keine dis­kri­mi­nie­ren­den Aus­wir­kun­gen auf die schwei­ze­ri­schen und aus­län­di­schen Trans­port­un­ter­neh­men im Güter­ver­kehr haben.

2 In unac­com­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port, the avera­ge level of com­pen­sa­ti­on per con­sign­ment trans­por­ted must decrease from year to year.

3 Accom­pa­nied com­bi­ned trans­port (Rol­ling High­way) may be sub­si­di­sed until the end of 2028.

4 The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may con­tri­bu­te to the operator’s liqui­da­ti­on costs in the year fol­lo­wing the ces­sa­ti­on of Rol­ling High­way operations.

 

«Modal shift requires determination from the top management team»

«Modal shift requires determination from the top management team»

The Coop Group has com­mit­ted its­elf to redu­cing CO2 emis­si­ons. Shif­ting trans­port to rail is a cen­tral com­po­nent of this stra­tegy. In an inter­view with VAP, Dani­el Hin­ter­mann, Head of Logi­stics at the Coop Group, explains how the retail and who­le­sa­le group is achie­ving this and the chal­lenges it faces.

 

VAP: Mr Hin­ter­mann, how did the Coop Group mana­ge to shift two thirds of the trans­port bet­ween its dis­tri­bu­ti­on cen­tres to rail?

Dani­el Hin­ter­mann: It was a pro­cess that took seve­ral years. It was initia­ted in 2010 with the decis­i­on to buy a freight rail­way. At that time, we took over Rail­ca­re AG as a whol­ly owned sub­si­dia­ry. We gra­du­al­ly inte­gra­ted the small rail trans­port com­pa­ny into Coop’s logi­stics world. Today, Rail­ca­re is an inte­gral part of our Group-wide trans­port chain. It enables us to fur­ther increase the pro­por­ti­on of rail transport.

How did the Coop Group come to have its own rail trans­port company?

In 2008, Coop deve­lo­ped its visi­on for CO2 neu­tra­li­ty and the cen­tra­li­sa­ti­on stra­tegy for logi­stics and pro­duc­tion. We were loo­king for new approa­ches to trans­port logi­stics in order to achie­ve the goals we had set our­sel­ves. We found what we were loo­king for with the Rail­ca­re con­cept at the time.

What pro­por­ti­on of rail trans­port are you aiming for?

We can ima­gi­ne incre­asing the share of rail trans­port in Swiss deli­very traf­fic – i.e. the out­bound busi­ness – from 40% today to 50%. We see simi­lar poten­ti­al for inbound traf­fic from Euro­pe and Switz­er­land. To achie­ve these goals, we are facing a chal­len­ging relo­ca­ti­on pro­cess las­ting seve­ral years.

What advice would you give to other com­pa­nies that want to shift trans­port from road to rail?

In my opi­ni­on, the top manage­ment team needs to be deter­mi­ned to actively shift trans­port. This requi­res a high degree of stan­dar­di­s­a­ti­on in the equip­ment and close pro­cess net­wor­king bet­ween the ship­per and the railway.

How does the Coop Group co-ope­ra­te with the VAP?

Coop has been a mem­ber of the VAP for many years. We have repea­ted­ly been able to count on the pro­fes­sio­nal sup­port of the VAP, par­ti­cu­lar­ly for con­tracts, pro­ject sup­port or tech­ni­cal recom­men­da­ti­ons on the sub­ject of sidings.

What strengths do you attri­bu­te to the VAP?

The VAP is par­ti­cu­lar­ly strong when it comes to know­ledge about sen­si­ble con­tracts and appli­ca­ble regu­la­ti­ons. We app­re­cia­te the fact that the peo­p­le in char­ge are available at any time and in an uncom­pli­ca­ted man­ner, take a prag­ma­tic approach and offer prac­ti­cal and rea­li­sable solutions.

How would you descri­be the VAP?

As a cen­tral know­ledge plat­form for all aspects of rail freight trans­port for the Coop Group as a shipper.

Who would you recom­mend working with the VAP?

All ship­pers who trans­port goods by rail or want to do so in the future.

Where do you see the most urgent need for action in rail freight transport?

Digi­ta­li­sa­ti­on across the enti­re trans­port chain. There is also an urgent need for auto­ma­ti­on on the last mile and in shun­ting traffic.

What would you like to see for the future of rail freight trans­port in Switzerland?

I would like to see rail freight trans­port beco­me sus­tain­ab­ly com­pe­ti­ti­ve. To achie­ve this, it must make suf­fi­ci­ent train paths available to the rail freight com­pa­nies. Final­ly, I would like to see more dyna­mism in pro­cess chan­ges, for exam­p­le when it comes to chan­ging trans­port flows.

What has not yet been said?

We are see­ing a trend towards over-regu­la­ti­on and tech­no­cra­cy in rail freight trans­port. This makes rail freight trans­port neither safer nor more com­pe­ti­ti­ve. The play­ers invol­ved should join forces to coun­ter­act this development.

Thank you, Mr Hin­ter­mann, for the infor­ma­ti­ve interview.

 

 

Dani­el Hin­ter­mann has been Head of Logi­stics and a mem­ber of the Coop Group’s Exe­cu­ti­ve Board since 2017. His long care­er at Coop began in 2001 at Inter­dis­count, and in 2010 he beca­me Head of Logi­stics Regi­on Nor­thwes­tern Switz­er­land. The licen­sed busi­ness eco­no­mist gai­ned his first pro­fes­sio­nal expe­ri­ence in manage­ment consultancy.

The Coop Group is the lar­gest retail and who­le­sa­le com­pa­ny in Switz­er­land. It employs 94,790 peo­p­le – inclu­ding 3,417 app­ren­ti­ces – and ope­ra­tes 2,633 sales outlets/markets in Switz­er­land and Euro­pe. One pil­lar is the retail trade with the Coop super­mar­kets and num­e­rous spe­cia­li­sed for­mats in Switz­er­land, the second is inter­na­tio­nal who­le­sa­le and production.

Gotthard Base Tunnel (#10): Europe presents the final report

Gotthard Base Tunnel (#10): Europe presents the final report

In mid-July 2024, the Joint Net­work Secre­ta­ri­at (JNS) of the Euro­pean Union Agen­cy for Rail­ways (ERA) published its final report on the acci­dent in the Gott­hard Base Tun­nel on 10 August 2023. This con­ta­ins an exten­ded scope of appli­ca­ti­on, an increased ope­ra­tio­nal uti­li­sa­ti­on limit, stric­ter spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons for risk con­trol mea­su­res and the recom­men­da­ti­on of the sound test for prevention.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • JNS Task Force publishes final report and impact assessment
  • 4 key points for all stake­hol­ders invol­ved: exten­ded scope of appli­ca­ti­on, hig­her uti­li­sa­ti­on limit, full imple­men­ta­ti­on of risk con­trol mea­su­res, sound test for prevention
  • Adapt Anne­xes 9 and 10 of the Gene­ral Con­tract of Use for Wagons
  • Pre­vent misun­derstan­dings in the inter­pre­ta­ti­on of the legal texts
  • Inter­na­tio­nal fol­low-up works well

 

The work of the JNS aims to har­mo­ni­se all mea­su­res taken fol­lo­wing an acci­dent or dis­rup­ti­on to rail traf­fic in the EU across the EU (see blog post «Gott­hard Base Tun­nel (#7): Sust report pro­vi­des cla­ri­ty»). The com­mit­tee is made up of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from ERA, the natio­nal super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty (NSA) and the Group of Repre­sen­ta­ti­ve Bodies (GRB) repre­sen­ting the inter­na­tio­nal rail­way asso­cia­ti­ons. The ERA has also published the short ana­ly­sis «Light Impact Assess­ment» as a fol­low-up assess­ment to the acci­dent in the Gott­hard Base Tun­nel, focus­sing on the issue of ‘bro­ken wheels’.

JNS final report contains existing and new measures

The dis­cus­sions bet­ween the JNS and the indus­try were co-ope­ra­ti­ve. They led to a num­ber of com­pro­mi­ses in order to avoid indi­vi­du­al natio­nal mea­su­res announ­ced by seve­ral NSAs. Spe­cial natio­nal regu­la­ti­ons jeo­par­di­se inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and the modal shift envi­sa­ged by the EU and Switzerland.

The fin­dings of the final report are based on the recom­men­da­ti­ons of the JNS ‘Bro­ken Wheels’ pro­cess (2017- 2019) and its final report from 2019. Chan­ges com­pared to the pre­vious report are high­ligh­ted in yel­low. The sup­ple­men­ted and impro­ved risk con­trol mea­su­res com­ple­te­ly replace those of the JNS pro­ce­du­re for wheel types BA 004 (‘Crack in the rim’, 2017–2019). The mea­su­res for a ‘crack in the wheel disc’ (wheel types BA 314 old/ZDB29) remain valid.

4 Key points for all stakeholders involved

The fol­lo­wing aspects are par­ti­cu­lar­ly rele­vant for freight wagon kee­pers and Enti­ty in Char­ge of Main­ten­an­ce (ECM):

  • Exten­ded scope of appli­ca­ti­on: The scope of appli­ca­ti­on of the risk con­trol mea­su­res has been exten­ded. The list of affec­ted wheel types now includes: BA 004 (also used in some ver­si­ons of the wheel­set type VRY), Db-004sa, BA 390, RI 025, R32, BA 304 and ‘other com­pa­ra­ble wheel types that were not part of the JNS assessment’.
  • Hig­her uti­li­sa­ti­on limit: The ope­ra­tio­nal uti­li­sa­ti­on limit (see box) for the wheel types con­cer­ned has increased from a dia­me­ter of 860 mm to 864 mm.
  • Full imple­men­ta­ti­on of risk con­trol mea­su­res: For all newly affec­ted wheel types, all actors invol­ved must eit­her fully imple­ment the JNS risk con­trol mea­su­res or take alter­na­ti­ve mea­su­res that ensu­re at least an equi­va­lent level of safe­ty and are jus­ti­fied by a risk ana­ly­sis in accordance with Annex 1 of EU Regu­la­ti­on 402/2013 (CSM RA).
  • Sound test for pre­ven­ti­on: The JNS final report lists the sound test as a simp­le pre­ven­ti­ve mea­su­re to redu­ce risks. We are of the opi­ni­on that rail­way under­ta­kings should not dis­pen­se with the sound test in the event of suspec­ted over­hea­ting of the wheel­set and/or cracks on the run­ning sur­face or wheel rim as part of the pre-depar­tu­re wagon inspec­tion. They should include them in their pre-depar­tu­re inspec­tion pro­cess if they have not alre­a­dy done so.

Ope­ra­tio­nal uti­li­sa­ti­on limit

The wheel dia­me­ter is not mea­su­red befo­re depar­tu­re or during train pre­pa­ra­ti­on. The ope­ra­tio­nal uti­li­sa­ti­on limit is defi­ned after main­ten­an­ce. Accor­ding to the ECM regu­la­ti­on, ECMs must defi­ne the appro­pria­te and safe main­ten­an­ce limit for wheels in order to pre­vent a wheel of the type con­cer­ned from being used below the ope­ra­tio­nal limit of 864 mm during ope­ra­ti­on. From dis­cus­sions in the JNS Task Force, the gene­ral main­ten­an­ce limit has been increased from the pre­vious 876 mm to 880 mm after wheel­set profiling.

Should an ECM deci­de to allow the use of a wheel with a main­ten­an­ce limit below 880 mm after pro­fil­ing, it must prove that this lower main­ten­an­ce limit (1) gua­ran­tees at least the same level of safe­ty, (2) is jus­ti­fied by a risk ana­ly­sis in accordance with Annex 1 of EU Regu­la­ti­on 402/2013 (CSM RA) and (3) the risk ana­ly­sis has been review­ed and appro­ved by an inde­pen­dent assess­ment body, as an instal­la­ti­on limit below 880 mm is con­side­red a ‘signi­fi­cant change’.

 
Adapt Appendices 9 and 10 of the General Contract of Use for Wagons

The JNS has sub­mit­ted a recom­men­da­ti­on to the Union Inter­na­tio­na­le des Chem­ins de fer (UIC), the Euro­pean Rail Freight Asso­cia­ti­on (ERFA) and the Inter­na­tio­nal Union of Wagon Kee­pers (UIP) as the respon­si­ble publishers of the Gene­ral Con­tract of Use for Wagons (GCU): The com­mit­tees should exami­ne the addi­ti­on of Appen­di­ces 9 and 10 to the GCU in order to regu­la­te the detec­tion of ther­mal­ly over­hea­ted wheels even more sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly and uni­form­ly in future.

The deba­te in the JNS has shown that both the natio­nal super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties of some (EU mem­ber) sta­tes and rail­way under­ta­kings are fin­ding it dif­fi­cult to inte­gra­te ECMs into their acti­vi­ties. The JNS the­r­e­fo­re recom­mends that the indus­try orga­ni­sa­ti­ons hold cla­ri­fy­ing dis­cus­sions bet­ween the Mem­ber Sta­tes and the Euro­pean Com­mis­si­on and publish gui­de­lines for rail trans­port companies.

Prevent misunderstandings in the interpretation of legal texts

Tog­e­ther with the UIP, we at the VAP will revi­sit the role and respon­si­bi­li­ty of the ECM in the con­text of the infra­struc­tu­re manager/rail trans­port company/wagon kee­per respon­si­bi­li­ty tri­ang­le. In doing so, we would like to pre­vent future misun­derstan­dings about the inter­pre­ta­ti­on of the legal texts among infra­struc­tu­re mana­gers and rail­way under­ta­kings as the main play­ers in accordance with the EU Safe­ty Direc­ti­ve and thus also among NSAs. The cur­rent dis­cus­sion in the Swiss par­lia­ment on lia­bi­li­ty in rail freight trans­port is evi­dence of the dif­fe­rent inter­pre­ta­ti­ons of the inter­na­tio­nal­ly stan­dar­di­sed rail freight trans­port regu­la­ti­ons by various natio­nal aut­ho­ri­ties, Euro­pean bodies and cer­tain parts of the rail sector.We the­r­e­fo­re con­sider the fact that the JNS has issued the afo­re­men­tio­ned recom­men­da­ti­on to the indus­try orga­ni­sa­ti­ons to be a suc­cess of our edu­ca­tio­nal work to date.

International follow-up works well

The final report of the JNS Task Force shows that the har­mo­nis­ed pro­ce­du­res for inci­dents and occur­ren­ces in the rail sec­tor work extre­me­ly well at Euro­pean level.
On the one hand, they allow a broad exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence and, on the other, con­cre­te impro­ve­ment mea­su­res that are sup­port­ed by the enti­re indus­try and all mem­ber states.

We will inform you as soon as the final report of the Swiss Safe­ty Inves­ti­ga­ti­on Board Sust on the inci­dent in ques­ti­on is available.

Total revision of the GüTG: The mood in the industry threatens to tip over

Total revision of the GüTG: The mood in the industry threatens to tip over

The Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes (KVF‑S) has con­cluded its deli­be­ra­ti­ons on the total revi­si­on of the Goods Trans­port Act (GüTG). Like the Fede­ral Coun­cil, it wants to impro­ve the frame­work con­di­ti­ons in favour of mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics chains. Howe­ver, SBB Cargo’s cur­rent beha­viour, with mas­si­ve price increa­ses and a reduc­tion in ser­vices, con­tra­dicts these efforts and puts ship­pers in a dan­ge­rous dilemma.

This is the issue:

  • What has hap­pen­ed so far
  • A clear yes to mul­ti­mo­da­li­ty and competition
  • Con­tro­ver­si­al beha­viour of SBB Cargo
  • The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on has a duty
  • Tog­e­ther out of the dilemma

 

What has happened so far

We have alre­a­dy repor­ted in detail on the KVF‑S’s initi­al pro­po­sals on the Fede­ral Council’s dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act (total revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Act on Freight Trans­port by Rail and Ship­ping Com­pa­nies) in our blog post ‘Now or never: ground­brea­king deba­te on Swiss rail freight trans­port’. As com­mu­ni­ca­ted on 21 June 2024, the preli­mi­na­ry con­sul­ta­ti­on com­mit­tee wants to streng­then com­pe­ti­ti­on in freight trans­port in a tar­ge­ted man­ner, regu­la­te RailCom’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for enfor­cing a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry offer in sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV) and spe­ci­fy the con­tent of the gui­de­lines for rail freight trans­port as the basis for the EWLV ser­vice agreement.

A clear yes to multimodality and competition

The Coun­cil of Sta­tes Com­mit­tee has now com­ple­ted its detail­ed deli­be­ra­ti­ons. In its latest media release dated 20 August 2024, it calls on the legis­la­tor to sti­pu­la­te in the regu­la­ti­ons that loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons are pas­sed on to ship­pers and reci­pi­ents and that inter­nal com­pa­ny ser­vices are made trans­pa­rent and monitored.Finally, a majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee sug­gests that an exten­si­on of the EWLV sub­s­idy should be deci­ded by Par­lia­ment and not by the Fede­ral Coun­cil. In this way, the KVF‑S would like to ensu­re that the finan­cial com­pe­tence and the decis­i­on on a pos­si­ble exten­si­on of sup­port are at the same level

Controversial behaviour of SBB Cargo

Ship­pers’ tem­pers are curr­ent­ly run­ning high over the beha­viour of the SBB sub­si­dia­ry SBB Cargo, which cle­ar­ly runs coun­ter to the efforts of the KVF‑S and the Fede­ral Council’s pre­vious state­ments. The mono­po­ly pro­vi­der demands a surchar­ge of 20% to 60% for its ser­vices – quite natu­ral­ly and wit­hout cost trans­pa­ren­cy or the pos­si­bi­li­ty of redu­cing costs from the sys­tem tog­e­ther with the rail freight ope­ra­tors. Even if the GüTG is amen­ded as pro­po­sed and the Coun­cil of Sta­tes appro­ves the pro­po­sals of the KVF‑S, there is an acute dan­ger that ship­pers will shift their trans­port ope­ra­ti­ons to the road on a large scale. As such a stra­te­gic reo­ri­en­ta­ti­on does not hap­pen over­night, they will adapt their logi­stics con­cepts over the next two years. In this case, both the bill its­elf and the fede­ral fun­ding requi­red for it would be obso­le­te – as would a par­lia­men­ta­ry deba­te on the mat­ter in the 2024 autumn session.

The federal government has a duty

In order to avoid unju­s­ti­fied mar­ket dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on and a shift to the road, ship­pers could also ori­en­ta­te their logi­stics con­cepts towards alter­na­ti­ve rail ser­vices offe­red by inno­va­ti­ve and cou­ra­ge­ous rail freight com­pa­nies and shift their trans­port volu­mes from a state mono­po­ly to mar­ket-based com­pe­ti­ti­on. This would be in line with the aim of the KVF‑S, which calls for more com­pe­ti­ti­on through ser­vice agree­ments and revi­sed gui­de­lines on EWLV. It is the­r­e­fo­re not insi­gni­fi­cant­ly the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the fede­ral govern­ment to initia­te appro­pria­te mea­su­res in the orde­ring pro­cess as soon as pos­si­ble, to invi­te pri­va­te freight rail­ways to sub­mit offers and to sup­port them in their development.

Together out of the dilemma

The indus­try must find a way out of the cur­rent dilem­ma befo­re the deba­te escala­tes. It is now up to the indus­try play­ers and the fede­ral govern­ment to work tog­e­ther to enable more com­pe­ti­ti­on and fun­da­men­tal­ly moder­ni­se the EWLV. To do this, they must work hand in hand to chan­ge the orga­ni­sa­ti­on of the EWLV sys­tem, open it up more to third-party pro­vi­ders and deve­lop it fur­ther on an equal foo­ting. The pri­va­te sec­tor has alre­a­dy come up with some attrac­ti­ve solu­ti­ons. If Par­lia­ment says yes to the pro­mo­ti­on of EWLV and thus streng­thens intra­mo­dal com­pe­ti­ti­on, ship­pers and rail freight com­pa­nies could refrain from defi­ant reac­tions. Ins­tead, they could – tog­e­ther with the SBB – seize the oppor­tu­ni­ty to final­ly break away from the mono­po­li­stic EWLV and deve­lop a self-eco­no­mic, broad-based net­work offer.

Now or never: groundbreaking debate on Swiss rail freight transport

Now or never: groundbreaking debate on Swiss rail freight transport

In the spring, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes’ Com­mit­tee for Trans­port and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons (KVF‑S) took up the total revi­si­on of the Goods Trans­port Act (GüTG) and trig­ge­red ground-brea­king dis­cus­sions on Swiss dome­stic goods trans­port in Par­lia­ment. Tog­e­ther with other stake­hol­ders, we at the VAP will help shape this deba­te. Our aim is to find a workab­le com­pro­mi­se and to empha­sise the inte­rests of our members.

That’s what it’s all about:

  • Good news for parliament
  • First pro­po­sals from the KVF‑S
  • Lively dia­lo­gue bet­ween the stake­hol­ders concerned
  • Chal­lenges for the eco­no­my and Euro­pean logi­stics as a whole
  • Pain thres­hold reached
  • This is the way forward

 

Good news for parliament

On 9 Febru­ary 2024, the Swiss Fede­ral Coun­cil published its dis­patch on the Freight Trans­port Act (total revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Act on the Trans­port of Goods by Rail and Ship­ping Com­pa­nies). In our view, par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on should be paid to the fol­lo­wing finan­cial aspects

  • Ope­ra­ting char­ges: In order to main­tain sin­gle wagon­load trans­port (EWLV) at the cur­rent nati­on­wi­de level during the con­ver­si­on phase, the Fede­ral Coun­cil plans to sub­si­di­se it finan­ci­al­ly on a degres­si­ve basis for a limi­t­ed peri­od of eight years. At the end of this peri­od, the aim is to achie­ve self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy. It is reques­t­ing CHF 260 mil­li­on for the first four years.
    More on this in the freight trans­port factsheet.
  • Incen­ti­ves for ship­pers: The plan is to intro­du­ce unli­mi­t­ed tran­ship­ment and loa­ding con­tri­bu­ti­ons and to com­pen­sa­te for the unco­ver­ed costs of the orde­red freight trans­port ser­vices for a total of CHF 60 mil­li­on per year.
Initial proposals of the KVF‑S

The KVF‑S, as the preli­mi­na­ry advi­so­ry com­mit­tee of the First Coun­cil, adopted the total revi­si­on of the GüTG this spring after con­sul­ting the indus­try, inclu­ding the VAP. The dis­cus­sions in par­lia­ment over the coming weeks and months will be ground­brea­king for the future of rail freight trans­port across the coun­try. In its detail­ed deli­be­ra­ti­ons, the com­mit­tee exami­ned num­e­rous points. The majo­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee is of the opi­ni­on that the total revi­si­on of the GüTG is sui­ta­ble for ensu­ring and impro­ving sus­tainable inter­ac­tion bet­ween the various modes of trans­port for Swiss trans­port poli­cy. It sug­gests making the fol­lo­wing chan­ges to the content:

  • Expli­cit streng­thening of com­pe­ti­ti­on in freight transport
  • Clear regu­la­ti­on of RailCom’s respon­si­bi­li­ty for revie­w­ing and enfor­cing the non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry pro­vi­si­on of EWLV services
  • Spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­on of the con­tent of the gui­de­lines for rail freight trans­port (basis for the ser­vice agree­ment in the EWLV)
  • Trans­fer of aut­ho­ri­ty to extend cer­tain pro­vi­si­ons (in par­ti­cu­lar com­pen­sa­ti­on) from the Fede­ral Coun­cil to Parliament

The com­mit­tee is expec­ted to fina­li­se the detail­ed dis­cus­sion with addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on from the admi­nis­tra­ti­on at its next mee­ting. The mat­ter will then go to the ple­na­ry ses­si­on of the Coun­cil of States.

Lively dialogue between the stakeholders concerned

Over the past few weeks, we have held dis­cus­sions – with the sup­port of our mem­bers – with the stake­hol­ders of the Wagon­load Trans­port Inte­rest Group (IG WLV), the Fede­ral Office of Trans­port (FOT) and the SBB Cargo sub­si­dia­ry of Swiss Fede­ral Rail­ways (SBB). Alex­an­der Muhm, CEO of SBB Cargo, pre­sen­ted the rough con­cept for a trans­for­ma­ti­on towards self-suf­fi­ci­en­cy to the VAP’s Exe­cu­ti­ve Com­mit­tee. Muhm’s pre­sen­ta­ti­on trig­ge­red an inten­si­ve dis­cus­sion bet­ween the par­ties invol­ved and fur­ther talks on the pos­si­bi­li­ties and risks.

Challenges for the economy and European logistics as a whole

A look at the sta­tis­tics shows that the trans­fer figu­res in Switz­er­land and Euro­pe are sta­gna­ting or even shrin­king slight­ly. There are many reasons for this. In Ger­ma­ny, there is great uncer­tain­ty about poten­ti­al invest­ment pro­gram­mes and the timing of a noti­ceable eco­no­mic upturn. Italy and France are strugg­ling with mode­st growth figu­res and high levels of debt. This, com­bi­ned with con­su­mer sen­ti­ment, is having a direct impact on com­pa­nies and their finan­cial situation.

In logi­stics, in addi­ti­on to the clo­sure of the Suez Canal or natu­ral dis­as­ters, there are other enorm­ous chal­lenges such as major con­s­truc­tion sites (e.g. on the Ger­man rail net­work) and cor­re­spon­ding diver­si­on traf­fic or hig­her track pri­ces. All of this is fuel­ling ope­ra­ting costs and put­ting pres­su­re on the com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of the rail­ways. The state of over­all Euro­pean logi­stics is important inso­far as the majo­ri­ty of goods used in Switz­er­land ori­gi­na­te from abroad and influence the EWLV in and through Switzerland.

Pain threshold reached

Since our foun­da­ti­on, we have been com­mit­ted to attrac­ti­ve, com­pe­ti­ti­ve and cus­to­mer-ori­en­ted rail freight trans­port and thus to the best pos­si­ble modal shift to rail. We are com­mit­ted to this goal eit­her as a part­ner to num­e­rous freight trans­port stake­hol­ders or with our own ideas and pro­jects. In trans­port poli­cy, we advo­ca­te suf­fi­ci­ent capa­ci­ty on all infra­struc­tures, favoura­ble logi­stics loca­ti­ons and sen­si­ble frame­work conditions.

In view of glo­bal com­pe­ti­ti­on and the cur­rent frame­work con­di­ti­ons for the Swiss eco­no­my, the ship­ping indus­try as our mem­ber­ship does not have to or can­not afford mas­si­ve­ly hig­her costs on the rail­way. Our mem­bers can no lon­ger cushion the impact of mista­kes such as the lack of (invest­ment) stra­tegy in the area of rol­ling stock over the last 20 years, the ongo­ing dis­mant­ling of infra­struc­tu­re faci­li­ties (dis­mant­ling of tracks, con­s­truc­tion of invest­ment pro­per­ties) or insuf­fi­ci­ent inte­gra­ti­on into over­all con­cepts from the per­spec­ti­ve of users and cus­to­mers. The con­se­quen­ces of such mista­kes, such as mas­si­ve price increa­ses (bey­ond infla­ti­on), are fatal for the eco­no­my and socie­ty. The com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness of rail com­pared to road is dwind­ling and the opti­mi­sa­ti­on of the modal split is being thrown into dis­ar­ray. In addi­ti­on, incre­asing cost sha­ring for the ope­ra­tio­nal use of ser­vice points can send the wrong signals.

For our mem­bers, the pain thres­hold has long since been rea­ched. We are pre­pared to pro­vi­de signi­fi­cant sup­port for the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment and trans­for­ma­ti­on of rail freight trans­port. Pro­vi­ded that those respon­si­ble ensu­re com­ple­te trans­pa­ren­cy regar­ding costs and their break­down and take mea­su­res within a fair, com­pa­ti­ble and har­mo­nis­ed framework.

The way forward

We are taking the fin­dings from the num­e­rous dis­cus­sions with the KVF‑S and other stake­hol­ders as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to initia­te num­e­rous acti­vi­ties within our mem­ber­ship and orga­ni­se fur­ther coor­di­na­ti­on mee­tings. Anyo­ne who would like to talk to us about logi­stics as the back­bone of the Swiss eco­no­my is cor­di­al­ly invi­ted to join the dialogue.

SEE AND BE SEEN

11 November 2024 – Second Zurich Freight Transport Round Table, Zurich

Inno­va­tions on quiet tracks. How can con­s­truc­tion sites in town cen­tres be desi­gned in such a way that busi­nesses and passers-by are affec­ted as litt­le as pos­si­ble? How can rail freight trans­port be sim­pli­fied? And what will it take for lor­ries wit­hout com­bus­ti­on engi­nes to achie­ve a breakth­rough? Three experts will report on the steps they have alre­a­dy taken towards these goals. Admis­si­on is free. More infor­ma­ti­on and regis­tra­ti­on here.

21. November 2024 – VPI Austria Info Event, Vienna

The popu­lar infor­ma­ti­on event orga­nis­ed by VPI Aus­tria will take place at the Novo­tel Haupt­bahn­hof in Vien­na. Infor­ma­ti­on will be pro­vi­ded on cur­rent rail freight trans­port topics. To the pro­gram­me and registration.

13–14 January 2025 – 12th VPI New Year’s Reception and 15th VPI Symposium, Hamburg

The New Year’s Recep­ti­on will take place on the pan­ora­ma deck of the EMPORIO with a 360° view over Ham­burg, free regis­tra­ti­on here, sepa­ra­te regis­tra­ti­on requi­red for the VPI Sym­po­si­um. The 15th VPI Sym­po­si­um will focus on trans­port poli­cy issues and inno­va­tions for sus­tainable rail freight trans­port. You will soon find the pro­gram­me at: https://symposium.vpihamburg.de.

24 January 2025 – ECM experience exchange, Olten

The VAP and railbex gmbh invi­te you to the 17th ECM exch­an­ge of expe­ri­ence. The expe­ri­en­ces to date and fur­ther deve­lo­p­ments of the EU Imple­men­ting Regu­la­ti­on 2019/779 as part of the 4th EU rail­way packa­ge will be dis­cus­sed. Regis­tra­ti­on by 15.01.2025 to info@railbex.com – the num­ber of par­ti­ci­pan­ts is limi­t­ed, con­side­ra­ti­on will be given in the order of regis­tra­ti­on. Pro­gram­me and fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on (in german)

14 may 2025 – VAP FORUM FREIGHT TRANSPORT, Zurich

The next Freight Trans­port Forum will take place on 14 may 2025 in Zurich. Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on will follow.

 

Media

Here you will find our media releases and reports from the media lis­ted chronologically.
 
 

fokus-oev-schweiz, 9. Sep­tem­ber 2024
Star­ke Zei­chen – Gene­ral­ver­samm­lung 2024 des Ver­ban­des der ver­la­den­den Wirt­schaft (VAP)

bahnonline.ch, 31.8.2024
VAP-Gene­ral­ver­samm­lung 2024

Ship2Shore, 28.8.2024
Simon Wey è il nuovo diret­to­re ope­ra­tivo di VAP

verkehr.co.at, 27.8.2024
VAP bekommt neuen Geschäftsführer

DVZ, 27.8.2024
Ver­la­der­ver­band VAP: Simon Wey wird neuer Geschäftsführer

Media release, 27.8.2024
VAP-Gene­ral­ver­samm­lung 2024: Die Zukunft der Schie­ne liegt in den Hän­den aller Akteure

Media release, 27.8.2024
Dr. Simon Wey über­nimmt die Geschäfts­füh­rung des VAP

Indus­trie Woche, 4.6.2024
Daten-Eco-Sys­te­me als Schlüs­sel für effi­zi­en­te Logistiklösungen

Logis­tik News 24, 28.5.2024
Poli­ti­sche und finan­zi­el­le Unter­stüt­zung für den Wagen­la­dungs­ver­kehr gefordert

Indus­try Press, 23.5.2024
Zukunft des Wagen­la­dungs­ver­kehrs: Her­aus­for­de­run­gen und Chan­cen diskutiert

Logis­tik Woche, 23.5.2024
Magnet­bahn­tech­nik: Poten­zi­al für auto­no­mes Fah­ren von Güterwagen

verker.co.at, 20.5.2024
Forum Güter­ver­kehr: Wagen­la­dungs­ver­kehr kann wett­be­werbs­fä­hig werden

Ver­kehrs­rund­schau, 17.5.2024
Wagen­la­dungs­ver­kehr kann wett­be­werbs­fä­hig werden

Media release, 17.05.2024
Forum Güter­ver­kehr: Wagen­la­dungs­ver­kehr kann wett­be­werbs­fä­hig werden

Ent­re­pri­se vom 26.4.2024
Berne veut remett­re le fret sur les rails

Ver­kehrs­Mo­ni­tor, 23.4.2024
Güter­bran­che ärgert sich über «intrans­pa­ren­te» SBB Cargo

NZZ, 4.4.2024
Güter­zü­ge fah­ren chro­nisch Ver­lus­te ein

Rail Busi­ness, 18.03.2024
SBB Cargo France soll links­rhei­ni­sche Ver­keh­re sichern

verkehr.co.at, 17.03.2024
VAP-Stel­lung­nah­me zum SBB-Jah­res­er­geb­nis 2023

Media release, 14.03.2024
SBB Jah­res­er­geb­nis 2023

Media release, 31.01.2023
Ver­ab­schie­dung Gleis­an­schluss-Char­ta 2024 in Deutschland

Media release, 10.01.2023
Rich­ti­ge Wei­chen­stel­lung für den Bin­nen­gü­ter­ver­kehr auf der Schiene

SRF «Ein­stein», 14.12.2024
Unfall im Gott­hard Basis­tun­nel: Wie wird die Bahn sicherer?

SRF «10 vor 10», 19.10.2023
Kon­se­quen­zen nach Unfall im Gotthard-Basistunnel

 

Topics

You will find various publi­ca­ti­ons from the VAP or from our part­ner orga­niza­ti­ons on the fol­lo­wing topics:

Freight industry

  • How do we shape the future of freight trans­port?
  • What moves the freight industry?
  • An over­view of the play­ers in rail freight transport.

Network

Here you will find useful infor­ma­ti­on on rail­roads, their orga­niza­ti­on and net­work access.

Financing

Infor­ma­ti­on on finan­cial sup­port and char­ges in freight transport.

Sites

Ever­y­thing about free loa­ding, ter­mi­nals, sidings or even mul­ti­mo­dal logi­stics hubs.

Interoperability

The VAP is com­mit­ted to har­mo­ni­zing the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that trains can run effort­less­ly on Euro­pean rail networks.

Sustainability

For a far-sigh­ted future, various areas need to be desi­gned sustainably.

Innovation

How can we drive inno­va­ti­on in freight transport?

Operations

In favor of fair com­pe­ti­ti­on, we want to uti­li­ze the strength of all modes of trans­port and com­bi­ne them opti­mal­ly. Becau­se this makes the route shorter – and more eco­no­mic­al – for everyone.

​Events

Here you will find fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments on our events Forum Freight Trans­port, our Gene­ral Assem­bly and others.

CAREFULLY CHOSEN, UP-TO-THE-MINUTE INFORMATION

We send you regu­lar elec­tro­nic news on the latest deve­lo­p­ments in trans­port poli­cy and the work of the asso­cia­ti­on. As a mem­ber of the VAP you get the e‑newsletter for free. As a non-mem­ber you can order two trial issues from us now.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER